The Decapitation of Pakistan by its own Military!

Zahir Ebrahim
September 28, 2009 | Revised November 02, 2009
Author's Note, Nov. 02, 2009: Pakistanis, apparently, simply cannot perceive that “insurgency” is manufactured – judging by the asinine questions they asked the Secretary of State Hillary Clinton during her visit to Pakistan last week. Every one of them was simplistic and devoid of any appreciation for the political science behind “imperial mobilization”. Ignoring the mercenaries, traitors, and vulgar propagandists at work in Pakistan, many well-meaning Pakistanis are entirely confused. Therefore, this revision draws upon some stark lessons learnt from Iraq to further substantiate the original report. See additional evidence and extensive deconstruction of mythologies in The Pakistan Decapitation Papers.
© Project HumanbeingsfirstTM. Permission granted to use freely as per copyright notice

[PHBF Report] Dateline Sept. 28 to Nov. 02, 2009, California, United States
Let me begin this very difficult exposition as a Pakistani citizen (my only citizenship, by choice, despite being a legal permanent resident in the United States for almost three decades) with the question Who really killed Benazir Bhutto? [1] I mean who are the prime-movers?
The trigger-pullers are obviously irrelevant and remain faceless. They will surely never be known.
Well, let's read it in Benazir Bhutto's own lucid words which have now been augmented, almost two years later, with the Pakistan's Army Chief of Staff's belated disclosures of September 21, 2009. [2] Why belated? Well, please see these unpublished letters to many Pakistani newspaper editors on their repeatedly perpetuating the fiction of Who Killed Benazir Bhutto in cahoots with the 'hectoring hegemons' and their agents! All traitors and co-opted errand boys. [3]
The American agenda for Pakistan is not a state-secret. Rather, it is only thinly disguised as perpetually fighting the “insurgents” in a lifetime of war, the World War IV. [4] Whereas, in reality, both the “insurgency”, and the “counter-insurgency”, are entirely designed and fabricated in the USA as part of the evolving tactics of Hegelian Dialectics. They are enacted on the ground by various two-bit errand boys and expert trigger pullers. The already well-known existence of black-ops assassination squads in Pakistan/Afghanistan, known to the local peoples for years as the real prime-movers behind the heinous local terrorist acts, belatedly confirmed by NYT, WP, and NYT, in August 2009. [5] See these two December 2008 reports on the Mumbai terrorist Act as reportedly orchestrated by ALI BABA from his perch in the Hindu Kush. [6] The arrival of the black-ops in the region is not recent, albeit the public disclosures might be.
Starting in the immediate aftermath of 911, and perhaps even earlier, Pakistan may well have become the largest deployment region for the CIA in modern times, both covert (unknown to Pakistani government and secretly working to destabilize Pakistan with false-flag operations), and overt (with Pakistani military's aiding and abetting, in full view of the world, ostensibly fighting the “insurgents”, “Bin Laden”, “Al-Qaaeda”, but in the process mainly “tickling” its own innocent civilians in many a barbaric way). [7]
And since Jundallah got launched to destabilize Iran from Pakistani soil (their “insurgencies”), Baluchistan along with the Pak-Afghan regions have been awash with black-ops, and obviously of course, also with officially recognized US soldiers manning American military bases on Pakistani soil. [8] But these soldiers of freedom were rarely spotted in the streets of major cities before. The following video report of September 08, 2009, therefore portends of ominous whirlwinds imminently engulfing Pakistan: [9]
RussiaToday September 08, 2009, Contractors in Pakistan: are troops next?
To put this ominous presence of soldiers of freedom and fortune on Pakistani soil in full black-ops context of NATO and the Western Alliance, of diabolically manufacturing and sustaining the very pretexts out of uniform to enable the in-uniform forces to continue on with their perpetual mission of fighting World War IV, it is sufficient to look at what is transpiring in IRAQ for lessons to wisely apply to one's own predicament in order to avoid a far worse one.
Fast forwarding past all the initial pretenses of Sadaam Husain being responsible for 911, his WMDs about to destroy America, the Mission Accomplished statement of President Bush, and the “oops! intelligence failure” statements by the neo-con's own Iraq Study Group after the raping of Mesopotamia and the DNA of its ancient and proud peoples were fait accompli, etceteras, the biggest reason for not withdrawing the US troops from Iraq is continually stated to be the infernal ongoing INSURGENCY. Iran, Shias, Sunnis, and Al-Qaeeda are variously blamed for the main cause of America's continued military occupation of Iraq; new “troop-surges” are periodically announced amidst some dissenting consternation willy-nilly expressed in its news media and by its politicians to let the American public know that it is not an easy choice to be making. The Iranian strawman has already been amply unraveled elsewhere. [10] However, witness the following familiar statement of former President George W. Bush on the legend of the new Ali Baba [11] of Mesopotamia, Abu Musab Al-Zarqawi: [12]
“You know, I hate to predict violence, but I just understand the nature of the killers. This guy, Zarqawi, an al Qaeda associate -- who was in Baghdad, by the way, prior to the removal of Saddam Hussein -- is still at large in Iraq. And as you might remember, part of his operational plan was to sow violence and discord amongst the various groups in Iraq by cold- blooded killing. And we need to help find Zarqawi so that the people of Iraq can have a more bright -- bright future.” -- George W. Bush, Press Conference, 1 June 2004
The indefatigable Michel Chossudovsky, citing Bush's afore-quoted statements wrote: “Zarqawi constitutes Washington's justification for the continued military occupation of Iraq, not to mention the brutal siege of densely populated urban areas directed against 'Al Qaeda in Iraq' which is said to be led by Zarqawi.” [13]
It is now November 02, 2009 – and the United States is still very much in Iraq. Its own economy is in deep recession, and the free-money printing by the Feds is taking it towards hyperinflation. The world is not only mired in its worst global financial crisis that is seeing the end of Western hegemony in its industrial production capabilities, but is also plagued by a global pandemic, global warming, and an un-ending global war on terror, sinking valuable trillions of dollars which could otherwise have been spent on converting overnight the entire world's six billion population into America's middle class status of the 1960s, while also wiping out much of the developing nations' unbearable debt. That alone would most assuredly have earned the United States the genuine love of the entire world instead of the present shoes thrown at its all powerful president. How remarkably has the world's sole superpower been brought down so pathetically to its knees by the Ali Baba of Iraq that today it cannot even extricate itself from giving a diabolical police-state to its own peoples in the pretext of saving them from the global terrorist! What sort of idiotic “American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives” agenda, and what kind of asinine quest for “Full Spectrum Dominance” is this? [14] Wow Ali Baba, what magical powers you have of not only so successfully entangling the United States in the Iraqi “quagmire” indefinitely, but of being the prime-mover behind the demise of nation-states to usher in the only permissible solution out of these multifaceted global threats – world government! [15]
Focussing on the pertinence at hand however, what does the Ali Baba of Iraq have to do with the following shocking news reports purveyed in titles which are illustrative enough of the key point: “Were British Special Forces Soldiers Planting Bombs in Basra?” September 25, 2005 ; British “Undercover Soldiers” Caught driving Booby Trapped Car “They refused to say what their mission was.” September 20, 2005. [16]
Michel Chossudovsky, writing the latter article and displaying his un co-opted integrity, asked the 64-million dollar obvious questions – the same modus operandi being replayed in Pakistan with even more drastic effect, as now the black-ops have been hardened in Iraq on how not to get caught when plenty of patsies can be trivially harvested for the job of “legitimizing Insurgency” [17] – which none appear to be publicly asking in Pakistan:
'The following Reuters report raises some disturbing questions.
Why were undercover British “soldiers” wearing traditional Arab headscarves firing at Iraqi police?
The incident took place just prior to a major religious event in Basra.
The report suggests that the police thought the British soldiers looked “suspicious”. What was the nature of their mission?
Occupation forces are supposed to be collaborating with Iraqi authorities. Why did British Forces have to storm the prison using tanks and armoured vehicles to liberate the British undercover agents?
“British forces used up to 10 tanks” supported by helicopters “to smash through the walls of the jail and free the two British servicemen.”
Was there concern that the British “soldiers” who were being held by the Iraqi National Guard would be obliged to reveal the nature and objective of their undercover mission?
