Project Humanbeingsfirst: Machiavelli

Machiavelli

Caption A Gestalt Shift in Perspective is required to understand Modernity (Image source)

WHAT IS THAT SHIFT IN PERSPECTIVE?

ABSOLUTELY NOTHING IN THE WORLD IS AS IT IS MADE TO APPEAR

Let's just take a sample:

(Click on the image of interest)

'War on Terror' is not about 'Islamofascism' – Please get with the real agenda you people!

Download PDF: The Poor-Man's Guide to Modernity 6th Edition 2013

An FBI presentation titled “Militancy Considerations” measures the relationship between piety and violence among the texts of the three Abrahamic faiths

Hijacking the word 'Islam' for Mantra Creation

Architecture of Modern Propaganda: The Public Mind in the Making

'Burn a Quran' pastor torching the 'religion of the devil' is not about religion – Please get with the real agenda you people!

Download PDF: Hijacking the Holy Qur'an and Islam 1st Print Edition March 2013

'600 page Fatwa on Terrorism' is not about terrorism – Please get with the real agenda you people!

'Nobel Peace Prize' is not about peace – Please get with the real agenda you people!

The Answer to the Burning Question du jour: Why was President Obama Gifted the Nobel Peace Prize?

'War on Iran' is not about its imminent threat of WMD any more than 'Operation Iraqi Freedom' was – Please get with the real agenda you people!

'TSA groping at Airports' is not about security – Please get with the real agenda you people!

TSA vagina probe and you – Where are America's balls? In the fist of the TSA…

Public Service Announcement: Body-scan Alert - Not Suffering Indignities at Airports

'Global Warming' is not about the environment – Please get with the real agenda you people!

Between Global Warming and Global Governance – Concern for Environment is a ‘Hegelian Mind Fck’!

Reflections on Modernity, Climategate, Pandemic, Peer Review, and Science in the Service of Empire

'Pandemic Vaccination' is not about fighting viruses – Please get with the real agenda you people!

Hysteria vs. Reality - Reconstruction of a Mass Hysteria - The Swine Flu Panic of 2009 By DER SPIEGEL Staff March 12, 2010

'Democracy Revolutions' are not about bringing liberation – Please get with the real agenda you people!

Instrumenting Kosovo in the 'arc of crisis' and the 'global zone of percolating violence'

'Insurgency vs. Counter-Insurgency' is not about quelling the pirates – Please get with the real agenda you people!

Insurgency vs. Counter-Insurgency By Zahir Ebrahim

'UFO' is not about aliens invading earth from outerspace or from mars – Please get with the real agenda you people!

The Agenda Behind Aliens and UFOs - A Hegelian Mind-Fck Part-II

Behavior Control: Anatomy and Architecture of Modern Propaganda Techniques for Psychological Warfare

'Global Financial Crisis' is neither about the economy nor finance nor banking – Please get with the real agenda you people!

The Monetary Conspiracy For World Government

Cacheof Tracking the Bailout via NYT U.S. Details $800 Billion Loan Plans Nov252008 26fed.600.gif

Overturning the 150 year running Zionist 'Settlement of Palestine' without taking-on the prime mover force protecting it is a Machiavellian treadmill deliberately fabricated to waste time – Please get with the real agenda you people!

The Omnipotent Rothschilds : Where is the Evidence? Part-3

Palestine: The Illusion of Power and the Calculus of Dispossession

Of Ostriches and Rebels on The Hard Road to World Order

Thank you for getting this far – you are evidently intrigued by the perspective change! The world does look a bit different from the eyes of the tom cat does it not? What should one believe if reality comes so wrapped in layers upon layers of make-beliefs, half-truths, quarter-truths, and just cold lies which run deeper than the proverbial rabbit hole? This is the ultimate information age – where everything the public is made to believe is false! It is also the ultimate age of liberty – getting the people to love their own servitude! During the staging process of achieving full scientific dictatorship of the planet, the public is kept content merely singing about justice alongside Les Miserables, or from their favorite book of hymns and elegies!

POSTSCRIPT Just one more thing.

Empiricism lamentably betrays that knowledge does not automatically lead to a change in behavior or mind-set. Only the courage of one's convictions does. So even if you figured out reality at the other end of the rabbit hole – then what of it? You can read this website all day long, listen to endless hours of talks and lectures on the internet with rapt attention, seek wise counsel from your chieftains, pontiffs and holy books, and it will not change your behavior one bit. However, the tickling of self-preservation will almost always instinctually lead to an immediate change in behavior! Unless of course one is too vested in enjoying one's servitude – like this brilliant fellow who clearly only lacks the courage of his own convictions and not knowledge!

Nevertheless, hope springs eternal that this gestalt shift in perspective will enable you to fully perceive the world from the predatory eyes of the tom cat eyeing its prey. You are the next meal in the fishbowl! My very first piece of public writing in April 2003 stated that to be the obvious fact of the matter. This Job advertisement in December 2011 by the US Military and NDAA 1031 validate it – if nothing else since 9/11 has done it for you. Nothing ever alters the tom cat's predatory instincts just because its prey refuses to recognize it.

The predator is always waiting, watching, scheming, conniving.... before pouncing – the inveterate “hectoring hegemon”! And it's done with the most devilishly cunning Hegelian Dialectics that simply run circles around the prey alternately shocking and exhausting it into accepting what's planned for it. The only escape from its death-jaws is for its preys to change their behavior pattern perspicaciously BEFORE it is a fait accompli. Ex post facto, one can narrate to one's heart's content – as gallant observers are doing today for NDAA 1031!

But it was already presaged in Chapter-5 way back in 2003! Had sagacious narrators of today paid even an iota of attention to such forensic examination of reality back then in the early stages of “imperial mobilization”, instead of 'United We Stand' to bomb Muslim nations or in mindless dissent, they wouldn't be vacuously narrating now!

Looking ahead, that future reality of “history's actors” is being engineered today... and that reality is World Order, a one-world government! This entire song and dance choreography is just to motivate mankind to get it there as quickly as possible. The oligarchy can't wait no more – they have already waited too damn long planning for this transformation! They just love crises – and they engineer them on demand to accelerate their choreography. So now you know – what you gonna do about it? Occupy? The financial oligarchy has crafted it themselves to create the crisis they need for the next stage of police state.... the sly predator cornering its prey has exactly anticipated all its typical behavior patterns:

“There will be no day of days then when a new world order comes into being. Step by step and here and there it will arrive, and even as it comes into being it will develop fresh perspectives, discover unsuspected problems and go on to new adventures. No man, no group of men, will ever be singled out as its father or founder. For its maker will be not this man nor that man nor any man but Man, that being who is in some measure in every one of us. World order will be, like science, like most inventions, a social product, an innumerable number of personalities will have lived fine lives, pouring their best into the collective achievement. ...

Nor does it alter the fact that even when the struggle seems to be drifting definitely towards a world social democracy, there may still be very great delays and disappointments before it becomes an efficient and beneficent world system.

Countless people, from maharajas to millionaires and from pukkha sahibs to pretty ladies, will hate the new world order, be rendered unhappy by the frustration of their passions and ambitions through its advent and will die protesting against it.

When we attempt to estimate its promise we have to bear in mind the distress of a generation or so of malcontents, many of them quite gallant and graceful-looking people.”
(New World Order – H. G. Wells, 1940, Ch. 12 WORLD ORDER IN BEING)

The only escape from its death-jaws is for the victims to collectively, in large numbers, and atypically, change their own behavior patterns from what's already been anticipated – FROM abject indifference and enjoying their servitude TO sagacious preemptive self-defense under mutually beneficial full spectrum alliances – BEFORE it is fait accompli. I.e., before it becomes history; a done deal!

This can only be accomplished at national levels. Brave nations, unwilling to accept the primacy of the internationalist sociopaths, breaking through the stifling web of international controls strangualting them by effectively coordinating their resistance under uncompromisingly strong national leadership, to survive the Grand Chessboard.

Can it be done?

(NO --- not in a modernity when nations' elites are house niggers and fifth columnists working for the same internationalist sociopaths laboring under the white mans' burden --- and not when the massa's own most notable dissent is merely a Hegelian Dialectic that keeps their predatory core axioms intact --- and not not when the most astute political minds of the East and the West can at best only echo the very same predatory axioms of empire they purport to oppose! Welcome to the Dawn of the New Age where Ostriches roam)

Source URL: http://humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/p/modernity.html

Last Updated on Monday, February 11, 2013 05:34 pm 1357

Full Copyright Notice

All material copyright (c) Project Humanbeingsfirst^TM, with full permission to copy, repost, and reprint, in its entirety, unmodified, for any purpose, granted, provided the full URL sentence and the copyright notice contained within each Document are also reproduced verbatim as part of this license, along with any embedded links within its main text, and not doing so may be subject to copyright license violation infringement claims pursuant to remedies noted at http://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap5.html. All figures, images, quotations, and excerpts are used without permission based on non-profit "fair-use" for personal education and research use only in the greater public interest. The usage is minimally consistent with the understanding of laws noted at http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 of US Copyright Laws, you are provided the material from Project Humanbeingsfirst upon your request, and taking any action that delivers you any of its documents in any form is considered making a specific request to receive the documents for your own personal educational and/or research use. You are directly responsible for seeking the requisite permissions from other copyright holders for any use beyond “fair use”. Exclusion: All rights are expressly reserved for the usage of the terms (c) Humanbeingsfirst^TM and (c) Humanbeingfirst^TM which are the copyrighted and trademarked intellectual property of Project Humanbeingsfirst^TM. Reproduction Note: It is acceptable to reproduce any document in smaller serialized parts provided the full URL sentence and the copyright notice within each document are also reproduced in each part and the entire document is reproduced. Please read http://humanbeingsfirst.org/#Legal-Disclaimer-Notice.

Caveat Emptor

Please be advised that Project Humanbeingsfirst^TM fully cooperates with all law enforcement and other governmental agencies worldwide in rooting out Terrorism in all its nuanced shades and stripes in order to end its Neanderthal reign of terror upon all who are human beings first. Project Humanbeingsfirst does not distinguish between terrorists clad in turbans and those wearing suits, nor between the predatory rampages of the pirates vs. the emperors, albeit each is apportioned the measure of crime and guilt commensurate to their respective station of power and impact on their victims. Law enforcement personnel worldwide, but especially in the United States and the West, are encouraged to participate with Project Humanbeingsfirst. It is essential for all nations' state security apparatus to learn how to forensically identify the monumental supreme terrorists hiding in plain sight among us under legal cover, the real merchants of death, while they dutifully chase down the easy to spot handful of often deliberately manufactured pirates at sea.

Open Letter to the Doctors of America from Zahir Ebrahim

April 30, 2013

Dear Medical Practitioners in the United States of America

What bothers me about America is that of the 20,000 doctors and surgeons in Boston, from Harvard-MIT MD-Phds to the Dana-Farber super-specialists in every healthcare related field esoterica, not one can stand up to call a spade a spade? The physician I spoke to privately on Jeff Bauman's Boston Marathon explosion injury images broadcast in the newsmedia (see Domestic Terror and Police-State), with just one look at the photos told me this cannot possibly be real.

Yet no medical practitioner, professor of medicine, EMT, EMS, man of science or man of commonsense from Boston to San Francisco has publicly made that call that the exploded legs victim looking alert and not bleeding to death while being strolled on Boylston Street in a wheelchair instead of a gurney is an absurdity?

Is that what you teach your medical students in the United States of America?

What has gone wrong that this nation only produces cowards?

Did Americans learn nothing from the Banality of Evil that created (and destroyed) the Third Reich?

Are you super learned AMA and FDA approved professors of medicine blind? Or merely “United We Stand” super Good Americans?

Disgusted.

Zahir Ebrahim

Project Humanbeingsfirst.org

California

Source URL: http://print-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2013/04/open-letter-to-doctors-of-america.html

Understanding Self-Inflicted Terror

Witness the following from the period of the Cold War, where synthetic terror was used in Western Europe in order to convince the increasingly skeptical Western European public that the Communist threat was real – revealed ex post facto in the BBC documentary in 1992 on NATO's Operation Gladio. Part-3 of the Gladio documentary has the following lovely statement quoted from the US Army's Top Secret Field Manual:

“Top Secret: There may be times when host country governments show passivity or indecision in the face of Communist subversion ... US Army Intelligence must have the means of launching special operations which will convince host country governments and public opinion of the reality of the insurgent danger ... US Army Intelligence should seek to penetrate the insurgency by means of agents of special assignments, with the task of forming special action groups among the most radical elements of the insurgency.”

Watch Operation Gladio All 3 Episodes

Replacing “Communist subversion” in the text above with “Islamofascist terror” or "domestic-terrorists' terror" makes what is being stated in this BBC documentary ominous. It begs the commonsensical question: Is wanton acts of terrorism inflicted upon innocent civilians still a Machiavellian part of statecraft today?

According to James Jesus Angleton, Head of CIA Counter Intelligence Operations from 1954 to 1974, and under whose watch all the momentous terroristic murders of America's most rebellious political leaders transpired (JFK, RFK, MLK, X), Machiavelli is statecraft: “Deception is a state of mind and the mind of the state”

Zbigniew Brzezinski, former president Jimmy Carter's national security advisor, observed the following in his 1996 book The Grand Chessboard:

“It is also a fact that America is too democratic at home to be autocratic abroad. This limits the use of America's power, especially its capacity for military intimidation. Never before has a populist democracy attained international supremacy. But the pursuit of power is not a goal that commands popular passion, except in conditions of a sudden threat or challenge to the public's sense of domestic well-being. The economic self-denial (that is defense spending), and the human sacrifice (casualties even among professional soldiers) required in the effort are uncongenial to democratic instincts. Democracy is inimical to imperial mobilization.”

Read Zahir's take on Making The Public Mind: The Mighty Wurlitzer

Understanding “Plausible Deniability”

During the inception of the Cold War, Harry S. Truman, the 33rd President of the United States, in a 1947 National Security Council directive known as NSC 10/2, signed the Machiavellian idea of “Plausible Deniability” and public deception as essential to undertaking successful covert operations:

'NSC 10/2 directed CIA to conduct “covert” rather than merely “psychological” operations, defining them as all activities “which are conducted or sponsored by this Government against hostile foreign states or groups or in support of friendly foreign states or groups but which are so planned and executed that any US Government responsibility for them is not evident to unauthorized persons and that if uncovered the US Government can plausibly disclaim any responsibility for them.”'

These Machiavellian insight into the calculus of statecraft by American statesmen themselves beg the obvious question: Does “Plausible Deniability” still continue after the end of the Cold War, and if so, how does it manifest itself?

Read Zahir's take on Plausible Deniability: Anatomy of Conspiracy Theory

Understanding “Worthy Victims” and “Unworthy Victims”

By Chomsky's definition, the “worthy victim” is always worthy of being mourned, as it is made victim by the bad guys or their allies. The “unworthy victim” is unworthy of being mourned or even worrying about, as it is made victim by the good guys or their allies.

And because frequently occurring “worthy victims” continually refuel the necessary “doctrinal motivation, intellectual commitment, and patriotic gratification” to sustain “imperial mobilization” since “democracy is inimical to imperial mobilization” as Zbigniew Brzezinski puts it, it is not beyond empire to create the “worthy victims” itself using the bad guys as stooges.

If you are bothered by these images of “Harmless innocence Melt” (Milton), mercilessly snuffed out in the bud and unworthy of even being mourned by both the massa and its house niggers, then:

Read Zahir's take on the utlitlity of Worthy and Unworthy Victims narrative for “imperial mobilization”

Understanding the “House Nigger” and the “Massa”

Malcolm X, assassinated by the “lone gunman” along with other recalcitrant political leaders of the United States in the 1960s, offered the following perceptive description of the house nigger and the massa in his autobiography:

“Today's Uncle Tom doesn't wear a handkerchief on his head. This modern, twentieth-century Uncle Thomas now often wears a top hat. He's usually well-dressed and well-educated. He's often the personification of culture and refinement. The twentieth-century Uncle Thomas sometimes speaks with a Yale or Harvard accent. Sometimes he is known as Professor, Doctor, Judge, and Reverend, even Right Reverend Doctor. This twentieth-century Uncle Thomas is a professional Negro ... by that I mean his profession is being a Negro for the white man.” -- (Malcolm X, The Autobiography of Malcolm X, 1964, 1999 hardcover edition, Chapter Black Muslims, page 265)

Martin Luther King Jr., also assassinated by the “lone gunman”, inspired by Malcolm X's unrelenting witticism, also dared to reluctantly capture the mind of the house nigger who eats from the massa's plate thusly:

“The white establishment is skilled in flattering and cultivating emerging leaders. It presses its own image on them and finally, from imitation of manners, dress, and style of living, a deeper strain of corruption develops. This kind of Negro leader acquires the white man’s contempt for the ordinary Negro. He is often more at home with the middle-class white than he is among his own people. His language changes, his location changes, his income changes, and ultimately he changes from the representative of the Negro to the white man into the white man’s representative to the Negro. The tragedy is that too often he does not recognize what has happened to him.” -- (Martin Luther King Jr., A Testament of Hope, page 307)

Read Zahir's take on the modern Intellectual Negro who typically lives among the “unworthy victims”, but echoes the massa's core lies and narratives, often in the guise of dissent

In summation, self-inflicted terror, manufactured by Machiavellian techniques which employ a retinue of stooges, dupes and patsies, is always accompanied by cloaking narratives of the Mighty Wurlitzer in order to make the act of terror achieve its core purpose of mass behavior control. In order to deflect the intelligent people among the public from unraveling the covert agenda and being believed by the rest, methods ranging from “plausible deniability” to “conspiracy theories” are employed to confuse and mislead the rest of the public from believing the unraveling. Not that complicated is it, once the diabolical methods of Machiavellian statecraft and its engagement with the Hegelian Dialectic are understood. Without achieving that perceptive understanding however, the whole concept of self-inflicted terror indeed appears like a 'kookish' conspiracy theory.

Source URL: http://humanbeingsfirst.wordpress.com/2013/04/17/understanding-self-inflicted-terror/

What is Hegelian Dialectic

"After 16 books and 25 years in basic research I thought I'd heard it all ... the world was a confused mess, probably beyond understanding and certainly beyond salvation - and there was little 'l could do about it.

