Project Humanbeingsfirst: Prisoners of the Cave - Deception Point 911 And Its Greatest Democratic Enablers

The Palestine Re-Settlement Business

The Israeli foreign minister has lauded Premier Benjamin Netanyahu for supporting a bill banning calls to worship from mosques in the occupied Palestinian lands.

Zahir Ebrahim: No No – Not the ‘New Nazis’
Rather, not making the 'Sherman mistake' in Palestine

The core-principle being, the outright elimination of indigenous peoples, wherein, “the very same army that had recently conquered and occupied the Southern states – led by Generals Grant, Sherman, and Sheridan – mass murdered Indian men, women, and children during the winters, when families would be together, with massive Gatling gun and artillery fire. In a letter to his son a year before he died (1889), Sherman expressed his regret that his armies did not murder every last Indian in North America.”
The Pious self-righteous Jews of Israel, atheist or orthodox, don’t intend to make the ‘Sherman mistake’ in Palestine! They have noted it time and again that “We declare openly that the Arabs have no right to settle on even one centimeter of Eretz Israel … Force is all they do or ever will understand. We shall use the ultimate force until the Palestinians come crawling to us on all fours.”

“Animals. Animals. Like the Discovery Channel. All of Ramallah is a jungle. There are monkeys, dogs, gorillas. The problem is that the animals are locked they can't come out. We're humans. They're animals. They aren't humans we are.”

BUT IT DOES NOT STOP THERE: “Israel could demand compensation for Jewish property in Arab lands”

“The Director of Property Management at Israel's Foreign Ministry is preparing a draft bill which, if passed into law, will see the Zionist state sending claims for compensation for Jewish property in a number of Arab countries. It is believed that the bill will be held back to be used during any negotiations discussing the situation of Palestinian refugees and their right of return.
The bill is divided into two: the first will demand that Egypt, Mauritania, Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, Libya, Sudan, Syria, Iraq, Lebanon, Jordan and Bahrain pay compensation for the properties of 850,000 Jews, with an estimated value of $300 billion. The figures are based on the 1948 census of Jews from each country.
At a second stage, Saudi Arabia will be landed with a compensation bill of more than $100 billion for Jewish properties in the kingdom since the time of Prophet Mohammed (peace be upon him). Apparently, Israeli experts in international law, history and geography in the universities of Bar-Ilan, Beer Sheva, Tel Aviv, Jerusalem and Haifa are working on this part of the claim. The budget for their work has been taken from the Foreign Ministry and is claimed to be in the region of $100m for 2012.
Compensation for the alleged hundreds of dead and missing Iranian Jews in Iran whose fates are unknown will be set at $100m.”

Zahir Ebrahim: And Palestinian Response?

Zahir Ebrahim: Overturning the 150 year running Zionist 'Settlement of Palestine' without taking-on the prime mover force protecting it is a Machiavellian treadmill deliberately fabricated to waste time – Please get with the real agenda you people!

The Invisible Octopus

Dear Zahir,

Regarding Zionism and Israel, although I find it rather pervasive yet it is clear as daylight that they have established a hegemony in the style of the spread of internet, very much enmeshed in the fabric of power. I don't believe this is something that just happens, rather, it seems to me the culmination of decades of organized and conscious effort. It is not natural to see powerful Western nations, in particular US and UK, behave like they are subject to threat and hence need to appease this sinister force even at the expense and betrayal of their own population. Here in Canada, our PM shamelessly supports whatever they do, virtually like a zombie. And it isn't just the Conservatives, Liberals and NDP are in it, too. One of our NDP MPs, Libby Davies, was strongly reprimanded by the late NDP head, Jack Layton, and she had done nothing but express the obvious about Israel. One wonders how we have come to this that a bunch of thugs are can have so much power over our government.

It is so easy to be disillusioned and demoralized when one looks at what is happening in our Muslim nations, though I try to keep faith alive in humanity and decency and justice, reminding myself that for example, the darkest of the night is before dawn. And I also wonder why Russia and China do not provide adequate challenge to these insane financial and belligerent policies that constitute the USrael/UK agenda. It is humanity that is being hijacked... I may have mentioned it to you before but in Farsi we have a saying, "harcheh b'gandad namakash mizannand; waay beh roozi keh b'gandad namak" which translated says, "whatever is liable to rot is treated with salt, alas the day when salt rots".

[A Canadian of Iranian descent]

My Response

"One wonders how we have come to this that a bunch of thugs are can have so much power over our government."

Indeed. This is what the Rothschild scions have been quoted for 250 years: "Give me control of a nations money supply and I care not who makes its laws"!

With that one single primordial control over nations in the form of controlling their central banks, they created what you aptly described: "they have established a hegemony in the style of the spread of internet, very much enmeshed in the fabric of power."

This is how they prevailed over Great Britain, the mother country of Canada, to issue the Balfour Declaration – one of the most treacherous documents in the history of colonialism. Click on the Balfour Declaration image below to see its careful language deconstruction by yours truly - Notice that the Balfour Declaration is issued to the Rothschild name!

Caption The Balfour Declaration November 2nd 1917

The full examination of the Rothschild power structure is in my Rothschild trilogy – called My Confusion Series Part-1, Part-2 and Part-3 !

And as you correctly noted of the interlockingness of their power, akin to "the spread of internet", the following explanation was given by W. Cleon Skoussen in his book 'The Naked Capitalist' on how it was exercised by a handful of men:

‘The real value of Tragedy and Hope … [is the] bold and boastful admission by Dr. Quigley that there actually exists a relatively small but powerful group which has succeeded in acquiring a choke-hold on the affairs of practically the entire human race. Of course we should be quick to recognize that no small group could wield such gigantic power unless millions of people in all walks of life were “in on the take” and were willing to knuckle down to the iron-clad regimentation of the ruthless bosses behind the scenes. As we shall see, the network has succeeded in building its power structure by using tremendous quantities of money (together with the vast influence it buys) to manipulate, intimidate, or corrupt millions of men and women and their institutions on a world-wide basis.’ (W. Cleon Skousen, The Naked Capitalist, pg. 6)

See "Monetary Reform: Who will bell the cat?" for a fuller examination of why it is next to impossible to overturn this all-pervasive corrupt-power once it has been legally granted to the predators.

It makes no difference, once this predatory power is granted and unleashed upon the public, who sits in the White House or the Congress. And the same is true of Canada, the EU, and the UK. I examined this in 2008 on the eve of US presidential elections and called for the boycott of the elections to give a low voter turnout in order to demonstrate the illegitimacy of democratic institutions once such power has been legally granted to the bankster fraternity. It is in this essay: "Not-Voting is a ‘YES’ vote to Reject a Corrupt System".

So yes, all democratic systems of governance under their respective constitutional republic fabrics have been entirely co-opted by such private power. It is that power and its affiliation with Zionism which makes all the western nations beholden to Zionism. If instead of Zionism, the predators had chosen to ally themselves to some new ideology, say "Babism" or Mayaism" -- just cooking up some terms -- then it would have been those ideologies which would now be holding their Damocles' sword upon the peoples of the earth.

In their present alliance with Zionism, the end goal is World Government by the financial oligarchy. All the global crises we see are merely enabling vehicles for this new system of global management of the planet, which to me appears will be ruled from Tel Aviv and legislated from the New Jerusalem – the claimed hometowns of the Rothschilds. It is obvious that this is already coming true -- for those who rule the White House, the sole unchallenged superpower, also rule the world. Soon, very soon, they will supplant the White House and rule the world directly as the new ruling state without pretensions. Zion will be the new "peace-maker" for the planet in her one-world government! We can already witness the prelude to that global “peace-making” in Palestine today in “From Genesis to Genocide” and “Holocaust in our Age”. We can also already see the enabling of the new public relations mantra for the god's chosen peoples in the FBI training graph below. Please click on the image to see its deconstruction by yours truly (also see "Hijacking the word 'Islam' for Mantra Creation"):

Caption An FBI presentation titled “Militancy Considerations” measures the relationship between piety and violence among the texts of the three Abrahamic faiths

The realization of the immenseness of this interlocking power-structure remains invisible in the struggle for Palestine among the Palestinians and their supporters. That is the real tragedy – that mankind has collectively failed to recognize the nature of this all-pervasive power which has besieged the world for over a hundred years by riding on the backs of world wars, empires, and presently the sole superpower.

Who or What can unlock their octopi like grip on the affairs of the world when people don't even see the octopus?

Zahir Ebrahim

Modern Medicine, Rockefellers, Big Pharma, Eugenics, Vaccination, and us

What's the truth about modern medicine?

Watch Desiree Rover: Vaccinations, Weapons of Mass Destruction - State of the Planet Conference, August 1, 2009

“Bed-bugs cause smallpox! I had no idea. In Pakistan, as children, like all of our generation in most developing nations, we were inoculated against smallpox and I remember being taught that it was spread by human contact!” --- Zahir Ebrahim's incredulous response to the sleuthing by Twelfth Bough on their discovering the remarkable research of Dr. Charles A. R. Campbell, M. D. and the above revealing talk by medical research journalist Desiree L. Rover.

Caption: Some slides from Desiree Rover's presentation

Watch David Rockefeller speaks about population control at the UN Ambassador's Dinner

“It is not a world that any of us would want to live in. Is such a world inevitable? It is not sure but there are two possible ways by which a world of 10 billion people can be averted. Either the current birth rates must come down more quickly or the current death rates must go up. There is no other way.” --- Robert McNamara, Speech to International bankers as Head of the World Bank, October 2, 1970, cited in Population control, US bio-weapons research, McNamara, Rockefeller, and AIDS

Eustace Mullins' 1988 underground classic Murder By Injection also speaks to the same conspiracy by the Rockefeller controlled medical profession – to vaccinate people to death and to blame it on natural causes. The Swine Flu Pandemic of 2009 came to underscore the same conclusions.

But what really is the real truth regarding modern medicine?

Is it pro-life (“Primum non nocere”: “First, do no harm"), or is it pro-population reduction (see United Nations Agenda 21, condensed version, 10 minutes dummies' version, The Move to Depopulate the Planet By Stephanie R. Pasco, Codex Alimentarious & Nutricide by Dr. Rima Laibow, etc.)?

If it is the latter, then how comes whenever I go to the doctor when I am ill I usually come back healthy – I should be dead by now if they were really trying to kill me! But if they are really trying to heal me, why do they preclude the development of other non big-Pharma related modalities of health care, such as alternate medicine?

Continue Reading at: What's the truth about modern medicine?

Ushering in Big Brother: Inventing the CMOS Imaging Sensor - Good or Bad?

The Fable of the Bees and the Seduction of Science and Technology

“Societal issues questions baggage I have been carrying around with me for a few years and I am going to unload on you ...
There is another set of issues which is loss of privacy from all this networking. When I first invented this CMOS image sensor technology we got a little bit of publicity and a reporter for the BBC radio came and talked to me, interviewed me, and he said:
'so tell me how you feel about the fact that now Big Brother is gonna be able so spy on us a lot better with all these cameras'.
And I said:
'oh it's not really a problem because there is not enough people to watch all the video screens and all cameras that are out there and we don't have to worry.'
But to my surprise, and chagrin a little bit, you know now computers can analyze images, and computer systems can track you based on facial recognition software from camera to camera to camera, as you might move around in a highly surveilled city for example.
And, so that means that you will be tracked and all your activity completely logged. It's on your permanent record now, whatever you did, or something you really don't want people to know about.
You know, is that a good thing? I don't think so. I feel like it's an invasion of my privacy. ...
I don't really like this application of my technology. There is nothing I can do about it, I have now unloaded that on you, so thank you.
We'll get back to the science and technology now, but I hope you also worry about these things and I especially hope you figure out what we are gonna do about this in the future.”
--- Dr. Eric Fossum, inventor of the CMOS imaging chip, the "camera-on-a-chip" technology which "is used in nearly all camera phones and webcams, digital-still cameras, high-speed motion capture cameras, automotive cameras, dental x-ray cameras, and swallowable pill cameras."

Remembering Steve Jobs

Steve Jobs' Commencement Address at Stanford University on June 12, 2005

Caption WOW!

While we honor this iconoclast for his peerless techno-visionary, for his passions, for his spirit of love, there is something else we must also ponder upon: The Legacy.

No, not what is captured in his commencement speech. And no not what all the presidents in the world, of nations and corporations, and nor all the tens of millions of iphone and ipad users in the world, soon to be billions, are remembering him for.

This legacy is the seduction of, and the fascination with, technology which has enabled The Technetronic Era

Steve Jobs was surely among its Greatest Master Builders – and I surmise that to his last breadth, he remained unaware of it!

Just as unaware as the rest of us who “see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil”

Caption The Master Builders of the Technetronic Era

How are such ardent worker-bees ever to find the pause for reflection on what they are doing while they are busy doing it? -- The Seduction of Science and Technology and the Concomitant Corruption of the Intellect and the Soul

Iranian President Ahmadinejad takes on the Hectoring Hegemons on their own turf at the UN

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad Addresses UN General Assembly Sep 22, 2011

Mr. President,

Excellencies,

Ladies and Gentlemen,

I am grateful to the Almighty Allah who granted me, once more, the opportunity to appear before this world assembly. I have the pleasure to express my sincere thanks to H.E. Joseph Deiss, president of the sixty-fifth session for his tremendous efforts during his tenure. I also would like to congratulate H.E Nassir Abdulaziz AI-Nasser on his election as the president of sixty-sixth session of the General Assembly and wish him all success.

Let me seize the moment to pay tribute to all those who lost their lives in the past year, particularly to the victims of the tragic famine in Somalia and the devastating flood in Pakistan and especially the earthquake and the ensuing explosions in the nuclear power plant in Japan. I urge everyone to intensify their assistance and aid to the affected populations in these countries.

Over the past years, I spoke about different global issues, and the need to introduce fundamental changes in the current international order.

Today, considering the international developments, I will try to analyze the present situation from a different angle. As you all know the dominance and superiority of human beings over other creatures, lie in the very nature and the truth of humankind which is a divine gift and a manifestation of the divine spirit including: faith in God, who is the ever-lasting creator and planner of the entire universe.

Showing compassion to others, generosity, justice-seeking, and having integrity both in words and in deeds.

The quest for dignity to reach the pinnacles of perfection, the aspiration to elevate one's material and spiritual status, and the longing to realize liberty; Defying oppression, corruption, and discrimination in trying to support the oppressed; Seeking happiness, and lasting prosperity and security for all.

These are some of the manifestations of common divine and human attributes which can clearly be seen in the historical aspirations of human beings as reflected in the heritage of our search for art and literary works both in prose and poetry, and in the socio-cultural and political movements of human beings in the course of history.

All divine prophets and social reformers invited human beings to tread on this righteous path. God has given dignity to humankind to elevate his status to assume his successor role on Earth.

It is vividly clear that despite all historical achievements, including creation of the United-Nations, which was a product of untiring struggles and efforts of free-minded and justice-seeking individuals as well as the international cooperation, human societies are yet far from fulfilling their noble desires and aspirations.

Most nations of the world are unhappy with the current international circumstances. And despite the general longing and aspiration to promote peace, progress, and fraternity, wars, mass-murder, widespread poverty, and socioeconomic and political crises continue to infringe upon the rights and sovereignty of nations, leaving behind irreparable damage worldwide.

Approximately, three billion people of the world live on less than 2.5 dollars a day, and over a billion people live without having even one sufficient meal on a daily basis. Forty-percent of the poorest world populations only share five percent of the global income, while twenty percent of the richest people share seventy-five percent of the total global income.

More than twenty thousand innocent and destitute children die every day in the world because of poverty. In the United States, eighty percent of financial resources are controlled by ten percent of its population, while only twenty percent of these resources belong to the ninety percent of the population.

What are the causes and reasons behind these inequalities? How can bone remedy such injustice?

The rulers of the global management circles divide the social life from ethics and spirituality while claiming the situation is the outcome of the pursuit of the path of divine prophets or the vulnerability of nations or the ill performance of a few groups or individuals. They claim that only their views and approaches can save the human society.

Wouldn't you think that the root cause of the problems must be sought in the prevailing international order, or the way the world is governed? I would like to draw your kind attention to the following questions:

Who abducted forcefully tens of millions of people from their homes in Africa and other regions of the world during the dark period of slavery, making them a victim of their materialistic greed?

Who imposed colonialism for over four centuries upon this world?

Who occupied lands and massively plundered resources of other nations, destroyed talents, and alienated languages, cultures and identities of nations?

Who triggered the first and second world wars, that left seventy millions killed and hundreds of millions injured or homeless. Who created the wars in Korean peninsula and in Vietnam?

Who imposed, through deceits and hypocrisy, the Zionism and over sixty years of war, homelessness, terror and mass murder on the Palestinian people and on countries of the region?

Who imposed and supported for decades military dictatorship and totalitarian regimes on Asian, African, and Latin American nations?

Who used nuclear bomb against defenseless people, and stockpiled thousands of warheads in their arsenals?

Whose economies rely on waging wars and selling arms?

Who provoked and encouraged Saddam Hussein to invade and impose an eight-year war on Iran, and who assisted and equipped him to deploy chemical weapons against our cities and our people?

Who used the mysterious September 11 incident as a pretext to attack Afghanistan and Iraq , killing, injuring, and displacing millions in two countries with the ultimate goal of bringing into its domination the Middle East and its oil resources?

Who nullified the Breton Woods system by printing trillions of dollars without the backing of gold reserves or equivalent currency? A move that triggered inflation worldwide and was intended to prey on the economic gains of other nations?

Which country's military spending exceeds annually a thousand billion dollars, more than the military budgets of all countries of the world combined?

Which governments are the most indebted ones in the world?

Who dominates the policy-making establishments of the world economy?

Who are responsible for the world economic recession, and are imposing the consequences on America, Europe and the world in general?