A report of Al Jazeera TV, which preceded the raid on the prison, suggests that the British undercover soldiers were driving a booby trapped car loaded with ammunition. The Al Jazeera report (see below) also suggests that the riots directed against British military presence were motivated because the British undercover soldiers were planning to explode the booby trapped car in the centre of Basra: ...'
See: Who is behind “Al Qaeda in Iraq”? Pentagon acknowledges fabricating a “Zarqawi Legend”, in which the Washington Post of April 10, 2006, in its rare moment of candor – just like the New York Times' ex post facto exposé of April 20, 2008 on the Pentagon using retired Generals as mercenaries for hire to blatantly lie on American television in order to drum public support for the Iraq war [18] – is quoted in full context as follows: [19]
'“The Zarqawi campaign is discussed in several of the internal military documents. "Villainize Zarqawi/leverage xenophobia response," one U.S. military briefing from 2004 stated. It listed three methods: "Media operations," "Special Ops (626)" (a reference to Task Force 626, an elite U.S. military unit assigned primarily to hunt in Iraq for senior officials in Hussein's government) and "PSYOP," the U.S. military term for propaganda work..." (WP. 10 April 2006)
The military's propaganda program, according to the Washington Post, has "largely been aimed at Iraqis, but seems to have spilled over into the U.S. media. One briefing slide about U.S. "strategic communications" in Iraq, prepared for Army Gen. George W. Casey Jr., the top U.S. commander in Iraq, describes the "home audience" as one of six major targets of the American side of the war." (WP, op cit.)
An internal document produced by U.S. military headquarters in Iraq, states that "the Zarqawi PSYOP program is the most successful information campaign to date.”'
With that precious lesson in “imperial mobilization” through sustained PSYOP and manufactured “insurgency” learnt from our brethren Muslim nation of Iraq – where, in retrospect, and in moments of reflection through their daily strife and humiliation, its beleaguered people must surely ponder upon what could they have possibly done earlier, before 1990, during the iron-reign of Sadaam Hussein, and throughout those horrible intervening 13 years of Western hegemonic sanctions, to have avoided this new dismal fate altogether – let's return to Pakistan.
The multimodal approaches to destabilizing, and consequently balkanizing Pakistan under the fabled pretext of its own illusive Ali Baba, “Osama Bin Laden”, have been so transparent, that today, finally, many a retired con-fession artist are getting in on the act to claim the flag of patriotism. [20] Going for hajj after having eaten 900 mice is the favorite pastime of Pakistani praetorian guards. I am only waiting for any sitting Pakistani General to rise to that occasion, if it's not already too late! [21] But I am afraid it probably is – see here, here, here, here, and here. [22]
The decapitation of Pakistan by Pakistan's finest, wantonly justifying the inglorious 'white man's burden' – the same old 'la mission civilisatrice' under a new name – upon impoverished indigenous shoulders! [23] Even Martin Luther Kings' penetrating description fails to do justice to the scale of calamity in Pakistan: [24]
“The white establishment is skilled in flattering and cultivating emerging leaders. It presses its own image on them and finally, from imitation of manners, dress, and style of living, a deeper strain of corruption develops. This kind of Negro leader acquires the white man's contempt for the ordinary Negro. He is often more at home with the middle-class white than he is among his own people. His language changes, his location changes, his income changes, and ultimately he changes from the representative of the Negro to the white man into the white man's representative to the Negro.”
The shameful and criminal dislocation of up to 2.4 million civilians in May of this year was rightly described as “an exodus that is beyond biblical”. [25]
Swat exodus biblical. UK Independent, May 31, 2009, caption: In Pakistan, an exodus that is beyond biblical; Photo Rashid Iqbal/EPA, source UK Guardian, May 11, 2009, caption: People flee Pakistan's restive Swat valley after a curfew was temporarily lifted to allow people to leave the intensifying conflict
Just as from the USSR's point of view in yesteryear, the “insurgency” against them in Afghanistan was foreign inculcated, entirely fabricated in the USA (as we know today but held as a closely guarded secret then), which thus forced the Soviets to apply counter-insurgency measures, and subsequently, an outright invasion of Afghanistan (read Brzezinski's own statements in Saving Pakistan, and watch Brzezinski speak in this video clip devilishly crafting the “insurgency” for the Russians on the Pak-Afghan border); the so called “insurgency” in Pakistan is also calculatingly fabricated, ab initio, in the USA through covert intervention and black-ops. [26] Subsequently, with sufficient “tickling” during the overt counter-insurgency operations, and by astutely harvesting all the cultural cracks and lacunae of the people, the “insurgency” acquires a reactionary life of its own. [27]
That latter stage, as well as on-going black-ops induced wanton acts of terrorism using the pre-“tickled” dupes and patsies as now rapidly transpiring, October 9-12, 2009, NYT, NYT – like the secret and 'officially denied' component of NATO's Operation Gladio in Western Europe of yesteryear which blamed it on the communists to keep an increasingly skeptical public's fear of the then boogieman du jour continually alive – are Machiavellianly projected in the news media, by the native informants, by the fabricated dissent-chiefs, and the Mighty Wurlitzer, as INSURGENCY. [28] And therefore, it is officially argued, an unarguable raison d'être for continuing the barbaric counter-insurgency to implement the writ of the state. This predictably creates a self-sustaining destabilization as both commonsense and political science 101 would inform even an imbecile. The blood-drenched puppetshow so enacted, inevitably affords a compelling pretext to the puppetmasters to justify their own military intervention to “save” the people who are incapable of doing it themselves.
The innocent Pakistan military, not too well-versed in political science or Hegelian Dialectics based Machiavellian state-craft (I presume), in this prelude to NATO forces marching in, is similarly being compelled to take real counter-insurgency measures like the Soviets. Aided and abetted of course by high ranking traitors from within their own ranks, and by their foreign paymasters' militaries (NATO, Blackwater now renamed Xe, and other un-named foreign divisions operating within Pakistan which I call “Jundallah-plusplus” to distinguish them from “Jundallah” which is apparently targeting Iran from Pakistani soil). The simple fact that Pakistan is supplying all the drinking water (bottled by Nestle), and full logistics channel for war-making supplies to NATO in Afghanistan is telling in and of itself. Pakistan is equally responsible for destroying the Afghan society, the Afghan people, and there is no less spilled-blood of innocent Afghani Muslims upon Pakistan's hands over the past 30 years, than upon the United States'.
Pakistani military helped destroy Afghanistan, and they are now helping to destroy Pakistan. No Pakistani civilian I know, including myself, ever authorized the Pakistani military to destroy Afghanistan, or aid the United States in its own hegemonic plans on the Grand Chessboard. Do you know anyone? So from where did they get their mandate? I would rather have clean drinking water in my tap, damn it! What good are the bloody nukes when they become the raison d'être for our very destruction in this manner without ever firing a single missile at the drones that are killing our own peoples?
It gives me no pleasure to repeatedly rehearse this footnote to history. What is not already obvious to the Pakistanis? It must surely still occur to many a reasonable military man serving with genuine zeal and honor in the real pivot of power in Pakistan that the end is drawing near. What are they doing idly watching the battle of their lives from the sidelines – when they are not shooting or displacing their own peoples that is? As quoted from a Dawn newspaper column:
“THIS article poses two questions: on the day after US/Nato forces invade and occupy some of Balochistan and Waziristan, what will we say we should have done, and why aren’t we doing it now? Is this far-fetched? ... One hopes that a small group of patriotic officers in Pakistan are also asking themselves what can be done, and why aren’t we doing it now.” [29]
Gentlemen may cry, Peace, Peace--but there is no peace. The war is actually begun! The next gale that sweeps from the north will bring to our ears the clash of resounding arms! And that's the tortuous déjà vu reality today. [30]
If one is genuinely confused about who is the enemy, whether it's the Taliban, Al-Qaeeda, Islamism, Militant Islam, unknown foreign fighters, foreign intelligence agencies, India, Israel, American interests, or the United States' globalist oligarchs hell bent on criminally realizing their one-world government agenda by fabricating and harvesting “revolutionary times” across the planet, [31] please spend some time reviewing the book The Pakistan Decapitation Papers available from Project [32] Write to me if you are still uncertain about who is behind “tickling” the so called “insurgents” into existence, and why that is necessary in order to fight the lifetime of World War IV with our blood. After all, God is on your side! [33]
Caption Zbigniew Brzezinski on the Pak-Afghan Border: 'God is on your side'!

