Zahir Ebrahim
September 28, 2009 | Revised November 02, 2009
Author's
Note, Nov. 02, 2009: Pakistanis, apparently, simply cannot
perceive that “insurgency” is manufactured –
judging by the asinine questions they asked the Secretary of State
Hillary Clinton during her visit to Pakistan last week. Every one of
them was simplistic and devoid of any appreciation for the political
science behind
“imperial mobilization”. Ignoring
the mercenaries, traitors, and vulgar propagandists at work in
Pakistan, many well-meaning Pakistanis are entirely confused.
Therefore, this revision draws upon some stark lessons learnt from
Iraq to further substantiate the original report. See additional
evidence and extensive deconstruction of mythologies in
The
Pakistan Decapitation Papers.
© Project Humanbeingsfirst
TM. Permission granted to use
freely as per
copyright
notice
[PHBF
Report]
Dateline Sept. 28 to Nov. 02, 2009, California, United States
Let
me begin this very difficult exposition as a Pakistani citizen (my
only citizenship, by choice, despite being a
legal
permanent resident in the United States
for almost three decades) with the question
Who really killed
Benazir Bhutto? [1] I mean who are the prime-movers?
The
trigger-pullers are obviously irrelevant and remain faceless. They
will surely never be known.
Well,
let's read it in
Benazir
Bhutto's own lucid words
which have now been augmented, almost two years later, with the
Pakistan's Army Chief of Staff's belated disclosures of
September
21, 2009.
[2] Why belated? Well, please see these unpublished letters to many
Pakistani newspaper editors on their repeatedly
perpetuating
the fiction
of
Who Killed Benazir Bhutto in cahoots with the 'hectoring
hegemons' and their agents! All traitors and co-opted errand boys.
[3]
The
American
agenda for Pakistan
is not a state-secret. Rather, it is only thinly disguised as
perpetually fighting the “insurgents” in a lifetime of
war, the
World
War IV.
[4] Whereas, in reality, both the “insurgency”, and the
“counter-insurgency”, are entirely designed and
fabricated in the USA as part of the evolving tactics of Hegelian
Dialectics. They are enacted on the ground by various two-bit errand
boys and expert trigger pullers. The already well-known existence of
black-ops assassination squads in Pakistan/Afghanistan, known to the
local peoples for years as the real prime-movers behind the heinous
local terrorist acts, belatedly confirmed by
NYT,
WP,
and
NYT,
in August 2009. [5] See these two December 2008 reports on the
Mumbai
terrorist Act
as reportedly orchestrated by
ALI
BABA
from his perch in the Hindu Kush. [6] The arrival of the black-ops in
the region is not recent, albeit the public disclosures might be.
Starting
in the immediate aftermath of 911, and perhaps even earlier, Pakistan
may well have become the largest deployment region for the CIA in
modern times, both covert (unknown to Pakistani government and
secretly working to destabilize Pakistan with false-flag operations),
and overt (with Pakistani military's aiding and abetting, in full
view of the world, ostensibly fighting the “insurgents”,
“Bin Laden”, “Al-Qaaeda”, but in the process
mainly “
tickling”
its
own
innocent civilians
in many a
barbaric
way).
[7]
And
since
Jundallah
got launched to destabilize Iran
from Pakistani soil (their “
insurgencies”),
Baluchistan along with the Pak-Afghan regions have been awash with
black-ops, and obviously of course, also with officially recognized
US soldiers manning American military bases on Pakistani soil. [8]
But these soldiers of freedom were rarely spotted in the streets of
major cities before. The following
video
report
of September 08, 2009, therefore portends of ominous whirlwinds
imminently engulfing Pakistan: [9]
To
put this ominous presence of soldiers of freedom and fortune on
Pakistani soil in full black-ops context of NATO and the Western
Alliance, of diabolically manufacturing and sustaining the very
pretexts out of uniform to enable the in-uniform forces
to continue on with their perpetual mission of fighting World War IV,
it is sufficient to look at what is transpiring in IRAQ for lessons
to wisely apply to one's own predicament in order to avoid a far
worse one.
Fast
forwarding past all the initial pretenses of Sadaam Husain being
responsible for 911, his WMDs about to destroy America, the Mission
Accomplished statement of President Bush, and the “oops!
intelligence failure” statements by the neo-con's own Iraq
Study Group after the raping of Mesopotamia and the DNA of its
ancient and proud peoples were fait accompli, etceteras, the biggest
reason for not withdrawing the US troops from Iraq is continually
stated to be the infernal ongoing
INSURGENCY. Iran, Shias,
Sunnis, and Al-Qaeeda are variously blamed for the main cause of
America's continued military occupation of Iraq; new “troop-surges”
are periodically announced amidst some dissenting consternation
willy-nilly expressed in its news media and by its politicians to let
the American public know that it is not an easy choice to be making.