Which governments are always ready to drop thousands of bombs on other countries, but ponder and hesitate to provide aid to famine-stricken people in Somalia or in other places?

Who are the ones dominating the Security Council which is ostensibly responsible for safeguarding the international security?

There exist tens of other similar questions. Of course, the answers are clear.

The majority of nations and governments of the world have had no role in the creation of the current global crises, and as a matter of fact, they were themselves the victims of such policies.

It is as lucid as daylight that the same slave masters and colonial powers that once instigated the two world wars have caused widespread misery and disorder with far-reaching effects across the globe since then.

Dear Colleagues and Friends;

Do these arrogant powers really have the competence and ability to run or govern the world. Is it acceptable that they call themselves the sole defender of freedom, democracy, and human rights, while they militarily attack and occupy other countries?

Can the flower of democracy blossom from NATO's missiles, bombs and guns?

Ladies and Gentlemen;

If some European countries still use the Holocaust, after six decades, as the excuse to pay fine or ransom to the Zionists, should it not be an obligation upon the slave masters or colonial powers to pay reparations to the affected nations?

If the damage and losses of the period of slavery and colonialism were indeed compensated, what would happen to the manipulators and behind-the-scene political powers in the United States and in Europe? Would there remain any gaps between the North and the South?

If only half of military expenditures of the United States and its allies in NATO was shifted to help solve the economic problems in their own countries, would they be witnessing any symptom of the economic crisis?

What would happen, if the same amount was allocated to poor nations?

What is the justification for the presence of hundreds of US military and intelligence bases in different parts of the world, including 268 bases in Germany, 124 in Japan, 87 in South Korea, 83 in Italy, 45 in the United Kingdom, and 21 in Portugal? Does this mean anything other than military occupation?

Don't the bombs deployed in the said bases undermine the security of other nations?

The main question is the quest for the root cause of such attitudes. The prime reason should be sought in the beliefs and tendencies of the establishment. An assembly of people in contradiction with the inner human instincts and disposition who also have no faith in God and in the path of the divine prophets, replace their lust for power and materialistic ends with heavenly values.

To them, only power and wealth prevail, and every attempt must bring into focus these sinister goals.

Oppressed nations have no hope to restore or protect their legitimate rights against these powers. These powers seek their progress, prosperity and dignity through imposing poverty, humiliation and annihilation to others.

They consider themselves superior to others, enjoying special privileges and concessions. They have no respect for others and easily violate the rights of all nations and governments.

They proclaim themselves as the indisputable custodians of all governments and nations through intimidation, recourse to threat and force, and abuse the international mechanisms. They simply break all the internationally recognized regulations.

They insist on imposing their lifestyle and beliefs on others. They officially support racism. They weaken countries through military intervention, and destroy their infrastructures, in order to plunder their resources by making them all the more dependent.

They sow the seeds of hate and hostility among nations and people of different pursuits, in order to prevent them from fulfilling their goals of development and progress.

All cultures, identities, lives, values and wealth of nations, women, youth, families as well as the wealth of nations are sacrificed to their imperialistic tendencies and their inclination to enslave and captivate others.

Hypocrisy and deceit are allowed in order to secure their interests and imperialistic goals. Drug- trafficking and killing of innocent human beings are also allowed in pursuit of such diabolic goals. Despite NATO's presence in the occupied Afghanistan, there has been a dramatic increase in the production of illicit drugs there.

They tolerate no question or criticism, and instead of presenting a reason for their violations, they always put themselves in the position of a claimant. By using their imperialistic media network which is under the influence of colonialism they threaten anyone who questions the Holocaust and the September 11 event with sanctions and military action.

Last year, when the need to form a fact-finding team to undertake a thorough investigation concerning the hidden elements involved in September 11 incident was brought up; an idea also endorsed by all independent governments and nations as well as by the majority in the United States, my country and myself came under pressure and threat by the government of the United States.

Instead of assigning a fact-finding team, they killed the main perpetrator and threw his body into the sea.

Would it not have been reasonable to bring to justice and openly bring to trial the main perpetrator of the incident in order to identify the elements behind the safe space provided for the invading aircraft to attack the twin world trade towers?

Why should it not have been allowed to bring him to trial to help recognize those who launched terrorist groups and brought wars and other miseries into the region?

Is there any classified information that must be kept secret?

They view Zionism as a sacred notion and ideology. Any question concerning its very foundation and history is condemned by them as an unforgivable sin.

However they endorse and allow sacrileges and insult against beliefs of other divine religions.

Dear Colleagues and Friends;

Real freedom, justice" dignity, well being, and lasting security are the rights of all nations. These values can neither be achieved by reliance on the current inefficient system of world governance, nor through the invasion of the world by arrogant powers and the gun barrels of NATO forces.

These values could only be realized through independence and recognition of others' rights and through harmony and cooperation.

Is there any way to address the problems and challenges besetting the world by using the prevailing international mechanisms and tools to help humanity achieve the long-standing aspiration of peace, security and equality?

All those who tried to introduce reforms whilst preserving the existing norms and tendencies have failed. The valuable efforts made by the Non-Aligned movement and Group 77 and GrouplS as well as by some prominent individuals have failed to bring fundamental changes.

Governance and management of the world require fundamental reforms.

What should be done now?

Dear Colleagnes and Friends;

Efforts must be made with a firm resolve and through collective cooperation to map out a new plan, on the basis of principles and the very foundation of universal human values such as Monotheism, justice, freedom, love and the quest for happiness.

The idea of creation of the United Nations remains a great and historical achievement of mankind. Its importance must be appreciated and its capacities must be used to the extent possible for our noble goals.

We should not allow this organization which is the reflection of the collective will and shared aspiration of the community of nations, to deviate from its main course and play into the hands of the world powers.

Conducive ground must be prepared to ensure collective participation and involvement of nations in an effort to promote lasting peace and security.

Shared and collective management of the world must be achieved in its true sense, and based on the underlying principles enshrined in the international law. Justice must serve as the criterion and the basis for all international decisions and actions.

All of us should acknowledge the fact that there is no other way than the shared and collective management of the world in order to put an end to the present disorders, tyranny, and discriminations worldwide.

This is indeed the sole way to prosperity and welfare of human society which is an established and vivid truth.

While acknowledging the above truth, one should note that acknowledgement alone is not enough. We must believe in it and spare no effort toward its realization.

Dear Colleagues and Friends;

Shared and collective management of the world is the legitimate right of all nations, and we as their representatives, have an obligation to defend their rights. Although some powers continuously try to frustrate all international efforts aimed at promoting collective cooperation, we must, however, strengthen our belief in achieving the perceived goal of establishing a shared and collective cooperation to run the world.

The United Nations was created to make effective participation of all nations in international decision-making processes, possible. We all know that this goal has not yet been fulfilled because of the absence of justice in the current management structures and mechanisms of the UN.

The composition of the Security Council is unjust and inequitable. Therefore, changes including the restructuring of the United Nations are considered the basic demands of the nations that must be addressed by the General Assembly.

During last year session, I emphasized the importance of this issue and called for the designation of the current decade as the decade of shared and collective Global Management.

I would like to reiterate again my proposal. I am sure that through international cooperation, diligence and efforts by committed world leaders and governments and through insisting on the realization of justice and the support of all other nations, we can expedite the building of a common bright future.

This movement is certainly on its rightful path of creation, ensuring a promising future for humanity. A future that will be built when humanity initiates to trend the path of the divine prophets and the righteous under the leadership of Imam al-Mahdi, the Ultimate Savior of mankind and the inheritor to all divine messengers and leaders and to the pure generation of our great Prophet.

The creation of a supreme and ideal society with the arrival of a perfect human being who is a true and sincere lover of all human beings, is the guaranteed promise of Allah.

He will come alongside with Jesus Christ to lead the freedom and justice lovers to eradicate tyranny and discrimination, and promote knowledge, peace, justice freedom and love across the world. He will present to every single individual all the beauties of the world and all good things which bring happiness for humankind.

Today nations have been awakened. With the increase in public awareness,they no longer succumb to oppressions and discriminations.

The world is now witnessing more than ever, the widespread awakening in Islamic lands, in Asia, Europe, and America. These movements are ever expanding their spirit everyday and influence the pursuit of the realization of justice, freedom and the creation of a better tomorrow.

Our great nation stands ready to join hands with other nations to march on this beautiful path in harmony and in line with the shared aspirations of mankind.

Let us salute love, freedom, justice, wisdom, and the bright future that awaits humankind.

Thank you.

(The full text of the speech courtesy of the United Nations via informationclearinghouse)

Can this TSA vagina probe happen to your teenage daughter?

America: TSA vagina probe and you

Where are American balls? In the fist of the TSA…

Caption: Obedience training of chicken hawk Americans flexing their courageous muscles on defenseless and powerless Afghanis, Iraqis, Pakistanis, and along the “arc of crisis” in the “global zone of percolating violence” — while pretending to be deaf, mute and dumb to the dehumanization of their own peoples and loved ones by their own perverse government.… To keep the Americans safe, it wasn't sufficient to get the blood of innocent civilizations of Iraq and Afghanistan on the American public's hands. Now their vaginas and testicles, and next their bending over for anal examination, will keep them the most safe.... Where is all that famous bravado which is routinely unleashed upon the 'untermenschen' 20,000 miles away from home? Being only the naïve 'untermensch', I merely ask...

For those who love to intellectualize their own terrorization while they terrorize others with 'United We Stand', the Airport intrusive patdowns cannot be understood in isolation from the two parallel contexts of “imperial mobilization” and “police state” which cradle that act. The pat-downs are merely obedience training for the American public.

It appears that in this particular instance, there was no choice for the passengers – be exposed to radiation and full nudity via X-ray body-scan, or, feel the pain of sexual groping and molestation.... LAX, Terminal six, United Airlines.

The grotesquely absurd demand by the TSA agent seeking $500,000 from Amy Alkon must be resoundingly defeated because I suspect it is not just the pot calling the kettle black (ulta chore kotwal ko dante), not just a TSA agent suing Amy for her loud complaining, but the TSA itself is suing Amy, DHS is suing Amy, Police-state is suing Amy, as part of silent acceptance of obedience training of Americans.

I suspect that this is another testing of the waters by the hectoring hegemons, a barometer, a rain gauge, of how successful their obedience training has been thus far --- will the Americans even accept this vile absurdity that after the state shoves its hand inside the American vagina, it prohibits complaining about it and the majority of people accept it?

The intimidation of lawsuit is also intended to be precedent setting to ensure that the majority of the public do not revolt because it will hit them directly in the pocket-book.

Remember, indoctrination and obedience training is primarily for the masses. The public already has accepted all the rest of 'war on terror' absurdities which have been heaped upon them since 9/11:

Convince People of Absurdities and get them Acquiescing to Atrocities: The Enduring Power of Machiavellian Political Science

‘War on Terror’ is not about ‘Islamofascism’ – Please get with the real agenda you people!

10th Anniversary: 9/11 and Imperial Mobilization

Hijacking Islam for Imperial Mobilization

Please promulgate this issue widely. Publish it if you have a website. Highlight Amy Alkon's case if you are a writer. Donate funds to her legal defense team if you have the capacity. For all these acts, you will actually be helping protect your own loved ones' vaginas and balls. And most importantly, take Amy's own advice for the best way you can support her, by standing up for your own self: "Thank you so much -truly appreciate that. And my wonderful attorney has the legal defense handled, but what I hope people will do is make a stand for our rights. Many, many thanks.-A"

9/11 Toronto Hearings: Long-awaited International Hearings Set for September, 2011

A strange cast of characters among 9/11 Truth Leaders - See Letter sent to the Toronto Hearings Panel

Click here for Toronto Hearings.org

Caption Professor Steven Jones of BYU (standing second from left) officially appointed in 1989 by the President of the United States, George H.W. Bush Sr., as an establishmentarian scientist to lead the DOE investigation into the potentially revolutionizing discovery of Cold Fusion. Can a George Bush Sr.’s trusted establishmentarian scientist suddenly become a genuine dissenting scientist against the same establishment in George Bush Jr.’s administration as anything other than controlled opposition? Steven Jones immediately rises to become the most prominent leader of 9/11 Truth seekers who even want to award him the Nobel Peace Prize! Hmmm.... watch the video above and click on the image of Steven Jones with Bush Sr. to read more about his previous role in Cold Fusion. We learn from history – or is that merely a cliché to use ex post facto in pedantic papers and history books?

Caption David Ray Griffin, the author of many famous books on 9/11 and the 'Dean of 9/11 Studies' according to many of his prominent cheerleaders who claim inspiration from him, is a self-admitted globalist seeking world government in the most eloquent Newspeak of Orwellian Establishmentarians. Hmmm.... watch David Ray Griffin proclaim world government in response to an audience question in the video above

Caption Vanilla or Chocolate is merely the icing on the devil's cake! Is the brilliant Western intellect really so naive that it cannot see that they all principally serve the same globalist agenda? Click on image

Is this ten year old pursuit of what was already obvious on September 11, 2001, “Operation Canned Goods” look-alike, really relevant to derailing “imperial mobilization” to one-world government which was irrevocably launched by that super terrorism of 9/11? Read what was already obvious on day one.

Even the Financial Times has argued that 9/11 finally enabled one-world government: 'for the first time in my life, I think the formation of some sort of world government is plausible. ... it is increasingly clear that the most difficult issues facing national governments are international in nature: there is global warming, a global financial crisis and a “global war on terror”'! Read Gideon Rachman's 'And now for a world government'.

Hear the bold proclamation on global governance by the EU president: “2009 is also the first year of global governance.... The climate conference in Copenhagen is another step towards the global management of our planet.”

The only people who are evidently unaware of these real-world developments, are the 9/11 Truth Movement born-again zealots – or, at least, they seem to behave that way when Pollyannaishly broaching their “new investigation” treadmill.

I haven't paid much attention to the 9/11 Truth Movement people because I have found them patently silly in their prime demand: new investigation. By who? Of what? There is no crime scene hard evidence preserved. And when the judge, jury, executioner, sherif, and posse, all work for the same club, the club of "imperial mobilization", what sense does new investigation make? The only sense of a red herring to keep more peoples occupied in specious pursuits, and administering some additional Hegelian mind-fck towards eroding national sovereignty by internationalizing the investigation, perhaps under the auspices of the vaunted UN, as baby-step towards accomplishing more world government. Now local crimes are investigated by a global body – a justification solidified, since none of the national authorities are deemed capable of it for one reason or another! After my brief communication with the 9/11 Truth movement cheerleaders and scientists, I had given up on anything useful coming out of this lot except hard runs on the treadmills of inefficacy. And they are at it again.

What's the point of the following stated agenda of the Toronto Hearings when all Western governments and international agencies are conniving to usher in world government which was enabled by 9/11: '(3) To submit a record and a summary of the Hearings, together with signed Statutory Declarations by witnesses, to relevant governments, groups and international agencies with the request that a full and impartial investigation be launched into the events of September 11, 2001'?

What is this farce of presenting the obvious by the learned foxes in hen's feathers to other foxes all pretending to guard the hen house amidst the cheering hens?

Only the sharp Western intellect can think of such absurdities and be taken seriously by useful idiots! For others, please click to read: The Poor-Man's Guide to Modernity.

Click to read what the men and women of abundant conscience should really be worrying about concerning what's up next, instead of wasting their time and energies on that which is already a fait accompli

Click to read what the men and women of abundant conscience should really be wrestling with instead of wasting their time and energies on fait accompli

Please see the full deconstruction of why I no longer trust Steven Jones and his coterie of Johnny come lately “experts” who have instantly acquired a following as if they were “collection agents” – and what have they been collecting?

I would suggest that they have been shepherding the well-intentioned conscionable peoples, citizens, anonymous good hearted folks, who were and are waking up ex post facto of Iraq invasion of 2003, lest the sheep wakeup too violently! Just get them to speciously demand a “new investigation”!

I wonder what these brilliant scholars and scientists and theologians where doing in September-October of 2001 when Afghanistan was being prepared to be bombed to smithereens? And in 2002-2003 when Iraq was being prepared to be “shock and awe[d]”? But suddenly, in 2004, these “experts” began to burst onto the public scene to become leaders of other ordinary mortals not endowed with brilliant titles like these scholars and scientists, who were also waking up slowly to the commonsense reality that no WMDs were found in Iraq? That steel buildings couldn't just collapse like that? It took David Griffin to write the New Pearl Harbor three years after 9/11 when a simple attendance at any anti-war teach-in during 2001-2003 protest demonstrations would have informed anyone principled enough to oppose the slaughter of innocent 'lesser peoples' of that fact?

Imagine that Richard Gage advertised on his website, by implication of comparing Steven Jones to Linus Pauling, that a Nobel Peace Prize might be in it for the new comer: “Steven Jones' call for a "serious investigation" of the hypothesis that the WTC 7 and the Twin Towers were brought down, not just by impact damage and fire, but through the use of pre-positioned cutter-charges" must be the rallying cry for all building design experts to speak out. Dr. Jones is following in the footsteps of Dr. Linus Pauling of the California Institute of Technology, who rallied his fellow scientists to oppose the development of the Hydrogen Bomb and the testing of nuclear weapons. He was later awarded the 1962 Nobel Peace Prize for these efforts.”

The same Dr. Jones who is pictured with George H. W. Bush Sr., above, being appointed by the heralder of the “New World Order” to scuttle the discovery of Cold Fusion? No – must be some other fellow.

But still, Nobel Peace Prize for what?