Back in 1968 my Western Technology and Soviet Economic Development was published by the Hoover Institution at Stanford University. In three substantial volumes I detailed how the West had built the Soviet Union. However, the work generated a seemingly insoluble puzzle - why have we done this? Why did we build the Soviet Union, while we also transferred technology to Hitler's Germany? Why does Washington want to conceal these facts? Why have we boosted Soviet military power? And simultaneously boosted our own? In subsequent books, the Wall Street series, I added more questions - but no answers. I had more or less arrived at the conclusion that there was no rational answer that could be proven.

Then a year or so ago I received an eight-inch batch of documents - nothing less than the membership lists of an American secret society. Glancing through the sheets it was more than obvious - this was no ordinary group. The names spelled Power, with a capital P. As I probed each individual a pattern emerged ... and a formerly fuzzy world became crystal clear.

... These volumes will explain why the West built the Soviets and Hitler; why we go to war, to lose; why Wall Street loves Marxists and Nazis; why the kids can't read; why the Churches have become propaganda founts; why historical facts are suppressed, why politicians lie and a hundred other whys.” --- Preface Antony C. Sutton

Here is a sample, pgs. 37-38:

How can there exist a common objective when members are apparently acting in opposition to one another?

Probably the most difficult task in this work will be to get across to the reader what is really an elementary observation: that the objective of The Order is neither "left" nor "right." "Left" and "right" are artificial devices to bring about change, and the extremes of political left and political right are vital elements in a process of controlled change.

The answer to this seeming political puzzle lies in Hegelian logic. Remember that both Marx and Hitler, the extremes of "left" and "right" presented as textbook enemies, evolved out of the same philosophical system: Hegelianism. That brings screams of intellectual anguish from Marxists and Nazis, but is well known to any student of political systems.

The dialectical process did not originate with Marx as Marxists claim, but with Fichte and Hegel in late 18th and early 19th century Germany. In the dialectical process a clash of opposites brings about a synthesis. For example, a clash of political left and political right brings about another political system, a synthesis of the two, neither left nor right. This conflict of opposites is essential to bring about change. Today this process can be identified in the literature of the Trilateral Commission where "change" is promoted and "conflict management" is termed the means to bring about this change.

In the Hegelian system conflict is essential. Furthermore, for Hegel and systems based on Hegel, the State is absolute. The State requires complete obedience from the individual citizen. An individual does not exist for himself in these so-called organic systems but only to perform a role in the operation of the State. He finds freedom only in obedience to the State. There was no freedom in Hitler's Germany, there is no freedom for the individual under Marxism, neither will there be in the New World Order. And if it sounds like George Orwell's 1984 - it is.

In brief, the State is supreme and conflict is used to bring about the ideal society. Individuals find freedom in obedience to the rulers.

Witness how the Hegelian Dialectic is being used today to hoe the Hard Road to World Order

Down Memory Lane Ten Years Later 2003 to 2013

"I don't believe that the majority of the American public, which the outside world perceives as self-serving for their self-indulgent pursuits of the “American Dream”, are quite like that. I don't believe that they are out to get the world, nor do I believe that they “knowingly” turn a blind eye to the machinations of their government, unlike how most of the world's populations might perceive them.

I believe that the American public is genuinely deceived, incredibly indoctrinated, and purposely and systematically kept ignorant. And that their condition of “ignorance” is the outcome of their institutional ruling elite finding this to be the most efficient way to conduct the “imperial” business of the state, because otherwise, “democracy is inimical to imperial mobilization”.

These are the main assumptions in my book. I guess if you don't agree with them, then you are only left with the first alternative, that the American public is indeed incredibly self-serving, and consequently morally guilty of war crimes against humanity for their role in knowingly aiding and abetting their government in this fictitious “war on terrorism”. Take your pick." --- America’s Shame - 2003!

"Wake up sleeping and complacent America!

It may have started with the Muslims, but it will not end there. You might be next. Fascism usually starts against a minority group, because it is easier to tolerate since it is only happening to those “damn Arabs” – not to us – how did our oil get under their sand anyway? But the laws that are getting on the books in the persecution of the minority, tend to stay there for a long time.

If not you, then your children will surely pay the price. Are the Bill of Rights so trivial that you can stay silent? If not for reasons of compassion for another, then at least for the logic of self preservation, do not let this injustice prevail." --- They dared to knock on my door - 2003

Everyone has their Polyannish moments - right?

The Gold Standard Boondoggle

Monetary Reform: First Look at the Gold Standard

Zahir Ebrahim | Project Humanbeingsfirst.org

First Written November 13, 2008

[ Author's Preface, March 26, 2013: I have a feeling that while 'war on terror' and other existential games are being played out in the left-field to continually engage the public's attention, the really significant issues are being decided in the right-field (thanks to the rebel Walter J. Burien, Jr., cafr1.com/BIO.html, for that apt baseball analogy from many years ago). There is very little analytical deconstruction of the Gold Standard that has been advanced over what has been known for ages. This is a seed to create a deeper more scrutinizing debate based on the examination of the five points mentioned towards the end of this article. These five points enable separating the chaff from the wheat.

It has been my sad observation that virtually all monetary reform advocates choose to remain silent on these questions while they trumpet their solutions as the best invention since sliced bread. I am less than impressed. Unfortunately Ron Paul has now departed (or will soon depart as per his statement earlier this year) from Congress but has left the legacy of Gold Standard wannabes as the panacea to world's financial crisis, including my favorite scholar, G. Edward Griffin, from whose books and videos, I will admit with thanks right off the bat, I cut my baby teeth on this monetary knowledge. Now I dare to challenge him as he is the co-exponent of the Gold Standard with Ron Paul, and, no surprise, the World Bank! I hope you can print this on your blog, website, and/or debate it, to put some more meat on this skeleton article. If a non-expert can get this far, the experts can certainly go farther. But where do they go instead? See what MIT Sloan Professor Simon Johnson named 'public intellectual' of the year says at MIT. And Nobel Laureate economist James Tobin says at Princeton. Bunch of bullshit is where they collectively take the public mind from America's top Ivy Leagues while the world of elite establishmentarians applaud; precisely where their pious detractors and fabled dissent also invariably take the public mind while the goofy public also applauds. And that is the Ron Paul's legacy on Gold Standard scrutinized below. Please better this almost 5 year old analysis.

The drive towards some kind of Gold Standard is accelerating among establishmentarians in the first world nations, with the sheep among the third world nations also demanding their own slaughter, while none among those learned in economics and financial policy-making in both worlds dare to publicly address the issues highlighted below. I know precisely why. That reason was most ably captured by W. Cleon Skousen in his commentary to Carroll Quigley's momentous work Tragedy and Hope, in these perceptive words: 'The real value of Tragedy and Hope ... [is the] bold and boastful admission by Dr. Quigley that there actually exists a relatively small but powerful group which has succeeded in acquiring a choke-hold on the affairs of practically the entire human race. Of course we should be quick to recognize that no small group could wield such gigantic power unless millions of people in all walks of life were “in on the take” and were willing to knuckle down to the iron-clad regimentation of the ruthless bosses behind the scenes. As we shall see, the network has succeeded in building its power structure by using tremendous quantities of money (together with the vast influence it buys) to manipulate, intimidate, or corrupt millions of men and women and their institutions on a world-wide basis.' (W. Cleon Skousen, The Naked Capitalist, pg. 6) ]

This is Project Humanbeingsfirst's first look at the key issues inherent in the Gold Standard as the backing commodity for national and international currency. It is being advocated by Hon. Congressman Ron Paul of Texas ('The Revolution – A Manifesto', Chapter-6 “Money The Forbidden Issue in American Politics”). He is inspired by the Ludwig von Mises Institute (http://mises.org/) which represents the libertarian political and economic thinking of the Austrian School of Economics. That in turn, in this scribe's opinion, can be elegantly captured in a nutshell by the British economist E. F. Schumacher's Buddhist paradigm of “Man is small, and, therefore, small is beautiful”. Mises Institute primarily features the work of Ludwig von Mises ('Human Action – A Treatise on Economics') where Mises notes: “Economics deals with society's fundamental problems; it concerns everyone and belongs to all. It is the main and proper study of every citizen”. Mises Institute also features the work of his student, Murray N. Rothbard ('What Has Government Done to Our Money?'), who notes: “On the free market, everyone earns according to his productive value in satisfying consumer desires. Under statist distribution, everyone earns in proportion to the amount he can plunder from the producers.”

Ron Paul is evidently inspired by these 'Small Is Beautiful' decentralization principles of sustainable economics, sustainable government, sustainable development, and the importance and responsibility of man for his own decision-making and welfare, as opposed to centralized institutional planning and impersonal decision-making [1]. Who would not like such 'manly' “Tim the Toolman Taylor” empowerment? As the iconic macho-man Governor of California, Arnold Schwarzenegger, might have said in some movie – only the “girlie man”!

However, there surely must also be, somewhere in its verbiage, an implied balance and harmony in this Buddhist doctrine of governmental non-interventionism. The extreme at either end is of course, only bounded by total anarchy on the one side, and total collectivism on the other, as correctly observed by G. Edward Griffin (http://realityzone.com). Both extremes can have undesirable characteristics. The communist style centralized planning and control is a well known collectivist extreme – and apparently the world today is indeed headed towards that characteristics with a global police state in the offing and a global central banking under construction which will usher in a global currency managed by private International banksters.

Whereas, complete deregulation and privatization (in for-profit hands) of public commons which are held in trust for all peoples, is the other extreme. As is blatantly apparent, the world today is also simultaneously headed in that direction too with neo-liberalism. The twain meet in the corporate boardrooms controlled by the same gluttonous hands on Wall Street whose principal share holders are usually the opaque “institutional investors”. It would perhaps only shock the most naïve to learn that the largest of these “institutional investors” is the sole superpower on earth, the United States of America Corporation, at all levels: local, state, and federal. See the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) that is produced by each of these governmental bodies and public agencies (a public report which the public and its mainstream news media have evidently never heard about, see http://CAFR1.com ).

And it is noteworthy for privatization impetus that as a non-predatory socio-economics system design principle, when there is an infinite demand for something, and the very life of every man and every woman may depend on its availability, holding it as a social benefit, in public trust, is the mark of wisdom; whereas privatizing it in unaccountable gluttonous hands a mark of predatory social Darwinianism. All reformers can surely agree that a nation's monetary system falls into this category, of a public commons, to be managed in trust, by their government, for the common good of all its peoples. This is all the more true for a non-predatory international monetary system which ought to sensibly be held in global trust as a global public commons.

That is the one key central platform upon which all monetary reformers are united, and have always remain united throughout history. It forms one continuous resistance against aggregated wealth holders who have hijacked control of any nation's money supply.

This resistance is profoundly historical, and even today, brings to bear its entire weight of all historical arguments made against private monopolistic control of a nation's money – from Julius Caesar to Cicero to Thomas Jefferson to Andrew Jackson to Abraham Lincoln to William Jennings Bryan. The latter being the last of the great challengers to private wealth holders perpetually seeking to make a precious limited commodity like gold the standard currency, before the devilish orchestration in 1913, of the present day private banking cartel of the Federal Reserve System, did one better. Legally acquired exclusive private monopoly rights over the most common element, 'thin air'! [2]

Therefore, in these times, we resume that same thread of resistance – with a clearer understanding of the devil before us, and with an even greater force of cumulative arguments – right from where William Jennings Bryan left off, continuing with his own precise principled words of 1896: [3]

“We say in our platform that we believe that the right to coin money and issue money is a function of government. We believe it. We believe it is a part of sovereignty and can no more with safety be delegated to private individuals than can the power to make penal statutes or levy laws for taxation.”

And of course, not neglecting to be inspired by America's famous “I killed the bank” President, Andrew Jackson's own motivating words: [4]

“You are a den of vipers. I intend to rout you out, and by God, I will rout you out.”

The presumably earnest reformers who believe in the Gold Standard, like Congressman Ron Paul and the Mises Institute, just as those who believe in Lincoln's Greenbacks or the Colonial Scrip of the American colonies, like the American Monetary Institute (http://monetary.org), and just as those who believe in other systems, like the 'tally sticks' of the English, or the 'Natural Economic Order' of Silvio Gesell, all equally share in this fantastically rich inheritance of principled resistance against the handful of private aggregated wealth owners squeezing the public in their beguiling lender's perpetual debt trap.

These reformers evidently only disagree in the pragmatic matter of which alternate monetary system to introduce against their common mortal enemy! And while they disunite amongst themselves as to “who's the fairest”, without a well-funded foundation backing them, an influential think-tank writing their policy papers, an effective political lobby-group pushing it to the Congress, or even a press-corps of editorial writers to their name to generate public opinion, their antagonists delight in this incapability of their rag-tag opposition to form effective coalitions on their own common grounds. The well-intentioned moral activist of modernity surely must intimately understand, beyond mindlessly parroting others, that the banking parasites have, in every epoch, very powerfully, and with much clever propaganda, attempted to gain control of this essential government function that President Lincoln called “the Government's greatest creative opportunity” [5]:

“The Government should create, issue, and circulate all the currency and credit needed to satisfy the spending power of the Government and the buying power of the consumers. The privilege of creating and issuing money is not only the supreme prerogative of Government, but it is the Government's greatest creative opportunity. By the adoption of these principles ... the taxpayers will be saved immense sums of interest. Money will cease to be master and become the servant of humanity.”

Therefore, it is all the more perplexing – given such profound intellectualism and advocacy for decentralized self-sufficiency on the one hand in the Austrian School of Economics, and such a rich historical legacy of resistance against private central banks controlling a nation's money supply on the other – why the return to Gold Standard is being so 'religiously' advocated by Ron Paul and the Mises Institute which only helps fatten the same “moneychangers”!

The Gold Standard is being projected by the reformers as the sine qua non of monetary reform to get the United States, and the world, out of its misery of debt burden and the imminent danger of financial collapse. It is surely well understood by Ron Paul, given that he talks about it a lot, that the collapse would be the pretext to create from its ashes, the pre-planned supra-national state of the North American Union, and a new currency called Amero. He also well understands the agenda for a centralized world government to be controlled by a cartel of private international central banks as the top of the ruling pyramid. Such an agenda is already being pursued at an accelerated pace, and the import of time-criticalness of any effective resistance to avert such an outcome that ends the sovereignty of nation-states is surely not lost on Ron Paul. Therefore, the inability to quickly comprehend the incongruence of this path of the Gold Standard with respect to their own aims seem rather Kafkaesque. Is this really rocket science that an ordinary person cannot think it through? Not according to Ludwig von Mises:

“Economics deals with society's fundamental problems; it concerns everyone and belongs to all. It is the main and proper study of every citizen.”

The Gold Standard advocates seem to think that gold will magically materialize, in great abundance, in the Fort Knox secure vaults of the United States as a public property in trust. While a pocket full of gold and silver coins can be made laudable work-horses for local trade as local currency – with perhaps a defined conversion-rate to national-currency – it does not work as a national currency in modernity. This analysis explains why. Gold's ability to insure against inflation, as well as against the inflation-tax when it is a fully-backed reserve rather than a fractional reserve, is a cleverly planted red herring. Or so it would appear, given the impracticalities of creating fairness between the wealthy asset holders who own a large stock of hard assets, and real producers who are often without such hard property assets, and mainly have the sweat of their brow, the creativity of their intellect, or the courage of their arms, as their main production asset and which remains unprotected by such protection mechanisms of the wealthy. The unexamined axiom itself, that guarding against inflation must be the paramount factor to optimize, and all other factors need to be subservient to this one dominant factor in the design of a rational and fair monetary system, needs detailed scrutiny. That axiom is not scrutinized here, but several preliminary arguments can be made to show that the axiom itself may be mis-constructed based on assumptions made, or imperatives defined, by powerful landed wealth owners.

In addition, as in any system design, whatever be its level of abstraction, there are always pragmatic tradeoffs. When one balances the entire system and looks at all the pros and cons of every aspect of any precious limited commodity based standard for a monetary system, the directions in which to make reasonable and rational tradeoffs to construct a well balanced system in the best public interest, with a rational operating envelop that is resilient to economic upheavals, become all the more clear. Only 'religion' may define absolutes without trade-off. Mercifully, heaven did not stipulate a specific monetary system, but only outlined its first-principle: don't transact in interest! A hundred viable systems can be architected with that quality. Jesus banished the “moneychangers” from the Temple in Jerusalem due to their fleecing their flock. He did not stipulate which exclusive money system to use, only what not to do. The needs of the people, and the times, determine what system to use. And William Jennings Bryan articulated that very need of the majority “man is small, and, therefore, small is beautiful” laboring man – which remains the same today – when he passionately orated at the 1896 Democratic National Convention:

“Having behind us the producing masses of this nation and the world, supported by the commercial interests, the laboring interests and the toilers everywhere, we will answer their demand for a gold standard by saying to them: You shall not press down upon the brow of labor this crown of thorns, you shall not crucify mankind upon a cross of gold.”

The preliminary analysis presented here is applicable, as first-principles, for any precious limited commodity-backed monetary standard. There is strong motivation brewing among many a 'malcontent' to take the power of coining money 'out of thin air' away from the Federal Reserve System, and to move the United States away from 'money as public debt' Hamiltonian principle. For background reading, please see the bibliographic recommendation at the end, and the afore-cited books.

And it would be entirely appropriate to begin with these most eloquent words, as they precisely capture the raison d'être of Project Humanbeingsfirst's motto: “The Plebeian Antidote To Hectoring Hegemons”:

“I would be presumptuous, indeed, to present myself against the distinguished gentlemen to whom you have listened if this were but a measuring of ability; but this is not a contest among persons. The humblest citizen in all the land when clad in the armor of a righteous cause is stronger than all the whole hosts of error that they can bring. ... I shall object to bringing this question down to a level of persons. The individual is but an atom; he is born, he acts, he dies; but principles are eternal; and this has been a contest of principle.” (Ibid.)