Footnotes April 03, 2003, Ex-CIA director: U.S. faces 'World War IV' by Charles Feldman and Stan Wilson,
[5] NYT August 19, 2009 C.I.A. Sought Blackwater’s Help to Kill Jihadists
The Washington Post August 20, 2009 , CIA Hired Firm for Assassin Program
NYT August 20, 2009, C.I.A. Said to Use Outsiders to Put Bombs on Drones
The Miami Herald, Oct. 02, 2009, Scores of bodies found in Pakistan's Swat valley By Saeed Shah, McClatchy Newspapers
Los Angeles Times April 13, 2008, Bomb blast in Iran mosque kills 9
'Bombings are rare in Iran, but insurgencies have been blamed for some deadly bomb attacks in recent years. In February 2007, a car loaded with explosives blew up near a bus carrying members of Iran's Revolutionary Guard, killing 11 of them. In 2006, blasts killed nine people in Ahvaz near the Iraq border. Iran alleges that the United States, Israel, and Britain are behind the upsurge in militant activity and says it has intelligence to support the allegation.' -- LA Times, April 13, 2008.
[9] Russia Today September 08, 2009, 'Contractors in Pakistan: are troops next?' Interview with Wayne Madsen
[12] Global Research, June 11, 2004, Historical Origins of the Islamic State (ISIS): Who is Abu Musab Al-Zarqawi? By Michel Chossudovsky
[13] Global Research, April 18, 2006, Origins of the Islamic State (ISIS): Who is behind “Al Qaeda in Iraq”? Pentagon acknowledges fabricating a “Zarqawi Legend” By Michel Chossudovsky
[14] Zahir Ebrahim, Prisoners of the Cave, 2003, Chapter 1
Project Humanbeingsfirst's Tutorial: The Hegelian Dialectics of Deception – Today's Focus: Anatomy of Modern Lies, Senseless Warfare, Merchants of Death
[16] Global Research, September 25, 2005 Were British Special Forces Soldiers Planting Bombs in Basra? Suspicions Strengthened by Earlier Reports, by Michael Keefer
Global Research, September 20, 2005 British “Undercover Soldiers” Caught driving Booby Trapped Car “They refused to say what their mission was.” by Michel Chossudovsky
[18] NYT, Sunday, April 20, 2008, Message Machine: Behind TV Analysts, Pentagon’s Hidden Hand - A PENTAGON CAMPAIGN Retired officers have been used to shape terrorism coverage from inside the TV and radio networks. By DAVID BARSTOW
See its pertinent deconstruction in Zahir Ebrahim, 'Bin Laden': Key enabler of “imperial mobilization” and nuclear attack on Iran-Pakistan
See Project Humanbeingsfirst's A Note on the Mighty Wurlitzer
[19] Global Research, April 18, 2006 Who is behind “Al Qaeda in Iraq”? Pentagon acknowledges fabricating a “Zarqawi Legend” by Michel Chossudovsky
Press TV September 14, 2009 Ex-Intel officer discloses US plans for Pakistan, exclusive interview of Pakistan's former ISI Chief General Hamid Gul to Press TV
'US officials "want to go for Pakistan's nuclear assets. They are inching close to those nuclear assets day by day," he added. When asked about Washington's long-term goal in Pakistan, the former Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) said that the United States wants to keep the country destabilized.' -- Press TV Sept. 14, 2009.
This is the same General Gul turning on his own patrons after he had fully assisted them in “giving to the USSR its Vietnam war” from Pakistani soil. An African proverb says: you need a very long spoon to sip with the devil.
Tehran Times September 14, 2009, Blackwater involved in Bhutto and Hariri hits: former Pakistani army chief
'TEHRAN - Pakistan’s former chief of army staff, General Mirza Aslam Beg (ret.), has said the U.S. private security company Blackwater was directly involved in the assassinations of former Pakistani prime minister Benazir Bhutto and former Lebanese prime minister Rafik Hariri.' -- Tehran Times Sept. 14, 2009
Why was this General muted when all the specious reports were being so boisterously promulgated by the Mighty Wurlitzer's propaganda machinery both in the West and in Pakistan's own newspapers? See the many Letters to Editors on Perpetuating the Fiction of who killed Benazir Bhutto by Zahir Ebrahim,
[22] UK Telegraph September 27, 2009 US threatens to escalate operations inside Pakistan
The News, Friday, September 25, 2009 More drone strikes possible in Pakistan (dead link) September 24, 2009 US Mulls Increasing Drone Strikes in Pakistan - Will Pakistan Escalation Come With Afghan Escalation? by Jason Ditz, September 27, 2009 US Threatening to Attack Major Pakistani City of Quetta - Will US Drone Strikes Move From Rural Pakistan to Baloch Capital? by Jason Ditz September 24, 2009 U.S., NATO Poised For Most Massive War In Afghanistan's History, By Rick Rozoff writing for Stop NATO
Thaindian News October 5, 2009 US pullout from Afghanistan would be ‘disastrous’: Musharraf,
[Added] Zahir Ebrahim, White Man's Burden,
The Grand Chessboard by Zbigniew Brzezinski, 1996,
[24] A Testament of Hope: The Essential Writings and Speeches of Martin Luther King (Jr.), pg. 307,
UK Independent, Sunday, 31 May 2009, In Pakistan, an exodus that is beyond biblical - Locals sell all they have to help millions displaced by battles with the Taliban By Andrew Buncombe ;
[Attribution Corrected] Photo Rashid Iqbal/EPA, source UK Guardian, Monday, 11 May 2009, caption: People flee Pakistan's restive Swat valley after a curfew was temporarily lifted to allow people to leave the intensifying conflict
[27] BBC News, Islamabad, October 02, 2009 Pakistan in video beating probe By Syed Shoaib Hasan,
[28] NYT October 9, 2009 Latest Pakistan Bombing Seen as Warning to Government
NYT October 12, 2009 Car Bomb Kills at Least 41 in Restive Region of Pakistan
Article: NATO’s secret armies linked to terrorism? 2004, by Daniele Ganser ;
Book: NATO’s Secret Armies. Operation Gladio and Terrorism in Western Europe, 2004 by Daniele Ganser , free PDF available online ;
Video: BBC Documentary Timewatch, 3 episodes, aired on BBC Ch 2, June 1992,
[Added] Analysis: Operation Gladio Yesterday and Worldwide Terrorism Today – Identifying the Enemy By Zahir Ebrahim, ; Imperial Surrogates and 'Terror Central' in Operation Gladio Redux By Zahir Ebrahim,
[Added] Zahir Ebrahim, Masters of Dissent and The Dying Songbird,
[Added] Zahir Ebrahiim, Gatekeepers From Left to Right - Response to Chris Hedges' amalgam of half-truths 'A Decade After 9/11: We Are What We Loathe',
[30] Epilogue in The Pakistan Decapitation Papers, echoing the immortal words of Patrick Henry, March 23, 1775,