For co-opted fools and mercenaries without conscience suffering from the superiority complex of silently watching the spectacle of genocidal slaughter of the 'untermenschen' on their telly and not uttering a public word of protest while Afghanistan and Iraq were decimated with “shock and awe”?
Or, for being further set-up as glorified “collection agents” for type-2 ordinary citizens; to attract those ordinary peoples who are finally waking up to the reality that 9/11 was an “Operations Canned Goods” as they lose their own skirts and shirts while their own nation descends into a police state? No they didn't protest when it was happening to that other fellow over there, but Machiavelli knows that they will protest when it starts happening to them right here at home. He is ready!

See this report to understand “type-2” and the political science of manufacturing dissent as an integral part of social engineering of consent. “Type-2” is Adolph Hitler's categorizing of people who “wake up”, who were formerly “type-1”, the flag-waiving and/or silent bystanders of mainstream with their full faith in their government. They suddenly “wake up” with lost faith in government. Virtually the entire majority of “9/11 Truth Movement” rank and file appear to be mainstream waked-up citizens whose newly awakened conscience and skepticism is being corralled into expending their energies on specious pursuits of what is already a fait accompli. All “type-2”.

These good and noble citizens of empire, benefiting from its loot and plunder of the rest of the world – ahem, the hidden hand of the market backed by the hidden fist, as Thomas Freidman put it in the NYT – in what became known as the 'American Dream' (see Unveiling America's Secret History ), can no more think independently without a pied piper leading them as the new dissentstream, than they could as the silent majority of mainstream. In either case they must be led. They look to “experts”. So “experts” are provided to them. And led they are, to the same pastures of ensuring that fait accompli of “imperial mobilization” is not impacted by their loss in faith in government. Read the aforementioned report to perceptively understand this straightforward mechanism of predatory statecraft in Western “democracies”.

And read this analysis to acutely comprehend the concept of fait accompli and the role of absurdities in political science. Unless you can insightfully understand that, and shrewdly begin to identify and eschew your fabricated leaders who are now your new pied-pipers, you will never comprehend how you are being taken for a ride no differently than when you were part of the flag-waiving mainstream! And it doesn't matter how many credentials you have, or what your station in life is. These matters are not decided by socio-economic, race, or class status, but by indoctrination and ability to think independently. Both of which are entirely wealth and college degrees agnostic.

For today's dissent-chiefs: It doesn't matter if you have a Ph.D. from MIT or Caltech – the Nazi Scientists, hard and soft, meaning, from physicists to social-psychologists, were far more brilliant than many coveting the Nobel prize in Physics in America today. And they stood United with their Führer too, at the peak of the Third Reich's hubris. Then they came over to America as defeated brilliance, often under new identities – “Operation Paperclip” – to run your science in America, blithely stating, and believing, as is famously quoted from the father of the rocket who ended up heading NASA to send America to the moon: “our job is to send it up, what does it matter where it comes down.”

If you didn't speak-out then, didn't protest then, didn't put your jobs and your life on the line in orchestrating nation-wide protests of the kind witnessed during the tail-end of the Vietnam War when your own peoples' body-bags were in ample display – a lesson many of you learnt while still in college during that most recent yesteryear – and you are suddenly prominent dissent-leaders today having silently watched tens of thousands of innocent 'lesser' civilians not even get a used body-bag, never mind a Muslim burial in DU soaked lands, I have to wonder about this sham.

It can only succeed in brain-washed, or perhaps brain-dead America!

The compromising image above, and the admission of being a globalist pitching the very message that David Rockefeller, the Council on Foreign Relations, the EU president, et. al., have been pitching loudly and publicly, indeed since the very founding of the Federal Reserve Bank that generations of bankster oligarchy has been pitching, condemn you as the vile assets of the Mighty Wurlitzer in the service of empire.

You only fool type-2, your primary mission.

Sorry – no brownie points for the silly Toronto Hearings. If you are genuine, you must prove it.

There is no reason for anyone to assume anything of anyone in an age when “deception is the state of mind and the mind of State”.

Convincingly answer the questions raised here by one whose 'lesser peoples' and civilizations have been bombed by your very first silence – and by the hubris of your elected representatives who “United We Stand” with their purse-strings right alongside your government which you install and replace every four years without a damn change occurring while you continually believe like damn fools that you are getting a change while the winner earns the 2008 Marketer of the Year award – before you head off to fool many more men and women of conscience on this Toronto journey. Stop fooling yourselves first, if indeed that's what this is and not controlled dissent to run the fed-up public on glamorized treadmills for a healthy democratic exercise of the conscience.

Why should damn fool “leaders” be welcomed by ordinary peoples? Damn fools who are asking the same ruling powers to investigate a fait accompli – like asking the robber to investigate his own crime, and the judge is the robber's father, the jury are his fraternity all having benefited from their brother's crime, and the other rulers being appealed to are part of the same Mafioso pact?

Of course, I hope I am wrong. That damn fools will turn out to be wise savants! So show me the effective and practical path to derailing “imperial mobilization” from your silly obsession with unraveling the mysteries of “Operation Canned Goods” and I will be converted to your religion.

Just Look at the absurdity of this obsession in the larger global context:

the invasion of Poland is a fait accompli;
the slaughters of the 'lesser peoples' are continuing on both the Eastern and the Western front; France and Western Europe is militarily occupied;
the Allied fire-bombings of occupied cities and Germany is at its peak killing more innocent civilians in the most atrocious manner than those killed by the Nazis in their hideous concentration camps;
Nuremberg is a distant memory;
the next nations to fall to “democracy” and “revolutions” in prelude to invasion and occupation, are along the rapidly expanding “arc of crisis” in the “global zone of percolating violence” and already visible;

and some brilliant scholars are discussing the how-tos of “Operation Canned Goods”?

An even greater absurdity is that these wise savants are making appeals to the Reich's henchmen installed all across the world for a “new investigation” of “Operation Canned Goods”?

And the greatest absurdity of it all is that they don't see that “Operation Canned Good” enabled the world government of Mein Führer's long-held dream, and all rulers in the dominion are now his lieutenants?

Those absurdities can only happen in two places in all of creation:

One, in Alice in Wonderland – the creation of the fertile imagination of an allegorical novelist for school children's reading pleasure and adult contemplation.
Two, in a nation so dumbed-down that they can no longer even use an iota of commonsense to rationally add two plus two to come up with four – the creation of the diabolical imagination of Machiavelli and its social engineers to ensure that the self-inflated with superiority-complex public continually look only towards designated “experts” for the answer to even simple arithmetic, to be happy when they invariably get “five”, and run helter-skelter with their new discovery!

Yah – I am in the presence of greatness singing “Hallelujah” and “Hava Nagila” to the white man's burden – give them all a Nobel Peace Prize. The prize given to the greatest mass murderers and henchmen in history!

Zahir Ebrahim

Project Humanbeingsfirst.org

Source URL: http://print-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2011/07/toronto-hearings-strange-cast-of.html

Afghanistan

“Afghanistan has been gangsterized by the occupation”

Partial Transcript Professor Zaher Wahab

– I think it was absolutely wrong for the United States to attack and invade Afghanistan, because Afghanistan as such had nothing to do with 9/11 ...

– Most Afghans still don't see the connection between them being occupied, and the tragedy and crime that happened on 9/11.

– Also you may remember that just before the October invasion by the United States and its Allies, the Taliban tried very hard to work something out with the United States government. This is all a matter of record now. But Washington would not have anything to do with that.

– There was also at the time, real tension between the Taliban and the Al Qaeda leadership. In fact Osama Bin Laden was under house arrest at the time of the 9/11.

– In fact, people now think that the Taliban had no idea that Al Qaeda had a plan to attack the United States.

– The Taliban now in the insurgency keep saying that they have nothing against the United States. They have nothing against the US government, the US people, or the country.

– And they keep saying that they have no agenda beyond their own freedom of their own country. So I think that needs to be understood.

– If you talk to ordinary Afghans, they would say this is occupation by NATO and the United States.

– As we know, president Obama in his very disingenuous, dishonest, distorting speech, at the same time his delegation was pressuring the Karzai government in Kabul to sign a long term strategic pact with the United States which would enable the United States to have permanent basis in Afghanistan. That work is underway.

– And there is clear evidence that the United States and its Allies are trying to develop the different bases, in Bagrām, in Kabul, in Kandahar, in Shinden, and in Jalalabad.

– Because, as I would submit to you, the United States has a deeper larger broader agenda. It's not fighting the Taliban, or terrorism, or liberating Afghan women.

– There is a coalition. Eisenhower called it the Military-Industrial coalition. We now call it the Military-Industrial-Intelligence-Terrorism-Media-War-profiteers coalition.

– So there is a very big coalition, and its global, and they want this to continue. Because there are billion of dollars to be made. Including people from Portland.

– What president Obama is doing, unfortunately, is simply escalate the war, deepen it, expand it, and destabilize the whole region. (5:50)

See Insurgency vs. Counter-Insurgency for the obvious method for president Obama to escalate, deepen, and expand the war which Professor Zaher Wahab mentioned above, but missed its modus operandi (among other matters)

Letter to Professor Zaher Wahab from Zahir Ebrahim

The Hidden Faith of America's Founding Fathers - Christians, Masons, Satanists, or NWOists? Connecting the Dots of 250 Years of History

The Hidden Faith of The Founding Fathers 2010

Aquarius - The Age Of Evil

Is America in Bible Prophecy - 'to guard, defend and protect the Jewish people...until the redeemer comes to Zion?'

'On Sept. 23, 1979, the founder of Israeli intelligence over dinner told me that America was developing a tolerance for terror. The gentleman's name was Isser Harel, the founder of Mossad Israeli intelligence-he ran it from 1947 to 1963. He told me that America had developed an alliance between two countries, Israel and Saudi Arabia, and that the alliance with Saudi Arabia was dangerous and would develop a tolerance for terror among Americans. He said if the tolerance continued that Islamic fundamentalists would ultimately strike America. I said "Where?" He said, "In Islamic theology, the phallic symbol is very important. Your biggest phallic symbol is New York City and your tallest building will be the phallic symbol they will hit." Isser Harel prophesied that the tallest building in New York would be the first building hit by Islamic fundamentalists 21 years ago.' --- Source

'The attacks on the World Trade Centre's twin towers and the Pentagon were humiliating blows to the intelligence services, which failed to foresee them, and to the defence forces of the most powerful nation in the world, which failed to deflect them. The Telegraph has learnt that two senior experts with Mossad, the Israeli military intelligence service, were sent to Washington in August to alert the CIA and FBI to the existence of a cell of as many of 200 terrorists said to be preparing a big operation. "They had no specific information about what was being planned but linked the plot to Osama bin Laden and told the Americans that there were strong grounds for suspecting Iraqi involvement," said a senior Israeli security official.' --- UK Telegraph, 16 Sep 2001'

Zahir Ebrahim: Seeded by that prophesy from the stellar Israeli intelligence mind, British Zionist Svengali at Princeton University, Bernard Lewis planted the 'The Roots of Muslim Rage' in CFR's Foreign Affairs in 1990: 'It should now be clear that we are facing a mood and a movement far transcending the level of issues and policies and the governments that pursue them. This is no less than a clash of civilizations – that perhaps irrational but surely historic reaction of an ancient rival against our Judeo-Christian heritage, our secular present, and the worldwide expansion of both. It is crucially important that we on our side should not be provoked into an equally historic but also equally irrational reaction against our rival.' That 'Muslim Rage' was subsequently transformed into a full blown political ideology for governing International Relations of the sole superpower as the 'Clash of Civilizations', by Bernard Lewis' confrere and fellow Zionist at Harvard University, Samuel Huntington, in 1995. This systematic myth construction was harvested into the very real 'War on Terrorism' on September 11, 2001 by George W Bush, the President of the United States, with the dialectical ultimatum to the world: 'either you are with us, or with the terrorists'! And all foretold by the clairvoyance of the Zionist Israeli Mossad founder, and reinforced by other Israeli Military Intelligence Mossad agents in the days just preceeding 9/11, of the brilliant Islamic fundamentalists' successful attack on the West's most prominent “phallic symbol”. Today, we are merely looking at the next brilliant escalating enemy, the aliens, in a new epic 'Clash of Planets'! The ultimate in good vs. evil dialecticism to mobilize both human fear and imagination for finally cementing one-world government in a threateningly apocalyptic War of the Worlds! This new threat to all the world's civilizations and to life on earth itself, will surely also be launched with the dialectical ultimatum: 'either you are with us, or with the aliens'! --- The Alien Agenda

National Geographic Channel Show Ponders The Possibility of an Alien Attack - US Military preparing for a new global threat!

It is not immediately obvious if 'Muslim Rage' will play a significant role in it (perhaps Al Qaeda will team up with the Aliens?), but once again, Islamic theology will surely be harvested from its highest pulpits to lend recognition to the vile antagonists in the new War of the Worlds, just as it was harvested in the yesteryear to first fight the Soviet Union in Afghanistan, and to subsequently legitimize the vile nemesis of Osama Bin Laden in the perpetual War on Terror.

Does it take a Cassandra to predict the final outcome after all the dust has settled: “A Zion that will light up all the world!”? Not if one understands Noble lies and perpetual war: Leo Strauss, the neo-cons, and Iraq

'Political Zionism has repeatedly characterized itself as the will to normalize the existence of the Jewish people, to normalize the Jewish people. By this self-definition it has exposed itself to a grave misunderstanding, namely, the misunderstanding that the will to normality was the first word of political Zionism; the most effective criticism of political Zionism rests on this misunderstanding. In truth, the presupposition of the Zionist will to normalization, that is, of the Zionist negation of galut [exile], is the conviction that "the power of religion has been broken". Because the break with religion has been resolutely effected by many individual Jews, and only because of this reason, it is possible for these individuals to raise the question on behalf of their people, how the people is to live from now on. Not that they prostrate themselves before the idol of normality; on the contrary: they no longer see any reason for the lack of normality. And this is decisive: in the age of atheism, the Jewish people can no longer base its existence on God but only on itself alone, on its labor, on its land, and on its state. ...'

Masters over the World

WHO drives this centuries old motivation to construct the “Zion that will light up all the world” on the backs of the “Christian” United States of America? Who wants to become the unassailable masters over the world – Some pathetic Ali Babas of Islamic Fundamentalism wielding their antediluvian 'Muslim Rage', or, a nuclear armed to the teeth advanced civilization who proclaim themselves god's chosen peoples and therefore, 'uber alles'?

The White Man's Burden appears Uniformly Distributed among Jews Christians and Atheists – how can one tell the difference?

Evidently, the hidden faith of the founding fathers of America shared in the same White Man's burden to create a New World Order!

And Evidently, the same burden is carried by the New Age Zeitgeist heralders for the Age of Aquarius – The New World Order!

What really was and still is that New World Order? Who are the Masons behind their builder's craft who posit themselves 'uber alles', who worship secular humanism and the occult as the new religion of the New Age of reason, the Age of Aquarius, but a stream of Rothschild assets planted in senior Masonic positions throughout the past 250 years, and now in the New Age Movement, implementing only the House of Rothschild plan in compartmentalized stages to eventually create the “Zion that will light up all the world” as the New World Order?

And it began so straightforwardly with the diabolically simple idea: “give me control of a nation's money supply and I care not who makes its laws”!

Zahir Ebrahim: We are living in a time when all peoples of faith must come together against this common enemy of mankind which like the chameleon, continually changes color to keep up with the times and the subversions, but always pushes the same singular agenda of global governance of the oligarchic elite in a world government. Muslims are especially lacking in this understanding which the Christians evidently are coming to understand rather well as betrayed in the videos in this article. See Letter to Muslims.

Project Humanbeingsfirst's Prediction: Alien Invasion - The Next Global Threat

National Geographic Channel Show Ponders The Possibility of an Alien Attack

“It should be as statistical as human nature, for example, that there's going to be good guys and bad guys,” says Dr. Travis Taylor, who's with the U.S. Space and Missile Command Department and has worked with the Department of Defense and NASA for 20 years.

“What we would hope is that the good guys show up first, and that would be really nice. But the point of this wasn't to debate whether they are or they aren't, it's what happens if they did. Do we have a plan? What type of plan should we put together, and how would we defend the planet?” Taylor has also written the handbook for harrying aliens, An Introduction to Planetary Defense.

Lt. Col. Brian De Toy, director of defense and strategic studies program at West Point, doesn't buy the premise. “I am a skeptical believer in miracles. So a year ago right now I was in Iraq, and I'm more worried about Iraq and Afghanistan right now and the aliens that I'm dealing with there. And so right now, I'm pretty skeptical about the others.”'--- National Geographic via Boston Herald May 17, 2011

President Ronald Reagan Ponders The Beneficial Consequences of an Alien Threat from Another Planet, Speaking at the UN General Assembly, September 21, 1987

“If suddenly there was a threat to this world from some other species from another planet,” President Ronald Reagan had read out loud from his script at the United Nations General Assembly podium in 1987, “in our obsession with antagonisms of the moment, we often forget how much unites all the members of humanity. Perhaps we need some outside universal threat to make us recognize this common bond. I occasionally think how quickly our differences worldwide would vanish, if we were facing an alien threat from outside this world!” --- President Ronald Reagan, Speaking at the UN General Assembly, September 21, 1987

Is it not strange that the US Military is openly playing war games for the absurd possibility of an Alien Attack within just 25 years of President Ronald Reagan expressing the Beneficial Consequences of a Hypothetical Alien Threat From Outside This World? What motivation drives the Hard Road to World Order which continually requires crafting new fabled threats? With Osama bin Laden now officially retired as Enemy No 1, does it require a Cassandra to foretell What's Next?