The first-principle concerns with any precious commodity based monetary standard, are three:

1) Gold is precious, therefore, by definition, it is limited; hence again by definition, someone has a monopoly over it. Acquiring it in sufficient quantity ab initio requires a priori assets that must be exchanged that is valuable to those who have this monopoly. For a State, this means hawking one's independence to the precious commodity supplier in perpetuity each time it wishes to expand its money supply beyond the reserves. Unless of course, by fiat, the State is able to confiscate that precious commodity in the name of national security or national interest.

2) Because the commodity is precious and limited – and even if initially acquired by whatever bootstrapping means to launch the standard, including hawking national sovereignty to bankers and institutional investors who already own a lot of gold, or confiscating gold from the public as was done by Roosevelt in 1934 – Gold cannot be used to arbitrarily expand the money supply which it backs, in order to create extremely large infusions of cash.

In post-agrarian and fully industrialized societies – such as the G-7 Western nations – setting up capital intensive mega-industries and mega-factories, and undertaking mega-infrastructure national projects, can take billions of dollars. Even for developing nations where development cost is invariably of the same order of magnitude as the West for similar projects, if a nation does not have the equivalent amount of the precious commodity fully backing its currency, she must either make recourse to fractional-reserve banking away from the full-reserve banking just by the practicalities of the matter, and therefore, incur its concomitant baggage of inflationary-tax once again. Or the poorer nations must put automatic and entirely artificial breaks on their national growth and national wealth creation, or otherwise become borrowers again to the same cartel of banksters! Unless of course one discovers an endless monopolistic benevolent supplier, like god planting it in one's backyard and giving one enough smarts and courage to not lease it out to snake-oil salesmen who will invariably come calling on F-16s spreading the black-ops cheer blithely claiming “Hegemony is as old as mankind”!

Both factors 1) and 2) are a major problem for any nation adopting a limited precious commodity as a standard. But it is an even greater problem if it is forcibly created as an International standard. Then it is especially an unfair standard imposed upon disadvantaged nations who do not have that commodity in abundance, just as it is an unfair advantage for those rich nations who do have an abundance of such commodity, or can acquire it.

Based on those two first-principles, I do not like any “precious commodity” based standard that is by definition, limited.

3) If it is not the limitedness of such a commodity, but its abundance, and its equitable distribution among all nations can be ensured, then I have no problem whatsoever with such a commodity backed national or International monetary standard.

Since fairness, and not 'might makes right', is the quintessential first-principle touchstone axiom of any rational analysis, Congressman Ron Paul's Gold penchant suffers from both factors 1) and 2). And it also does not have 3) as a mitigating characteristic. If a touchstone other than fairness is employed, such as how to fatten the gluttonous appetite of banksters, then surely the Gold Standard is a great plan-B in case the private central banks fiat money monopoly becomes too onerous for the sensibilities of the debt-laden strangulated public.

Apart from these three first-principle factors, the many theoretical advantages of a commodity based standard, as noted by Ron Paul, seem plausible. Specifically, a fully backed commodity based standard does not create an inflationary-tax upon the public when money supply is expanded within its fully-backed reserve limit. Beyond its reserve limit, fractional reserve mechanics kick-in to artificially inflate the money-supply which inherently creates the inflationary-tax. If one does not exceed the backing limit, money retains its value over long periods of time so long as the backing commodity retains its value. However, this necessitates the commodity be artificially protected from market capitalism, and its price not allowed to be subjected to market forces in order to retain its stability as a reliable and credible backing standard. The irony of protectionism being made the foundation of 'free-market capitalism' is surely lost to its enthusiastic advocates. But that's merely only of theoretical interest to purists, and of no practical significance to reality, since genuine free market capitalism also only exists in text books. No nation can survive its implementation, least of all, the developing and poor nations rich in natural resources surrounded by global predators forcing 'free-trade' down their throats to create banana republics for careful harvesting.

This price-fixing of gold bullion was the protectionist outcome of the Gold Equivalence Standard which President Roosevelt ushered into law in 1934, and which remained in force until 1971 when President Nixon abolished it. The Gold Equivalence Standard (GES) was not a fully backed standard, but a fractional reserve standard, and when other nations and institutional-agents demanded their gold in exchange for the dollar bill, the United States risked failure to deliver as its gold bullion reserves were not sufficient. It was the same principle as any vanilla run on banks by consumers when the banks' liquidity come into question. The GES was unilaterally abolished by the United States for fear of default when the gold reserves fell dangerously low when I believe France made its demand for gold.

In this GES, gold bullion that comprised it, was priced outside the pale of market forces, at a fixed value of about $35 an ounce. But more disturbingly, all gold from the American public was forcibly confiscated in 1934. The public was given approx. $18 an ounce for their life's savings, with the price being immediately revised upwards to almost twice that as the stable value of the new backing standard. This protectionist value of gold bullion was used in International money-supply transactions of the dollar which was setup as the default reserve currency of the world at Bretton Woods Conference post World War II, based on the currency of the unparalleled economic and military power of its main victor. Whereas the price of actual gold continually fluctuated on the open market across the world. Ownership of gold was also made illegal for American citizens (except for numismatists and jewelers). So large institutional multinational investors and banksters with foreign affiliations could easily purchase the gold bullion from the US Treasury in foreign names, but not United States citizens. All of American public's gold was thus made out as a gratuitous gift to the banksters by the fiat of a simple executive signature by President Roosevelt. His New Deal ushered in massive deficit spending of paper money. In his three terms in office he outspent all his predecessors combined.

There is no a priori reason to believe that the future of any new proposed Gold Standard to orchestrate another 'New Deal' – as the remedy for the next Great Depression which is already upon the world's doorsteps – does not already have a precedent-setting paved super highway to travel on. The banksters I am sure are massaging both their gullet and their stomach with joyous glee as plan-B is eagerly put before them as the public's own 'desired solution' for the economic and financial crises of the banksters' own crafty manufacturing!

Since neither Congressman Ron Paul, nor does any other establishmentarian or contrarian exponent of the Gold Standard, address either 1) or 2), nor does anyone stipulate 3) as a mitigation, that is the Achilles heal of the Gold Standard mantra. Mises Institute is victim of the same considerations.

As the banksters already have a monopoly on Gold – or can soon monopolize it because they can create, by fiat, all the cash they need simply out of thin air to purchase what they don't already own – the Honorable Republican Congressman from Texas, in his well meaning enthusiasm, but also his apparent profound inability to clearly think matters through down to their core axioms (see “Open Letter to Hon. Ron Paul Supporters October 29, 2008”), makes a great patsy in their globalist conniving hands as the plan-B enabler already in-place in Congress!

If the above three factors can be satisfactorily addressed, along with practicable implementation modalities which do not impose a draconian burden upon the public as was imposed by President Roosevelt in 1934, then there is nothing inherently wrong with the Gold Standard. Clearly, that is merely a tautological statement since those very innate characteristics of Gold as a limited and precious commodity, and its hoarding in monopolistic hands, is what's wrong with the Gold Standard.

The 5 initial touchstone questions laid out in “Towards a Common Standard Benchmark for evaluating all Monetary Reform Proposals” [7] are reproduced below in context of Ron Paul's advocacy. All Gold Standard exponents must reply to all of these questions satisfactorily – before one can be sure of their proposals which are almost always couched in propagandistic sloganeering, syntactic sugaring over poison pills, prancing around with erudite gibberish to skirt the core issues, and of course outright bs.

a: Central Banking in private hands charges the public perpetual compound-interest for the public's own money. Nationalizing the money creation function solves this problem of 'money as public debt'.

Ron Paul's Gold Standard proposal, as did President Lincoln’s Greenback fiat money, evidently addresses this, by eliminating all interest on the creation of money.

b: Private Central Bank is a legalized monopoly behavior that permits private banks to collude legally for 'price-fixing' the interest-rate. Thus it helps create the business cycle of expanding and contracting credit by modulating its availability in legal collusion – what I call the 'business rape cycle'. Bankers profit from this by buying up those businesses who can’t cut it, pennies to the dollar during the bust periods which dutifully follow upon the heals of boom financing periods.

Nationalizing this function, by having the government manage the availability of credit, what Thomas Edison called “the proper ratio” for money supply – not too much to prevent wild speculation, and not too little to prevent stagnation – goes to a large extent in managing this 'price-fixing' of interest-rate and availability of credit in the greater common good of the public, rather than the banking cartel's now represented by the Federal Reserve System. But government management does not entirely eliminate this aspect – because the private banks can still secretly collude in managing credit availability as they have always done, since they have the same powerful handful of owners at the top!

How does Ron Paul address “the proper ratio” [8] and its implementation for managing the money supply?

c: A Central Bank’s arbitrary money creation by fiat – whether the CB is public or private doesn’t matter, and which is what Greenbacks were – creates an inflationary tax. Nothing new here.

There is no inflationary-tax in a fully backed Gold Standard as proposed by Ron Paul.

This tax will inevitably exist however, by definition, if the GS mutates into a fractional GES and the money supply exceeds the backing gold reserves.

This will happen by default as a matter of practicality, because supply of gold will always be limited in relation to the demand for capital in modern industrialized nations. Therefore, a full proposal needs to be made by the Gold Standard advocates which can be scrutinized in the light of these real-world constraints. Perhaps this is why not a single advocate of the GS fully addresses this specific point. Nor do they conveniently address where the Gold will come from to create the International reserves for such a global world currency, and nor do they ever focus their pious platitudes on the very real issues outlined in 1), 2), and 3) in the analysis of the Gold Standard above. At least, I have not encountered it as of this writing. I am sure these must have been sorted out in some super-classified documents at bis.org, or present in the underground vaults of their execution arm at the World Bank and IMF who will arguably field such global currency as the buck is passed, in the name of reform, from the Federal Reserve Bank to their international global money lender fraternity. See the next item.

d: In modern industrialized societies where the demand for capital can be enormous, far more than was prevalent in agrarian or early-developing industrialized societies, as Richard Cook, the former U.S. Treasury Department employee and now a monetary reformer, argues, how can this natural inflationary tax be avoided in such a fiat money system? In the time of the Greenbacks during the Civil War, while Lincoln printed around 400 million dollars, or some say 500, that is nothing compared to what is needed today in the capital intensive public and private mega-projects. For instance, simply to set up a class-1 semiconductor fab takes a billion+ dollars.

How does Ron Paul's Gold Standard address this large demand for mega-capital that would not also pose an inflationary tax? Where does Ron Paul propose to get all this gold from to fully back his currency? As he has himself noted, he was the member of the Gold Commission in the 1980s, and he could not even at that time say how much of the American public's gold was left in the secure vaults of Fort Knox – the speculation being that whatever remained after Nixon abandoned the GES in 1971, was subsequently sold off to private institutional investors by the United States Treasury, and only empty vaults today are being guarded in great pretense to hide the legal heist of what most might believe was a national asset. So many questions – and no answers by the Gold advocates. Who designs a system, or advocates it, under such conditions of ambiguous and incomplete comprehension? Perhaps there is indeed a secret plan to restock Fort Knox to the ceiling with lead-gold? If that's the case, do make sure there is a bathtub handy and every shiny gold brick first takes a dip in it, with someone reliable present to record each result!

e: Banking itself, indeed, all of International banking, is based on fractional reserve lending. This is the real source of any banker’s continuous and perpetual wealth creation, and hence the source of their unmatched and unrivaled power.

Ron Paul's Gold Standard is fully backed at the time of money creation as a national public commons.

However, it is not clear how he addresses fractional lending at the institutional banking level as individual loans and deposits are made by borrowers.

Can Ron Paul show a practicable method, and not merely in platitudes, whereby the private capitalist banks of the world – owned by powerful trillionaires who also own the majority of lawmakers of the world not to mention in the United States Congress as just witnessed by the passage of the trillion dollar banksters bailout bill in October 2008 despite all the public opposition – can be made to agree to have a fractional reserve lending ratio of 1?

The entrenched forces of private banking are pulling in the opposite direction – towards global private central banking in a world government. How does Congressman Ron Paul along with his Gold Standard buddies plan to counter that powerful force in any efficacious measure?

The solution to the How Problem – for the rest is mere talk, mere rehashing of knowledge that is as old as hegemony, as old as mankind. [9]

There is clearly something awry when the World Bank itself proposes the Gold Standard as a barometer of the public mind through its official mouthpiece in sympathy with Ron Paul. The self-explanatory Reuter's headline of November 08, 2010 reads: World Bank chief surprises with gold standard idea (cached PDF).

Footnotes

Source URL: http://print-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2013/03/the-gold-standard-boondoggle-revisited.html

Iran Today - Building Self Reliance Under Siege

Is it enough to outlive sanctions and deter military invasion??

Click to hear 'What I Learned in Iran' by Mark Weber September 2012 (Photo Tehran at night, ihr.org)

A friendless Muslim nation of 75 million stands alone against hectoring hegemons!

What is their crime?

The Loud REJECTION of Occidentosis – A Plague From The West

The Loud ACCEPTANCE Of Their Inalienable Right To INDEPENDENCE AND SELF-DETERMINATION As All Nations Of The West Claim Entitlement To;

Without Being Harvested As A Hegelian Dialectic --- A Fabricated Enemy for Imperial Mobilization

The day is not far away when Zbigniew Brzezinski, or his inheritors, will make the same confession about bringing "revolutionary Islam" to Iran as both Robert Gates and Brzezinski did about "Mujahadeen Islam" to Afghanistan with: God is on your side!

Both Brilliantly lighting the Arc of Crisis in the Global Zone of Percolating Violence, seeding a never ending revolutionary times across the planet ripe for multiple harvests.

Without persistent enemies world government would not be possible!

And “Revolutionary Islam” is the best enemy that even money cannot buy! That “enemy” is now being manufactured in Pakistan under the “New Savak” with the grotesque Shia killings on a daily basis at the hands of the vassals of empire! While Iran today has no way out except to remain steadfast and persevere, Pakistan can still prevent herself from becoming the new persistent “enemy” of the West.

If I had to architect that inextinguishable Hegelian inferno based on diabolically harnessing Islam and Muslims for Imperial Mobilization, I surely could not have done it any better myself. There is no mind more amenable to being choreographed as puppets on a string by Machiavellian power as the Muslim public mind!

Without comprehension of game theory, Pakistan and Iran will likely share the same ultimate fate in this lifetime of 'War on Terror' through which much progress towards one world government has already been made.

Source URL: http://humanbeingsfirst.wordpress.com/2013/02/16/iran-today-building-self-reliance-under-siege-by-zahir-ebrahim/

Iranian President Ahmadinejad takes on the Hectoring Hegemons on their own turf at the UN

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad Addresses UN General Assembly Sep 22, 2011

Mr. President,

Excellencies,

Ladies and Gentlemen,

I am grateful to the Almighty Allah who granted me, once more, the opportunity to appear before this world assembly. I have the pleasure to express my sincere thanks to H.E. Joseph Deiss, president of the sixty-fifth session for his tremendous efforts during his tenure. I also would like to congratulate H.E Nassir Abdulaziz AI-Nasser on his election as the president of sixty-sixth session of the General Assembly and wish him all success.

Let me seize the moment to pay tribute to all those who lost their lives in the past year, particularly to the victims of the tragic famine in Somalia and the devastating flood in Pakistan and especially the earthquake and the ensuing explosions in the nuclear power plant in Japan. I urge everyone to intensify their assistance and aid to the affected populations in these countries.

Over the past years, I spoke about different global issues, and the need to introduce fundamental changes in the current international order.

Continue Reading President Ahmadinejad's take on international order...

And now read Zahir Ebrahim's take on what the distinguished President of Iran egregiously missed in that great opportunity to explain to the world about world order in the making!

Why People Think Sandy Hook is a Conspiracy – The Creation of Revolutionary Times

Caption Obama's former chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel, reiterating in his own words what the founding first Prime Minister of the Jewish State, David Ben-Gurion, had stated: “you never want a serious crisis to go to waste. And what I mean by that is an opportunity to do things that you think you could not do before.” --- Rahm Israel Emanuel (at time 1m 3s)

And this is what Rahm Emanuel's father's mentor, David Ben-Gurion, had originally explained as the quintessential Machiavellian process for implementing unpopular agendas during the violent creation of Israel on Palestinian lands: “What is inconceivable in normal times is possible in revolutionary times; and if at this time the opportunity is missed and what is possible at such great hours is not carried out – a whole world is lost” --- David Ben-Gurion

Project Humanbeingsfirst has examined this nihilistic political science principle at great length in its many reports to help deconstruct not just the fiction of 'War on Terror', but all crises that have besieged mankind since 9/11. See The Poor-Man's Guide to Modernity.

Anatomy of Conspiracy Theory

Caption American Government Response to Conspiracy Theories “Conspiracy theories exist in the realm of myth, where imaginations run wild, fears trump facts, and evidence is ignored. As a superpower, the United States is often cast as a villain in these dramas.”

Caption Anatomy of Conspiracy Theory. NSC 10/2 directed CIA to conduct “covert” rather than merely “psychological” operations, defining them as all activities “which are conducted or sponsored by this Government against hostile foreign states or groups or in support of friendly foreign states or groups but which are so planned and executed that any US Government responsibility for them is not evident to unauthorized persons and that if uncovered the US Government can plausibly disclaim any responsibility for them.” – Furthermore, in order to preempt such uncovering, to continually seed red herrings and false theories; to delegitimize their unraveling by labeling them as kookish “conspiracy theories”; to defocus public energies by introducing “beneficial cognitive diversity”, fabricated leaks of half-truths which retain core-lies, and “Limited Hangout” mea culpae, all fed through the “Mighty Wurlitzer” messaging machinery; to brand the few daring and persistent unravellers of “truth's protective layers” as deniers of reality suffering from “emotional or mental illness”, an “oppositional defiant disorder” exhibiting a pattern of “negativistic, defiant, disobedient and hostile behavior toward authority figures” and therefore a threat to themselves and to society; and when all else fails, to eliminate these 'malcontents' who refuse to tow the official line by branding them “domestic terrorists”.

Some may rationally ponder that how is it, that such a long running global conspiracy for world government as outlined in Project Humanbeingsfirst's report “The Enduring Capitalist Conspiracy for World Government”, can be kept alive across centuries and across geographies. This brief paper examines that question.

Continue Reading

Conspiracy or Theory?