The author, an ordinary researcher and writer on contemporary geopolitics, a minor justice activist, grew up in Pakistan, studied EECS at MIT, engineered for a while in high-tech Silicon Valley ( ), and retired early to pursue other responsible interests. His maiden 2003 book was rejected by numerous publishers and can be read on the web at He may be reached at Verbatim reproduction license at

First September 28, 2009 | Revised November 02, 2009 4835
Links fixed, references [Added] to Footnotes to sync with Case Study: Insurgency vs Counter-Insurgency, April 17, 2016
Links fixed, Swat photo attribution corrected, March 03, 2018 1:00 pm

The Decapitation of Pakistan by its own Military! By Zahir Ebrahim

Between Imperial Mobilization and Islamofascism: Bribing the Maggots and the Soul Extractor

Zahir Ebrahim
April 03, 2009 | Last updated April 05, 2009 | Links fixed February 10, 2018
Almost a decade later house niggers are even more ubiquitous!

© Project HumanbeingsfirstTM. Permission granted to use freely as per copyright notice.

Islamofascism, militant Islam, radical Islam, suicide bombers, jihadis, et. al., occupy the mind of not just the beleaguered Pakistani suffering its categorical imperatives, but also the Western mind worrying about the end of their modern Western Civilization at the hands of some antediluvian 'Ali Baba' barbarians. [1] In fact, Daniel Pipes had put it thusly: “[It is] Not a Clash of Civilizations, It's a Clash between the Civilized World and Barbarians.” [2]
While it is expected that the purveyors of “Imperial Mobilization” [3] will try to sell the burden of their 'la mission civilisatrice' to the barbarians, it is always a bit inexplicable that the barbarians should, in every generation, young and old, man and woman, also sell the same to their own 'sheep to the slaughter' – except of course if one recalls the perceptive wisdom of Dr. Martin Luther King, whence, the colonized Negro trivially “changes from the representative of the Negro to the white man into the white man's representative to the Negro.” [4] [36a] Even having understood that tortuous colonizing effect which synthesizes voluntary servitude, I am still filled with consternation when I come across Pakistani Negroes pitching the 'white man's burden'. In an empirical modernity when even distant reality is visible to all and sundry, the astute observation of MLK is no consolation: “The tragedy is that too often he does not recognize what has happened to him.” [ibid.]
Take for example, the recent article “Suicide attacks – religious flair!” [5] by a relatively unknown Pakistani “freelance journalist” [usually also a cover for intelligence agents, assets and sayanim] which stated: “Radical forces in Pakistan have given a new dimension to suicide attacks in today’s environment by intermixing it with religion and collective tasks. Religious flair concept is borrowed from freedom fighters engaged mostly with US or Israeli security apparatus in Palestine or Iraq”, and went on to analyze the construction of this “new dimension”. This colonists' conceptualization of manufactured reality, borne entirely of seeding circuses of “doctrinal motivation, intellectual commitment, and patriotic gratification” [6] for the benefit of its own Western peoples, as well as for blinding the pending meals to their own slaughter under the Hegelian butcher's knife, is endemic throughout the mainstream newsmedia in Pakistan. And of course, it is also systemic everywhere else, wherever the “Mighty Wurlitzer's” [7] suzerainty reigns supreme [8]. In this essay I take the bull by the horn and cleave it asunder, yet again – for the 'Negro' disease continues to plague the 'untermenschen' and shows no sign of being contained, never mind eradicated.
The cited article is quite illustrative of fabricated narratives which attempt to give reality to the 'Unbirthday party' of tortuous “Islamofascism” while entirely omitting to recognize its deliberately manufactured roots to create the pretexts for fighting the lifetime of “World War IV” [9], and therefore, its omissions – the cardinal sin of the vulgar propagandists – cannot be taken lightly. Inadvertent or calculated is immaterial, because, as was duly noted by one more skilled and insightful on matters existential, its utility in modernity to manufacture consent remains unsurpassed:
“Great is truth, but still greater, from a practical point of view, is silence about truth. By simply not mentioning certain subjects... totalitarian propagandists have influenced opinion much more effectively than they could have by the most eloquent denunciations.” (Aldous Huxley)
The grotesque fact of the matter is that the following PBS video clip of Zbigniew Brzezinski from 1980, and the February 18, 1980 Time Magazine's description of what the jihadist American National Security Advisor was doing at the Pak-Afghan border Selling the Carter Doctrine, are in action triple-replay today in some Hegelian variations: [9a]
The transcription of that one-minute video clip of not too distant past is revealing of America's covert role in making patsies of the 'untermenschen' without any moral compunction:
News voice over 1980: “US National Security Advisor Brzezinski flew to Pakistan to set about rallying resistance. He wanted to arm the Mujahideen without revealing America's role. On the Afghan border near the Khayber Pass, he urged the Soldiers of God to redouble their efforts”
Brzezinski 1980: “We know of their deep belief in God, and we are confident that their struggle will succeed. That land over there, is yours, you'll go back to it one day, because your fight will prevail, and you'll have your homes and your mosques back again; because your cause is right; God is on your side.” [enthusiastic clapping by the Mujahideens]
Brzezinski 1990s in the studio speaking to the PBS interviewer: “... [garbled] coordinated with the Pakistanis will be to make the Soviets bleed, for as much, as long, as possible.”
Surely, the learned “freelance journalist” does not work for the RAND Corporation as a shill for the New World Order, like all the other two-bit 'native-informants' from Pakistan, to not know of such blood-soaked modus operandi for waging war by way of deception?
Surely, the “freelance journalist” is herself not so co-opted as to not realize that when she imaginatively alludes to the “Indian” hand like the Pakistani newsmedia and the ISI routinely parrot: “Or some external elements, like Indian spy agencies protecting their interest, and utilising local hands for logistics and support in orchestrating suicide attacks in urban parts of the country”, that a diabolical 'Jundallah-plusplus' is operational in Pakistan with full cooperation from Pakistan's own military apparatchiks?
Or is it genuinely way past the wit of all Pakistani columnists, purported scholars, lauded think-tankers, career foreign service bureaucrats, military intelligence, and indeed the entire highly paid Pakistani newsmedia, to realize that these manufactured covert-ops are funded by NATO and Pentagon black-ops dollars, and doing to Pakistan from her own soil with suitcases full of dollars, precisely what the CIA-ISI tag-team covertly did to the USSR from the same “PAK” soil not too long ago?
Suitcases full of cash and cultivated “well-placed bureaucrats” for orchestrating covert operations is an old phenomenon in Pakistan as even candidly admitted by a former Director of the ISI in his 1995 memoirs “Profiles of Intelligence” [10]. As an insider to the intelligence apparatus, he observed of the history of American Interventionism in Pakistan:
'Essentially, the US policy configurations vis-a-vis Pakistan have been that of a “master” and not of a “friend”. Oscillating between persuasion and coercion, the US tends to employ all available means to keep Pakistan under watch, pressure and diplomatic subjugation. At times, it has used the 'carrot and stick' of aid, and at others, lashed out threats of economic strangulation or declaring Pakistan a terrorist state.
Pakistan's geostrategic position, nuclear capability, agricultural and technological potential, as well as the Islamic ideological base are matters of vital concern to US policy makers. The US will not and cannot allow Pakistan to govern her own affairs. While Pakistan was still in its infancy, the American hawks pounced upon and hijacked our national interests by building up an exaggerated threat of the former Soviet Union's expansionist designs against Pakistan and their so called 'mad' drive to the warm waters. ...'
Having been trivially made patsies once by selling Pakistan's military the “strategic-depth” snake-oil enticement, the American oligarchs have invented the new boogieman to make patsies of the Negroes once again with some new snake-oil of their “benefit” in the New World Order, for Pakistanis are entirely eager to dance to the tune of the 'white man' regardless of the song. The Director of the ISI further noted of the covert-ops penetration (in Pakistan) by the CIA:
'The CIA is known for adopting various covert and overt means to undermine the integrity of other countries for achieving their own objectives and furthering their 'nefarious' designs. It is equipped with colossal material resources and its men are canny and ruthless in executing their assignments. Their methods in madness include:
a) Espionage and penetration in all areas of interest like defence, foreign affairs, science/technology, developmental programmes, economy, education, and politics. b) Propaganda, disinformation campaigns, subversion, terrorism, psy warfare, assassinations, blackmail, bribes, coercion and intimidation. ...
j) Install CIA agents as presidents, prime ministers, ministers, generals and senior advisors, etc.' (pages 20 – 22)
Therefore, as existential proof of the State itself deceptively abetting such covert-ops in Pakistan today, is simply examining what the already 'well-outed in the Western mainstream' terrorist outfit named 'Jundallah' is doing to beleaguered Iran, our next door Muslim neighbor, even as we speak, and again from the same “PAK” soil, and yet how it is plainly getting away with it, really beyond the sensible wit of rational man to make logical deductions from?
Are these geopolitically driven orchestration of events, while closely spaced in time for which no hard receipts and confessionals can be found until after fait accompli, but which are altogether quite transparently being orchestrated on the Grand Chessboard, really so hard to fathom? Surely not! Please see for instance “Iran, the Associated Press, and Covert-War of 'Imperial Mobilization'”. [11]
Pakistan today is truly the “petri-dish of international terrorism” as was stated by the late Benazir Bhutto at the Council on Foreign Relations on August 15, 2007 [12] before she ventured to return to Pakistan with their overt blessings. But that unfortunate source of terror is the despicable State itself, and the equally despicable Western apparatus which fully controls and funds it as a subservient client-state. The erstwhile twice-leader of Pakistan and the scion of a worthy-name simply neglected to mention that fact as she graced the 'radical Islamists' – the state's own construction – with that lofty aphorism thinking that's what the rulers of the world wanted to hear. The same blunder is being made by Nawaz Sharif and all the others in Pakistan.
The Pakistani newsmedia therefore, is also following the diktats of “wisdom” du jour. Thus it is unsurprising that the perspective developed in the article by the “freelance journalist” would also characteristically omit any mention of the tortuous set-up for the deliberate orchestration of the balkanization of Pakistan [13] with the devilish connivance of the state's own fifth columnists. The history of clever deployment of “doctrinal motivation” through a high degree of “intellectual commitment” to craftily re-synthesize “God is on your side” for illiterate and aggrieved patsies has been so cleverly omitted, that one might think such Machiavellian concepts don't, and cannot, exist in West's highly ethical modernity (sic!).