The Mighty Wurlitzer Cultivating the Next Hegelian Mind-Fck: A Super Ali Baba++ to Seed the Clash of Planets

Fabricating a public discourse on an absurd fantasy as if it's something real by couching it in the veneer of science (or declassified State-Secrets/whistleblowing) and then reacting to that invention at supra-national levels from the United Nations to the Catholic Church, only legitimizes such discourse thus setting the stage for the later creation of a new insurmountable global threat, the Clash of Planets. If political scientists are to be believed on the utility of diabolical protocols for “imperial mobilization”, then, “that exercise requires a high degree of doctrinal motivation, intellectual commitment, and patriotic gratification.” Its doctrinal seeds must be planted years in advance. This too will surely also be launched with “either you are with us, or with the aliens”! --- The Agenda Behind Aliens and UFOs.

The rulers can “United We Stand” the masses upon any absurdity, if they can get them to believe it. This is Machiavelli 101: 'Convince People of Absurdities and get them Acquiescing to Atrocities: The Enduring Power of Machiavellian Political Science!' --- Wikileaks and the UFO.

The Alien-UFO Agenda is one such future fait accompli in the works which can still be averted by the public becoming rationally informed about the demonic art of the Mighty Wurlitzer. The fact that references to UFOs even made it into one of Wikileaks whistleblowing disclosures; the fact that the FBI recently made available a 1950 Roswell UFO memo lending “UFOs” a legitimacy in the gullible mind by way of it being held as a supposed “state-secret” for these past sixty years; and the uptick in bogus conversations on Aliens and UFO sightings even appearing in the mainstream press not to mention its unrelenting repetition in the so called “alternate media” and on the internet; all indicate that its unveiling time is likely approaching near. This too will surely also be launched with “either you are with us, or with the aliens” false dialectics! --- A Note on the Mighty Wurlitzer - Anatomy of Modern Propaganda Techniques.

Using State-Secrets For Myth Fabrication

Caption 'Proof of (alien) life? A copy of the 1950 memo that recounts the discovery of flying saucers and aliens in New Mexico. The memo has been published on the FBI website' --- UK Daily Mail 9th April 2011.

Using absurdities For Myth Fabrication: Pope's astronomer says he would baptise an alien if it asked him

'Aliens might have souls and could choose to be baptised if humans ever met them, a Vatican scientist said today. The official also dismissed intelligent design as “bad theology” that had been “hijacked” by American creationist fundamentalists.

Guy Consolmagno, who is one of the pope's astronomers, said he would be “delighted” if intelligent life was found among the stars. “But the odds of us finding it, of it being intelligent and us being able to communicate with it – when you add them up it's probably not a practical question.”

Speaking ahead of a talk at the British Science Festival in Birmingham tomorrow, he said that the traditional definition of a soul was to have intelligence, free will, freedom to love and freedom to make decisions. “Any entity – no matter how many tentacles it has – has a soul.” Would he baptise an alien? “Only if they asked.”' --- UK Guardian 17 Sep 2010

UN 'to appoint space ambassador to greet alien visitors'

'Mazlan Othman, a Malaysian astrophysicist, is set to be tasked with co-ordinating humanity’s response if and when extraterrestrials make contact.

Aliens who landed on earth and asked: “Take me to your leader” would be directed to Mrs Othman.

The 58-year-old is expected to tell delegates that the proposal has been prompted by the recent discovery of hundreds of planets orbiting other starts, which is thought to make the discovery of extraterrestrial life more probable than ever before. Mrs Othman is currently head of the UN’s little known Office for Outer Space Affairs (Unoosa).

In a recent talk to fellow scientists, she said: “The continued search for extraterrestrial communication, by several entities, sustains the hope that some day human kind will received signals from extraterrestrials.

“When we do, we should have in place a coordinated response that takes into account all the sensitivities related to the subject. The UN is a ready-made mechanism for such coordination.”

Opinion is divided about how future extraterrestrial visitors should be greeted. Under the Outer Space Treaty on 1967, which Unoosa oversees, UN members agreed to protect Earth against contamination by alien species by “sterilising” them.

Professor Stephen Hawking has warned that alien interlopers should be treated with caution.

He said: “I imagine they might exist in massive ships, having used up all the resources from their home planet. The outcome for us would be much as when Christopher Columbus first landed in America, which didn’t turn out very well for the Native Americans.”' --- UK Telegraph 26 Sep 2010

What is the basis for this bizarre prediction?
Click here to comprehend the Anatomy of Propaganda and reach your own conclusions

March 19: Bush bombed Iraq 2003 - Obama bombs Libya 2011

Our blood still spills red: Instrumenting Kosovo in the 'arc of crisis' and the 'global zone of percolating violence'

Thanks to the Mighty Wurlitzer Obama Wins! ... Advertising Age's 2008 Marketer of the Year Award beating out Apple Computer!

The Answer to the Burning Question du jour: Why was President Obama Gifted the Nobel Peace Prize?

From President George W. Bush to President Barrack Obama – More faces change, more they remain the same!

“To everyone else, these are "revolutions". To me, these are pretexts for "imperial mobilizations" aided and abetted by Trojan horses and fifth columnists. A nation may perhaps survive its fools, but not its fifth columnists and Trojan horses. The latter come in every robe and in every flavor, often wearing the mask of high morality. They permeate all our institutions across all walks of life. They are a greater threat to a nation than the vile mafiosos sitting at the thrones whom all can see. They are every nation's first enemy, the enemy within, who contrive to open the gates to the conquistadors outside the door. Without them, no nation and no people can be defeated easily. They are the ones who carry the white man's burden with more gusto and alacrity than the white man himself. This white man's burden is so damn uniformly distributed across all religions, color, castes, creeds, and politicisms, that it is perhaps the only universally egalitarian pursuit which truly does not discriminate.” -- Zahir Ebrahim in letter to Muslims

Why ostriches are very happy creatures...

Ostrich: noun

1. a large, two-toed, swift-footed flightless bird, Struthio camelus, indigenous to Africa and Arabia, domesticated for its plumage: the largest of living birds.

2. according to National Geographics: The flightless ostrich is the world's largest bird. They roam African savanna and desert lands and get most of their water from the plants they eat.

3. a person who attempts to ignore unpleasant facts or situations..

Please circulate this final essay in the 7-part series whose subtext theme is 'Why ostriches are very happy creatures....' to those whom you care about. You can get these essays by clicking on the ostrich (mirror), and the head in sand (mirror) images above. Compliments of Zahir Ebrahim. Project Humanbeingsfirst.org

Masters over the world

'... The point is that a Jew has strength, ability and power to create the desire within G-d to accept and become King over the entire creation.

It's understood, that the existence of the entire creation, in truth, is brought about by the Jew's coronation of G-d, and through which He becomes a King over the entire creation, which ultimately results in the fact that all of creation comes from the Primary being, G-d.

It's obvious that since every Jew, men and even women and children, brings about the existence of the entire creation, they become masters over the world, and thus every single creation owes them recognition for this good.

Being that through the Jew, all beings were created, he therefore becomes the master over all of them.

This is especially so in regards to what needs to be accomplished on erev [every?] Rosh Hashana.

Since the judgment of Rosh Hashana is primarily regarding physical matters, as explained in Likutei Torah, therefore the Jew is in complete control, particularly over physical matters.

The physicality of the world itself has to recognize the good that the Jew has accomplished.

Through the Jews they came into being, and their true existence is through their unity with the True Being.

Since G-d and the Jews are one, each Jew becomes a True Being, and is thus able to bring about all of creation.

He therefore has control over all of creation and not only that, but they owe him thanks and are indeed thankful, for being provided with abundance in physical and especially spiritual matters.'

Re-visiting Money as Debt and Monetary Reform: The Secret of Oz

Does Ellen Brown secretly work for the FED? January 10, 2011 – How comes Ellen Brown says: “Bernanke drives a Ford Falcon. I think he's one of us!”?

Zahir Ebrahim's letter to Still Griffin and Brown - World Bank chief surprises with gold standard idea Nov 9, 2010 – How comes they don't respond?

Letter to Bill Still – Director of The Secret of Oz – How?

Letter to American Monetary Institute: Refocussing Monetary Reform Agenda from the WHY and the WHAT to the HOW

The Missing Link of Monetary Reform: HOW?

The entrenched notion of Public Debt in America – will take a gestalt shift to overcome!

Towards a Common Standard Benchmark for evaluating all Monetary Reform Proposals

Monetary Reform: Who will bell the cat?

The Monetary Conspiracy For World Government

Mr. Obama's New Deal

Why won't President Obama's 'Stimulus' work?

And the most fruitful realization of Captain Rhett Butler's swashbuckling truism is yet to come, the profiting “from the upbuilding” of civilization: the new Gold Standard which will be pitched with Congressman Ron Paul's help as the panacea demanded by the peoples. Since all the world's gold bullion supply, and the world's gold mines, are already under monopoly control of the same arsonists, no problem.

In the New Economic World Order, with global central banks – themselves controlled from behind the scenes by the same handful of private family banks owned by the Rothschilds, the Rockefellers – managing the world's merged global monetary system as well as all the world's political governments in a global governance architecture, it won't be a problem returning to the Gold Standard. All the fine gold will have to be purchased from the same private international banksters in order to back the trillions in new common currency issued for transacting the entire world's commerce. How convenient once again!

The new monetary system will be happily made inflation averse amidst cheers from the foolish goyem of the world. The new gold based standard after all, does have to protect the enormous wealth of the private banksters from inflationary-erosion in a largely serf-world of the New World Order, wherein, the only real asset owners are the banks. The new financial empire also has to be stable enough to last a millennium! Can't have inflation eroding away all its loot as it did moms and pops meager assets and life savings in the twentieth century. Why indeed the Gold Standard will now make perfect sense for the banksters and the handful of real wealth owners of the world, was so passionately explained over a hundred years ago by William Jennings Bryan, that it is best refreshed in the goy's mind directly from the horse's mouth. The contorted dialectical brilliance of the devilish banksters is truly unsurpassed!

Caution – Winding Road Ahead: One also has to be cautious of Congressman Ron Paul's End the Fed H.R. 833 and all variations thereof, that it does not end up creating a cosmetic veneer in its implementation as did the superficial nationalization of the Bank of England, whereby, its effective control was retained in the same private bankster hands. The hidden agenda in any public nationalization of the FED would be to bring it on par with the European Union Central Bank so that the private banksters can continue on with their calculated moves for consolidating the new uniform global monetary system. A nationalized FED would be the precursor to the North American Union Bank.

These international banksters are masters of legal shenaniganism as is evident from their crafting of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, pitching the same plan through both the Republican Party and the Democratic Party as fake oppositions to each other, and the latter version rammed through Congress on Christmas eve. This time around, the tactics may entail the carefully crafted 'Messiah' figure and the handful of cultivated 'Rebel' figures both backing it, and each pitching it to their respective constituency. This way, they will claim transparency to make up for the previous time around. It is essential that the people understand the depth of the banksters' 300 years of devilish experience in orchestrating cleverly disguised private central banks. Please watch the Money Masters video documentary with your family, and read the short News Epilogue and Introduction in the Monetary Reform Bibliography, so that no 'dumb goy' is ever fooled into enslaving their own nation once again.

Source URL: http://humanbeingsfirst.wordpress.com/2010/10/05/re-visiting-money-as-debt-and-monetary-reform-the-secret-of-oz/

Tutorial - What is the pertinence of destroying Theism for Secular Humanism

Between Common Purpose and Secular Humanism – And Between Newspeak and House Negroes: What's the pertinence of destroying Theism?

Letter to Muslims: Is Islam really the Last Obstruction to World Government?

Between Militant Islam and Moderate Islam: Introducing “beneficial cognitive diversity” for Endless Hegelian Mind Fck!

In today's modernity, Islam is principally subverted in the same mold by introducing “beneficial cognitive diversity” (sic!) into that original singular formulation of “straight-path”.

The sophistication of Islam's subversion however that is evidently running circles around the Muslim mind today, relies in the employment of complex political theory called Hegelian Dialectic: invent two or more opposing and polarized ideologies (or lies), say one entirely militant, and the other entirely spiritual, and get them to clash by forcing people to choose between them while perniciously harvesting each one in the greater service of “imperial mobilization”. This is the underlying philosophy in the “good Muslim” vs. “bad Muslim” dialectic, and in Presidential statements like “either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists”. The conflict that is naturally seeded in any clash of the opposites is an opportunity for birth-panging something far greater from the burnt ashes left behind. Tortuous processes so unleashed upon the unsuspecting public can leave so much confusion and chaos in its wake that as David Ben Gurion had explained the purpose of seeding controlled chaos: “what is inconceivable in normal times is possible in revolutionary times”. And the Council on Foreign Relations proposed exactly that same modus operandi to seed world government:

'In short, the ‘house of world order’ will have to be built from the bottom up, rather than from the top down. It will look like a great ‘booming, buzzing confusion’ to use William James’ famous description of reality, but an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault.'

Watch the fabrication of the Hegelian Dialectic of “militant Islam” vs. “moderate Islam” in the following two videos. Both are officially sponsored by the ruling establishment of the Hectoring Hegemons to promulgate their respective asininity and myriad conflicts among the Muslim masses for a purpose so diabolical that it can only be fully comprehended in the domain of political theory with dynamic systems analysis, and not by studying each component separately. This is primarily the reason most Muslims, while knowing that there is something wrong with the 'War on Terror' in that the way the UK-US-EU axis of evil is going about it only creates more terror, remain perpetually confused by what is it that the West really wants when it arbitrarily seems to support opposites simultaneously. Inextricably caught between suicide bombers and F-16s, and between neo-colonialism and struggle for daily bread, most clutch at every strawman spun by any detracting snake-oil salesman in town. Thus we see the proliferation of conspiracy theories and asinine explanations with the concomitant “beneficial cognitive diversity” which it naturally engenders.

This is because, as Bertrand Russell had put it in the aftermath of the idiocy of World War I in Proposed Roads to Freedom: “Man is naturally competitive, acquisitive, and, in a greater or less degree, pugnacious. When the Press tells him that so-and-so is his enemy, a whole set of instincts in him responds to the suggestion. ... If a man is offered a fact which goes against his instincts, he will scrutinize it closely, and unless the evidence is overwhelming, he will refuse to believe it. If, on the other hand, he is offered something which affords a reason for acting in accordance with his instincts, he will accept it even on the slenderest evidence. The origin of myths is explained in this way, and much of what is currently believed in international affairs is no better then myth.”

And almost exactly 80 years later, on the eve of the commencement of World War IV, Philip D. Zelikow, the man who was later to be put in charge of the 9/11 Commission as its Executive Director, described the same gullibility of a public to believe in vicariously planted myths thusly: 'Public Assumptions' Shape Views of History: “Such presumptions are beliefs (1) thought to be true (although not necessarily known to be true with certainty), and (2) shared in common within the relevant political community. The sources for such presumptions are both personal (from direct experience) and vicarious (from books, movies, and myths).”'

In this ultra-sophisticated landscape of engineering consent by brilliant hegemonic minds, our own learned scholars, news media, politicians, establishmentarians, have all been so co-opted that they willingly lead the Newspeak chorus on the myths of 'war on terror', taliban, al-qaeeda song and dance routine as the House Negroes of the West. Our best minds have turned Native Informant. So who is left to explain Realityspeak to the Muslims?

Convince People of Absurdities and get them Acquiescing to Atrocities: The Enduring Power of Machiavellian Political Science

And more Pertinent to Muslim 'House Negroes': Mentally Colonize a People – And 'United We Stand' them forever with the 'Massa'

* Also see: Islam and Knowledge vs. Socialization *

What is War on Terror?

What is War on Terror?

But first, some latest empiricism from the BBC: Nato contractors 'attacking own vehicles' in Pakistan

(as in Operation Gladio in Western Europe during the Cold War to keep the fear of Communism alive)

First Watch Operation Gladio part1 part2 part3

Top Secret: There may be times when host country governments show passivity or indecision in the face of Communist subversion ... US Army Intelligence must have the means of launching special operations which will convince host country governments and public opinion of the reality of the insurgent danger ... US Army Intelligence should seek to penetrate the insurgency by means of agents of special assignments, with the task of forming special action groups among the most radical elements of the insurgency. --- “I never heard such a thing” William Colby, Director of CIA 1973-1976

Here are some straightforward definitions

War on Terror: 'Might defines right' leads to “Hegemony is as old as mankind”, which in turn leads to If we don't have real enemies then we have to create or imagine some, and in either case yell 'we are being attacked' in order to a) justify “imperial mobilization” and all its barbarianism upon the “terrorists”; and b) motivate an unwilling peoples into sacrificing for the agendas of achieving world government in the pretext of fighting terrorists in a perpetual Global War on Terror. To understand this visually, watch how Oceania is in perpetual war with the murdering barbarian armies of Eurasia, and compare with George W. Bush ushering in the perpetual war with “either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists”.

So, how to do this in perpetuity in order to maintain police-state in perpetuity? Because, “World government could only be kept in being by force.”!

Insurgency and counter Insurgency: The American agenda for Pakistan is not a state-secret. Rather, it is only thinly disguised as perpetually fighting the “insurgents” in a lifetime of war, the World War IV. [4] Whereas, in reality, both the “insurgency”, and the “counter-insurgency”, are entirely designed and fabricated in the USA as part of the evolving tactics of Hegelian Dialectics. They are enacted on the ground by various two-bit errand boys and expert trigger pullers. The already well-known existence of black-ops assassination squads in Pakistan/Afghanistan, known to the local peoples for years as the real prime-movers behind the heinous local terrorist acts, belatedly confirmed by NYT, WP, and NYT, in August 2009. [5] See these two December 2008 reports on the Mumbai terrorist Act as reportedly orchestrated by ALI BABA from his perch in the Hindu Kush. [6] The arrival of the black-ops in the region is not recent, albeit the public disclosures might be.