“It is not a world that any of us would want to live in. Is such a world inevitable? It is not sure but there are two possible ways by which a world of 10 billion people can be averted. Either the current birth rates must come down more quickly or the current death rates must go up. There is no other way.” --- Robert McNamara, Speech to International bankers as Head of the World Bank, October 2, 1970,

Read Zahir's take on Population Control for full context ,

Read Zahir's take on modern medicine and vaccines for full context ,

Read Zahir's take on Global Warming and Carbon Credit scam - the basis of Bill Gates presentation - for full context

Agenda 21 For Dummies

Download the UN Documents Mentioned in the Videos

Which Organization in the United States is the prime-mover behind this?

PDF The Hard Road To World Order, The Council on Foreign Relations, New York, Foreign Affairs, April 1974

Which Family in the United States is the prime-mover behind all this?

“Some even believe we (the Rockefeller family) are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure – one world, if you will. If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.” --- Memoirs, 2002, pg. 405, ch. Proud Internationalist; Chairman The Council on Foreign Relations; Chairman Emeritus Chase bank, link1 for full context , link2 for full context , link3 for full context , link4 for full context

“Ironically however, the very innovations that are making possible dramatic improvements in human well-being are also creating new problems which raise the spectre of an alarming and possibly catastrophic disaster to the biosphere we live in. And herein lies the dilemma that we all face. Let me illustrate. Improved public health, has caused the world’s infant mortality rate to decline by 60 percent over the last 40 years. In the same period, the world’s average life expectancy has increased from 46 years in 1950s to 63 years today. This is a development which as individuals we can only applaud. However the result of these positive measures is that the world population that has risen during the same short period of time geometrically to almost 6 billion people, and can exceed easily 8 billion by the year 2020. The negative impact of population growth on all of our planetary eco-systems is becoming appallingly evident. The rapid growing exploitation of the world’s supply of energy and water is a matter of deep concern. And the toxic by products of widespread industrialization and increased atmospheric pollution to dangerous levels. Unless nations will agree to work together to tackle these cross-border challenges posed by population growth over consumption of resources and environmental degradation, prospects for a decent life on our planet will be threatened. The recent UN meeting in Cairo is appropriately focussed on one of these key issues, population growth. But the controversies which have erupted at the conference illustrate the problem of coming to grips with issues that are deeply divisive and which have a profound moral dimension. The United Nations can and should play an essential role in helping the world find a satisfactory way of stabilizing the world population and stimulating economic development in a manner that is sensitive to religious and moral considerations. Economic growth is of course an inevitable corollary of a growing population, and is essential to improved standards of living. But without careful coordination, unrestrained economic growth poses further threats to our environment. This was a major subject of discussion at the conference in Rio de Janeiro on the environment two years ago. The focus then was on sustainable growth, and global development. [Agenda 21] It was pointed out at the conference that growth is most efficiently managed by the private sector, but regulation of the process by national governments and international bodies is also needed. And once again, United Nations can certainly be among the catalysts and coordinators of this process.” --- David Rockefeller, Annual UN Ambassadors’ Dinner Sep 14, 1994, link for full context

Which Family in Europe is the prime-mover behind all this?

“We (the House of Rothschild) provide advice on both sides of the balance sheet, and we do it globally. ... We have had 250 years or so of family involvement in the finance business, ... There is no debate that Rothschild is a Jewish family, ... For a family business to survive, every generation needs a leader, ... Then somebody has to keep the peace. Building a global firm before globalisation meant a mindset of sharing risk and responsibility. If you look at the DNA of our family, that is perhaps an element that runs through our history.” --- Baron David de Rothschild, The first barons of banking by Rupert Wright, UAE thenational.ae, November 6, 2008, link for full context: The Invisible House of Rothschild By Zahir Ebrahim

Is there any respectable name that you can cite who agrees with your take on matters?

“We are at present working discreetly with all our might to wrest this mysterious force called sovereignty out of the clutches of the local nation states of the world. All the time we are denying with our lips what we are doing with our hands, because to impugn the sovereignty of the local nation states of the world is still a heresy for which a statesman or publicist can perhaps not quite be burned at the stake but certainly be ostracized or discredited.” --- Arnold Toynbee, The Trend of International Affairs Since the War, International Affairs, November 1931, pg. 809, link for full context: The Poor-Man's Guide to Modernity By Zahir Ebrahim, 6th Edition

But that's only a dead historian you cite --- how about someone living, who is also part of officialdom and shares these insane notions?

“In the next century, nations as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single, global authority. National sovereignty wasn't such a great idea after all.” --- Strobe Talbot, Former President Bill Clinton's Deputy Secretary of State, 1992, link1 for full context

“We are living through exceptionally difficult times. Financial crisis and its dramatic impact on employment and budgets, the climate crisis which threatens our very survival --- a period of anxiety, uncertainty, and lack of confidence. Yet these problems can be overcome, by a joint effort, in and between our countries. 2009 is also the first year of Global Governance with the establishment of the G-20 in the middle of financial crisis. The climate conference in Copenhagen is another step towards the Global Management of our Planet. Our mission, our presidency is one of hope, supported by acts, and by deeds.” --- Herman Van Rompuy, EU Council President, press conference Nov 19, 2009, op.cit.

Source URL: http://humanbeingsfirst.wordpress.com/2013/03/06/agenda-21-for-dummies/

Americans are slowly waking up!!

This same fellow was mainstream just a little while back --- he even voted for Mr. Obama in 2008 --- just watch him now!

Good for your Mark Novitsky.

While the born-again young rebel, whistle-blower and interlocutor extraordinaire, Mark Novitsky fondly remembers the late Senator Paul Wellstone's contributions to his beloved nation, I hope I may be forgiven to wonder out loud:

Dear Senator Paul Wellstone --- I hope you can hear me up there. I just wonder if you had voted for the Patriot Act-I in September 2001 that turned your nation into a Police state; voted for the invasion of Afghanistan in September 2001 that brought blood upon the hands of your nation which no perfumes of Arabia shall ever wash off; and had bought into the 9/11 fiction of Al Qaeda and Osama Bin Laden terrorists violating America's chaste virginity on that very first day that that rape of America happened when of all the peoples in America, it was your job to be wide-awake, and to wake intelligent people like Mark Novitsky up so that the pretext for "imperial mobilization" and the "transformation" into New World Order could have been nipped in the bud? I just wonder....

Every nation needs its heroes. I guess your are it Mr. Wellstone for this born-again generation. May God rest your soul in peace... and may the angels miss their count of how many died in Afghanistan due to that first evil congressional vote that sanctioned the invasion of Afghanistan, and from which all the other evils have followed in the world. That first vote----May the Angels overlook it. Everyone was in shock in America, they shall surely understand. In any case, it was only the untermensch, the unworthy victims 20,000 miles away who were gonna be paying the price of that congressional vote with Daisy Cutters, not the worthy American children .... I just gotta wonder about these things – for evidently no one in America ever does. The good Americans wake-up when their own bacon is being fried, and sing the songs of their own heroes. Never the count of how many dead untermenschen... the price of their vote. Oops I forget, the Pentagon also does not keep count of them, so why would anyone else...

As you surely already know by now, At Nuremberg, that first invasion of Poland by the Third Reich using their own 9/11 'Operations Canned Goods' "to goosestep the Herrenvolk across international frontiers", was deemed to be a crime of aggression so first-cause that it was even termed by the US Chief Prosecuting Counsel the “supreme international crime differing only from other war crimes in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole”. All those who voted, participated, and aided and abetted in that first-cause were called 'war criminals' – despite their pleas that it was waging a war against the terrorist Poland. Some of them were hanged. But of course no such victor's justice exists for a pious unsurpassed superpower that has turned into the Fourth Reich with such short term memories.... Now they become heroes because they refused to kill any further, and stopped earlier than others. May the angels overlook that first count --- it was only the trial run before the conscience wakes up. That wakeup is intended to wash the slate clean. Perhaps Mr. Wellstone you can verify that for your Judeo-Christian followers.

May God rest your soul in peace.

911 Revisited 2013 - The Evidence Once Again

Experts Speak Out

Here is Kevin Ryan's Research on Who had Demolition Access to the WTC Towers 2009-2010

Click to Watch More 9/11 Experts Speak Out and my responses to them

Zahir's take: Wonderful stuff! The technical analysis will surely continue to be rehashed for another two hundred years. However, the political analysis trumps it – just like Machiavelli trumps a thousand brilliant scientists and engineers in every era – a prima facie “Operation Canned Goods” to launch “imperial mobilization”.

That half sentence worth of political analysis was done within the first day by this scribe, and confirmed to his own conviction by re-reading 'The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich' and 'Mein Kampf', followed by 'The Grand Chessboard – American Primacy And Its Geostrategic Imperatives' and 'The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order', starting the very first week of 911. As he wrote in the Foreword of Prisoners of the Cave:

“How did I learn about these plans? I actually only uncovered PNAC, JV2020, and the Wolfowitz’s chauvinist doctrines of preemption that he had supposedly been pushing since 1990, after 911, when I started scratching my head at the inexplicability of it all the moment some 19 Muslim hijackers’ names were announced, and the public was informed that they had learnt flying on flight simulators and had told their instructors that they weren’t interested in learning how to land! If Bin Laden was so smart at having planned such an outrageous attack and counted on such brilliant executioners who did it so flawlessly after only learning to fly on simulators, he was pretty stupid at having enlisted idiots who would deliberately leave such a trail of evidence behind, including statements that they weren’t interested in landing – so that either they would risk being uncovered before the attack, or their attack foiled while in progress, or after a successful attack, America would know exactly whom to go bomb in retaliation!

Only one of these aspects could be true, either they were brilliant military tacticians and strategists, or nincompoops from a three stooges movie who succeeded despite themselves, but the incongruence could not exist simultaneously on this large scale military style invasion project, except in a Hollywood spoof.

Having already read Brzezinski’s Grand Chessboard and Huntington’s Clash of Civilizations several years earlier, I immediately grasped the new pearl harbor concept the moment America deployed to bomb Afghanistan without adequately explaining or investigating any of the events of 911. ...

I started to reread Brzezinski and Huntington very carefully once again, then reread the entire voluminous Rise and Fall of the Third Reich, and the Mein Kampf of Hitler. The similarities between the rising crescendo of WMDs and the propaganda that William Shirer had recorded as having transpired in the Third Reich, and the similarities between ZB’s and Hitler’s descriptions of their respective imperatives and how to get them, were ominous, except that ZB’s were more polished and more sophisticatedly put. I got really paranoid as many more light bulbs went on in my head which had not gone on when I had originally read them. I had just taken Brzezinski’s book as theoretical, as being from the pen of a Cold War warrior now retired and indulging in some arm chair warrior fantasies. I didn’t understand that hectoring hegemons never retire until they are six feet under. I had also dismissed Huntington’s book as an ignoramus's work not to be taken seriously, as it was replete with obvious disinformation and tortuous conclusions that were easy to spot by anyone who knew anything about the subject. Now both were being egregiously put into practice, and the latter’s book did not appear so silly anymore, but rather shrewd and calculated.

The first time I had read Huntington with the lens of ‘here is an interestingly titled book from a prominent Harvard professor, let me see what he has to say’; the second time I read it with the lens ‘let me understand how deception is created and its seeds planted in a free society that is not too knowledgeable about the rest of the world’. The second reading showed that the obviousness of his distortions, coming from a top branded American University like Harvard, had some deeper strategic thinking behind it. Huntington is also involved in national security and other strategic studies as a prominent professor and intellectual at Harvard, and couldn’t be just a simple moron like Harvard’s President, Lawrence Summers, who recently claimed women were inherently not as smart as men. I was wondering how people like that become president at prestigious American universities, until once again I uncovered during my research that the same Harvard President had also written how the industrialized nations should dump their waste in developing nations while he was at the World Bank in the 1990s. With Wolfowitz now as the head of the World Bank, it is only shortsightedness to underestimate the power of the dark side, or the people who wield it. Huntington’s theme from portions of his book relevant to the topic at hand is systematically dismantled in Chapter 9. Based on this new found respect of the doctrinal scholars for their craft, and realizing that we were entering a phase with the hastily approved Patriot Act I that could only lead to the Fourth Reich in America, I started attending antiwar teachins and protest marches with my family, and began talking to prominent Vietnam war dissenters about governmental lies.

And that is when I first heard about the PNAC – from antiwar teachins. Ordinary people like me, engagingly concerned about what was happening, had uncovered more material from public sources and the analysis of history, than the entire mainstream scholarship and media apparatus in the United States of America.”

At least now, 12 years later, get your collective heads out of your brilliant technical analyses! Develop some political wherewithal of hegemonic statecraft: could any nation, let alone ordinary people, during the Third Reich, do anything about its Operation Canned Goods to launch its quest for their Lebensraum, except to militarily confront the Third Reich?

Why do you think it is different for confronting the Fourth Reich; for their new “Lebensraum” of world government?

Oh, but the same guy who explains the legal definition of “conspiracy” in the documentary above will rush to call that quest for world government a “conspiracy theory” – but hopefully not ( See Anatomy of Conspiracy Theory http://tinyurl.com/anatomy-of-conspiracy-theory ).

Here is a funny fact: The same fellow who started the World Trade Center project is also the exponent of world government. He is also the former head of the Council on Foreign Relations which is driving the agenda of Global Governance by open declaration of its modus operandi: “an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece”.

And here is another funny fact: No military interdiction to counter that revived quest for a global “Lebensraum” is possible today. World Government is a macro fait accompli.

A few more “Operation Canned Goods” will surely be required to incrementally induce micro fait accompli in baby steps, to piece meal cement the journey in its each successive stage to make turning back impossible or impractical from that stage, which brilliant people will also continue to talk about for many more decades to come.

That's the great brilliance of the ever sleeping American mind chasing its American Dream – never the ability to preempt abhorrence by learning from history; only the belated “wakeup” to continue talking about history, ex post facto, for years and years to come. It is an entire industry. (Scroll down about mid way on this page and you will see: 'A strange cast of characters among 9/11 Truth Leadership' in the sidebar below)

Well, guess what? Machiavelli knows that too: Convince People of Absurdities and get them Acquiescing to Atrocities – the first rule of hegemony when “democracy is inimical to imperial mobilization”. Afterwards, if the public ever wakes up (when their own burden becomes too high), its enlightened scholars, scientists and historians, and the odd ball rebel of conscience can study the fait accompli all they want:

“We’re an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you’re studying that reality — judiciously, as you will — we’ll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that’s how things will sort out. We’re history’s actors . . . and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do.” — Senior Bush Advisor, The New York Times, October 17, 2004

Focus on the political science – not the technical science! The political science is ancient, the technical science is rapidly evolving. It will continually create new technological demonstrations and most imaginative catastrophes to shock and awe the public mind, to repeatedly herd its instinct for self-preservation into the same 'United We Stand' state as was done on September 11, 2001. And you, all of you, will be left to just study what they do. Sun Tzu captured the obviousness of it with remarkable eloquence when defining the characteristics of a true warrior in the Art of War 2500 years ago:

“To lift an autumn hair is no sign of great strength; to see the sun and moon is no sign of sharp sight; to hear the noise of thunder is no sign of a quick ear.”

The shrewd public warrior now finally awake from the American Dream and into the American Nightmare, anticipates, prepares, calculates, and preempts, rather than narrate after the fact sheepishly clamoring for “New Investigation” from the same wolves who slaughtered the lamb in the first place! He astutely comes to understand the “forces that drive them” and formulates strategies to counter that, instead of chase their myriad effects. As Bernard Lewis of Princeton University had explained in his propaganda manual 'The Crisis of Islam – Holy War and Unholy Terror' to reinvigorate the “doctrinal motivation” for America's war on terror:

“Terrorism requires only a few. Obviously the West must defend itself by whatever means will be effective. But in devising means to fight the terrorist, it would surely be useful to understand the forces that drive them.”

So what's next that “will make Sept. 11 pale by comparison” (Bush, Feb. 13, 2008) --- How can you preempt it?

Caption The Next Global Threat? A Super Ali Baba Plus Plus to Terrify Mankind With? (Click image to see what's that all about)

See Letter to Learned People: Problem articulation and Solution space

What can make 'Sept. 11 pale by comparison'?

What if the next big 9/11 is Aliens/UFOs landing? If that were to indeed transpire, it is my bet that Muslims worldwide will be the first to accept it --- they will race to join the imperial narrative of the new intergalactic catastrophe in exactly the same manner as Pakistan did for the first catastrophic terrorism imperial narrative of 9/11 'war on terror'. This is what I wrote in 2008:

'The abominable shared fates that unite Iran (“Bush and Iran, again”, WSJ April 15, 2008), and Pakistan, from President Bush calling Pakistan “Terror Central” in 2007, to this week, April 13, 2008, 'clairvoyantly' asserting that “If another September 11 style attack is being planned, it probably is being plotted in Pakistan, and not Afghanistan”. And as already noted in its March 29, 2008 heads-up warning to America by Project Humanbeingsfirst (“Nuclear attack on Iran appears imminent!”), when such a “planned” attack transpires, it “will make Sept. 11 pale by comparison” (Bush, Feb. 13, 2008).'

What can make "Sept. 11 pale by comparison" according to the former President of the United States? Well, I don't rightly know, but according to the likely candidates usually prognosticated by the super visionaries on both the Left and the Right, these range from false-flag nuclear terror attack on American or its Allies' soil blamed on any of the "Terror Centals" in the world, including Pakistan and Iran; to new plagues and viruses requiring Defcon-2 Alert and forced vaccinations; to some even suggest planets colliding with each other – well of course, but of course, as James Bond would repartee to M were he invited to plan it all out in the next sequel on how to create world government for the City of London.