While no one is surely perfect and all-knowing, especially when it comes to the complex deception laden, Hegelian dialectics driven “imperial mobilization” agendas for 'one-world' government [14], perhaps all who wish to pay lip service to concern for humanity and eagerly pick up the mighty pen to defend it against tyranny, might spend some useful time first researching how “imperial mobilization” is actually conducted with false-flag operations seeding the enabling pretexts, lest they inadvertently lead others astray. They might delve into how NATO intelligence conducted 'Operation Gladio' for creating and sustaining the 'Strategy of Tension' in Western Europe in order to keep the fear of the barbaric 'communists taking over' perpetually alive in the mind of the European public. Many a wanton terrorist act (purportedly) by NATO intelligence, were blamed on their own manipulated patsies like the Red Brigade and the boogieman then in vogue, the godless armed to the teeth with nuclear weapons “communists”. [15]
And today, it is the fully god-imbibed, but supposedly even more barbaric armed to the teeth with box-cutters “islamofascists”. The play of Hegelian dialectics is so superbly orchestrated that no conventional mind can reach the zenith of its moral depravity. The seeds of which, interestingly so, were devilishly re-planted by Bernard Lewis in 1990 right after the demise of the communist USSR, when he coined the mantra “Clash of Civilization” for the same Council on Foreign Relations to which Benazir Bhutto continually paid homage throughout her career.
Bernard Lewis, the “vulgar propagandist” (as knighted by Noam Chomsky in a video interview on CBC, December 9, 2003, see part-2 [16]), seeded this devilish mantra in CFR's Foreign Affairs in 1990 thusly, in order to re-harvest the previously celebrated Brzezinski appendage now left adrift after the satisfactory conclusion of the ten year Afghan War. The bleeding dissolution of the USSR for which both Brzezinski [17], and the judeofascist American Enterprise Institute from where George W. Bush had “borrowed twenty [of its] finest minds” [18] to wage the new lifetime of 'war on terror', had entirely taken full unshared-credit. [19]
“In 1990 Bernard Lewis, a leading Western scholar of Islam, analyzed 'The Roots of Muslim Rage,' and concluded: 'It should now be clear that we are facing a mood and a movement far transcending the level of issues and policies and the governments that pursue them. This is no less than a clash of civilizations - that perhaps irrational but surely historic reaction of an ancient rival against our Judeo-Christian heritage, our secular present, and the worldwide expansion of both. It is crucially important that we on our side should not be provoked into an equally historic but also equally irrational reaction against our rival.' ” (Samuel Huntington in Clash of Civilization).
Only eleven years later, that 'Muslim rage' was catastrophically enacted on the international scene – a “catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor” [20] – supposedly by an islamofascist 'Ali Baba' [21] named 'Bin Laden' [22] to re-enable “imperial mobilization”. The distance between seeding mantras and its harvesting does not seem to be a very long epoch in the scientific modernity du jour when only “Prisoners of the Cave” [23] abound in astronomically large numbers.
This isn't rocket science, only political science. A state-craft perversely seeded in the atheistic “Noble Lies” of the Straussian 'Ubermensch' [24]. “Hegemony is as old as mankind” [25] is their sole 'bible', and “one-world government”, their sole imperative [26]. Their calculus of global primacy principally entails Machiavellianly seeding “revolutionary times” all across the “global zone of percolating violence” [27] – the 'war on terror' [28] – while simultaneously precipitating the global financial collapse to make “an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece”. [29] The devil's apprentices have cleverly perceived of a gullible mankind bred on 'bread and circuses', that, “what is inconceivable in normal times is possible in revolutionary times.” [30] Any people will accept under times of stress, turmoil, uncertainty, and war, what they wouldn't under peaceful times. The best way to transform a people, a society, or a world, is to plague them with a lifetime of warfare [31].
The incremental fait accompli inducing baby-steps towards full spectrum transformation of the planet into a world government, unfortunately includes the deadly balkanization and de-nuking of Pakistan. It is part of the long-running genesis-to-genocide death-rebirth cycle of repeatedly raising the phoenix from the grotesquely burnt ashes of humanity. Only a catastrophic destruction of the existing order can lead to the ultimate New World Order of the globalists: an infernal global police state. As connivingly argued by Bertrand Russell, “It seems to follow that a world government could only be kept in being by force,” [32]. All the world wars of the twentieth century were incrementally transformative towards this very globalists' agenda, and the World War IV that we are unfortunate to be living through as the generation caught “Between Two Ages” [33], is intended to induce the grotesque “birth pangs” for the devil's bastard child.
To ensure that not one iota of the preceding paragraphs was ever treated as mere philosophical gibberish by the super-learned of the planet, an exquisite Western Negro unabashedly summed up her white man's blood-stained agenda on how labor-pains are to be induced across the raped “global zone of percolating violence” in these delectable words:
“What we're seeing here, in a sense, is…the birth pangs of a new Middle East and whatever we do, we have to be certain that we're pushing forward to the new Middle East, not going back to the old one.” (U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, July 21, 2006)
With all the empirical evidence of Western barbarianism seen in Afghanistan and Iraq, and the surfeit of doctrinal evidence of the latest 'white man's burden', only a fool, or a treasonous mercenary would deny or ignore the American shenanigans in Pakistan, Iran, and in the “global zone of percolating violence”. As noted elsewhere on Project Humanbeingsfirst's website, while sensibly trying to talk Pakistani military out from perversely contributing to our own treasonous demise by our military bombing our own peoples to smithereens, when I had gratuitously suggested to some newly retired Pakistani Generals that I could trivially construct a suicide bomber to their precise specification, of ht, wt, sex, and other unmentionable body-part specification for less than a certain amount of dollars to make the palpable point of how easy it was to manufacture “jihadis” after you have shattered their tabula rasa and created an ambiance of sustained “jihadist” indoctrination over the past 30 years, I had been stunned when one of them had immediately remarked, something to the effect: “Zahir you are asking too much – I can do it for much less, around 2000 dollars”.
After having patiently listened to me rant non-stop for over three hours on how Machiavellian political theology runs the modern world, the mighty military men (Ret. with full honors I hasten to add) of Pakistan had silently departed, having first agreed with me that the suicide bombings in Pakistan weren't very difficult to fabricate under the present manufactured triumvirate climate of deprivation, indoctrination, and civilian-killings, that these suicide attacks were not a native part of our historical-cultural-sociological-makeup, and that it had suddenly cropped up in Pakistan only in the aftermath of 911. They however left hanging, the plaintiff's obvious begging question, why persist in acts which only create more of that? [33a]
The real issue is not that the suicide bombings are fabricated, or how they are fabricated and inculcated as an expression of political dissatisfaction (see for instance 'Dying to Win – The Strategic Logic of Suicide Terrorism' by Robert A. Pape, 2005), but WHO is manufacturing this abhorrence at the top of the compartmentalized chain of command! That isn't very hard to answer either. Simply ask cui bono!
For anyone to pretend that the blatant agenda for the balkanization of Pakistan by the United States of America – the self proclaimed hectoring hegemons [34] – is not the crucial prime-mover behind Pakistan's calculated destabilization with these wanton acts of terror that are entirely reminiscent of 'Operation Gladio' even to the extent of rapid blame attribution to the 'communists' du jour, i.e., the 'Islamofascists', [34a] is either foolhardiness, or outright treasonous. While a fool can surely be educated, and being one is hardly a crime, the fair tradition of dealing with traitors in all societies demands that the treasonous be hanged without mercy. The moral lessons of modernity further stipulate that this occur only after administering the full rites of the 'Enemy Combatant' protocol. Any Pakistani to still be perpetuating America's fabricated mantras as “Our War” after what the world has blatantly witnessed in Iraq, can only be of the latter kind. Indeed, before coming to power, Mr. Zardari had eagerly asserted, echoing his late wife's sentiments, as also Pakistan military's and its politicians' and newsmedia's aspiration:
'The Pakistan People’s Party (PPP), if it comes into power, must persuade the people that the fight against militants is “our war”, not just America’s war' ( Daily Times, February 17, 2008, 'Taliban fight is our war: Zardari' )
For one given to much rational cynicism, the sole intent of this vulgar propaganda today appears to be for putting Pakistan's military back in the driving seat for the much desired 'unity of command' that was lost when America's favorite posterchild braving the line-of-fire, General PM, fell into disfavor. The terrorist act in Lahore, as was also noted by editor [35], suggests precisely that calculated highest order purpose, of manufacturing sympathy for the previously maligned local bad-guys in order for the elected politicians to officially hand control back to the 'unity of command' of the military as the lesser of all evils without any resistance from the public.
And while I too believe that Pakistan's nuclear-armed military today (assuming they haven't already been disarmed) still holds the infernal key to saving Pakistan through rational and independent-minded realpolitik – as noted in this 2007 Open Letter to Pakistani General [36] – that courageous act of putting out the deliberately lighted fire cannot happen while the 'arsonists are running all the fire brigades in town'!
It must be obvious to anyone that it is rather trivial today to curry favor from the ruling elite – become their shill and bleat the mantra of 'Islamofascism', delve deeply into some arcane aspects of it but keep that very axiom intact. One will surely get noticed eventually, and perhaps acquire a chair at the Hudson, or get employment at the RAND. Minimally, one will get invited to speak at JINSA and Heritage, get published in mainstream news, and variously earn tangible and intangible benefits. And if one would rather play dissent to win over the odd rabble rouser and 'malcontent', composing something like “Between Imperialism and Islamism” (as Pervez Hoodbhoy did in the Himal Southasian, October-November 2007 issue [36a]), will surely lead to invitation at the 911 memorial in New York to speak to 'Muslim-terrorism'.
In either case, whether participating in manufacturing consent among the gullible masses, or dissent among the 'malcontent' [37], so long as one keeps intact the core-axioms of empire [37a] – which today happens to be the narratives of 'Islamofascism' – in these hard times when the military-industrial complex is emerging as the largest and the only superfunded global employer for its war-making global police-state agenda, which of course also includes vulgar propaganda for both Orwellian and Huxleyan imposition of forced and voluntary servitude, it's surely a rational move to join empire. One can, at least, finally earn a decent living when only joblessness and despair surrounds one. After all, one has to feed the family first, before one can fight the good fight.
Perhaps Project and all those upholding the same categorical imperatives, ought to do the same. We are surely wasting our valuable time and our life going against the grain and standing up to the threats of Hemlock – when we can simply become the favored peoples of our rulers! Okay, perhaps the skin-color for some might get in the way. But surely, that can be made up by the “virtue” of empire also acquiring the remaining un co-opted type-3 people “who critically examine ... and judge accordingly” on their payroll (see Mein Kampf, vol 1, ch 10, pg 240, for Hitler's classification of populations). Imagine all the riches.... all of which we shall surely take with us to our grave to bribe the hungry maggots and entice the proverbial Soul Extractor.