The
Iranian
strawman
has already been amply unraveled
elsewhere.
[10] However, witness the following familiar statement of former
President George W. Bush on the legend of the new
Ali
Baba
[11] of Mesopotamia,
Abu
Musab Al-Zarqawi:
[12]
“You
know, I hate to predict violence, but I just understand the nature of
the killers. This guy, Zarqawi, an al Qaeda associate -- who was in
Baghdad, by the way, prior to the removal of Saddam Hussein -- is
still at large in Iraq. And as you might remember, part of his
operational plan was to sow violence and discord amongst the various
groups in Iraq by cold- blooded killing. And we need to help find
Zarqawi so that the people of Iraq can have a more bright -- bright
future.” -- George W. Bush, Press Conference, 1 June 2004
The
indefatigable Michel Chossudovsky, citing Bush's
afore-quoted
statements
wrote:
“Zarqawi constitutes Washington's justification for
the continued military occupation of Iraq, not to mention the brutal
siege of densely populated urban areas directed against 'Al Qaeda in
Iraq' which is said to be led by Zarqawi.” [13]
It
is now November 02, 2009 – and the United States is still very
much in Iraq. Its own economy is in deep recession, and the
free-money printing by the Feds is taking it towards hyperinflation.
The world is not only mired in its worst global financial crisis that
is seeing the end of Western hegemony in its industrial production
capabilities, but is also plagued by a global pandemic, global
warming, and an un-ending global war on terror, sinking valuable
trillions of dollars which could otherwise have been spent on
converting overnight the entire world's six billion population into
America's middle class status of the 1960s, while also wiping out
much of the developing nations' unbearable debt. That alone would
most assuredly have earned the United States the genuine love of the
entire world instead of the present shoes thrown at its all powerful
president. How remarkably has the world's sole superpower been
brought down so pathetically to its knees by the Ali Baba of Iraq
that today it cannot even extricate itself from giving a diabolical
police-state to its own peoples in the pretext of saving them from
the global terrorist! What sort of idiotic “
American
Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives”
agenda, and what kind of asinine quest for “Full Spectrum
Dominance” is this? [14] Wow Ali Baba, what magical powers you
have of not only so successfully entangling the United States in the
Iraqi “quagmire” indefinitely, but of being the
prime-mover behind the demise of nation-states to usher in the only
permissible solution out of these multifaceted global threats –
world
government!
[15]
Focussing
on the pertinence at hand however, what does the Ali Baba of Iraq
have to do with the following shocking news reports purveyed in
titles which are illustrative enough of the key point:
“Were
British Special Forces Soldiers Planting Bombs in Basra?”
September
25, 2005
;
British “Undercover Soldiers” Caught driving Booby
Trapped Car “They refused to say what their mission was.”
September
20, 2005.
[16]
Michel
Chossudovsky, writing the latter article and displaying his un
co-opted integrity, asked the 64-million dollar obvious questions –
the same modus operandi being replayed in Pakistan with even more
drastic effect, as now the black-ops have been hardened in Iraq on
how not to get caught when plenty of patsies can be trivially
harvested for the job of “
legitimizing
Insurgency”
[17] – which none appear to be publicly asking in Pakistan:
'The
following Reuters report raises some disturbing questions.
Why
were undercover British “soldiers” wearing traditional
Arab headscarves firing at Iraqi police?
The
incident took place just prior to a major religious event in Basra.
The
report suggests that the police thought the British soldiers looked
“suspicious”. What was the nature of their mission?
Occupation
forces are supposed to be collaborating with Iraqi authorities. Why
did British Forces have to storm the prison using tanks and armoured
vehicles to liberate the British undercover agents?
“British
forces used up to 10 tanks” supported by helicopters “to
smash through the walls of the jail and free the two British
servicemen.”
Was
there concern that the British “soldiers” who were being
held by the Iraqi National Guard would be obliged to reveal the
nature and objective of their undercover mission?
A
report of Al Jazeera TV, which preceded the raid on the prison,
suggests that the British undercover soldiers were driving a booby
trapped car loaded with ammunition. The Al Jazeera report (see below)
also suggests that the riots directed against British military
presence were motivated because the British undercover soldiers were
planning to explode the booby trapped car in the centre of Basra:
...'