Out of uniform and In-uniform forces: To put this ominous presence of soldiers of freedom and fortune on Pakistani soil in full black-ops context of NATO and the Western Alliance, of diabolically manufacturing and sustaining the very pretexts out of uniform tickling insurgency to enable the in-uniform forces to pursue counter-insurgency in the perpetual mission of fighting World War IV, it is sufficient to look at what is transpiring in IRAQ for lessons to wisely apply to one's own predicament in order to avoid a far worse one. Excerpted from The Decapitation of Pakistan by its own Military.

But when you ask about this today of any among the “Massa” and their plentiful “House Negroes” around the world, like William Colby quoted above in the context of Operation Gladio of yesteryear, all only incestuously reinforce the white man's theme song of 9/11, that “Islamofascism” of Osama Bin Laden and the Talibans/Al-Qaeeda is the enemy.

The House Negroes further rush to clarify the distinction between “good Muslim” and “bad Muslim” ostensibly to distance themselves from the “enemy', but in actuality only lending further credence to the existence of the enemy and its threat in full service to the “Massa”. The Hegelian Dialectic Militant Islam vs. Moderate Islam will surely go down in history as among the greatest enablers of war and manufactured consent, rivaling and perhaps surpassing both Communism vs. Fascism and Communism vs. Capitalism of the twentieth century. It is their legatee for the twenty-first century. It is already called “World War IV” (see Ex-CIA director: U.S. faces 'World War IV').

This is all what you hear on all media sources as consent is continually engineered for sustaining “imperial mobilization”. That's principally all there is to it.

The rest is merely the narrations of the 1001 puppet-shows built on this core-lie. Its narrators are all murderers – their hands are as soaked in blood as those who press the triggers – but only the victor's justice can ever prove that in court.

As Hitler had observed at the peak of his own hubris: “The victor will not be asked afterward whether he told the truth or not. In starting and waging a war it is not the right that matters, but victory.”

For ordinary people to see all this truism only requires that they overthrow their own self-interests as the House Negroes of Empire. The ubiquitous indoctrinating mantras are only as potent as people's own self-interests in believing what they are told. If not for self-interest, Realityspeak trivially nullifies Newspeak. All human beings are capable of thought. Try it.

But not all are capable of giving up their self-interests.

When self-interest trumps morality, in Dante's colorful rendition: “the hottest places in hell are reserved for those who in a period of moral crisis, maintain their neutrality.”

All you pious peoples better believe it!

Zahir Ebrahim

911 and Imperial Mobilization Redux

9/11 HOT

Prisoners of the Cave – Deception Point 911 And Its Greatest Democratic Enablers

.“911 is is a point of departure for me ... I see the deliberate hands of the American-Israeli intelligence agencies and/or “Second Foundationers” from deep within the American ruling elite in orchestrating this New Pearl Harbor. For a country that can sense what is deep within the bowels of the Earth and in the farthest reaches of the heavens, that seeks “full spectrum dominance” of air, land, sea, space, cyberspace, et. al. in its own military doctrines, and that publicly warns in its strategy documents that the only way for it to embark on this “imperial mobilization” is an increased military budget that can only come about in a “new pearl harbor”, 9-11 has only one reality – self-inflicted. --- Chapter 2: Don't Ever Ask “Why is it possible to hate America” Prisoners of the Cave

.“I am betting that when knowledge of the crime of the emperor comes to them, and their complicity in it is realized by them, that like Lady Macbeth, the American public will be torn by their good conscience, that they will be as unable to remain “innocent of knowledge” as Lady Macbeth, and will endeavor to right the wrongs done in their name by their successive governments. As Arundhati Roy put it in a speech: “Yours is by no means a great nation – but you could be a great people – history is giving you the chance – seize the time.” I am betting that the conscience of its own people will prove to be the real fifth column in the United States of America. Perhaps somewhat idealistic, but it is precisely ideals that seem to be lacking in the collective wisdom of this nation, where mostly everything is viewed from the distorted prism of the pragmatic, the expeditious, the instantly gratifying, and the “might makes right” imperial sight. Its injection into the American polity cannot be a bad thing. I don't expect everyone to necessarily agree with my work, the point of it being not to make you agree with me, but to motivate you into examining your invisible chains in the hope that if you earnestly look for them, you will likely find them. --- Postscript Prisoners of the Cave

The world pleads: “God save us from American peace and liberty”

.“This irrational behavior is only possible because we, the citizens of the nation, permit it. It is no longer a question of controlling a military-industrial complex, but rather, of keeping the United States from becoming a totally military culture. --- The United States: A militarized society, Jerome B. Wiesner, president emeritus MIT, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, Aug 1985, pg. 104

And just as his predecessors did, President OBAMA too reiterates who the enemy is, even threatening the public to not question America's official sacred story of who the enemy is, and cleverly lumping “questioning 9/11” with “justifying 9/11”

.“I am aware that there is still some who would question, or even justify the offense of 911.

But let us be clear. Al Qaeeda killed nearly 3000 people on that day. The victims were innocent men, women, and children from America and many other nations who had done nothing to harm anybody.

And yet Al Qaeeda chose to ruthlessly murder these people, claimed credit for the attack, and even now states their determination to kill on a massive scale.

They have affiliates in many countries, to try to expand their reach.

These are not opinions to be debated. These are facts to be dealt with.

Okay, Mr. President! But can you also inform us how did “Al-Qaeeda” cause this third WTC-7 building demolition on 9/11?

Footage of WTC 7 destruction showing its Penthouse Collapse before the building's symmetric and catastrophic demolition into its own footprint

And how did “Al-Qaeeda” cause this WTC explosion?

Does the pulverized WTC tower into such a fine dust debris look like a Gravity Collapse of millions of tons of steel and concrete due to fire to you?

And can you explain what super-technology Al Qaeeda possessed that they can pulverize steel and concrete into dust but leave the sacred mounds of paper alone?
According to ABC News: “But most interesting, in the mix, they are looking they think, at specs of steel that used to be beams and elevators, marble and the lobby floor and facings, so what were once the strongest architectural elements in the two towers, were pulverized. Large portions turned into clouds, like this one. Still there is this mystery. If some of the hardest materials were vaporized, how to account for the presence everywhere of paper. Fully intact letters, business forms, stationary, paper is so fragile, and combustible, and yet, somehow, maybe because we have so much of it, it was everywhere.” --- ABC News.

And, by the verdict of your own logic of 3000 innocent victims killed by “Al-Qaeeda” on 9/11, what of the several million INNOCENT CIVILIAN VICTIMS barbarically murdered by the United States in Afghanistan and Iraq in retaliation for 9/11?

.“We have shot an amazing number of people, but to my knowledge, none has ever proven to be a threat, --- Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal, New York Times, March 26, 2010

.“all murderers are punished unless they kill in large numbers and to the sound of trumpets. --- Voltaire, Welcome Letter

Until of course, Victor's Justice catches up to the “apostles of death and hate”

.“ – we are not prepared to lay down a rule of criminal conduct against others which we would not be willing to have invoked against us. --- U.S. Justice Robert H. Jackson, formulating the finer points of law as moral absolutes for administering victor's justice at Nuremberg, Minutes of Conference Session of July 23, 1945, International Conference on Military Trials : London, 1945

.“ – the only conceivable end for these merchants of aggression, and as they plunged the world into a blood bath, it is fitting that they take their final plunge in ignominy! --- Universal Newsreels: 21 Nazi Chiefs Guilty, Nuremberg Trials 1946/10/8

Watch

But until then, 2 + 2 is always 5 whenever OCEANIA is at perpetual war with the dark murdering armies of EURASIA – watch modernity scripted in George Orwell's movie “1984” below

.“To those who would paralyze our Government in the face of impending threat by encasing it in a semantic strait-jacket, we must reply that all concepts are relative. --- Justice Vinson, U.S. Supreme Court, 1951, re-formulating the finer points of law in Newspeak, Justice in the Service of Empire

.“Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities --- Voltaire, The Enduring Power of Machiavellian Political Science

And as the sighted can already see, like the “Big Brother” of OCEANIA, the rulers of United States of America using their own Newspeak and the savagery of fabricated wars against “barbarians”, transformed their own nation into a Police State while its indoctrinated masses, its pathetic “House Negroes” and immigrant “Uncle Toms”, insanely cheered “United We Stand” against Islamofascism.

America's own prominent Judge, Andrew Napolitano, belatedly lamented the loss of Natural-Rights of the American peoples to The Patriot-Act

Of course, also only the sighted will ever see that from President George W. Bush to President Barrack Obama --- More faces changed, more they remained the same!

.“The system is not only broken, it was crippled at birth – for it is so easily hijackable – from Wounded Knee to Iran, with new “Pearl Harbors” cleverly used for “imperial mobilization” from the USS Maine to 911 to the new nookular '911' that President Bush keeps warning the Americans and the world about in these ominous words as late as February 13, 2008: “Good morning [America]. At this moment, somewhere in the world, terrorists are planning new attacks on our country. Their goal is to bring destruction to our shores that will make September the 11th pale by comparison.” It is one continuous predatory imperative, from the Truman Doctrine, to the Carter Doctrine, to the Reagan Doctrine, and now to the Bush Doctrine. What did impeachment of Richard Nixon ever accomplish or deter, never mind restore to America's millions of untold and unaccounted victims in Asia and South America? --- How to derail “imperial mobilization” and preempt the crossing of the Nuclear Rubicon

.“What is the point of this analysis and all this verbage? The point is a matter of life and death for nations. That is the point of this. Let me be very precise. Either the United States, or Israel, are poised to attack Iran, as noted by many commentators in the World press,... This is March 2007. I have two imperatives before me: A) I do not wish to hear in 2010 that there was an “intelligence failure”, that it was another Gulf of Tonkin, or some other new contrivance from the imaginative and fertile mind of the hectoring hegemons. --- Dialog Among Civilizations – Whytalksfail When the Hectoring Hegemons Are Running It And What To Do About It

Since the doctrines of aggression variously couched in Newspeak have remained the same despite the changing presidential faces in the White House, the AMERICAN PUBLIC'S REALPOLITIK to bravely extract their nation from the jaws of Big Brother's Fourth Reich also remains the same:

1) Firstly, anything, including all 'nuclear terrorist acts' on American soil, or anywhere in the world, all shocking revelations by whistleblowers, all leaks in newspapers, and all phantasmal mantras that distract from the afore-stated goal, regardless of how compelling the reasons, must be treated by the unwary and gullible American public and its intellectual dissenting-chiefs, as red herrings, pretexts, and deceptions for premeditated “imperial mobilization” by their nation's rulers.

2) Secondly, if there is reason for the United States to nuclear decimate any country or any peoples in purported 'self-defense', the American peoples must demand a ratification of the decision to go to war through a public referendum – let its great “populist democracy” speak directly in the modernity of the 21st century before it is called upon to make its sacrifices, before it is called upon to pay its taxes to fund the war, and before it is called upon to acquire innocent blood on its hands!

3) Thirdly, draw the soldiers, officers and war-technicians from the pool who vote for war! If they can vote yes to invade other nations and wantonly shatter the tabula rasa of a 'lesser humanity', then they must also first be willing to sign up for doing it themselves – instead of having a draft of economic conscription. Every 'yes' voting home in America must have at least one 'patriot' from the immediate family show up on the front-lines without exception – or their 'yes' vote is void!

Source 9/11 HOT Topics URL: http://humanbeingsfirst.wordpress.com/hot/

Also see: Circulation Request Letter

Justice is a delicacy best served cold, preferably in cold blood - Sentenced to 86 years in Jail

The Curious Case of Dr. Aafia Siddiqui and Imperial Mobilization

Caption Harmless innocence Melt, Flours of all hue, and without thorn the rose: Is this merely the Ugly Side of US Law? The matching facade of Pakistan’s outrage over Aafia’s Treatment

“Nothing is more certain in modern society than the principle that there are no absolutes, that a name, a phrases, a standard has meaning only when associated with the considerations which give birth to nomenclature. To those who would paralyze our Government in the face of impending threat by encasing it in a semantic strait-jacket, we must reply that all concepts are relative.” -- Justice Vinson, U.S. Supreme Court, 1951 AD

So What Is REAL JUSTICE - Not in Newspeak but in Realityspeak?

Zahir Ebrahim Responds to Rafia Zakaria's and Amnesty International's Call for 'prosecution of Taliban leaders for war crimes'

Preamble

The following letter is Project Humanbeingsfirst's overly polite August 11, 2010 response to jurist doctor Rafia Zakaria J.D., General Secretary, Board of Directors Amnesty International USA, on her enacting absurdities upon absurdities in the service of empire – and against her own peoples in Pakistan and the United States.

This latest round is as the General Secretary at Amnesty International, charging the fabricated enemy for war crimes against humanity right out of George Orwell's recipe for convincing a people to continue fighting and dying in the perpetual war against the dark murdering armies of Eurasia, without even mentioning the Hectoring Hegemons who militarily invaded other nations and are routinely committing war crimes while admitting it publicly! Her previous round at foisting imperial absurdities upon the plebes among mankind as the empire's “House Negro” was examined in Letter to Editor: The politics of 'Reinventing the Taliban' goes through a core-lie! April 07, 2010.

Can Rafia Zakaria J.D., also a candidate for Ph.D. in political science, be so innocent of knowledge like the rest of the tens of millions of mainstream Americans who were easily misled into “United We Stand” with their hectoring hegemons? Can she really be so Newspeak blind to the distemper of hegemony as a jurist and political scientist, so damn innocent in the ways of Machiavelli and her own field of study? On the path to imperial glory, did she become so averse to the pain and suffering of the 'untermenschen' in Iraq and Afghanistan that she cannot see what the United States has done to those poor defenseless nations for its “imperial mobilization”? Or, does she rightly know which side her bread, accolades, appointments, and lucrative career is buttered?

The inescapable conclusion, at least for those not sitting on the fence, is that only such uber learned peoples shamelessly groveling for fame and fortunes at the feet of the “massa” are congenially appointed to the various prestigious Board of Directors of empire's own instruments of social engineering. Like Daniel Pipes was once appointed to head the Institute for Peace by President George W. Bush. The difference though being that both the latter are among the “massa” themselves, laboriously carrying the “white man's burden” to the 'untermensch' as their “la mission civilisatrice”, to benevolently give to the barbarians a more civilized “moderate Islam” instead of their abhorrent “militant Islam” which attacked America on 9/11. It is understandable that the ruling elite would engage in such Newspeak based on their overarching agenda to subvert their own democracy which, in the absence of “conditions of a sudden threat or challenge to the public's sense of domestic well-being”, remains “inimical to imperial mobilization”. For immigrants from the land of the 'untermensch' to echo the hectoring hegemons' message, is akin to joining them in their mission as the “merchants of aggression.”

Watch the following merchants of aggression, despite their hubris and their Newspeak, eventually take their “final plunge in ignominy” in another epoch as the victors vociferously claimed the objectivity of their justice: “they are crimes whether the United States does them or whether Germany does them”! Changing epochs does not change the nature of the crimes of aggression which constitutes the “supreme international crime differing only from other war crimes in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole”.

If the Taliban are guilty of war crimes, then, by the very definition of war crimes, those who invaded their nation are far more guilty of a more heinous crime, one which contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole!

But of course, no hectoring hegemon and their associate chanting the various Mighty Wurlitzer tunes, at the peak of their hubris can ever think of themselves suffering that day of ignominy – as is amply evidenced in the following statement of the United States' own Supreme Court Justice in 1951, right after the victor's justice had been juridically administered with great fanfare to the vanquished at Nuremberg: “Nothing is more certain in modern society than the principle that there are no absolutes, that a name, a phrases, a standard has meaning only when associated with the considerations which give birth to nomenclature. To those who would paralyze our Government in the face of impending threat by encasing it in a semantic strait-jacket, we must reply that all concepts are relative.”

Victor or victim, all in the world must know and be continually reminded of, that baboons wear no clothes even when they may steal the white man's sunglasses to look cool. Today, the baboons, white, brown, black and stripped, have stolen some clothes to pass themselves off as hominids concerned with the plight of their victims. They come to you weeping at the funeral demanding justice after having killed off your family. And they come to you as the “peace makers” after creating the most mayhem on earth! While the baboons may try to lie to themselves in the mirror, we know what they are. So I can at least agree with Rafia Zakaria and the Amnesty International on their profound conclusion, if not their analysis, that “Unless the international community takes a stand on this issue, Afghan civilians will continue to believe that they will be abandoned by the world and left to endure another regime of barbarism.”

Read the Letter at Source URL: http://print-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2010/09/zahir-responds-rafia-zakaria-amnesty.html

And Real Pursuit of Justice?

Open Letter to Francis Boyle, the Moral Law Professor, on the Ignored Iraqi & Afghani Victims of Imperial Mobilization

Date: January 31, 2010

Subject Re: International Criminal Court Complaint Filed Against Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Tenet, Rice, Gonzales By Prof. Francis A. Boyle

Dear Dr. Francis Boyle:

In reference to your complaint filed with the ICC against the previous errand-boys who occupied the White House, would it be rude to notice that the higher order bits of using 911 to “goosestep the herrenvolk across international frontiers” ; the subsequent “shock and awe” visitations upon largely civilian population-centers and civilian infrastructures ; the decimation of millions of Iraqis/Afghanis ; subverting of the United States into a pre-planned police-state ; fabricating crises upon crises to propose pre-planned solutions in order to systematically usurp national sovereignty as per the diabolical modus operandi set by the Council on Foreign Relations in their own documents: “In short, the ‘house of world order’ will have to be built from the bottom up, rather than from the top down. It will look like a great ‘booming, buzzing confusion’ to use William James’ famous description of reality, but an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault.” – have all been overlooked to pursue the relatively lower order crimes of “extraordinary rendition” upon a few individuals with the highly dubious statement: “I doubt very seriously that the Accused would have inflicted these criminal practices upon 100 White Judeo-Christian men.” ?