None of these scenarios still create the kind of credible threat that can unite mankind permanently into a one-world government. Surely the CFR and the Rockefeller Foundation that excel in scenario analysis must be agonizing over it. As Ronald Reagan read off from his script at the UN podium barely hinting at the thought processes going on behind the scenes in the Iron Mountain underground vaults:

“If suddenly there was a threat to this world from some other species from another planet,” President Ronald Reagan had read out loud from his script at the United Nations General Assembly podium in 1987, “in our obsession with antagonisms of the moment, we often forget how much unites all the members of humanity. Perhaps we need some outside universal threat to make us recognize this common bond. I occasionally think how quickly our differences worldwide would vanish, if we were facing an alien threat from outside this world!” --- President Ronald Reagan, Speaking at the UN General Assembly, September 21, 1987

I fear that the Muslim public mind, led by its Mullahs, just as they did last time led by the General, will announce their 'United We Stand' against this new global intergalactic catastrophic threat of terrorism by aliens before anyone even comes asking them to join the coalition of the willing. Last time, or so the narratives say, it only took a phone call. I don't really subscribe to that public relations line because the General was implanted into the matrix long before, to de-nuke Pakistan before the launch pad to the war in Afghanistan could pragmatically be mobilized. I have no proof of this but immanent game-theory scenario analysis indicates to me that Pakistan does not have any Nuclear weapons, at least not as a viable option at least before September 11, 2001.

Anyway, not to digress, this time around, Pakistani Mullahs like Tahir-ul-Qadri (among the Sunnis pushing “moderate Islam”), and perhaps Jawad Naqvi (among the shias pushing “revolutionary Islam”), and perhaps al Qaeda (among the fanatics pushing “militant Islam”), and I am certain every country will have their own such mullahs and their own such group mobilizations, including Iraq-Iran's Ayatollahs in residence and Egypt-Saudi Muftis on the pulpits, all pulling together behind the same hectoring hegemons against the new global threat. Those lagging behind will be the religious Christians, as theologically, they are the center of creation, Jesus died for their sins, so how can aliens even exist? Muslims will take the lead because theologically, God even proclaims in the Holy Qur'an that He is “Lord of the Worlds” (Surah Al-Waqia 56:80) and has sent His Criterion as “an admonition to all creatures” (Surah al-Furqaan 25:1). Both those simple and elegant verses, already memorized by 99 percent of the Muslims, will be used to prove that alien landing is a divine miracle. The Muslims will bow in sajdah all day long---it will be sight to behold with some raconteur at the Rand Corporation actually peeing in his pant from unstoppable laughter. The moment the aliens draw first blood however, the Muslim Ayatollah and Mufti will join forces to lead the battle against the evil-doers, eagerly uniting behind the hectoring hegemons all of 2 billion Muslims worldwide in much the same way as the General previously coerced merely the 200 million in Pakistan behind them.

All war-menacing stances and posturing the West has today against “Terror Central” Iran, unless Iran has already been wiped out or used up as a threat, will themselves be washed away without batting an eye --- fabricated as this enemy is to begin with. It is a sad loss of objectivity for the shia Muslim mind of Pakistan, just like any sad loss of objectivity for any group-think, that it accepts the propaganda line of Iran being their savior, while the rest of the sunni Muslim mind worldwide accepts the propaganda line of the West that Iran is the devil incarnate. The truth is elsewhere. But not to digress once again.

Why do I believe this new 9/11 could very well be aliens landing? It could of course always be preceded by the mahdi and the messiah together arriving as well, on NASA's Universal Holographic Satellite Projection System (I made that up) but I needlessly digress again. But were that to happen as well, it will be to play the Armageddon card instead of the alien card. This is what I wrote in 2009 on that front:

'Whereas, the poor monetary reformer fighting the fabricated financial crisis, already the underdog and resourceless in going against an entrenched financial oligarchy with infinitely deep pockets, is also outwitted by the sheer magnitude of the Hegelian design for Global Governance. The momentum created by the disparate crises spanning the gamut of global financial meltdown, global warming, global pandemic, global war on terror, is insurmountable enough. Imagine if the next global crisis after global food panic and global crop failure, is alien sightings and landings!

It will be the coup de grace for bringing the fractious humanity finally together in one-world government “if suddenly there was a threat to this world from some other species from another planet.” As President Ronald Reagan had read out loud from his script at the United Nations podium in 1987: “we often forget how much unites all the members of humanity. Perhaps we need some outside universal threat to make us recognize this common bond. I occasionally think how quickly our differences worldwide would vanish if we were facing an alien threat from outside this world”:

Coming soon to your local friendly skies, complete with the 'messiah' and the 'mahdi' descending from the heavens on the wings of dove, or the chariots of fire, in their final return to save the now united mankind against the common threats. Maybe there is something to this 'dajjal' story, the 'false messiah' lore after all! Brought to you courtesy of NASA's Universal Holographic Satellite Projection System.'

But I dare to think that the alien card appears more likely --- as the mahdi-messiah card could induce “uncontrolled predictability” into the already stochastic equations of game theory. “Controlled chaos” is what is needed for cementing world government. But if part of the scenario is to get Muslims and Israel to wage the epic battle of population reduction, that Armageddon can surely reduce the earth's population by half in no time.

Well, while I do not have a crystal ball any more clairvoyant than anyone else (except that people like Zbigniew Brzezinski and the CFR surpass all others in uncannily presaging the vilest form of dystopia with an accuracy that puts Nostradamus to shame), some real-time data-mining on the crescendo of propaganda on Aliens and UFOs is the hint for the new galactic catastrophe being staged to surpass 9/11. It is far more controllable as a chaos than the arrival of the mahdi and the messiah which will unleash pure uncontrolled fanaticism worldwide. Not sure how anyone could ever control that, even with the stochastic finesse of game theory and infinite supercomputers housed near electric power plants and flowing rivers.

Here is two counterfeit pennies worth of game-theory scenario analysis for alien landing extracted from the real everyday tunes and harmonics of the Mighty Wurlitzer.

Continue Reading What can make 'Sept. 11 pale by comparison'

911 Truth A Red Herring?

A strange cast of characters among 9/11 Truth Leaders

Letter to the 2011 Toronto Hearings Panel

Caption Professor Steven Jones of BYU (standing second from left) officially appointed in 1989 by the President of the United States, George H.W. Bush Sr., as an establishmentarian scientist to lead the DOE investigation into the potentially revolutionizing discovery of Cold Fusion. Can a George Bush Sr.’s trusted establishmentarian scientist suddenly become a genuine dissenting scientist against the same establishment in George Bush Jr.’s administration as anything other than controlled opposition? Steven Jones immediately rises to become the most prominent leader of 9/11 Truth seekers who even want to award him the Nobel Peace Prize! Hmmm.... watch the video above and click on the image of Steven Jones with Bush Sr. to read more about his previous role in Cold Fusion. We learn from history – or is that merely a cliché to use ex post facto in pedantic papers and history books?

Caption David Ray Griffin, the author of many famous books on 9/11 and the 'Dean of 9/11 Studies' according to many of his prominent cheerleaders who claim inspiration from him, is a self-admitted globalist seeking world government in the most eloquent Newspeak of Orwellian Establishmentarians. Hmmm.... watch David Ray Griffin proclaim world government in response to an audience question in the video above

Caption Vanilla or Chocolate is merely the icing on the devil's cake! Is the brilliant Western intellect really so naive that it cannot see that they all principally serve the same globalist agenda? Click on image

Is this ten year old pursuit of what was already obvious on September 11, 2001, “Operation Canned Goods” look-alike, really relevant to derailing “imperial mobilization” to one-world government which was irrevocably launched by that super terrorism of 9/11? Read what was already obvious on day one.

Even the Financial Times has argued that 9/11 finally enabled one-world government: 'for the first time in my life, I think the formation of some sort of world government is plausible. ... it is increasingly clear that the most difficult issues facing national governments are international in nature: there is global warming, a global financial crisis and a “global war on terror”'! Read Gideon Rachman's 'And now for a world government'.

Hear the bold proclamation on global governance by the EU president: “2009 is also the first year of global governance.... The climate conference in Copenhagen is another step towards the global management of our planet.”

The only people who are evidently unaware of these real-world developments, are the 9/11 Truth Movement born-again zealots – or, at least, they seem to behave that way when Pollyannaishly broaching their “new investigation” treadmill.

I haven't paid much attention to the 9/11 Truth Movement people because I have found them patently silly in their prime demand: new investigation. By who? Of what? There is no crime scene hard evidence preserved. And when the judge, jury, executioner, sherif, and posse, all work for the same club, the club of "imperial mobilization", what sense does new investigation make? The only sense of a red herring to keep more peoples occupied in specious pursuits, and administering some additional Hegelian mind-fck towards eroding national sovereignty by internationalizing the investigation, perhaps under the auspices of the vaunted UN, as baby-step towards accomplishing more world government. Now local crimes are investigated by a global body – a justification solidified, since none of the national authorities are deemed capable of it for one reason or another! After my brief communication with the 9/11 Truth movement cheerleaders and scientists, I had given up on anything useful coming out of this lot except hard runs on the treadmills of inefficacy. And they are at it again.

What's the point of the following stated agenda of the Toronto Hearings when all Western governments and international agencies are conniving to usher in world government which was enabled by 9/11: '(3) To submit a record and a summary of the Hearings, together with signed Statutory Declarations by witnesses, to relevant governments, groups and international agencies with the request that a full and impartial investigation be launched into the events of September 11, 2001'?

What is this farce of presenting the obvious by the learned foxes in hen's feathers to other foxes all pretending to guard the hen house amidst the cheering hens?

Only the sharp Western intellect can think of such absurdities and be taken seriously by useful idiots! For others, please click to read: The Poor-Man's Guide to Modernity.

Click to read what the men and women of abundant conscience should really be worrying about concerning what's up next, instead of wasting their time and energies on that which is already a fait accompli

Click to read what the men and women of abundant conscience should really be wrestling with instead of wasting their time and energies on fait accompli

Please see the full deconstruction of why I no longer trust Steven Jones and his coterie of Johnny come lately “experts” who have instantly acquired a following as if they were “collection agents” – and what have they been collecting?

I would suggest that they have been shepherding the well-intentioned conscionable peoples, citizens, anonymous good hearted folks, who were and are waking up ex post facto of Iraq invasion of 2003, lest the sheep wakeup too violently! Just get them to speciously demand a “new investigation”!

I wonder what these brilliant scholars and scientists and theologians where doing in September-October of 2001 when Afghanistan was being prepared to be bombed to smithereens? And in 2002-2003 when Iraq was being prepared to be “shock and awe[d]”? But suddenly, in 2004, these “experts” began to burst onto the public scene to become leaders of other ordinary mortals not endowed with brilliant titles like these scholars and scientists, who were also waking up slowly to the commonsense reality that no WMDs were found in Iraq? That steel buildings couldn't just collapse like that? It took David Griffin to write the New Pearl Harbor three years after 9/11 when a simple attendance at any anti-war teach-in during 2001-2003 protest demonstrations would have informed anyone principled enough to oppose the slaughter of innocent 'lesser peoples' of that fact?

Imagine that Richard Gage advertised on his website, by implication of comparing Steven Jones to Linus Pauling, that a Nobel Peace Prize might be in it for the new comer: “Steven Jones' call for a "serious investigation" of the hypothesis that the WTC 7 and the Twin Towers were brought down, not just by impact damage and fire, but through the use of pre-positioned cutter-charges" must be the rallying cry for all building design experts to speak out. Dr. Jones is following in the footsteps of Dr. Linus Pauling of the California Institute of Technology, who rallied his fellow scientists to oppose the development of the Hydrogen Bomb and the testing of nuclear weapons. He was later awarded the 1962 Nobel Peace Prize for these efforts.”

The same Dr. Jones who is pictured with George H. W. Bush Sr., above, being appointed by the heralder of the “New World Order” to scuttle the discovery of Cold Fusion? No – must be some other fellow.

But still, Nobel Peace Prize for what?

For co-opted fools and mercenaries without conscience suffering from the superiority complex of silently watching the spectacle of genocidal slaughter of the 'untermenschen' on their telly and not uttering a public word of protest while Afghanistan and Iraq were decimated with “shock and awe”?
Or, for being further set-up as glorified “collection agents” for type-2 ordinary citizens; to attract those ordinary peoples who are finally waking up to the reality that 9/11 was an “Operations Canned Goods” as they lose their own skirts and shirts while their own nation descends into a police state? No they didn't protest when it was happening to that other fellow over there, but Machiavelli knows that they will protest when it starts happening to them right here at home. He is ready!

See this report to understand “type-2” and the political science of manufacturing dissent as an integral part of social engineering of consent. “Type-2” is Adolph Hitler's categorizing of people who “wake up”, who were formerly “type-1”, the flag-waiving and/or silent bystanders of mainstream with their full faith in their government. They suddenly “wake up” with lost faith in government. Virtually the entire majority of “9/11 Truth Movement” rank and file appear to be mainstream waked-up citizens whose newly awakened conscience and skepticism is being corralled into expending their energies on specious pursuits of what is already a fait accompli. All “type-2”.

These good and noble citizens of empire, benefiting from its loot and plunder of the rest of the world – ahem, the hidden hand of the market backed by the hidden fist, as Thomas Freidman put it in the NYT – in what became known as the 'American Dream' (see Unveiling America's Secret History ), can no more think independently without a pied piper leading them as the new dissentstream, than they could as the silent majority of mainstream. In either case they must be led. They look to “experts”. So “experts” are provided to them. And led they are, to the same pastures of ensuring that fait accompli of “imperial mobilization” is not impacted by their loss in faith in government. Read the aforementioned report to perceptively understand this straightforward mechanism of predatory statecraft in Western “democracies”.

And read this analysis to acutely comprehend the concept of fait accompli and the role of absurdities in political science. Unless you can insightfully understand that, and shrewdly begin to identify and eschew your fabricated leaders who are now your new pied-pipers, you will never comprehend how you are being taken for a ride no differently than when you were part of the flag-waiving mainstream! And it doesn't matter how many credentials you have, or what your station in life is. These matters are not decided by socio-economic, race, or class status, but by indoctrination and ability to think independently. Both of which are entirely wealth and college degrees agnostic.

For today's dissent-chiefs: It doesn't matter if you have a Ph.D. from MIT or Caltech – the Nazi Scientists, hard and soft, meaning, from physicists to social-psychologists, were far more brilliant than many coveting the Nobel prize in Physics in America today. And they stood United with their Führer too, at the peak of the Third Reich's hubris. Then they came over to America as defeated brilliance, often under new identities – “Operation Paperclip” – to run your science in America, blithely stating, and believing, as is famously quoted from the father of the rocket who ended up heading NASA to send America to the moon: “our job is to send it up, what does it matter where it comes down.”

If you didn't speak-out then, didn't protest then, didn't put your jobs and your life on the line in orchestrating nation-wide protests of the kind witnessed during the tail-end of the Vietnam War when your own peoples' body-bags were in ample display – a lesson many of you learnt while still in college during that most recent yesteryear – and you are suddenly prominent dissent-leaders today having silently watched tens of thousands of innocent 'lesser' civilians not even get a used body-bag, never mind a Muslim burial in DU soaked lands, I have to wonder about this sham.

It can only succeed in brain-washed, or perhaps brain-dead America!

The compromising image above, and the admission of being a globalist pitching the very message that David Rockefeller, the Council on Foreign Relations, the EU president, et. al., have been pitching loudly and publicly, indeed since the very founding of the Federal Reserve Bank that generations of bankster oligarchy has been pitching, condemn you as the vile assets of the Mighty Wurlitzer in the service of empire.

You only fool type-2, your primary mission.

Sorry – no brownie points for the silly Toronto Hearings. If you are genuine, you must prove it.

There is no reason for anyone to assume anything of anyone in an age when “deception is the state of mind and the mind of State”.

Convincingly answer the questions raised here by one whose 'lesser peoples' and civilizations have been bombed by your very first silence – and by the hubris of your elected representatives who “United We Stand” with their purse-strings right alongside your government which you install and replace every four years without a damn change occurring while you continually believe like damn fools that you are getting a change while the winner earns the 2008 Marketer of the Year award – before you head off to fool many more men and women of conscience on this Toronto journey. Stop fooling yourselves first, if indeed that's what this is and not controlled dissent to run the fed-up public on glamorized treadmills for a healthy democratic exercise of the conscience.

Why should damn fool “leaders” be welcomed by ordinary peoples? Damn fools who are asking the same ruling powers to investigate a fait accompli – like asking the robber to investigate his own crime, and the judge is the robber's father, the jury are his fraternity all having benefited from their brother's crime, and the other rulers being appealed to are part of the same Mafioso pact?

Of course, I hope I am wrong. That damn fools will turn out to be wise savants! So show me the effective and practical path to derailing “imperial mobilization” from your silly obsession with unraveling the mysteries of “Operation Canned Goods” and I will be converted to your religion.

Just Look at the absurdity of this obsession in the larger global context:

the invasion of Poland is a fait accompli;
the slaughters of the 'lesser peoples' are continuing on both the Eastern and the Western front; France and Western Europe is militarily occupied;
the Allied fire-bombings of occupied cities and Germany is at its peak killing more innocent civilians in the most atrocious manner than those killed by the Nazis in their hideous concentration camps;
Nuremberg is a distant memory;
the next nations to fall to “democracy” and “revolutions” in prelude to invasion and occupation, are along the rapidly expanding “arc of crisis” in the “global zone of percolating violence” and already visible;

and some brilliant scholars are discussing the how-tos of “Operation Canned Goods”?

An even greater absurdity is that these wise savants are making appeals to the Reich's henchmen installed all across the world for a “new investigation” of “Operation Canned Goods”?

And the greatest absurdity of it all is that they don't see that “Operation Canned Good” enabled the world government of Mein Führer's long-held dream, and all rulers in the dominion are now his lieutenants?

Those absurdities can only happen in two places in all of creation:

One, in Alice in Wonderland – the creation of the fertile imagination of an allegorical novelist for school children's reading pleasure and adult contemplation.
Two, in a nation so dumbed-down that they can no longer even use an iota of commonsense to rationally add two plus two to come up with four – the creation of the diabolical imagination of Machiavelli and its social engineers to ensure that the self-inflated with superiority-complex public continually look only towards designated “experts” for the answer to even simple arithmetic, to be happy when they invariably get “five”, and run helter-skelter with their new discovery!

Yah – I am in the presence of greatness singing “Hallelujah” and “Hava Nagila” to the white man's burden – give them all a Nobel Peace Prize. The prize given to the greatest mass murderers and henchmen in history!