'“The
Zarqawi campaign is discussed in several of the internal military
documents. "Villainize Zarqawi/leverage xenophobia response,"
one U.S. military briefing from 2004 stated. It listed three
methods: "Media operations," "Special Ops
(626)" (a reference to Task Force 626, an elite U.S.
military unit assigned primarily to hunt in Iraq for senior officials
in Hussein's government) and "PSYOP," the U.S.
military term for propaganda work..." (WP. 10 April 2006)
The
military's propaganda program, according to the Washington Post, has
"largely been aimed at Iraqis, but seems to have spilled over
into the U.S. media. One briefing slide about U.S. "strategic
communications" in Iraq, prepared for Army Gen. George W. Casey
Jr., the top U.S. commander in Iraq, describes the "home
audience" as one of six major targets of the American side of
the war." (WP, op cit.)
An
internal document produced by U.S. military headquarters in Iraq,
states that "the Zarqawi PSYOP program is the most successful
information campaign to date.”'
With
that precious lesson in “imperial mobilization”
through sustained PSYOP and manufactured “insurgency”
learnt from our brethren Muslim nation of Iraq – where, in
retrospect, and in moments of reflection through their daily strife
and humiliation, its beleaguered people must surely ponder upon what
could they have possibly done earlier, before 1990, during the
iron-reign of Sadaam Hussein, and throughout those horrible
intervening 13 years of Western hegemonic sanctions, to have avoided
this new dismal fate altogether – let's return to Pakistan.
The
multimodal approaches to destabilizing, and consequently balkanizing
Pakistan under the fabled pretext of its own illusive Ali Baba,
“
Osama
Bin Laden”,
have been so transparent, that today, finally, many a
retired
con-fession artist
are getting in on the act to claim the
flag
of patriotism.
[20]
Going for hajj after having eaten 900 mice is the
favorite pastime of Pakistani praetorian guards. I am only
waiting for any
sitting
Pakistani General
to rise to that occasion, if it's not already too late! [21] But I am
afraid it probably is – see
here,
here,
here,
here,
and
here.
[22]
“The
white establishment is skilled in flattering and cultivating emerging
leaders. It presses its own image on them and finally, from imitation
of manners, dress, and style of living, a deeper strain of corruption
develops. This kind of Negro leader acquires the white man's contempt
for the ordinary Negro. He is often more at home with the
middle-class white than he is among his own people. His language
changes, his location changes, his income changes, and ultimately he
changes from the representative of the Negro to the white man into
the white man's representative to the Negro.”

Just
as from the USSR's point of view in yesteryear, the “insurgency”
against them in Afghanistan was foreign inculcated, entirely
fabricated in the USA (as we know today but held as a closely guarded
secret then), which thus forced the Soviets to apply
counter-insurgency measures, and subsequently, an outright invasion
of Afghanistan (read Brzezinski's own statements in
Saving
Pakistan,
and watch Brzezinski speak in this
video
clip
devilishly crafting the “insurgency” for the Russians on
the Pak-Afghan border); the so called “insurgency” in
Pakistan is also calculatingly fabricated, ab initio, in the
USA
through covert intervention and black-ops. [26] Subsequently, with
sufficient
“tickling”
during the overt
counter-insurgency
operations,
and by astutely harvesting all the cultural
cracks
and lacunae of the people,
the “insurgency” acquires a
reactionary
life
of its own. [27]
That
latter stage, as well as on-going black-ops induced wanton acts of
terrorism using the pre-“tickled” dupes and patsies as
now rapidly transpiring, October 9-12, 2009,
NYT,
NYT
– like the secret and 'officially denied' component of
NATO's
Operation Gladio
in Western Europe of yesteryear which blamed it on the communists to
keep an increasingly skeptical public's fear of the then boogieman du
jour continually alive – are Machiavellianly projected in the
news
media,
by the
native
informants,
by the
fabricated
dissent-chiefs,
and the
Mighty
Wurlitzer,
as
INSURGENCY. [28] And therefore, it is officially argued, an
unarguable
raison d'être for continuing the barbaric
counter-insurgency to implement the writ of the state. This
predictably creates a self-sustaining destabilization as both
commonsense and political science 101 would inform even an imbecile.
The blood-drenched puppetshow so enacted, inevitably affords a
compelling pretext to the puppetmasters to justify their own military
intervention to “save” the people who are incapable of
doing it themselves.
The
innocent Pakistan military, not too well-versed in political science
or Hegelian Dialectics based Machiavellian state-craft (I presume),
in this prelude to NATO forces marching in, is similarly being
compelled to take real counter-insurgency measures like the Soviets.