We only wish there was one decent 'Christian' man or woman alive in the hallways and beltways of Western academe and among the legal fraternity who might even attempt to capture the angst of the tens of millions of Iraqis/Afghanis still barely alive and who still await someone who will file legal charges against the monumental crimes that have been perpetrated upon them and their millions of murdered kin.

We fervently hope that you, Professor Francis Boyle, might be such a person. That you will file pertinent charges in the ICC, for both culpability and restitution, on behalf of the untold millions already dead in Iraq and Afghanistan, many more suffering with their entire national fabric, ancient heritage, and even their DNA despoiled in a crime so stupendous that “it is a mystery whose parallel may only be the one of Sinai when something was revealed to mankind.”

For surely, it is inconceivable that you make complete obeisance to Western standards of morality by focussing on this lower order crime in the presence of un-addressed higher order monumental crimes – a morality which brazenly asserts from the highest pulpit of law in this land of the free:

And as you venture to focus on the higher order real monumental crimes against humanity, we hope you will not remain content by focussing merely on the errand boys. That you will see the connections between the quest for “Global Governance”, fabricated crises from pandemics to global warming, the seeding of “revolutionary times” across the “global zone of percolating violence” to make “imperial mobilization” possible which otherwise is “inconceivable in normal times”, and the “history's actors” who drive war-mongering policies and orchestrate wretched events from their Zion in the Middle East to their Zion in the Western capitals, not the least of which is Washington DC, in the expectation of creating the ultimate “Zion that will light up all the world”.

And that, as you pursue the highest order crimes, you will not shy away from going directly for the jugular of the prime-movers behind the scenes of all the war-mongering 'errand boys' fronting for them in the Western capitals as the duly elected representatives of a duped Western peoples, including those presently occupying the White House. This was, lamentably enough, already pleaded to no avail in the following editorial when your lonely fraternal brother, Mr. Vincent Bugliosi, courageously asserted that “Murder Trumps Torture”, but inexplicably failed to also simultaneously assert the legal and moral commonsense that prime-movers trump trigger-pullers: Who is more guilty of monumental war crimes - the prime-movers or trigger pullers? April 09, 2009.

Attempted prosecution of state-criminals on 'petty charges' without also prosecuting their criminal aiders and abettors who 'legalize' and propagandistically justify their brazen acts of aggression, and therefore are entirely culpable in toto for “all the evil which follows” ; staying silent on punitive as well restitutive compensation for their victims, is a legal sham that is only waiting to be torn down by some courageous people. We hope, Dr. Francis Boyle, that you might be one such precedent setting spark which ignites the moral imagination of many to follow. The world has had enough from the dispensers of victor's justice!

Thank you.

Zahir Ebrahim

Project Humanbeingsfirst.org

Addendum February 02, 2010

In. Ref To: Bush To The Hague! The Hague Acknowledges Francis Boyle On His Filing Against Bush et al For War-Crime: Extraordinary Rendition

Additionally, in principle, Project Humanbeingsfirst.org supports all effective measures which attempt to bring the entire hierarchy of monumental criminals to fair justice. As is often the case with victor's justice however, and with those in the victor civilizations pursuing their notion of justice against the criminals in their own midst, the big picture is being silently swept aside in the “Bush To The Hague!” Campaign. That moral campaign should rightly be “Bush-Obama-Congress-Foundations-Banksters To The Hague” Campaign. And a similarly appropriate one waged in the UK and the EU.

It is not sufficient, in the view of Project Humanbeingsfirst, to pursue lower order crimes and charge the lower-order errand boys for these crimes, while staying eloquently silent on the most significant crimes and neglecting to seek restitution/compensation/punitive-damages for the most significant of its victims! While the old errand boys out of power are being pursued with vigor, a new crop of errand boys are already in-charge committing new monumental crimes without inhibition. What rational commonsense does this make? Are we to presume that morality in modernity is inversely proportional to rationality and commonsense? That millions of 'untermensch' victims are to simply remain nameless and faceless statistics to build careers and glossy prize-winning narratives on? We certainly hope not!

To put efficacy into the matter of stopping crimes against humanity before they transpire rather than lament in futility afterwards with vacuous pledges of 'never again' with Public Relations show trials and new museums, the perpetual prime-movers of wars pushing their insidious multifaceted agendas behind the turbulence of wars have to be neutered. Their enormous power and influence stemming from their infinite wealth that is legally sanctioned to them by the law makers who represent them in governance, terminated. Where is the precedent for that being set?

It wasn't even set at the Nuremberg Military Tribunals when Dr. Hjalmar Schacht, the former governor of the Reich Bank – the bankster who orchestrated the financing for Hitler's war-machine with funding from Wall Street and the City of London financiers – went scot-free! Just that tiny point of incontrovertible fact proves the truth of this open letter and demonstrates the enormous power of the prime-movers which is being swept under the rug by focussing on their errand boys. These errand boys are untouchable so long as their godfathers protect them, except when made dispensable and administered the victor's justice as at the Nuremberg Trials.

We hope this minor oversight will be rectified.

Read the full open letter and the distinguished jurist's response here

Source URL: http://print-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2010/01/letter-francisboyle-iraq-afghan-victims.html

Western Civilization's Tryst With Justice

And lest the Westerners should feel too complacent

- “Nothing is more certain in modern society than the principle that there are no absolutes, that a name, a phrases, a standard has meaning only when associated with the considerations which give birth to nomenclature. To those who would paralyze our Government in the face of impending threat by encasing it in a semantic strait-jacket, we must reply that all concepts are relative.” -- Justice Vinson, U.S. Supreme Court, 1951 AD

Palestine Current

Champions of Palestinian struggle today

DOWNLOAD HOW TO RETURN TO PALESTINE THIS DAY FORWARD (PDF)

From Genesis to Genocide in Palestine : The Golem Is Not Jewish!

From Genocide to ReGenesis in ZERO Compromise - Preamble to Palestine: The Struggle Forward

Palestine: The Struggle Forward

Rescuing the struggle for Palestine from its endless narratives

Caption A Palestinian child's indomitable courage on Ground Zero in Palestine (Photographer unknown). In order to be effective in dealing with such a multifaceted and unique adversary, a division of labor between those compelled to face the live ammunition and checkpoints on Ground Zero, and those in Diaspora living in the comforts of the West with the luxury of time and liberty to effectively focus on the prime-movers, is the rational demand of the hour. But evidently, none suffering the excruciating weekend pains of Diaspora can muster even the courage of a tiny child of Palestine!

The day a brave Palestinian narrator in Diaspora is willing to risk an iota of hair on his balding head, or underneath the fashionable headscarf, that will surely be the first day of reclaiming Palestine for their progeny. No dissent-chief, East or West, is going to do it for them. The only way they ever get to become dissent-chiefs in the first place is by not going there.

Every child of Palestinian Diaspora must learn to throw the comparable intellectual stone and be willing to risk being shot dead like the child of Palestine on Ground Zero, if they ever want to reclaim their home. The grandiose prize-winning narratives fired while resting one's mighty pen safely upon the tiny shoulders of the uncompromising child of Palestine - one who is risking it all in throwing a tiny pebble at a Goliath which can annihilate him even before the pebble leaves his tiny palm - is the grotesque caricature of the Palestinian struggle in the relative safety of Diaspora.

Palestine: Seeking The Enemy Within

From Genesis to Genocide in Palestine

'I am Anna Baltzer.
My first reaction when I heard these things by the way was complete disbelief.
I thought there is no way, there is no way that Israel is anything different from what I believe it to be, and what I know it to be.
When I met people who told me anything different, I thought well these are perfectly nice people, but they have been brain washed. They have been told propaganda. And I set out to sort of try and prove them wrong. To show them that I knew what I was talking about.
And as soon as I began to do some research, I realized very quickly that I was the one who is missing a lot of information on this issue.
And not knowing sort of who to believe anymore, decided to go there and see with my own two eyes what was happening in Palestine.
So that's what I travel around the country telling people about is what I found there.
I hope I can offer people a combination of sort of some of the basics of what's going on there, and then also some ways of going a little bit deeper into the history, and most importantly, where we can go from here.
I like like to start out by clarifying a few different categories that can be very confusing to people in addressing this issue.
I'd like to distinguish between what it means to be Jewish: so I am Jewish what does that mean. Somebody who is Jewish is somebody either of the Jewish religion, obviously, or the Jewish lineage. My mother is Jewish, her mother is Jewish, etceteras. It's a bloodline.
And that to be Jewish is different from what it means to be Israeli: an Israeli is a citizenship, and Israeli is a citizen of the state of Israel.
And that to be Israeli is different from what it means to be a Zionist: Zionism is the political ideology that supports the idea of a Jewish state in historic Palestine, sometimes no matter what that means in reality, and no matter what it does.
Anyway, these are different categories, Jewish, Israeli, Zionist.
And sometimes they overlap in the same person, but they are not the same thing.
There are Jews who are not Israeli, like myself.
There are Israelis who aren't Jewish, about 25, about 20 percent of the Israeli population is Palestinian.
There are Jews who are anti-Zionist, who say this land should be for anybody who's been living there for generations regardless of what their religion or their ethnicity is.
And then there are Zionists who aren't Jewish. The increasingly influential Christian Zionist movement, largely based in this country that talks about fueling this conflict to bring about the Armageddon, the return of the Messiah. Again, not at all pro-Jewish, right? You know what happens to Jews in the Armageddon is not about preserving Judeism, it is Zionism.
So we see this distinction and it's very important that we see that distinction and that we express it when we are talking about this issue.
First of all, because there is no reason to associate anything that Israel is doing in terms of occupation, oppression, segregation, things that were pretty sobering that I found when I was over there. These things have nothing to do with Judeism.
And likewise, to speak out when we see people's rights being violated is not anti-Jewish.
It's not anti-Semitic. In fact, it's in line with the tradition of social justice that has been the pride of Jewish people as well as many other communities for a very long time.
So I wanna start out with that, especially because I know that people talking about this issue are often, sort of, these names are called at you, and it's absolutely absurd.
There is nothing Jewish about what Israel's doing, nothing anti-Jewish about speaking out when we see it happening.' --- Transcription by Project Humanbeingsfirst.org

Anna Baltzer: Life In Occupied Palestine

And Where Does That Still Leave The Silent Spectators?

“One can expect demonic conquerors to burn and maim others' children while they proclaim 'never again' for their own, but one cannot accept the apathy of the world idly watching...” -- screamed the young canary in Palestine to no avail

Now hear the story of Palestinian Peoples (from Palestinians for a change)

“Somehow, the victim screaming in pain is considered biased, but their victimizers' description of their victims' plight is academic honesty and intellectual brilliance! ... When we give higher currency to conscionable dissent makers whose prime cultural affiliations are with the victim makers themselves, over those voices of anguish of the victims, we do both the victims and other well intentioned bystanders longing to figure out how to make peace with justice, a great disservice! ... The voices of the victims themselves describing their own fate are as potent, and as legitimate, as the Jewish moralist and Holocaust survivor Elie Wiesel's description of what the Jewish victims faced at the hands of another monumentally criminal oppressors. Just as the victims' own description of their Holocaust outweighs any detractors and revisionist historians claims to the contrary - indeed even laws are being constructed in many Western nations to make it illegal to challenge the victims stories and the victims suffering and the victims version of what calamity befell them - so must the systematic genocide and depopulation, terrorizing, and inhuman subjugation of an innocent peoples in their own words must now replace the many Diaries of Anne Frank.” -- The endless trail of red herrings

1948: Lest We Forget

Hasbara or Za’bara

My Personal Story of Dispossession and Suffering

The Persistence of a Palestinian Family

I am a rebel, not a refugee, do you hear me?

And Learn WHO did it to the Palestinians, and to the Jews, WHY, and HOW (from non Palestinians for a change)

The Balfour Declaration by Arthur James Balfour to Lord Rothschild

The House of Rothschild is NOT a Za’bara!

What is the Iron Wall

Breaching the Iron Wall

Which god?

Contested Histories – Contested Narratives : It's only Beneficial Cognitive Diversity!

The Secret King of Zion – House of Rothschild and the new Roman Jerusalem

Rescuing a Failed Struggle From Its Narratives: A Response to Anna Baltzer

Rothschild Connection to World Government and Zionism: David Icke – Origins and Symbolism of the EU

The Jewish Genocides Against The Amelekites

Visit Lords of the Ring Rothschilds' Monument to Justice in Zionistan

“[And] Pray for the peace of Jerusalem, for our son Joel and all the IDF soldiers, for al those who have come to fight the Islamic enemy.”

And do visit the still ongoing Holocaust Museum in Palestine to witness that “Islamic enemy”

And so, finally, perhaps the thoughtful scratch their head

“Israel is not traumatized while committing such actions; but is traumatized while watching them”? -- Fri, 16 Oct 2009

How do the god's chosen people routinely get away with their saintly chutzpah?

With their repeatedly spitting and peeing on others?
With brazenly writing their own Mein Kampfs – 'The King's Torah'?
And without any effective repercussions to themselves?
With most of the world instead even joining them in celebration?
The odd moral-infighting aside that is: “A prominent rabbi of the Iranian Jewish community has urged his congregation to burn 'The King's Torah', a controversial book, which supports the murder of non-Jews. The Iranian rabbi, however, said on Monday that the book's message, in fact, directly contradicted the teachings of Moses. Rabbi Golestaninejad said the book was not based on the tenets of the Jewish faith.”
And the troubled goy's unsurpassed eloquence aside that is, which sees only one devil amidst thunderous applause from its own flock: “Jewry is the international albatross now hung around the neck of the world. What glorious destiny might have been ours without it. What we might have earned, what we might have discovered, what we might have accomplished without its enervating and meddling weight.”?
How is the entire world brazenly able to look at the finger pointing away at the moon, and yet only concentrate on the finger missing out all that heavenly glory?

That's How: by fabricating Zionism for a monstrous Hegelian Dialectic!

From Left-wing Reform Judeism of Moses Hess in 1828, to Right-wing Antediluvian Judeism of Rabbi Rabbi Yitzhak Shapira in 2009 – is one continuous synthesis in every generation to suit any genius in the flock to be returned to the Promised Land.

By Hook or by Crook!

Like the WWF wrestlers hurling mortal philosophy at each other in the pig-pen to attract the mesmerized crowd, while all the time sipping at the same trough outside the shit-hole, it is fed from the same coffers.

Despite repeated attempts to solicit condemnation from the elders, their silence affirms this Nietzscheian truth.

As with the secret of Samson's indomitable strength, this golem's (almost hidden) source of power lies deceptively elsewhere!

And that is the real Samson Option!

Want to get rid of the golem? You gonna have to pay in spades. This takes more than just writing scholarly books and conducting research into who's right and who's wrong. It takes more than just exercising one's enormous lung-power in weekend protest marches on catchy slogans which automatically get incremented each Nakba commemoration: “Our DATE is 60 years LATE, we shall return.” Instead of the voluminous lung-capacity, it's going to take unemotional brain-capacity – both “Mens et Manus” – to engineer the neutering of the golem, beginning rightly with one's own House of Negroe first. That's the only effective Way Forward:

Maps of 62 Years of Al Nakba, of deal making, peace processes, and Nobel Peace prizes

(The latest Palestinian Uncle Tom for the Nobel Peace Prize:

Dr. Mustafa Barghouti

see prediction here, its confirmation here, antidote here)

From Genocide to ReGenesis in ZERO Compromise - Preamble to Palestine: The Struggle Forward

But don't get rid of the golem – and you are next!

If you are still unconvinced, please read my appeal.

And visit From Genesis to Genocide in Palestine to witness what happens when Anna Baltzer's categories, Jewish, Israeli, and Zionist, overlap in the same person – when it's calculatingly combined in one 'ubermensch' entity – while you remain silent.

Watch carefully one's own future-history unravel in the mirror of the poor canary of Palestine.

Source URL: http://print-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2009/11/genesis-to-genocide-golem-not-jewish.html

The Missing Link of Monetary Reform: How?

The Real Challenge: Preamble

CBS 60 Minutes: “Is that tax money that the Fed is spending?”

Ben Bernanke: “It's not tax money. The banks have accounts with the Fed much the same way that you have an account in a commercial bank. So to lend to a bank, we simply use the computer to mark up the size of the account they have with the Fed. So it's much more akin, although not exactly the same, but it's much more akin to printing money then it is to borrowing.”

CBS 60 Minutes: “You've been printing money?”

Ben Bernanke: “Well effectively, and we need to do that because our economy is very weak, and inflation is very low. When the economy begins to recover, that'll be the time we need to unwind those programs, raise interest rates, reduce the money supply, and make sure that we have a recovery that does not involve inflation.”

--- Question to monetary reformers: how many falsehoods are in Ben Bernanke's utterance above?

--- Question to the public: wouldn't it be great if the public too can get to have monopoly money magically appear in our bank accounts every once in a while, like the banks do? What powers of persuasion do you think the Fed wield upon the government that they can make counterfeit money – just printing it whenever they want – and it magically becomes legal tender? But you and I can't print our own money whenever we want without going to jail for 100 years? How did that happen? How are such skilled powers of persuasion of the banksters to be effectively countered?

--- Reality check: Is there even any point to all this talk of monetary reform when absolutely no one among the who's who of reform will speak to the real issues of power that actually prevents all reform? The monetary reform agenda today is largely an academic conversation piece, to be debated in conferences, on websites, and a source of livelihood for the often indigent authors peddling their favorite solution on paper. Instead of all coming together on one singular platform, of taking the power of coining money away from private banksters gratuitously getting fat on usury, they energetically bicker among themselves on what solution to replace it with!