[1] Zahir Ebrahim, Ali Baba in Mumbai – Eid 2008 Reflections, December 09, 2008,
[2] Zahir Ebrahim, Open Letter To Middle East Scholar Daniel Pipes, April 03, 2007,
[3] Zbigniew Brzezinski, The Grand Chessboard – American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives, Basic Books, 1996, pg 36, full quote: “Democracy is inimical to imperial mobilization.”
[4] Zahir Ebrahim, The Prized Negroes of Pakistan, March 26, 2009,
[5] Nadia Khan, Suicide attacks – religious flair!, April 02, 2009, originally at: ,
[6] Zbigniew Brzezinski, Op. Cit., pg 212. Full quote: “More generally, cultural change in America may also be uncongenial to the sustained exercise abroad of genuinely imperial power. That exercise requires a high degree of doctrinal motivation, intellectual commitment, and patriotic gratification.”
[7] WILLIAM SCHAAP, attorney, expert witness on media disinformation under sworn court testimony, full statement: “When you read the books about the history of the CIA, one of the heroes was the first man in charge of media operations, a man named Frank Wizner. And they referred to his organization as the Mighty Wurlitzer. And there's this image of this guy sitting at one of those giant organs, you know, with seventeen keyboards and you're playing this -- sort of like The Phantom of the Opera in that scene, and there was the guy running the CIA media operations all around the world. And he really was because every single city of any size on earth, he had some employee who was -- supposedly worked for a newspaper or a magazine or a radio station or a wire service, and they could get stories anywhere.”
Video at: ; 