Aided and abetted of course by high ranking traitors from within
their own ranks, and by their foreign paymasters' militaries (NATO,
Blackwater now renamed Xe, and other un-named foreign divisions
operating within Pakistan which I call “Jundallah-plusplus”
to distinguish them from “Jundallah” which is apparently
targeting Iran from Pakistani soil). The simple fact that Pakistan is
supplying all the drinking water (bottled by Nestle), and full
logistics channel for war-making supplies to NATO in Afghanistan is
telling in and of itself. Pakistan is equally responsible for
destroying the Afghan society, the Afghan people, and there is no
less spilled-blood of innocent Afghani Muslims upon Pakistan's hands
over the past 30 years, than upon the United States'.
Pakistani
military helped destroy Afghanistan, and they are now helping to
destroy Pakistan. No Pakistani civilian I know, including myself,
ever authorized the Pakistani military to destroy Afghanistan, or aid
the United States in its own hegemonic plans on the Grand Chessboard.
Do you know anyone? So from where did they get their mandate? I would
rather have clean drinking water in my tap, damn it! What good are
the bloody nukes when they become the raison d'être for
our very destruction in this manner without ever firing a single
missile at the drones that are killing our own peoples?
It
gives me no pleasure to repeatedly rehearse this footnote to history.
What is not already obvious to the Pakistanis? It must surely still
occur to many a reasonable military man serving with genuine zeal and
honor in the real pivot of power in Pakistan that the end is drawing
near. What are they doing idly watching the battle of their lives
from the sidelines – when they are not shooting or displacing
their own peoples that is? As
quoted
from a Dawn newspaper column:
“THIS
article poses two questions: on the day after US/Nato forces invade
and occupy some of Balochistan and Waziristan, what will we say we
should have done, and why aren’t we doing it now? Is this
far-fetched? ... One hopes that a small group of patriotic officers
in Pakistan are also asking themselves what can be done, and why
aren’t we doing it now.” [29]
Gentlemen
may cry, Peace, Peace--but there is no peace. The war is actually
begun! The next gale that sweeps from the north will bring to our
ears the clash of resounding arms! And that's the tortuous
déjà
vu reality
today. [30]
If
one is genuinely confused about who is the enemy, whether it's the
Taliban, Al-Qaeeda, Islamism, Militant Islam, unknown foreign
fighters, foreign intelligence agencies, India, Israel, American
interests, or the United States' globalist oligarchs hell bent on
criminally realizing their
one-world
government agenda
by fabricating and harvesting
“revolutionary times”
across the planet, [31] please spend some time reviewing the book
The
Pakistan Decapitation Papers
available from
Project
Humanbeingsfirst.org
[32]
Write
to me if you are still uncertain about who is behind “tickling”
the so called “insurgents” into existence, and why that
is necessary in order to fight the lifetime of World War IV with our
blood
. After all,
“God
is on your side”
!
[33]
Footnotes
'Bombings
are rare in Iran, but insurgencies have been blamed for some deadly
bomb attacks in recent years. In February 2007, a car loaded with
explosives blew up near a bus carrying members of Iran's
Revolutionary Guard, killing 11 of them. In 2006, blasts killed nine
people in Ahvaz near the Iraq border. Iran alleges that the United
States, Israel, and Britain are behind the upsurge in militant
activity and says it has intelligence to support the allegation.'
-- LA Times, April 13, 2008.
[18]
NYT, Sunday, April 20, 2008, Message Machine: Behind TV Analysts,
Pentagon’s Hidden Hand - A PENTAGON CAMPAIGN Retired officers
have been used to shape terrorism coverage from inside the TV and
radio networks. By DAVID BARSTOW
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/20/us/20generals.html
'US
officials "want to go for Pakistan's nuclear assets. They are
inching close to those nuclear assets day by day," he added.
When asked about Washington's long-term goal in Pakistan, the former
Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) said that the United States wants
to keep the country destabilized.' -- Press TV Sept. 14, 2009.
This
is the same General Gul turning on his own patrons after he had fully
assisted them in “giving to the USSR its Vietnam war”
from Pakistani soil. An African proverb says: you need a very long
spoon to sip with the devil.
'TEHRAN
- Pakistan’s former chief of army staff, General Mirza Aslam
Beg (ret.), has said the U.S. private security company Blackwater was
directly involved in the assassinations of former Pakistani prime
minister Benazir Bhutto and former Lebanese prime minister Rafik
Hariri.' -- Tehran Times Sept. 14, 2009
The
News, Friday, September 25, 2009 More drone strikes possible in
Pakistan (dead link)
http://www.thenews.com.pk/top_story_detail.asp?Id=24694
Gladio
First
September 28, 2009 | Revised November 02, 2009 4835
Links fixed, references [Added] to Footnotes to sync with Case Study: Insurgency vs Counter-Insurgency, April 17, 2016
Links fixed, Swat photo attribution corrected, March 03, 2018 1:00 pm
The Decapitation of Pakistan by its own Military! By Zahir Ebrahim