--- Challenge: Why not come together on what's common ground? And instead of pitching one's own new-and-better “mouse-trap”, create an unbiased monetary commission of monetary reformers and rebellious economists to look into all the proposals on the table, chartering them to come up with a recommendation, or series of recommendations or advocacies if you will, which in turn can be put on the ballot in each state for public adjudication? This is where perhaps all the conferencing, books, websites, speeches, television talk-shows, grass-roots activism to educate the public on the monetary commission's recommendations, can be made fertile pursuits rather than the present infertile conversations in conferences. That's how one builds up counter-power in a system where, as Hitler had aptly put it, “when the voting papers of the masses are the deciding factor; the decision lies in the hands of the numerically strongest group”. One has to work the system – unless one is working on overthrowing it! The former sometimes entails withholding the votes entirely to show the system's illegitimacy when both political parties and its electees represent the same corrupt oligarchic ruling interests, and other times it entails gathering the votes to show the same. That requires uniting on a common platform in order to gather enough votes!

Response to American Monetary Institute's 2009 National Conference on Monetary Reform , Chicago, September 24-27, 2009

California, September 14, 2009

My principal problem with modern monetary reformers is that they typically act like prima-donnas telling the ignorant public what is the best solution for them. Each one thinks they have just descended from the mountain with the tablet. Unless the implementation issues wrestled with in “Monetary Reform: Who will bell the cat?” and “The entrenched notion of Public Debt in America – will take a gestalt shift to overcome!” are addressed head-on, just more pipe-dreaming words from the mighty reformers applying the think-system invented by the “Music Man”. The following Huxley statement sums up my consternation with the present crop of monetary reformers completely:

“Well this is the real problem. Nothing is easier than to formulate high ideals, but few things are more difficult than to discover the means for by those ideals might be implemented, and the categorical imperatives which spring from them can be a pain. This is the real problem. I mean one has to dream, but one has to dream in a pragmatic way to consider how... Merely preaching to people doesn't have much effect, people have been preaching for an awefully long time and we are still pretty much where we were.”

The respected Prophet-Reformer of mankind, Moses, too had a great plan for his flock three millennium ago – “thou shall not kill” – but few have found the means to implement the glorious Ten Commandments even millennia later.

Watch below Ron Paul* candidly describe the unmatched legal power of the Federal Reserve and the American Elite way back in 1988 which makes even the mighty United States Congress powerless before them. This was reaffirmed 20 years later in the 2008 Bailout Bill!

Given the tortuous reality of the “Monetary Conspiracy for world Government” rapidly progressing towards fruition, how do the monetary reformers plan to counter it?

Do they think that the banksters and the elite will simply roll over and play dead so that a bunch of conscionable rebels can get their reforms passed in a Legislature and Executive which is entirely controlled by the oligarchs?

As was truthfully observed once before: 'Ah – but what if the “criminals” were to write the laws and the statutes themselves? Then, the conniving and conspiring isn't legally defined as a crime, nor the “criminals” called criminals. In fact, most are called bankers (emperors previously), and their instruments today, foundations (fleets previously)! Isn't that just peachy?'

What is the implementation plan, the How, to counter this entrenched legal power that gives the present monetary system its raison d'être – apart from “faith” and “hope” that is, that a “Jesus” will magically be found to throw the moneychangers out of the temple?

A rather straightforward challenge to monetary reform proponents.

Zahir Ebrahim

Project Humanbeingsfirst.org

Suggested Further Readings:

*Also see Ron Paul Related: My beef with the stellar congressman Hon. Ron Paul
Monetary Reform Related: Response to Ellen Brown's 'How to Resolve the Credit Crisis
Monetary Reform Related: Towards a Common Standard Benchmark for evaluating all Monetary Reform Proposals
Monetary Reform Related: Response to 'Sign Petition for a Monetary System That Puts People First - Open Letter to G-20'
Economic Reform Related: Letter to Editor: Response to 'G7 sets sights on new world economic order' February 15, 2009
Other Reform Related: A challenge to the aspiring reformers of the Journalism Profession
Monetary Reform Related: US treasury seeks action against Iranian banks, PressTv, October 6, 2009 (Tortuous Reality Check on Monetary Reform is repeatedly thrown in one's face for anyone not entirely lost in the immanent spaces of their ivory tower. The owners of the present monetary system wield a power so gargantuan, that they can strangulate the dissent of entire nations, and those whom they must, as the threat made by the US Treasury Secretary, Timothy Geithner, betrays. What of monetary reform conversations by a handful of overzealous reformers? Only indigenous institutions and nations banding together in Full Spectrum Alliances to reject the present hegemonic monetary system of the oligarchs – that is coercing all nations into the shared predicament of one-world government – and with real teeth to back their common stance in Full Spectrum Deterrence, can there be any power in monetary reform. The first order of business therein must be to get rid of the corrupt indigenous rulers and politicians who eagerly share in these inequities, who suffer from a surfeit of avarice and cowardice, and therefore, have no incentive to affect any reform. In the United States Congress, the present crop of Honorable office bearers could not even muster sufficient chutzpah to defeat the 2008 banksters bailout bill when almost the entire American nation was overwhelmingly with them!)
Monetary Reform Related: Letter to Ellen Brown on Monetary Reform. October, 16, 2009
Monetary Reform Related: Response To Steve Lendman's Abolish the Fed and Return Money Creation Power to Congress December 06, 2009
Monetary Reform Under Global Governance Related: Tutorial: The Brilliant Construction of World Order – Or a children's bedtime story December 2009
Monetary Reform Related: Letter to MIT Professor and former IMF Chief Economist, Simon Johnson, March 17, 2010
Monetary Reform Related: 'One thing is true – there is no substitute for critical thinking. If that leads to a real “paralysis”, then either the formulation of the problem or the approaches to solving it were faulty, but not the act of thinking. And if critical thinking indicates something is clearly suspicious, of dubious character, a Machiavellian red herring, then, not wishing to run on that treadmill surely cannot be considered “paralysis”! Furthermore, not knowing a solution for how to counter the great evil before us ought not to goad the well-intentioned to mindlessly run fast on treadmills in fear of otherwise “nit-pick[ing] ourselves into paralysis”. The realpolitik solution to “paralysis” is potency that can lead to efficacy, not more placebos whose only efficacy is psychological. I am forwarding this article to some others and may include it in my running compilation of the Missing Link of Monetary Reform (hence I have edited your good name out). That repository is just that – an unarguable demonstration that realpolitik is missing from the isolated pursuits of 'end the fed', 'break the bank', 'state owned banks', etc., of almost all the well-intentioned Monetary Reformers. The recognition of the massive global forces rapidly leading to Global Governance has been masked out by the idealists pushing reforms. That force whose effect is felt all around us but which cannot be seen, like the force of gravitation, prevents escape from Alice in Wonderland – unless “escape velocity” can be instrumented for that endeavor. And that can't be engineered if the force of gravitation remains unknown, never mind quantitatively taken into account (the escape velocity on Jupiter is different than on Earth)! When the foxes are arguing alongside the chickens that the world needs to have better coops to protect the chickens, to not see a problem with that – I only wonder if that might be considered a problem in itself? Seems to me that the foxes are counting on that very psychological cataract! They even call it a “benefical cognitive diversity” – remember Cass Sunstein, today President Obama's Information Czar in the White House?' Response to a correspondent on Breaking up the Big Banks April 23, 2010
Monetary Reform Related Self Defense: 'It is the (self-defense) responsibility of every denizen of the world to understand how humanity is being herded into global debt-enslavement and a centrally managed world-government, baby-step at a time, by manufacturing deliberate crisis and then proposing the next baby-step as its solution or fait accompli. Each baby-step erodes away some aspect of national sovereignty. 911 helped setup the global police state as a proposed solution to 'terrorism' – a manufactured product – to create the sine qua non mechanisms for world-government. “World government could only be kept in being by force”, as Bertrand Russell had put it. The latest financial crisis is designed to systematically create a central world-banking system, as a proposed solution to 'bad loans' – again a manufactured product – to be managed by a global banking cartel under legal sanction. “Give me control of a nation's money supply, and I care not who makes its laws”, as the Rothschild banking scions boldly narrate in almost every generation. “We shall have World Government, whether or not we like it. The only question is whether World Government will be achieved by conquest or consent.”' -- Statements of fact in the Monetary Reform Bibliography

Swine Flu: That Great Debate of 2009

Swine Flu: Fait Accompli

He had already said “It's fait accompli” --- vs. --- She consistently lied “It's voluntary”

The merit of the CASE IS IRRELEVANT because the mercenaries and vulgar propagandists' half truths always triumph over full lies!

The 'empire' plays to win strategically and can't be derailed by a handful of reactionary truth tellers after the manufactured crises have been affected – for had truth-telling any efficacy, Socrates might have been handed a trophy instead of the Hemlock, and Jesus the kingdom instead of the cross. The key to the success of Hegelian Dialectics over time, is the diabolical Fait Accompli sewn in baby-steps. The impact of the invasion of Iraq upon its peoples cannot be reversed by withdrawing the American troops anymore than the impact of the Pandemic can be reversed by arguing whether the vaccine is good or bad. The Pandemic has already created its intended fait accompli – for, 90% of the masses are not only ready today to take the vaccine but also demanding it. The secretive agenda probably is to inoculate at least 50% of the targeted populations in this generation, priming them for at least two things: microchipping, and staging for long term population reduction/culling through some complex biowarfare protocol. They will surely achieve 70 to 80 percent success towards that goal in this round of the pandemic pandemonium. And this is a conservative estimate. That's pretty damn remarkable social engineering for one baby-step fait accompli. More baby-steps to come. The overarching agenda for world-government and its multi-dimensional goals is long-term, across multiple generations, and hinges on irreversibility of small baby-steps to eventually raise the complete Phoenix of the New Atlantis from the systematically burnt ashes in stages of the old order. Under the guise of this Pandemic look how much has already been achieved: the immense loss of national sovereignty to WHO. Under its level-6 Pandemic alert, WHO now controls the emergency response stratagems in all nations that are signatory to its convention. That's most of the world!

As validation of what is stated above, just look at the long lines demanding the vaccine after the declaration of emergency by the President of United States

And the mass psychology driving the long lines is an Edward Bernays special. In CFR shill's own very perceptive words of October 16, 2009:

“... Having said that, does it work to mandate [vaccination]? I think what would work better would be to say that there was a shortage and people tend to buy more of something that's in demand. (Laughter.) We saw that -- there was one season where, really, people lined up all night to get a flu shot.

... we thought we were going to need two doses for every adult and since we are – only one dose, so, actually, we have twice as many doses and enough for the whole population at this point, I understand.”

Watch the entire incestuously-reinforcing CFR disinfo session on Pandemic Influenza this past October 16, 2009:

No one from the learned audience in the above video asked the distinguished panel of experts carefully assembled by the CFR (whose bios, it was explicitly stated, is on the web and “in your packets if you are here”), that how did they suddenly learn that now the public needed only a single doze of inoculation, when just a few months ago it was being heavily promoted as requiring multiple dozes?

No one asked them that where did they get the new scientifically valid data (as opposed to anecdotal one) to change their expert recommendations so rapidly within the span of just a couple of months, when the vaccines for this new pathogen are themselves very new and haven't been around long enough to carry out controlled double-blind studies of their efficacy over the long term to know how many dozes are needed – since the damn virus itself is new and never seen before on planet earth?

And if the older vaccines are imagined by their manufacturers to be very broad-spectrum, as the President of the United States presumed when he ordered several billion dollars worth without testing on the actual new virus, then why did the officials not know how many dozes will be needed just a few months ago? What new data was received in the span of just a few short months between the summer and fall?

And the most crucial aspect to this question, no one asked the distinguished panelists who spoke in all sorts of foreign accents, that if, by their own admission, this 2009 virus is “novel” and “lacks certain signatures which other pandemic influenza viruses have ... which suggest that this virus is not a 1918 like virus ... or 1957 or 1968 virus”, then they could not have possibly known of the older vaccines' efficacy on this new virus a priori any more than the newly patented vaccines, and therefore, when did they actually test the vaccines on the new virus and upon whom?

Because, practically speaking, how could they have tested the vaccines on the new virus (for any length of time) when they didn't even know, and surely now don't know, who actually has the virus and who doesn't since “the CDC abruptly advised states to stop testing for H1N1 flu, and stopped counting individual cases” way back in late July 2009?

So, where did the clinical testing data magically come from between the summer and fall, for the expert's statement: “we thought we were going to need two doses for every adult and since we are – only one dose,” – except out of thin air no differently than the missing WMDs in Iraq after the domain experts from that officialdom had similarly asserted that their “data” incontrovertibly indicated that these were there and about to be launched upon the United States unless the superpower invaded Iraq with the most absolute “shock and awe” immediately?

But the ubiquitous Dr. Nancy Snyderman of NBC says that “this is one time there is no conspiracy, listen to our government agencies, these guys are telling the truth. You know there is no conspiracy here folks. Get your damn vaccine.” Should we believe her and dreadingly also await the inevitable ex post facto “oops!” for this new nemesis of mankind?

Obviously not one science person in the audience, and those supposedly calling in their questions on Twitter, knew how to add 2 + 2 to become skeptical of the panelists' techno-babble gibberish anymore than any mainstream scientists have been of the official NIST report on the how the WTC towers catastrophically collapsed into their own footprints due to a short fire. No one among the questioners straightforwardly suggested to the expert CFR panelists that as per their own admission (quoted above), the simplest convincing explanation appeared to be their own one made in jest, that they were indeed artificially manufacturing demand for the swine flu vaccines for their own agendas!

But that's not the end of straightforwardness if one was actually permitted and inclined to ask questions freely as a science person is imagined to be wont. It could have gone straight down hill from there if even one person present had any courage to boldly ask the obvious followup questions and pushed the envelope of the CFR assembled experts' credibility right to the edge. One could, for instance, have put the following biowarfare related burning questions residing on many a skeptic's mind to the CFR panelists and given them an opportunity to counter all the nay-sayers rationally with reproducible scientific evidence rather than disparagingly as was actually done (see below):

a) what role did the secret bioweapons laboratories and their mad scientists play in fabricating this never before seen in nature hybrid virus, as by their own admission its signature is different from all other past pandemic viruses;

b) could they prove that the new virus occurred entirely naturally and that bioweapons labs played no black-ops role in its synthesis and dissemination when it is only they who possessed all the samples from the previous pandemic viruses and could indeed have more easily fabricated the new pathogen to their desired level of deadly pathogenicity than the poor pigs relying only on their natural pig-pens – just like 911 is more straightforwardly explained as an inside job, a coup d'etat, than as the surprise attack of a disgruntled Ali Baba upon the most armed to the teeth superpower from his underground caves in the Hindu Kush;

c) that, there definitely appeared to be so much incredulity in common in the officially designated nemesis in both cases, Osama Bin Laden and the pigs, that the public insists on seeing some verifiable proof this time around before submitting to the officialdom's remedies and could they kindly provide that proof since their own glowing bios, though undoubtedly stellar, were not sufficient evidence;

d) how could the big-Pharma have filed so many patents for the vaccines before the existence of the new virus itself was known, and remarkably, also just in time to profit from the sudden appearance of the virus as a pandemic, with WHO, CDC, and all governmental agencies coercively pushing these vaccines as the only solution upon the global public while giving blanket immunity from liability to the big-Pharma whose stock has gone soaring, and that why might not one conclude from all this that the pharmaceutical companies knew about the virus and its pandemic breakout schedule ahead of time and they are being given immunity from lawsuit because the vaccines are indeed dangerous and untested;

e) how could they make such accurate predictions of when the viral pandemic would burst on the world scene, even as a hypothetical case study, as for instance in the Air Force's April 1996 planning document “Alternate Futures for 2025” pg. 54 which stated: “in 2009, when an influenza pandemic struck”, and in IBM's 2006 interdepartmental memo whose very first bullet item stated: “There is a 100% chance that a Pandemic will occur within the next 5 years”;

f) that could they explain scientifically, how such predictions could be accurately made to come to pass by just the laws of chance on something as unpredictable as a mutating virus, without someone deliberately bringing it to fruition?

One could have further challenged the distinguished CFR panelists at this point by asking whether they were aware that the pandemic served CFR's own diabolical agenda of creating “an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece [to] accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault” as was blatantly stated by CFR's Richard Gardner in the April 1974 Foreign Affairs article Hard Road to World Order, and that they, as stellar scientists, but perhaps un-learned in the ways of Machiavellian social engineering, were being played as mere pawns for creating justifications towards that globalists' agenda?

Obviously, not one person in that carefully screened audience had ever read anything other their own science and medical text books. But strangely, no one from the internet Tweeted in those kinds of questions either (sic!). Indeed, one erudite questioner in physical attendance, someone who identified himself as being affiliated with Cornell Medical School (the man pictured in the CFR video image above), even preemptively described any skeptical questioning by the ever growing coalition of bipartisan nay-sayers in the world, as a sort of “Hitler-Stalin Pact” in this disparaging way:

“I think we are all aware that the anti-vaccine movement is having a field day on the internet and on media outlets like Fox News and so on, and causing reductions in vaccine uptake. And it appears a pretty unholy alliance of the ultra-right and the ultra-left working together as the sort of Hitler-Stalin pact (laughter), and I am not sure that we are countering these people very well ... and you have to take these people on in a different style than the scientists are used to. ... Crazy people who think the vaccine will kill you! ... How best we can to stop the anti-vaccine movement?”

It is surely not beyond the wit of those “crazy people” left standing after all that propaganda and giving the CFR's dog and pony show only some minor indigestion from their over-exuded hubris, to imagine that the following riot preparations, ostensibly for the masses demanding vaccine and not getting it – again an Edward Bernays Special Edition – is in reality for the “Hitler-Stalin pact” malcontents unwilling to play ball and actually refusing it:

But Judge for Yourself if unconvinced that there is more to this pandemic story, and consequently, more to the bizarre impetus behind the hook or by crook vaccinating the world's populations under its ‘booming, buzzing confusion’ than meets the eye. Or, if you'd rather skip to The Conclusion, or jump to the Preamble to better grasp the overarching dynamics behind the swine flu first, do it now.