Zahir Ebrahim

Project Humanbeingsfirst.org

Source URL: http://print-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2011/07/toronto-hearings-strange-cast-of.html

911 and Imperial Mobilization Redux

9/11 HOT

Prisoners of the Cave – Deception Point 911 And Its Greatest Democratic Enablers

.“911 is is a point of departure for me ... I see the deliberate hands of the American-Israeli intelligence agencies and/or “Second Foundationers” from deep within the American ruling elite in orchestrating this New Pearl Harbor. For a country that can sense what is deep within the bowels of the Earth and in the farthest reaches of the heavens, that seeks “full spectrum dominance” of air, land, sea, space, cyberspace, et. al. in its own military doctrines, and that publicly warns in its strategy documents that the only way for it to embark on this “imperial mobilization” is an increased military budget that can only come about in a “new pearl harbor”, 9-11 has only one reality – self-inflicted. --- Chapter 2: Don't Ever Ask “Why is it possible to hate America” Prisoners of the Cave

.“I am betting that when knowledge of the crime of the emperor comes to them, and their complicity in it is realized by them, that like Lady Macbeth, the American public will be torn by their good conscience, that they will be as unable to remain “innocent of knowledge” as Lady Macbeth, and will endeavor to right the wrongs done in their name by their successive governments. As Arundhati Roy put it in a speech: “Yours is by no means a great nation – but you could be a great people – history is giving you the chance – seize the time.” I am betting that the conscience of its own people will prove to be the real fifth column in the United States of America. Perhaps somewhat idealistic, but it is precisely ideals that seem to be lacking in the collective wisdom of this nation, where mostly everything is viewed from the distorted prism of the pragmatic, the expeditious, the instantly gratifying, and the “might makes right” imperial sight. Its injection into the American polity cannot be a bad thing. I don't expect everyone to necessarily agree with my work, the point of it being not to make you agree with me, but to motivate you into examining your invisible chains in the hope that if you earnestly look for them, you will likely find them. --- Postscript Prisoners of the Cave

The world pleads: “God save us from American peace and liberty”

.“This irrational behavior is only possible because we, the citizens of the nation, permit it. It is no longer a question of controlling a military-industrial complex, but rather, of keeping the United States from becoming a totally military culture. --- The United States: A militarized society, Jerome B. Wiesner, president emeritus MIT, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, Aug 1985, pg. 104

And just as his predecessors did, President OBAMA too reiterates who the enemy is, even threatening the public to not question America's official sacred story of who the enemy is, and cleverly lumping “questioning 9/11” with “justifying 9/11”

.“I am aware that there is still some who would question, or even justify the offense of 911.

But let us be clear. Al Qaeeda killed nearly 3000 people on that day. The victims were innocent men, women, and children from America and many other nations who had done nothing to harm anybody.

And yet Al Qaeeda chose to ruthlessly murder these people, claimed credit for the attack, and even now states their determination to kill on a massive scale.

They have affiliates in many countries, to try to expand their reach.

These are not opinions to be debated. These are facts to be dealt with.

Okay, Mr. President! But can you also inform us how did “Al-Qaeeda” cause this third WTC-7 building demolition on 9/11?

Footage of WTC 7 destruction showing its Penthouse Collapse before the building's symmetric and catastrophic demolition into its own footprint

And how did “Al-Qaeeda” cause this WTC explosion?

Does the pulverized WTC tower into such a fine dust debris look like a Gravity Collapse of millions of tons of steel and concrete due to fire to you?

And can you explain what super-technology Al Qaeeda possessed that they can pulverize steel and concrete into dust but leave the sacred mounds of paper alone?
According to ABC News: “But most interesting, in the mix, they are looking they think, at specs of steel that used to be beams and elevators, marble and the lobby floor and facings, so what were once the strongest architectural elements in the two towers, were pulverized. Large portions turned into clouds, like this one. Still there is this mystery. If some of the hardest materials were vaporized, how to account for the presence everywhere of paper. Fully intact letters, business forms, stationary, paper is so fragile, and combustible, and yet, somehow, maybe because we have so much of it, it was everywhere.” --- ABC News.

And, by the verdict of your own logic of 3000 innocent victims killed by “Al-Qaeeda” on 9/11, what of the several million INNOCENT CIVILIAN VICTIMS barbarically murdered by the United States in Afghanistan and Iraq in retaliation for 9/11?

.“We have shot an amazing number of people, but to my knowledge, none has ever proven to be a threat, --- Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal, New York Times, March 26, 2010

.“all murderers are punished unless they kill in large numbers and to the sound of trumpets. --- Voltaire, Welcome Letter

Until of course, Victor's Justice catches up to the “apostles of death and hate”

.“ – we are not prepared to lay down a rule of criminal conduct against others which we would not be willing to have invoked against us. --- U.S. Justice Robert H. Jackson, formulating the finer points of law as moral absolutes for administering victor's justice at Nuremberg, Minutes of Conference Session of July 23, 1945, International Conference on Military Trials : London, 1945

.“ – the only conceivable end for these merchants of aggression, and as they plunged the world into a blood bath, it is fitting that they take their final plunge in ignominy! --- Universal Newsreels: 21 Nazi Chiefs Guilty, Nuremberg Trials 1946/10/8

Watch

But until then, 2 + 2 is always 5 whenever OCEANIA is at perpetual war with the dark murdering armies of EURASIA – watch modernity scripted in George Orwell's movie “1984” below

.“To those who would paralyze our Government in the face of impending threat by encasing it in a semantic strait-jacket, we must reply that all concepts are relative. --- Justice Vinson, U.S. Supreme Court, 1951, re-formulating the finer points of law in Newspeak, Justice in the Service of Empire

.“Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities --- Voltaire, The Enduring Power of Machiavellian Political Science

And as the sighted can already see, like the “Big Brother” of OCEANIA, the rulers of United States of America using their own Newspeak and the savagery of fabricated wars against “barbarians”, transformed their own nation into a Police State while its indoctrinated masses, its pathetic “House Negroes” and immigrant “Uncle Toms”, insanely cheered “United We Stand” against Islamofascism.

America's own prominent Judge, Andrew Napolitano, belatedly lamented the loss of Natural-Rights of the American peoples to The Patriot-Act

Of course, also only the sighted will ever see that from President George W. Bush to President Barrack Obama --- More faces changed, more they remained the same!

.“The system is not only broken, it was crippled at birth – for it is so easily hijackable – from Wounded Knee to Iran, with new “Pearl Harbors” cleverly used for “imperial mobilization” from the USS Maine to 911 to the new nookular '911' that President Bush keeps warning the Americans and the world about in these ominous words as late as February 13, 2008: “Good morning [America]. At this moment, somewhere in the world, terrorists are planning new attacks on our country. Their goal is to bring destruction to our shores that will make September the 11th pale by comparison.” It is one continuous predatory imperative, from the Truman Doctrine, to the Carter Doctrine, to the Reagan Doctrine, and now to the Bush Doctrine. What did impeachment of Richard Nixon ever accomplish or deter, never mind restore to America's millions of untold and unaccounted victims in Asia and South America? --- How to derail “imperial mobilization” and preempt the crossing of the Nuclear Rubicon

.“What is the point of this analysis and all this verbage? The point is a matter of life and death for nations. That is the point of this. Let me be very precise. Either the United States, or Israel, are poised to attack Iran, as noted by many commentators in the World press,... This is March 2007. I have two imperatives before me: A) I do not wish to hear in 2010 that there was an “intelligence failure”, that it was another Gulf of Tonkin, or some other new contrivance from the imaginative and fertile mind of the hectoring hegemons. --- Dialog Among Civilizations – Whytalksfail When the Hectoring Hegemons Are Running It And What To Do About It

Since the doctrines of aggression variously couched in Newspeak have remained the same despite the changing presidential faces in the White House, the AMERICAN PUBLIC'S REALPOLITIK to bravely extract their nation from the jaws of Big Brother's Fourth Reich also remains the same:

1) Firstly, anything, including all 'nuclear terrorist acts' on American soil, or anywhere in the world, all shocking revelations by whistleblowers, all leaks in newspapers, and all phantasmal mantras that distract from the afore-stated goal, regardless of how compelling the reasons, must be treated by the unwary and gullible American public and its intellectual dissenting-chiefs, as red herrings, pretexts, and deceptions for premeditated “imperial mobilization” by their nation's rulers.

2) Secondly, if there is reason for the United States to nuclear decimate any country or any peoples in purported 'self-defense', the American peoples must demand a ratification of the decision to go to war through a public referendum – let its great “populist democracy” speak directly in the modernity of the 21st century before it is called upon to make its sacrifices, before it is called upon to pay its taxes to fund the war, and before it is called upon to acquire innocent blood on its hands!

3) Thirdly, draw the soldiers, officers and war-technicians from the pool who vote for war! If they can vote yes to invade other nations and wantonly shatter the tabula rasa of a 'lesser humanity', then they must also first be willing to sign up for doing it themselves – instead of having a draft of economic conscription. Every 'yes' voting home in America must have at least one 'patriot' from the immediate family show up on the front-lines without exception – or their 'yes' vote is void!

Source 9/11 HOT Topics URL: http://humanbeingsfirst.wordpress.com/hot/

Also see: Circulation Request Letter

What is Real Pursuit of Justice?

Open Letter to Francis Boyle, the Moral Law Professor, on the Ignored Iraqi & Afghani Victims of Imperial Mobilization

Date: January 31, 2010

Subject Re: International Criminal Court Complaint Filed Against Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Tenet, Rice, Gonzales By Prof. Francis A. Boyle

Dear Dr. Francis Boyle:

In reference to your complaint filed with the ICC against the previous errand-boys who occupied the White House, would it be rude to notice that the higher order bits of using 911 to “goosestep the herrenvolk across international frontiers” ; the subsequent “shock and awe” visitations upon largely civilian population-centers and civilian infrastructures ; the decimation of millions of Iraqis/Afghanis ; subverting of the United States into a pre-planned police-state ; fabricating crises upon crises to propose pre-planned solutions in order to systematically usurp national sovereignty as per the diabolical modus operandi set by the Council on Foreign Relations in their own documents: “In short, the ‘house of world order’ will have to be built from the bottom up, rather than from the top down. It will look like a great ‘booming, buzzing confusion’ to use William James’ famous description of reality, but an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault.” – have all been overlooked to pursue the relatively lower order crimes of “extraordinary rendition” upon a few individuals with the highly dubious statement: “I doubt very seriously that the Accused would have inflicted these criminal practices upon 100 White Judeo-Christian men.” ?

We only wish there was one decent 'Christian' man or woman alive in the hallways and beltways of Western academe and among the legal fraternity who might even attempt to capture the angst of the tens of millions of Iraqis/Afghanis still barely alive and who still await someone who will file legal charges against the monumental crimes that have been perpetrated upon them and their millions of murdered kin.

We fervently hope that you, Professor Francis Boyle, might be such a person. That you will file pertinent charges in the ICC, for both culpability and restitution, on behalf of the untold millions already dead in Iraq and Afghanistan, many more suffering with their entire national fabric, ancient heritage, and even their DNA despoiled in a crime so stupendous that “it is a mystery whose parallel may only be the one of Sinai when something was revealed to mankind.”

For surely, it is inconceivable that you make complete obeisance to Western standards of morality by focussing on this lower order crime in the presence of un-addressed higher order monumental crimes – a morality which brazenly asserts from the highest pulpit of law in this land of the free:

“Nothing is more certain in modern society than the principle that there are no absolutes, that a name, a phrases, a standard has meaning only when associated with the considerations which give birth to nomenclature. To those who would paralyze our Government in the face of impending threat by encasing it in a semantic strait-jacket, we must reply that all concepts are relative.” -- Justice Vinson, U.S. Supreme Court, 1951 AD

And as you venture to focus on the higher order real monumental crimes against humanity, we hope you will not remain content by focussing merely on the errand boys. That you will see the connections between the quest for “Global Governance”, fabricated crises from pandemics to global warming, the seeding of “revolutionary times” across the “global zone of percolating violence” to make “imperial mobilization” possible which otherwise is “inconceivable in normal times”, and the “history's actors” who drive war-mongering policies and orchestrate wretched events from their Zion in the Middle East to their Zion in the Western capitals, not the least of which is Washington DC, in the expectation of creating the ultimate “Zion that will light up all the world”.

And that, as you pursue the highest order crimes, you will not shy away from going directly for the jugular of the prime-movers behind the scenes of all the war-mongering 'errand boys' fronting for them in the Western capitals as the duly elected representatives of a duped Western peoples, including those presently occupying the White House. This was, lamentably enough, already pleaded to no avail in the following editorial when your lonely fraternal brother, Mr. Vincent Bugliosi, courageously asserted that “Murder Trumps Torture”, but inexplicably failed to also simultaneously assert the legal and moral commonsense that prime-movers trump trigger-pullers: Who is more guilty of monumental war crimes - the prime-movers or trigger pullers? April 09, 2009.

Attempted prosecution of state-criminals on 'petty charges' without also prosecuting their criminal aiders and abettors who 'legalize' and propagandistically justify their brazen acts of aggression, and therefore are entirely culpable in toto for “all the evil which follows” ; staying silent on punitive as well restitutive compensation for their victims, is a legal sham that is only waiting to be torn down by some courageous people. We hope, Dr. Francis Boyle, that you might be one such precedent setting spark which ignites the moral imagination of many to follow. The world has had enough from the dispensers of victor's justice!

Thank you.

Zahir Ebrahim

Project Humanbeingsfirst.org

Addendum February 02, 2010

In. Ref To: Bush To The Hague! The Hague Acknowledges Francis Boyle On His Filing Against Bush et al For War-Crime: Extraordinary Rendition

Additionally, in principle, Project Humanbeingsfirst.org supports all effective measures which attempt to bring the entire hierarchy of monumental criminals to fair justice. As is often the case with victor's justice however, and with those in the victor civilizations pursuing their notion of justice against the criminals in their own midst, the big picture is being silently swept aside in the “Bush To The Hague!” Campaign. That moral campaign should rightly be “Bush-Obama-Congress-Foundations-Banksters To The Hague” Campaign. And a similarly appropriate one waged in the UK and the EU.

It is not sufficient, in the view of Project Humanbeingsfirst, to pursue lower order crimes and charge the lower-order errand boys for these crimes, while staying eloquently silent on the most significant crimes and neglecting to seek restitution/compensation/punitive-damages for the most significant of its victims! While the old errand boys out of power are being pursued with vigor, a new crop of errand boys are already in-charge committing new monumental crimes without inhibition. What rational commonsense does this make? Are we to presume that morality in modernity is inversely proportional to rationality and commonsense? That millions of 'untermensch' victims are to simply remain nameless and faceless statistics to build careers and glossy prize-winning narratives on? We certainly hope not!

To put efficacy into the matter of stopping crimes against humanity before they transpire rather than lament in futility afterwards with vacuous pledges of 'never again' with Public Relations show trials and new museums, the perpetual prime-movers of wars pushing their insidious multifaceted agendas behind the turbulence of wars have to be neutered. Their enormous power and influence stemming from their infinite wealth that is legally sanctioned to them by the law makers who represent them in governance, terminated. Where is the precedent for that being set?

It wasn't even set at the Nuremberg Military Tribunals when Dr. Hjalmar Schacht, the former governor of the Reich Bank – the bankster who orchestrated the financing for Hitler's war-machine with funding from Wall Street and the City of London financiers – went scot-free! Just that tiny point of incontrovertible fact proves the truth of this open letter and demonstrates the enormous power of the prime-movers which is being swept under the rug by focussing on their errand boys. These errand boys are untouchable so long as their godfathers protect them, except when made dispensable and administered the victor's justice as at the Nuremberg Trials.

We hope this minor oversight will be rectified.

Read the full open letter and the distinguished jurist's response here

Source URL: http://print-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2010/01/letter-francisboyle-iraq-afghan-victims.html

Response to Francis Boyle's '2011: Prospects for Humanity?' – Unlimited Imperialism and Nation-States but no Secret Rule by Oligarchy for World Government!

Zahir Ebrahim | Project Humanbeingsfirst.org

Friday, January 07, 2011

After reading Francis A. Boyle's missive with the overarching title “2011: Prospects for Humanity?”, I now perhaps begin to fathom why the Ph.D. professor of international law at the University of Illinois College of Law, author of two of my favorite books on informed activism from which I have learnt a great deal: “Protesting Power: War, Resistance, and Law” and “Biowarfare and Terrorism”, does not recognize the real prime-movers of hegemony and 'unlimited imperialism'. By his own admission that he is a Hans Morgenthau protégé, the fog is gently lifting on why Dr. Boyle always only focuses on the state's actions and crimes, never on those who control the state from behind the scenes with their hired front-men and errand boys serving only their narrow interests in the guise of Elected Representatives of the People.

I never understood this before, and wrote letters upon letters to Dr. Francis Boyle rationally pleading with him to focus on the prime-movers, to obviously no avail. Letters like these:

http://print-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2010/01/letter-francisboyle-iraq-afghan-victims.html

http://print-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2010/10/response-fboyle-jewistan-what-elephant.html

http://print-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2010/10/zahirs-letter-fboyle-case-for-treason.html

Well, it is now clear why Francis Boyle never responded to appeals to look behind the puppetshows of statecraft to directly spotlight the puppetmasters.

Hans Morgenthau, his teacher, principally saw nation-states as the key actors of power. The errand boys running the Pentagon and the White House and the Congress were deemed the real players of power projection. They were implicitly defined as the ruling elite in the military-industrial complex. The calculus of power realism therefore, was principally to be understood in the context of nation-states exercising 'unlimited imperialism' by these power-brokers alone, never the financial oligarchy ruling the super-power nation-state, the United States of America, from behind the scene for their own narrow interests which had nothing to do with nation-state's best interests, let alone the nation's people's best interests.

A strategic omission?

Was this error in calibration of foreign policy calculus deliberate?