Also see Zahir Ebrahim, A Note on the Mighty Wurlitzer,
[8] Carl Bernstein, THE CIA AND THE MEDIA, ;
Richard Keeble, Hacks And Spooks, March 3, 2006,
[9] Charles Feldman and Stan Wilson, Ex-CIA director: U.S. faces 'World War IV', April 03, 2003, CNN, full statement: 'Former CIA Director James Woolsey said Wednesday the United States is engaged in World War IV, and that it could continue for years. In the address to a group of college students, Woolsey described the Cold War as the third world war and said "This fourth world war, I think, will last considerably longer than either World Wars I or II did for us. Hopefully not the full four-plus decades of the Cold War." He said the new war is actually against three enemies: the religious rulers of Iran, the "fascists" of Iraq and Syria, and Islamic extremists like al Qaeda. Woolsey told the audience of about 300, most of whom are students at the University of California at Los Angeles, that all three enemies have waged war against the United States for several years but the United States has just "finally noticed." "As we move toward a new Middle East," Woolsey said, "over the years and, I think, over the decades to come ... we will make a lot of people very nervous." It will be America's backing of democratic movements throughout the Middle East that will bring about this sense of unease, he said. "Our response should be, 'good!'" Woolsey said. '
[9a] Citation added for completeness, February 10, 2018
Time magazine, Selling the Carter Doctrine, February 18, 1980,
PBS Video clip, Zbigniew Brzezinski at the Pak-Afghan border, 'God is on your side',
[10] Brigadier Tirmazi, Profiles of Intelligence, 1995, excerpted in Zahir Ebrahim, Who Killed Benazir Bhutto? In her own words!, February 04, 2008,
[11] Zahir Ebrahim, Iran, the Associated Press, and Covert-War of 'Imperial Mobilization', April 13, 2008,
[12] CFR Transcript, A Conversation With Benazir Bhutto, August 15, 2007, NY. Introduced by CFR President RICHARD N. HAASS as follows: “It is, for me, a personal pleasure to welcome back to the Council on Foreign Relations an old friend of mine and someone who is familiar to many of you in this room and knows well this organization, the former prime minister of Pakistan, Benazir Bhutto.” The full quote of Benazir Bhutto: “I seek to lead a democratic Pakistan which is free from the yoke of military dictatorship and that will cease to be a haven, the very petri dish of international terrorism.”
[13] Zahir Ebrahim, The Day After – American Agenda for Pakistan, March 21, 2009,
[14] Zahir Ebrahim, The Enduring Capitalist Conspiracy For World Government, September 25, 2008,
[15] Daniele Ganser, NATO's Secret Army: Operation Gladio and Terrorism in Western Europe, 2005, ;
Daniele Ganser, Operation Gladio, Interview, ;
Daniele Ganser, Secret Warfare: Operation Gladio and NATO's Stay-Behind Armies, Introduction Overview, ;
Daniele Ganser, Secret Warfare: From Operation Gladio to 9/11, EIR Interview, April 08, 2005, ;
Chris Floyd, Sword Play: Attacking Civilians to Justify “Greater Security”, ;
Webster G. Tarpley, 9/11 Synthetic Terror, 4th edition, 2007 ;
Philip P. Willan, Puppetmasters: The Political Use of Terrorism in Italy, 2002 ; Timewatch: Operation Gladio, BBC Ch 2, 3-part Documentary, June 1992, available online, 