Okay: So join Miss Piggy, Arnold Ziffle, Porky Pig, Pooh's Piglet and the Putnam Gang

Swine Flu: That Great Debate of 2009

THE AFFIRMATIVES

“This is one time there is no conspiracy, listen to our government agencies, these guys are telling the truth. You know there is no conspiracy here folks. Get your damn vaccine” — Dr. Nancy Snyderman, NBC’s Chief Medical Editor, August 2009

THE NEGATIVES

“Sky rocketing stock values of Novavax Inc., precipitated by dozens of flu deaths in Mexico, implicates a leading Anglo-American network of genetic engineers in a conspiracy to commit genocide” — Dr. Leonard Horowitz, April 2009

( PDF of the above powerpoint presentation is here ~5 MB )

FINAL ROUND

He said “It's a recipe for disaster” --- vs. --- She said “legal immunity”, no sweat!

He said “It's fait accompli” --- vs. --- She said “It's voluntary”

He files lawsuit in New York to halt the vaccination campaign “None of the vaccines against H1N1 have been properly tested” --- vs. --- She insists on vaccine safety with great authority as “the most important tool against the pandemic”!

He reviews “Early and Current Fears about Vaccine Dangers” --- vs. --- She delivers the current data “As of 11 October 2009, worldwide there have been more than 399232 laboratory confirmed cases of pandemic influenza H1N1 2009 and over 4735 deaths reported to WHO.”

He finally argues “remember the swine flu scare of 1976?”

--- vs. --- And she strongly recommends “trust your government, trust the scientists, and take 3 shots”!

Are you pulling your remaining hair out by now?

THE JUDGES

Email a friend an invitation to come and judge with Miss Piggy and the Putnam Gang

THE CONCLUSION

H1N1 Conclusion: Whether or not there is a real Swine Flu pandemic raging, whether or not it may be real biowarfare, or mainly psyops being waged upon the unsuspecting world's public in combination with other fabricated global threats, I am saying 'NO' to Swine Flu Vaccination. All this heavy-handed hullaballoo appears to me to be yet another “war on terrorism” to fabricate a global pretext for quite a different agenda from the publicized one. The real agenda this time around being to inoculate the world public with something inimical in the guise of fighting the pandemic. This is more than simply an attempt to sell vaccines of dubious efficacy for hefty corporate profiteering. It suspiciously appears to be the new “imperial mobilization” of the long wished for population reduction agenda, 'to “prime” populations worldwide'. The threat of the A/H1N1 virus killing some (or many) people may well be real even if manufactured, just like 911 – the “new pearl harbor” – was a real demonstration of fabricated threat by controlled demolition which killed many thousand people. But under these dubious 'sky is falling' conditions made to “look like a great ‘booming, buzzing confusion’ to use William James’ famous description of reality,” the most rational and commonsensical course of action under conflicting claims of vaccine safety and efficacy backed by draconian 'police-state' policies to forcibly administer it: 1) take one's statistical chances with the “pandemic” rather than with its forced “cure”; 2) permit the human body's own natural defenses to fight the disease if infected, rather than be aided into oblivion by its purported helper, the vaccine! (See Note on Vaccination for additional clarity)

Read the forensic points upon which this conclusion is based
Read more gory details of the deconstruction of this psyop in the April–May 2009 Swine Flu Report here
Understand the crucial bottom-line here
See the deconstruction of the Digital Cacophony here
See the construction of the Ultimate Revolution here
See That Great Debate of 2009 here
AFP October 15, 2009: Lawsuit seeks to halt US swine flu vaccination campaign (“None of the vaccines against H1N1 have been properly tested,” The suit was brought on behalf of a group of doctors, nurses and other medical personnel in New York, where health care professionals who see patients are required to be vaccinated against H1N1, ...) (cached)
New Discovery Nov 05, 2009: Guilty of Insider Trading “Morning Joe” Features Dr. Nancy “Get your damn vaccine” Snyderman and NYT report on Dr. Nancy Snyderman August 21, 1999

Source URL: http://print-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2009/11/swine-flu-fait-accompli.html

About Us

About

The Plebeian Antidote To Hectoring Hegemons

Fresh Air

Opening up the Discussion Space here on urgent matters of human concern. Main Index here. Pubs Index here. Topical Index here. Press Releases here. Download PDF here. View Printable here. Mirror here. Mirror Blog here. Comments Page here. Contact here. Book 'Prisoners of the Cave' here. About its author here. 'My Little Jihad' here. Feel free to take anything, thoughts, words, madness, sanity, courage, foolishness, but do see the big copyright and fine print legal notices first. Home is humanbeingsfirst.org.

Please see Welcome Letter and Letter to Muslims.

Modernity Simplified

What is all this verbiage by Project Humanbeingsfirst^TM really all about? Is there a reductionist and simplified explanation at the level of a 'poor-man'?

Yes. In the simplest terms: 'Might defines right'.

This leads to “Hegemony is as old as mankind”.

That in turn leads to the following psychological pathocracy – some call it empire:

If we don't have real enemies then we have to create or imagine some, and yell 'we are being attacked' in order to, principally:
a) justify one's hegemonic barbarianism upon others; and
b) motivate an unwilling plebeian peoples into sacrificing for the conquests of the oligarchic elite.

Euphemistically, today as the winning empire, this is called “imperial mobilization”.

Grotesquely, for previously defeated empires, it is called “quest for Lebensraum”.

That's all there is to it.

All which follows is only in further examination of how that is accomplished under the veneer of “democracy”, because, in the absence of such deception, “democracy is inimical to imperial mobilization”. That quoted statement was made by Zbigniew Brzezinski in his 1997 book: The Grand Chessboard – American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives.

This “quest for Lebensraum” (German word for acquiring more space as an imperative), ahem, “imperial mobilization” of the ruling oligarchy, the ubermensch (German word for superior, above all others), just happens to be the age-old quest for one-world government in disguise.

It is to be achieved piece-meal, incrementally, one fait accompli at a time, one fabricated crisis at a time, one manufactured war at a time, one real or imagined pestilence at a time, and one catastrophe at a time.

The psychological pathocracy of modern statecraft requires continuous threats, crises, and uncertainty, to corral the democratic instincts of the modern public into accepting the unpleasant totalitarian agendas of the ruling oligarchy.

The solution presented for addressing each uncertainty is the next baby-step towards centralized global control of all humanity in a global empire of the financial oligarchy.

That world order, the new world order, as we can already perceive even in its initial stages, is governed with moral relativism wherein, legal opinions as those proclaimed by a United States Justice before its Supreme Court, prevail:

'Nothing is more certain in modern society than the principle that there are no absolutes, that a name, a phrases, a standard has meaning only when associated with the considerations which give birth to nomenclature. To those who would paralyze our Government in the face of impending threat by encasing it in a semantic strait-jacket, we must reply that all concepts are relative.'

The term 'oligarchic elite' refers to people who are several notches above – and more hidden from public view in their enormous wealth and their secretive exercise of 'social engineering' – than what is typically understood by the term 'ruling elite', or simply the 'elite'. The latter often refers to the generally affluent 1% of any society, more interested in being rich and running corporations than in 'social engineering', and many among them can be found in the Forbes' richest people listing.

But one will never see a Rothschild, or David Rockefeller listed in Forbes billionaires list. That's perhaps because they are trillionaires, with all their massive wealth legally hidden behind private tax-exempt foundations, and in their opaque ownership of private banks, which in turn own many a private central bank! They can muster vast sums of private monies for 'social engineering', and administer untold funds through their tax-exempt foundations and think-tanks. They are the proverbial 'king makers' who craft 'errand boys' to do their policy bidding.

To unmask them all before fait accompli is Project Humanbeingsfirst's imperative – i.e., before it's all a done deal.

Ex post facto, narrators can rehearse the deceptions and their disentanglement all in the comforts of one-world government. And of course laugh their way to fame and fortune just as today's narrators call it erudite scholarship to openly rehearse the settlement of the Americas and the genocide of millions of its indigenous peoples.

Even the sixth graders in elementary schools today throughout the North American continent learn of the choice between the gattling-gun (force) and the small-pox laden bacteriological warfare (treachery) magnanimously offered to the indigenous natives, without batting their own eye-lids or offering a few tears in compensation.

Detachment from history and from previous generations who inflict crimes upon the 'lesser humanity', the 'untermenschen' (German word for 'lesser peoples'), evidently washes away both the evidence and the guilt. But not the bold and often truthful narratives which become openly public, and their bearers lauded scholars and touted academics.

In the transition to the modernity of today, the euphemisms have become considerably refined with the march of Western civilization. It is now the more egalitarian choice between “democracy” (euphemism for force) and “revolution” (euphemism for treachery) under the dialectical “either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists”, that is being magnanimously offered to the indigenous natives along the “arc of crisis” in the “Global Zone of Percolating Violence”. The objectives unfortunately remain the same as in antiquity – by hook or by crook usurping what does not belong to one. The two quoted descriptive phrases are once again Zbigniew Brzezinski's, respectively from a January 15, 1979 Time magazine article titled 'IRAN: The Crescent of Crisis', and from Brzezinski's already mentioned 1997 book.

Thusly, in the case of our modernity as well, perhaps only our progeny might also bear truthful witness to the crimes and sham of intellectualism of their hypocritical ancestors – scholars, leaders, military-men, holy-men, politicians, teachers, news-bearers, both in the West and the East, on the left and the right – who hath proclaimed to stand for truth, but who only aided and abetted vile hegemonic power with their own convolutions and confabulations. Modernity du jour is entirely unwilling to unravel their confusing and deceptive narratives.

We must wait a 100 years, or perhaps only 20, before anyone who is a somebody will again truthfully proclaim how new 'smallpox laden blankets' were used to fashion one-world government. Before then, it is all to be dismissed as 'conspiracy theory'.

This is why, as had been self-servingly predicted by the Council on Foreign Relations in 1974:

'... it will look like a great ‘booming, buzzing confusion’ to use William James’ famous description of reality, but an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault.'

That, in the simplest of terms, is Modernity Simplified to the level of a 'poor-man' (i.e., one with limited ability, or time, to carefully read, write, and reason about the times one lives in).

Read minimal expansion upon this basic explanation in The Poor-Man's Guide to Modernity here.

Read Project Humanbeingsfirst's Welcome Letter to comprehend a common man's role in that modernity.

Endorsement

If you feel that any of the documents of Project Humanbeingsfirst speak for you, that you ought to have authored them, then you may add your public endorsement to the specific document as its virtual author of conscience. A subsequent confirmation step is required. For endorsement request, please click here.

Contact

Please write to Humanbeingsfirst@gmail.com

Legal-N-Things

Full Copyright Notice

All material copyright (c) Project Humanbeingsfirst^TM, with full permission to copy, repost, and reprint, in its entirety, unmodified, for any purpose, granted, provided the full URL sentence and the copyright notice contained within each Document are also reproduced verbatim as part of this license, along with any embedded links within its main text, and not doing so may be subject to copyright license violation infringement claims pursuant to remedies noted at http://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap5.html. All figures, images, quotations, and excerpts are used without permission based on non-profit "fair-use" for personal education and research use only in the greater public interest. The usage is minimally consistent with the understanding of laws noted at http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 of US Copyright Laws, you are provided the material from Project Humanbeingsfirst upon your request, and taking any action that delivers you any of its documents in any form is considered making a specific request to receive the documents for your own personal educational and/or research use. You are directly responsible for seeking the requisite permissions from other copyright holders for any use beyond “fair use”. Exclusion: All rights are expressly reserved for the usage of the terms (c) Humanbeingsfirst^TM and (c) Humanbeingfirst^TM which are the copyrighted and trademarked intellectual property of Project Humanbeingsfirst^TM. Reproduction Note: It is acceptable to reproduce any document in smaller serialized parts provided the full URL sentence and the copyright notice within each document are also reproduced in each part and the entire document is reproduced.

Legal Disclaimer Notice

1) Project Humanbeingsfirst^TM asserts that as human beings first, one is entitled to all the inalienable Human Rights noted in http://www.hrweb.org/legal/undocs.html, including those of free thought and free expressions of those thoughts in addition to of course not being the victims of any hectoring hegemons. Freedom of expression stops at the threshold of justice. If one is offended by these simple moral truths, one has the equal right to not be here.

2) Project Humanbeingsfirst documents often contain external links as citations and references, and sometimes incorporate and/or embed external media content. The other content of these external websites, as well as the external links/media used by Project Humanbeingsfirst, is the sole responsibility of their respective owners/authors and Project Humanbeingsfirst cites each external link or embeds media content only for academic, scholarly, and/or documentation purpose as specifically pertaining to the topic at hand in its own presentation. Project Humanbeingsfirst is not affiliated with these external sources nor responsible for any of their actions, speech, or thoughts, whether legal or otherwise. 3) Public's voices added through comments or email or letter contact with Project Humanbeingsfirst, termed “contact voices”, come under the purview of “fair use” and may be reproduced and reused elsewhere without notice. 4) These “contact voices”, howsoever the contact is made, are obviously only their respective owner's, whomsoever they might be, and are not reflective of Project Humanbeingsfirst and nor is Project Humanbeingsfirst responsible for that or any other content owned/linked to by these “contact voices”. 5) Men and women of conscience who endorse the work of Project Humanbeingsfirst or become “virtual authors” of its documents as echoing their own heartfelt sentiments, or anyone in the world or on another planet links to Project Humanbeingsfirst documents, obviously do so at their own moral imperative, for their own purposes, and Project Humanbeingsfirst is not affiliated with them nor responsible for their actions, speech, or thoughts, whether legal or otherwise.

6) Any interference with peoples' rights to access the freely available documents of Project Humanbeingsfirst in any shape or form, is denying their unalienable right to be educated and informed, and is thus deemed akin to preventing the public from visiting a library making such interference liable under the same civil and/or criminal laws as might be applicable in such case.

7) Anything that is not covered above, is covered by the blanket statement that Project Humanbeingsfirst stands firm by its claim of being the Plebeian Antidote to Hectoring Hegemons. Project Humanbeingsfirst does not solicit funds nor accepts donations. All Project Humanbeingsfirst's opinions in any form, essays, reports, letters, books, etc., are completely gratis. Thus it is completely independent of all co-opting pressures, except perhaps that of the proverbial loaded gun with its trigger cocked when put to its head. When that happens, you may know it – look for complete silence, echoes of the hectoring hegemons' own core lies and axioms, and political science absurdities. It is entirely your responsibility to adjudicate Project Humanbeingsfirst's bombastic self-portrayal; to carefully validate its reports before accepting any opinion, informed or not, on the mere basis of its self-serving claim to forthrightness; and to think for yourself. Those who allow others to think for them, often end up prematurely dead. Most people however rather die than think, and evidently they do; Project Humanbeingsfirst is not in the 'saving' business. No opinion of Project Humanbeingsfirst should be deemed as offering any sort of advice, legal or medical advice, whether solicited or unsolicited, even when its positions at times may strongly and very boldly contradict conventional and/or official wisdom with copious commonsense and rational analyses to back it. You get what you paid – and you paid exactly zero monies here. There is no transaction.

8) Project Humanbeingsfirst is only responsible for its own work, both its credit, if any, and its penalties for taking its unvarnished positions in the pursuit of justice.

9) Any grievances against Project Humanbeingsfirst may be addressed in court. Please also see fine print in caveat emptor.

Caveat Emptor

Please be advised that Project Humanbeingsfirst^TM fully cooperates with all law enforcement and other governmental agencies worldwide in rooting out Terrorism in all its nuanced shades and stripes in order to end its Neanderthal reign of terror upon all who are human beings first. Project Humanbeingsfirst does not distinguish between terrorists clad in turbans and those wearing suits, nor between the predatory rampages of the pirates vs. the emperors, albeit each is apportioned the measure of crime and guilt commensurate to their respective station of power and impact on their victims. Law enforcement personnel worldwide, but especially in the United States and the West, are encouraged to participate with Project Humanbeingsfirst. It is essential for all nations' state security apparatus to learn how to forensically identify the monumental supreme terrorists hiding in plain sight among us under legal cover, the real merchants of death, while they dutifully chase down the easy to spot handful of often deliberately manufactured pirates at sea.

The Palestine Re-Settlement Business

The Invisible Octopus

It's called an Oligarchy

The Revolution Business

I have a dream

Modern Medicine, Rockefellers, Big Pharma, Eugenics, Vaccination, and us

Agenda 21 For Dummies

Ushering in Big Brother: Inventing the CMOS Imaging Sensor - Good or Bad?

Remembering Steve Jobs

Iranian President Ahmadinejad takes on the Hectoring Hegemons on their own turf at the UN

Islam Through FBI Eyes?

Can this TSA vagina probe happen to your teenage daughter?

Why ostriches are very happy creatures...

Click on image to read that essay

Tutorial - What is the pertinence of destroying Theism for Secular Humanism

What is War on Terror?

911 and Imperial Mobilization Redux

Justice is a delicacy best served cold, preferably in cold blood - Sentenced to 86 years in Jail

So What Is REAL JUSTICE - Not in Newspeak but in Realityspeak?

And Real Pursuit of Justice?

Western Civilization's Tryst With Justice

Palestine Current

From Genesis to Genocide in Palestine

The Missing Link of Monetary Reform: How?

Swine Flu Conclusion of 2010

Swine Flu: That Great Debate of 2009

Books

About Us

About

Fresh Air

Modernity Simplified

Endorsement

Contact

Legal-N-Things

Full Copyright Notice

Legal Disclaimer Notice

Caveat Emptor

Archives

Also See

Didn't find it? Search Project Humanbeingsfirst