Well, where did Francis Boyle study? Chicago and Harvard of course. Do they mention the Federal Reserve System over there? Do they mention money as debt, or ever wonder why the hell does a super power have to pay private bankers the interest on the national currency? Do they mention the names of the Rockefeller family donors, unless laudatorily, as when David Rockefeller recently donated $400 million to Harvard? Do they mention the House of Rothschilds, heaven forbid, except when ordering their champagne by the cart full? Is there some on-going discussion at the Kennedy school of government, or in the political science departments of Chicago, Harvard, and Princeton, of how tax-exempt foundations hiding the immense wealth of the Black Nobility, whom I call the financial oligarchs, actually fabricate the policies for the elected errand-boys and appointed ministers at the Pentagon and the Treasury to execute? Policies which are designed at the CFR and the Trilateral Commission, at the AEI and the hundred think-tanks along the Potomac, to incrementally, and diabolically, lead to Global Governance by breaking up the United States and all nation-states by stages: “In short, the ‘house of world order’ will have to be built from the bottom up, rather than from the top down. It will look like a great ‘booming, buzzing confusion’ to use William James’ famous description of reality, but an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault.” And all this agenda wasn't known in the aftermath of World War II? Not in the aftermath of World War I?

Oh really!

See my article:

http://print-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2010/12/of-ostriches-and-rebels-zahirebrahim.html

And by Francis Boyle's own interesting admissions elsewhere of his experience at America's finest universities, it is all the more evident what imperial institutions pursue, and not pursue, in the service of empire. Why would students who study in these imperial institutions, and the professors who teach there, be any more immune from the core assumed axioms of empire which almost become second nature like the air we breathe, than the rest of the intellectuals, engineers, and scientists who willingly help construct empire in the rest of the vast military-industrial-thinktank complex of the West? All share common assumptions, assumption which they leave unexamined, or belittle when brought to the fore. Here is the latest example from the modern epoch, of a Harvard professor seeking greener pastures at Google, The Master Builders of the Technetronic Era – sharing common axioms wherever one looks, albeit at different levels of abstraction based on each individual's role in the imperial system.

Thus, in the dissent-space located in Hans Morgenthau's axiomatic world of which Francis Boyle is evidently a zealot member by his own admission, when nation-state's international policies go awry, become criminal, as in America's many senseless wars of evidently imperialism but with little national gain except to the military-industrial complex coffers due to military spendings, the elected representatives of the people are the first criminals, along with the overt bureaucracy and the visible officialdom. Thus, the analyses of just those visible imperial policies gone awry, and the criminal actors enacting them, in just that singular context of nation-state's “negotiating” their power-interests on the Grand Chessboard, is deemed sufficient to explain the entire calculus of hegemony in that worldview.

But is that really sufficient? Or, like the iceberg that shows, is it merely the 10% agenda visible above the surface?

All the examples of imperialism cited by Prof. Francis Boyle in his missive above, from ancient Alexander-Roman-Muslim empires to America's wars today, exactly reflect that principle of officialdom and visible rulers, kings and monarchs, being the main ruling elite of the empire. The overt rulers of empires in all of history that Francis Boyle refers to, were almost always indeed their main ruling elite. They were not like the iceberg. Thus the Hans Morgenthau world of dissent could be applicable to them – if it was permitted to exist at the time under the absolutist powers of the kings.

But is that really the case for the sole-superpower, the United States of America, where “democracy is inimical to imperial mobilization”, where “deception is the state of mind and the mind of state”, where pretexts for imperial mobilizations are diabolically fabricated and shrewdly harnessed, where the freedoms of Orwell, of Machiavelli, of manufactured consent and manufactured dissent, of social engineering, is their prized gift to mankind?

Only in absurdities, and only for intellectual savants living in the vast immanent spaces of academe with no bearing in empiricism which can otherwise see them terminated of their over-rated services for which they are paid aplenty as professors spitting in the same plate which feeds them; i.e., critiquing the very empire they draw their lucrative salaries from. Dissent of professors on the payroll of empire – can they ever penetrate the semi-transparent veil to reveal the real corridors of power, by definition, except in enacting the shadowplay as in Plato's cave?

And can those living in that Plato's cave ever figure out the reality of what's going on by studying the shadowplay being enacted on the screen for their benefit?

That's what the noble jurist Francis Boyle's life's work has evidently been focussed on – the visible puppethsows enacted on Plato's cave and bringing those actors to justice!

Noam Chomsky easily comes to mind as the one who most closely resembles Francis Boyle when I read statements like these in “2011: Prospects for Humanity?”: “By shamelessly exploiting the terrible tragedy of 11 September 2001, the Bush Jr. administration set forth to steal a hydrocarbon empire from the Muslim states and peoples living in Central Asia and the Persian Gulf under the bogus pretexts of (1) fighting a war against international terrorism; and/or (2) eliminating weapons of mass destruction; and/or (3) the promotion of democracy; and/or (4) self-styled "humanitarian intervention." Only this time the geopolitical stakes are infinitely greater than they were a century ago: control and domination of two-thirds of the world's hydrocarbon resources and thus the very fundament and energizer of the global economic system – oil and gas.” – but I don't think Chomsky's teacher was Hans Morgenthau.

I suspect Noam Chomsky is almost entirely self-taught in his controlled and very measured dissent, especially of 9/11, that it was an invasion from abroad, directly echoing the Pentagon's core-message, with soulful inspiration of dissent drawn from the likes of atheist like Bertrand Russell and the fabians, anarchists, and every brand of rebel except the one who can spell Rothschild, Rockefeller, 'inside job'.

And like the distinguished Noam Chomsky, “arguably the most important intellectual alive”, the much respected Francis Boyle among the dissent crowd, too evidently pretends by way of omission that such evergreen statements of the Rothschild's: “give me control of a nation's money supply and I care not who makes its laws” is merely folklore at best, and of no immediate pertinence in comprehending the real calculus of real power-projection of nation-states for 'unlimited imperialism' from behind the scenes, because, as it's now clear, his mentor, Hans Morgenthau, too acted in precisely that way, obviously sharing in the same pretenses that nation-states are the principal prime-movers in the exercise of hegemony, and teaching his students the same sense of justice as he had.

Continue Reading

Sacred Cow: Allama Iqbal - marde-momin or superman?

Allama Iqbal defined “marde-momin” in his seminal poem titled “Tulu-e-Islam” ( طلوع اسلام ). In English it means “Renaissance of Islam”. The poem is in his compilation Bang-e-Dara, and the verse in which he used that specific word is:

Endeavoring to induce “Renaissance of Islam” among the backward Muslims is surely a commendable cause to spend one's life in. Like the endeavor to “reform Islam” itself, it can also be a fast ticket to name and fame, knighthood and status.

It is pertinent to point out the commonsense observation that when “revolutionaries” and “reformers” are awarded medals, titles, and knighthood by empire, it can only mean that they work for the benefit of empire in some way. The truth of these words is beyond doubt. It is self-evident.

It has always bothered me that “Sir” Muhammad Iqbal accepted the knighthood in 1922 from the King of England, King George V, the head of state of the most plunderous colonizing empire ruling the Indian sub-continent.

Continue Reading Sacred Cow: Allama Iqbal - marde-momin or superman?

The 'Ahrar-Ahmadiya controversy' of 1953 and Shia Killings today in Pakistan

Zahir Ebrahim | Project Humanbeingsfirst.org

April 09, 2013

Part-I, Part-II, Part-III, Part-IV, PART-V

In order to perceptively comprehend some of the dynamics behind the latter day Shia Killings in Pakistan, it is pertinent to read the very insightful report convened by the Government of Pakistan for the yesteryear Ahmadiya killings in 1953, titled: The Ahrar-Ahmadiya controversy Munir Report of the Court of Inquiry 1954.

This report which came to be called the Munir Report, sheds a great deal of light on present matters pertaining to the movement toward Shia kafirdom in Pakistan. The methods used against the Ahmadiyas by the Ahrar almost exactly 60 years ago is a mirror image of the methods being used today by the Tafriki-Lej-alphabet-acronym-soup (enumerated in my article: Some Context for What's Transpiring in Pakistan and What Not to do in the Upcoming 2013 Elections) against the largely defenseless and unarmed Shia Muslims of Pakistan.

The key difference to me between then and now is exactly one (apart from the palpable fact that it was Ahmadis then and Shias now):

Then the government was incapacitated into taking no action against the Ahrar's terrorism due to political considerations in the fragile new Pakistan, and inadvertently let the conditions between 1948-1952 exacerbate by wavering in its determination to curb the politically motivated religious fanaticism of the Ahrar leading to the riots of 1953 in Punjab against the Ahmadis and the concomitant declaration of Pakistan's first martial law in Punjab. In other words, then, as is evident from the Munir Report, the situation was created due to political incompetence and political calculus of the political officialdom in the new Pakistan that the law and order deteriorated to that extent. Meaning, the officialdom did not want it, and the Ahmadiya killings occurred because of keeping political stability was deemed more important than immediately curbing the law and order situation with a just but unflinching hand and possibly exacerbating the situation.
Whereas today, virtually all the power-wielders in Pakistan, some within the govt., both federal and state, I am sure also district down to the local thaana (police station) level, and some within the Military and nearly all of the intelligence apparatuses, and some within the media, I would say all the media both local and foreign, and also big businesses (including enterprises like Nestle Pakistan that has been supplying water to the occupation troops in Afghanistan for the past 12 years and part of officialdom in no less a measure than those officially drawing a salary from the national treasury), comprise the 'new Ahrar'. And, therefore, unlike what one sees in the Munir Report of repeated governmental officials writing memos to senior administrators and leaders to take stern action against the Ahrar, one will surely find no such memos in today's government as all the officialdom is together the 'new Ahrar'. I have already analyzed why I they think the officialdom of Pakistan is the 'new Ahrar' under the title 'The New SAVAK in Pakistan'.

And all indications continue to pile up that the Shias are being goaded into militantly rising up (by killing a sufficient number of them) to create a full scale internecine war in Pakistan; Muslims killing Muslims once again to fertilize the “shia crescent”. This is beyond any proxy warfare between Iran and Saudi Arabia, and while its seeds are surely planted in the deep seated shia-sunni differences, these spate of shia killings and the accompanying propaganda warfare upon the Shia Muslims of Pakistan is not due to Shia Sunni issue which is fourteen centuries old.

Both of those aforementioned factors that the media harps about, and the politicians variously draw upon with approaching elections in Pakistan, are misleading and calculated red herrings to disguise the real purpose behind this warfare. Unfortunately, due to the media participation in the New SAVAK project, more and more Shia and Sunni public are both getting confused about it.

Don't get confused ---- it is a fabricated war along the Hegelian Dialectic that I have by now surely explained to death on my website and have now stopped explaining altogether. It's like kicking an already dead dog to death.

But if you do not understand Hegel, you cannot possibly make sense of any of the apparent insanity in Pakistan. It is not insanity, but a calculated game-theory laced warfare being waged upon Pakistan to create a perpetual enemy for the West.

In the next five years, there will likely arise a "Hezbollah" Pakistan in reaction to the oppression by the New SAVAK in Pakistan, and that is more than arm chair prediction. It is an inevitability if the oppression upon the Shias of Pakistan continues.

One can see that the Shias of Pakistan have been the most docile of communities in Pakistan, largely self-obsessed in their rituals and silently minding their own business amidst all the war on terror being waged upon the world by the mightiest tyrants in the world despite their lofty principled sloganeering that has defined the shia ethos for fourteen centuries. One is forced to wonder why Shia militancy is being “tickled” into existence if not to bring to fruition the long awaited "shia crescent".

Two matched and armed to the teeth nemesis will paint Lahore to Karachi more red than Peshawar to Quetta have been painted thus far unilaterally by the "new Ahrar" and the "new SAVAK".

A smart self-respecting people will surely always rise to defend themselves --- but simultaneously, also refuse to be used as stooges and patsies by declining to become the West's perpetual enemy.

To not make the same national suicidal mistake as Iran takes a lot more wherewithal, national sha-oor, than has been publicly displayed by even the finest in Pakistan. For a nation not known for either the abundance of its intellectual prowess, or the superfluity of its noble integrity, it is not hard to perceive that Pakistan was stochastically designed to be DOA (dead on arrival) into this world.

I will end by quoting the last paragraph of the Munir Report, and if what it says was true then at the very inception of Pakistan, only the janaza (funeral) remains to be recited (I hope of course that I am wrong and persons of great commonsense will miraculously come to the forefront of national leadership to untie the Gordian knot so craftily tied on Pakistan's destiny on the Grand Chessboard):

"And it is our deep conviction that if the Ahrar had been treated as a pure question of law and order, without any political considerations, one District Magistrate and one Superintendent of Police could have dealt with them. Consequently, we are prompted by something that they call a human conscience to enquire whether, in our present state of political development, the administrative problem of law and order cannot be divorced from a democratic bed fellow called a Ministerial Government, which is so remorselessly haunted by political nightmares. But if democracy means the subordination of law and order to political ends—then Allah knoweth best and we end the report."

Source URL: http://print-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2013/04/memo-ahrar-ahmadiya-controversy-of-1953.html

The New SAVAK in Pakistan - Understanding Shia Killings

February 18, 2013

Part-I, Part-II, Part-III, Part-IV

Caption Shia Killings, Quetta mass funeral and burial, February 20, 2013 (via Hazara.net)

The Pakistani intelligentsia occupying front row chairs in the news media, and Pakistan's so called intellectuals in its proliferating think-tanks, along with the bleeding so called liberals and the revolutionary so called conservatives, and not to forget the multiplying secular humanists and various and sundry human rights groups; all full of it. At least in my never to be humble view. None are calling, or able to call, the systematic shia killings perceptively, forget forensically. The latest in the Quetta bomb blast on 16 February 2013, on the 37^th day of mourning of an earlier bomb blast on 10 January in the same ravaged city of Baluchistan, the richest and most atrociously managed province of Pakistan.

Labels such as “genocide” to “ethnic cleansing” to “shia-phobia” are bandied about by the erudite analysts and Pakistani expats. writing all over the world; and the shia mullahs in Pakistan are evidently reaping a great harvest of audience from the misfortunes of the dead and their grieving families; إِنَّا لِلّهِ وَإِنَّـا إِلَيْهِ رَاجِعونَ ; all blind to the geopolitical game being played in Pakistan with proxy service providers.

While protesting these killings of the innocent is necessary; silence is a crime; unless that game is understood, what the players are doing will remain senseless. And therefore, never able to be interdicted effectively in self-defence. So long as reactionary emotions continue to rule the Pakistani public mind, and so long as it is ruled by useful idiots and mercenaries, the intellect of the superman devouring Pakistan and Muslims will always trump it.

On the surface, the killing of the shias in Quetta, Baluchistan, appear entirely senseless. It is presented as the work of sectarian hatred by the odd terrorist and fanatic group who supposedly hate the shias.

Nothing can be further from truth. Mercenaries and assets do not hate. They follow handlers' orders.

To understand what is transpiring in Pakistan, one must first journey to Iran of the 1970s when SAVAK roamed supreme and tyrannized its public in entirely predictable outcome -- at least predictable for those at the RAND Corporation. The same purpose is being fomented by the various terrorist organizations in Pakistan. They are collectively, a replacement of SAVAK.

Just as the terrorist organization SAVAK was formed and trained by the CIA and worked for the Shahansha of Iran, the terrorist organizations operating in Pakistan – from Jundallah in Baluchistan targeting Iran ( http://tinyurl.com/Jundallah-Pakistan-CIA ), to its sister organizations (or itself) targeting Pakistanis with dumb jackasses groomed for sectarian hatred and intolerance by the same apparatuses of the state being told to take the credit for killing the Shias in the name of religion – are trained by the same paymasters and work for those in charge of Pakistan affairs today. Some of them are the front faces duly elected, some wear uniforms, some turbans, some live abroad, and some remain occulted from the public eye. They all have the same master as Saddam Hussein and the Shahansha of Iran once did, and work in a compartmentalized and cellularized manner from each other towards a broader agenda of which each perhaps remains entirely clueless. Each is respectively led by the carrot appropriate to its own genius mind. The terrorists, organized in blue-teams and red-teams, also remain unaware of each others existence and do their assigned job. And part of that job is to divert attention to make it look like sectarian and religious based.

This is the statecraft of modern warfare in the exercise of hegemony. There is not one general in the higher military echelons of Pakistan who can claim ignorance of these principles. And nor can the high-falutin defense analysts, the retired generals.

Yet, not once has the CIA trained and Pakistani military supported Jundallah been mentioned by anyone in Pakistan in the targeted killing of the Shias in Quetta, and in the rest of Pakistan. The terrorist group's name has evidently been removed from media and military memory.

What the Shahansha's SAVAK did, and what the West did to cultivate and protect the reaction to SAVAK's excesses, finally bringing it to power on an Air France Jet Airliner that could have easily been blown out of existence in just the same way as Iranian passenger Airbus plane, Iran Air Flight 655, was shot down in Iranian waters in the Persian Gulf on July 3, 1988 by the U.S warship, the Vincennes, in a flagrant act of state-directed terrorism that killed 290 passengers on board; and yet “Revolutionary Islam” ( http://tinyurl.com/Islam-and-Revolution-Khomeini ) was brought to land safely after transiting through the safe-harbor in NATO controlled France, and that was after being deliberately evicted from Iraq by Saddam Hussein who also only marched to his master's voice; all reproduced below in the retrospective on Iran.

Click on the links in the article Iran Today - Building Self Reliance Under Siege (see below), study a little, analyze a little, and you shall perceptively begin to see the pattern of synthesis of “revolutionary Islam” -- the best enemy no money can buy, but Islam provides for free to Machiavelli in the presence of Muslim sectarian cracks and lacunas, fifth columnists and mercenaries.

The Path Forward remains the same: Impacting Muslim Existence! ( http://tinyurl.com/Impacting-Muslim-Existence )

Source URL: http://print-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2013/02/the-new-savak-in-pakistan.html

Some Context for Shia Killings in Pakistan

Part-I, Part-II, Part-III, Part-IV

February 21, 2013

The New SAVAK in Pakistan, the latest spate of shia killings, should be examined in the context given below and the senseless creation of “revolutionary times” across the world will begin to make sense. Pakistan is a component of it. That component is tickled through sectarianism as that is the genius of our peoples. Other nations are tickled according to their own respective genius minds. The New SAVAK in Pakistan works for these superman gods in no less a measure than the old SAVAK worked for its own superman god. Is this stuff rocket science you people? Why can't learned people in Pakistan see it? Especially why can't the high falutin armchair analysts, and the defense analysts, who have routine access to media see it? Look at my examination systematically unlayering the overarching context below. Does that sound like American empire or Zionist empire to any of you? Or does it appear exactly what it is -- an Oligarchic Empire for World Government being constructed with “an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece” (Hard Road to World Order, CFR 1974 – read the superman's paper if you think I make things up with my unconstrained hyperactive imagination)!