[16] Noam Chomsky, Interview with Evan Solomon on CBC,

[17] Zbigniew Brzezinski, 1998 interview to French magazine Le Nouvel Observateur, translation by William Blum,
[18] George W. Bush, 26 February 2003, speaking to AEI: “Some of the finest minds of our nation are at work on some of the greatest challenges to our nation. You do such good work that my administration has borrowed twenty such minds. I want to thank them for their service.”
[19] AEI history, under the heading “AEI's Diamond Jubilee, 1943-2003”, at, full statement: “The 1980s were great years for AEI's ideas but troubled years for the institution itself. President Ronald Reagan appointed several dozen AEI scholars and fellows to his administration and to federal judgeships, where they helped him to achieve monumental improvements in economic, regulatory, and legal policy and to deploy the more assertive foreign policy that dispatched Soviet Communism by decade's end.”
[20] PNAC Report, Rebuilding America's Defenses, 2000, full context: “Until the process of transformation is treated as an enduring military mission – worthy of constant allocation of dollars and forces – it will remain stillborn”, page 58 ; “Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor”, page 51.
[21] Zahir Ebrahim, Op. Cit.,
[22] Zahir Ebrahim, 'Bin Laden': Key enabler of “imperial mobilization” and nuclear attack on Iran-Pakistan, April 17, 2008,
[23] Zahir Ebrahim, Prisonsers of the Cave, 2003,
[24] Leo Strauss, see Shadia Drury's Interview with Danny Postel, Noble lies and perpetual war: Leo Strauss, the neocons, and Iraq, ;
to appreciate the sublimity of the atheist's genius mind which makes it a Nietzscheian judeofascist superman, also see Zahir Ebrahim, Letter to Editor: Dalit Voice's 'Which god?' February 08, 2009,
[25] Zbigniew Brzezinski, Op. Cit., pg 3, opening sentence of the book.
[26] Zahir Ebrahim, Response to Financial Times Gideon Rachman's 'And now for a world government', December 11, 2008,
[27] Zbigniew Brzezinski, Op. Cit., map pg 53.
[28] Zahir Ebrahim, From Balance of Terror to Unilateral Terror on the Grand Chessboard!, April 26, 2008,
[29] Richard N. Gardner, The Hard Road To World Order, Foreign Affairs, CFR, April 1974, full quote: “In short, the ‘house of world order’ will have to be built from the bottom up, rather than from the top down. It will look like a great ‘booming, buzzing confusion’ to use William James’ famous description of reality, but an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault.”
[30] David Ben Gurion
[31] Norman Dodd, Congressional Investigator, interview disclosure to G. Edward Griffin, The Hidden Agenda of Tax Exempt Foundations for World Government, full statement regarding what was uncovered during the 1953-1954 Congress sanctioned investigation by the Reece Committee in the 1908 minute books of the Carnegie Endowment for Peace: 'We are now at the year 1908, which was the year that the Carnegie Foundation began operations. In that year, the trustees, meeting for the first time, raised a specific question, which they discussed throughout the balance of the year in a very learned fashion. The question is: “Is there any means known more effective than war, assuming you wish to alter the life of an entire people?” And they conclude that no more effective means than war to that end is known to humanity.' ; 

Also see full excerpt in Zahir Ebrahim, The Monetary Conspiracy For World Government, November 23, 2008,
[32] Bertrand Russell, The Impact of Science on Society, Unwin 1952, pg 37,
[33] Zbigniew Brzezinski, Between Two Ages: America's Role in the Technetronic Era, Viking,1970,
[33a] Citation added for completeness, February 10, 2018
Time magaine, The CIA's Silent War in Pakistan, Monday, Jun. 01, 2009,
pt4:,9171,1900248-4,00.html ;
Also see: Zahir Ebrahim, The Decapitation of Pakistan by its own Military!, September 28, 2009,
[34] PNAC, author's field in “Rebuilding America's Defences”,
[34a] Citation added for completeness, February 10, 2018
Zahir Ebrahim, Operation Gladio Yesterday and Worldwide Terrorism Today – Identifying the Enemy, January 28, 2014, ;
Zahir Ebrahim, Imperial Surrogates and 'Terror Central' in Operation Gladio Redux, February 25, 2014,
[35] Abid Jan, Lahore Attack: One in the many steps towards making Pakistan another Afghanistan, editorial, March 30, 2009,
[36] Zahir Ebrahim, Re-Imagining Pakistan's Defenses - Open Letter to a Pakistani General, November 30, 2007,
[36a] Citation added for completeness, February 10, 2018
Pervez Hoodbhoy, Between imperialism and Islamism, Himal Southasian, October-November 2007, ;
See its deconstruction in Zahir Ebrahim, FAQ What is an Intellectual Negro?, February 9, 2010, ;
Also see Zahir Ebrahim, The Prized Negroes of Pakistan, March 26, 2009, ;
Also see Zahir Ebrahim, Letter to Editor, Dawn, The Prized Negroes of Pakistan Speak Out, March 30, 2009, ;
Also see Zahir Ebrahim, The Achilles heel of Pakistan – Its Intellectuals, January 16, 2014,
[37] Zahir Ebrahim, Weapons of Mass Deception – The Master Social Science, Jun 01, 2008,
[37a] Citation added for completeness, February 10, 2018
Zahir Ebrahim, The Dying Songbird, September 15, 2013,

The author, an ordinary researcher and writer on contemporary geopolitics, a minor justice activist, grew up in Pakistan, studied EECS at MIT, engineered for a while in high-tech Silicon Valley (patents here), and retired early to pursue other responsible interests. His maiden 2003 book was rejected by six publishers and can be read on the web at He may be reached at Verbatim reproduction license at

First Published April 03, 2009 | Last Updated 04/05/2009 23:38:09 5749
Links Updated: 09/19/2009 13:25:09 5749
Links Fixed April 21, 2016 5749
Links Fixed, citations [9a], [33a], [34a], [36a] & [37a] added for completeness, on Saturday, February 10, 2018 11:00 pm 6308

Between Imperial Mobilization and Islamofascism: Bribing the Maggots and the Soul Extractor 18/18

Full Copyright Notice

All material copyright (c) Project HumanbeingsfirstTM, with full permission to copy, repost, and reprint, in its entirety, unmodified, for any purpose, granted, provided the full URL sentence and the copyright notice contained within each Document are also reproduced verbatim as part of this license, along with any embedded links within its main text, and not doing so may be subject to copyright license violation infringement claims pursuant to remedies noted at All figures, images, quotations, and excerpts are used without permission based on non-profit "fair-use" for personal education and research use only in the greater public interest. The usage is minimally consistent with the understanding of laws noted at In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 of US Copyright Laws, you are provided the material from Project Humanbeingsfirst upon your request, and taking any action that delivers you any of its documents in any form is considered making a specific request to receive the documents for your own personal educational and/or research use. You are directly responsible for seeking the requisite permissions from other copyright holders for any use beyond “fair use”. Exclusion: All rights are expressly reserved for the usage of the terms (c) HumanbeingsfirstTM and (c) HumanbeingfirstTM which are the copyrighted and trademarked intellectual property of Project HumanbeingsfirstTM. Reproduction Note: It is acceptable to reproduce any document in smaller serialized parts provided the full URL sentence and the copyright notice within each document are also reproduced in each part and the entire document is reproduced. Please read

Caveat Emptor

Please be advised that Project HumanbeingsfirstTM fully cooperates with all law enforcement and other governmental agencies worldwide in rooting out Terrorism in all its nuanced shades and stripes in order to end its Neanderthal reign of terror upon all who are human beings first. Project Humanbeingsfirst does not distinguish between terrorists clad in turbans and those wearing suits, nor between the predatory rampages of the pirates vs. the emperors, albeit each is apportioned the measure of crime and guilt commensurate to their respective station of power and impact on their victims. Law enforcement personnel worldwide, but especially in the United States and the West, are encouraged to participate with Project Humanbeingsfirst. It is essential for all nations' state security apparatus to learn how to forensically identify the monumental supreme terrorists hiding in plain sight among us under legal cover, the real merchants of death, while they dutifully chase down the easy to spot handful of often deliberately manufactured pirates at sea.