Com'on you idle spectators and bullshit purveyors (those who deliver crap in the opportunity they get in the media), all my good friends I am sure. Six feet under the maggots can't tell the bloody difference. Only the dead have seen the end of war, says Plato. Sure -- those living see it everyday. And Most recently, in the systematic Muslim killings in Pakistan where, in the immediate aftermath of targeting the Hazara shias in Quetta with a bomb on 16 Feb. 2013, the shia eye surgeon, Dr. Ali Haider, and his 11-year-old son Murtaza Haider (photos above, more graphic images here), were ruthlessly and prematurely dispatched to meet their Maker with bullets to their head in Lahore this past Monday, 18 Feb. 2013. إِنَّا لِلّهِ وَإِنَّـا إِلَيْهِ رَاجِعونَ .

You, me, all of us, don't speak up right now, you, all of you my friends in Pakistan, they are coming for you and me next (the question in the photo above is not merely rhetorical; the assertion by the child is also not rhetorical, but a dare, a show of courage and perseverance that mirrors the Palestinian defiance living and dying under the jackboots of a superman terrorist state). For, this is the harvest of remaining silent when ZA Bhutto was politically declaring the Qadianis non-Muslims. Watch this confessional speech in Urdu by the brilliant late Pakistani Shia scholar, Allama Syed Irfan Haider Abidi, in which he openly apportions due credit to the Shia scholars of the time, of 1974, for participating in that political travesty in support of the Sunni ullema led effort that ZA Bhutto was orchestrating from behind the scenes to neutralize the American sponsored fanatic religious opposition to him (see Profiles of Intelligence quoted in Who Killed Benazir Bhutto for America's role in funding the PNA Alliance of the religious right to finally unseat ZA Bhutto).

Chicken coming home to roost for the Shias of Pakistan

Caption Quoting the Shia scholar (translation is mine): “All the Muslims in the world would not have been able to declare Qadianis kafir if 'Ali Waale' were not present!” (time 1m 55s) See Role of Shias in Qadianis' Kafirdom ( http://tinyurl.com/Raahe-Nijaat-Pakistan )

Who gives the right to man to challenge another's beliefs; let alone deny a people their political, religious, civil, and basic human rights, including to not be killed by either the pirate or the emperor for their beliefs, inheritance, ethnicity, their land, whatever? See Islam and Knowledge vs. Socialization.

You open that can of worms by the state giving legitimacy to calling one group “kafir”, and now the Shias and Ismailis are the new “kafirs” today. Following that, who's next? YOU, my sunni friends, who are silently watching the spectacle of shia deaths and demonization, just as both together previously spectated the Qadiani pogroms in silence; you and your parents, and your siblings still living in Pakistan and unlucky enough to not have the Green Card or Canadian citizenship. It is these cracks and lacunas in our sectarian ethos which are perennially ripe for harvest for the “revolutionary times”, we see being enacted today in Pakistan. Unless we get rid of these sectarian cracks that are repeatedly and deliberately enlarged into fault-lines by empire builders who know how to both cultivate and harvest these most efficiently for “imperial mobilization”, we are burnt toast.

And learned people who are supposed to have the wherewithal to lead the charge, to educate the public mind to what's really going on, to motivate them to stand up, have all been turned into glorified House Niggers and useful idiots.

Never too late to throw that yoke of servitude---even for house niggers and silent bystanders---and for selfish reasons of self-preservation if not for altruistic concern for anyone else.

So what can we do? Two things to begin with:

1) Perceptively comprehend the overarching motivation of the super-terrorists in order to come up with proper self-defence. See my article unlayering reality below. Among all the patent lies the “vulgar propagandist” (Chomsky's epithet, not mine) Bernard Lewis spinned on Islam over the years, the one thing he stated most accurately was: “Terrorism requires only a few. Obviously the West must defend itself by whatever means will be effective. But in devising means to fight the [super]terrorist, it would surely be useful to understand the forces that drive them.” Well, obviously the victims of the super terrorists must intelligently play at that table to also defend themselves by whatever means will be effective. This will lead all of us who are capable of understanding to comprehend that all variants of Islam, “militant Islam”, “moderate Islam”, and “revolutionary Islam”, are creations of minds working assiduously on “imperial mobilization” over a lifetime. None will therefore be fooled by them.

This means shias won't be fooled by “revolutionary Islam” despite their partisanship with the shia sect, and sunnis won't be fooled by the other versions despite their partisanship to sunni sects. These have nothing to do with the religion of Islam and its 1.6 to 2 billion ordinary believers --- but with methods of creating “controlled chaos” by cognitive infiltration of the religion, which means creating chaos that is predictable, its tempo increasable and decrease-able at will, and switch-off-able when its purpose is harvested. At present, that tap control resides in the West. It is entirely independent of the local population which therefore cannot break through its strangulating grip in the normal fashion. Just like the “Iron Wall” that surrounds Palestine. That diabolical construct was accurately described by Vladimir Jabotinsky: “This colonization can, therefore, continue and develop only under the protection of a force independent of the local population – an iron wall which the native population cannot break through.”

Something similar to this “Iron Wall” protects these mal constructs of “Islam” rapidly devouring our nation while simultaneously lending the much needed pretext to the West for sustaining its “imperial mobilization”. Its strategic and full spectrum redressing takes more than just ineffectively banning these terrorist organizations (which has been tried halfheartedly in lip-service to the Hegelian Dialectic) or ineffectively curtailing their antediluvian “Islamization of Pakistan” programs (which is talked about by the so called secular humanists who are the second line of useful idiots of empire, the first being our leaders, those who are not outright mercenaries that is). It is discussed elsewhere.

2) Bravely speak up, stand up, be part of the making your presence felt in society by giving up the silence of the lamb, the ostrich, and the coward.

In that speaking up, and standing up, boycott the forthcoming 2013 Pakistani elections.

Not participating is a resounding NO vote to reject the entire corrupt system. Do not participate in a fabricated system designed to ab initio continue its servility to massa; all waters run only Westward, even if wearing the turban, the beard, clean-shaved, in uniform, in awami-libas, in duppatta, in burqa – and that includes Imran Khan, the favorite savior of the young generation.

Continue Reading Imran Khan 'the savior'

Short URL: http://tinyurl.com/Context-Shia-Killings-Pakistan

Source URL: http://print-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2013/02/context-whats-transpiring-in-pakistan.html

Role of Shias in Qadianis' Kafirdom

Chicken coming home to roost for the Shias of Pakistan

Sunday, February 24, 2013 11:02 pm | Last Updated February 27, 2013 01:00 pm

In reaction to the ongoing targeted Shia killings in Pakistan as the new “kafirs” (see Some Context for Shia Killings in Pakistan and The New SAVAK in Pakistan), while researching the role of fanatical Sunni sects in condemning the Qadianis previously as the original "kafir" in 1973-74 under ZA Bhutto's Islamization drive to neutralize the American sponsored religious right, I stumbled upon the following gem. Watch this video clip, at time 1m 55 sec:

Chicken coming home to roost for the Shias of Pakistan?

Caption Quoting the late Pakistani Shia scholar, Allama Irfan Haider Abidi, (translation is mine): “All the Muslims in the world would not have been able to declare Qadianis kafir if 'Ali Waale' were not present!” (Allama Irfan Haider Abidi, Qadiyani Aur Sunni Main Farq?, 1990s, time 1m 55s, translated by Zahir Ebrahim)

Caption Quoting the late Pakistani Shia scholar, Allama Irfan Haider Abidi, why the Shia pulpit is protected from officially being declared 'kafir' in Pakistan; which perhaps explains the psychology behind why it was easy for the 'Ali Waale' (video above) to team up with the fanatic Sunni pulpits against the Qadianis' political disenfranchisement orchestrated by ZA Bhutto in 1974 –– when they could have just as easily recused themselves from the political charade even if no one rationally dare declare Shias 'kafir' (translation is mine):

“I am speaking from both Shia and Sunni point of view. In Islam, there is no concept of majority and minority. In Islam only non-Muslims are called minority. (Some instructions to the listeners to pay close attention and to stop sloganeering) In Islam the Muslims are always in the majority (by definition); even if among 200 non-Muslims there are only 2 homes (that are Muslim). And minority is 'scheduled caste'; the non-Muslims are called the minorities. And responsible citizens are sitting here. Our Mr. Shah sahib participated in the formation of the 1973 Constitution, and he knows better; he is also an advocate, and he is very experienced; he has studied constitutional law. Our Mr. Qizalbash sahib is also sitting here; and he also knows. And other law experts must also be present here.

The 1973 Constitution had clearly written the words “non-Muslim minorities” in reference to Personal Law. Meaning, those minority communities which are not Muslim. Personal Law was only for them. We don't except the Western terminology of Personal Law and Public Law.

The 1973 Constitution made it clear-cut that Personal Law will only be for minorities. After that, during the military dictatorship rule when the 1973 Constitution was disfigured, this clause was removed. And then every (Muslim) sect was given freedom to do whatever they want under Personal Law. Every sect does not need freedom in Personal Law to do whatever they want. I am not going to bury my dead by asking the government first. It is my right.

Pakistan's 1973 Constitution was subverted and disfigured through amendments during the military era. Go pick up copies of the Constitution and examine it. This reference to Section 227 that is often made; it was subverted, disfigured. Where other aspects of the Constitution have been disfigured, this has also been disfigured.

Personal Law is only for minorities. And the term "minorities" in Islam is exclusively reserved for kafirs. Until such time that someone does not declare us (shias) kafirs, we don't accept any Personal Law. And there is no such brave person, 'mai ka lal', born to any mother, who can dare declare those who follow Ali as 'kafir'. I swear by God. (cheering).

Writing on doors and walls nothing happens; just writing "kafir kafir", dear listeners, nothing can happen. Because, and this is our only main advantage (or superiority), that no one can ever declare those who say "ya Ali" to be 'kafir'.

And the reason no one can declare that, is because we also say "la illaha illallah", we also say "Muhammad-un rasool ullah", and immediately after that we say "Ali-un vali ullah". And after saying "Ali-un vali ullah", it becomes an automatic announcement (a declaration of faith) that now no more messengers will come, because now Ali's Imammate has commenced! (cheering) Are you paying attention? Reflect again.

As for declaring the Shia-an-e-haidar-e-karar 'kafir', friends, if you ask me my personal opinion, I pray to Allah, someone should really declare us 'kafir', just one time. By just someone's proclamation one of course does not become 'kafir'. And a kafir declaring someone else 'kafir' cannot make the momin (Shia) 'kafir', obviously. (laughter, sloganeering).

But I would like to say at least this little thing, that God willing, it should come into someone's mind to declare Shia-an-e-haidar-e-karar 'kafir'.

Remember, it is from our beliefs that the existence of Pakistan is intimately associated (or dependent). Pay attention, I am stating a very important sentence. And this voice should be spread if the news media representatives whom I had especially invited are present here. My message should be spread, and very responsible citizens are present here.

In all their presence I am stating: it is with our beliefs and (our) Islam that the future of the entire country is intertwined. I am saying just try it – if we are declared 'kafir', constitutionally, Pakistan's Resolution, the 1940 Resolution, the 1945 Convention, the 1930 Allahabad Convention (Sir Muhammad Iqbal's 1930 Presidential Address, Allahabad, 29 December 1930), all these will automatically become null and void!

The entire conception of Pakistan will become null and void. Because, if we are declared 'kafir', then the founder of Pakistan also becomes 'kafir'!”
(Allama Irfan Haider Abidi, 8th Muharram 1990 at Karachi, time 43m 55s to 49m 18s, translated by Zahir Ebrahim)

When a people are not very principled, when their rulers' and leaders' politics is based on expeditious reasoning, and political expediency is the foundation of rule of law, as it has been for the entire 65 year history of Pakistan, what goes around comes around. The fact, according to the Shia scholar in the first video above, that the “Ali Waale”, meaning the Shia scholars, participated in conferring that epithet of official kafirdom upon another peoples, the Qadianis, leaves the ongoing Shia killings today in the name of their own kafirdom, with the tail wagging the dog. The logical invincibility proclaimed in the second video not being all that effective in protecting the ordinary Shia peoples from the daily targeted wrath of the barbarians. Someone evidently forgot to inform the murderous barbarians and their manufacturers and handlers that the Shias are invincible!

If there is substantive truth to this matter of the Shia pulpit being instrumental in clinching the theological argument for condemning another people to political disenfranchisement, I hasten to reason with all fairness that before the Shias (and the Sunnis who also will not escape being made victims in similar numbers) can claim any sanctuary from these manufactured barbarians, they must first apologize to the Qadianis. All Muslim peoples of Pakistan must together endeavor to collectively end this long beleaguered minority's political dispossession in order to save their own respective skin. So long as the Qadianis remain “kafir” -- that precedent-setting fault-line among Islam's followers will eventually be made to devour all Muslims.

For each one of you, well, except for the few who are converts to Islam, your religion is your inheritance, just as it is for me. There is absolutely no merit in you being born a Shia, or Sunni, or demerit in being born a Qadiani, and for that matter a Dalit or any other. We were all born in our respective homes and socialized into our worldviews, our faith, our beliefs, our loves, and also our hates (see Islam and Knowledge vs. Socialization). Being condemned and dispossessed of political rights, marginalized and killed, because of one's beliefs – that used to happen in the Dark Ages in most parts of the world, and still happens in Palestine today for the Palestinians under occupation. But why does that still happen in Pakistan? It is easy to point to effects and think them to be the cause. Cause and effect are two different things. Blood-drenched sectarianism is the symptom, like the ugly boil on the syphilis ridden new bride's lip. What is the cause? The principal first cause is the directionless-ness of the nation; carved from blood and dispossession, never forging an independent national destiny, and preferring to continue as the newly freed but still emotionally dependent slave of the massa.

We don't even have a sensible understanding of what is likely obvious to even intelligent first graders in the West. One is criminalized in a civilized society only for one's acts of crime – and beliefs are not a crime in a civilized society. Except, when it becomes Orwellian; when even thought-crimes can be defined by the fiat of law to carry the death penalty. In such a dystopian society, no one is immune from being made kafir, terrorist, or even classified as suffering from a psychiatric illness such as the newly coined “oppositional defiant disorder” and locked away for life --- once that cat of marginalizing a people based on their beliefs is let out of the bag!

So why were the Shia and Sunni Muslim public in Pakistan silent in 1974 when their respective scholars were condemning another minority to kafirdom? When many good people remain silent to the travails of others, the few bad people take over and screw each good people in turn. Duh! It is for this reason that Solon, the ancient Athenian law-giver, advocated for social responsibility as not just a moral requirement, but a legal requirement. When asked which city he thought was well-governed, Solon said: “That city where those who have not been injured take up the cause of one who has, and prosecute the case as earnestly as if the wrong had been done to themselves.”

To overcome that banality of evil has been the principal teaching of all religions, but specifically Islam (see Islam: Surah Al-Asr of the Holy Qur'an and Path Forward: Impacting Muslim Existence). We turned that lofty religion into a bunch of rituals, and my sect's is bigger than your sect's childish rivalry among the few which continued to spread by way of socialization into self-righteousness. Its natural culmination is the barbarianism now being visited upon those previously silent and too busy pursuing their own “Pakistani Dream” – both in and out of the mosques – to give a fck about anyone else's blood being shed. It isn't my blood, my child, my wife, my brothers and sisters, my parents – phew. Let's move on to the next channel see what's playing.

What share should we apportion to ourselves for our public apathy and silence for this carnage that is now Pakistan? We hasten to blame our national misery on the rampages of the pirates, on the greed of the politicians, and on the emperor's armies and think-tanks playing the new great game on the grand chessboard. What has been our tacit role in rubber-stamping their rampages with our indifference, with our abiding signatures, and with our quiet compliance?

Just because you are a Shia, or a Sunni, or a Christian, or whatever other minority peoples exist in Pakistan, and your erudite turban or shalwar-kameez excretes poison for others, especially when you are a majority, you don't have to go along with your tribe “United We Stand”. Have the courage to instead “United We Stand” with moral decency, with civic mindedness, with fairness, with justice, diligently applying the Golden Rule “do unto others as you have others do unto you” to adjudicate upon any and all matters; and today the Shia ass would not be in the line of fire of these antediluvian manufactured barbarians – because the Qadiani ass would also never have been in that line of fire.

To be effective in stopping this carnage for any one sect, the carnage must stop for all citizens regardless of their sect and religion. Given the state of narrow parochialism the mass Pakistani mind has been reduced to today, only a firm separation of religion and state with all citizens accorded the same rights and privileges irrespective of religion; the adoption of the principle of amicable co-existence derived from verse 5:48 of the Holy Qur'an as mandatory for all sects and religions accorded recognition by the state (see Path Forward: Impacting Muslim Existence); and the elimination of religion identification from the Pakistani national identity card and passport; remain the core national first course of action before the country disintegrates completely. Many people all across Pakistan have reached this conclusion of separation of state and religion which all the political founders of Pakistan, without exception, advocated, and the Muslim public who supported them with their own blood, expected. If a referendum is taken today, it should not surprise anyone that the overwhelming majority of the ordinary Pakistani public even three generations later, despite the national dysfunction, will also still agree with it.

The problem is not [the lack of] abstract theory. It is the intertwining of political will and the power nexus in Pakistan that is still entirely beholden to the same white man's burden now merely wearing the indirect “liberal” garb of democracy instead of the iron fisted one of direct colonial occupation. Here is the pertinent text of the founder of beleaguered Pakistan, Mr. Muhammad Ali Jinnah's first Presidential Address to the Constituent Assembly of Pakistan, August 11, 1947. Excerpted from G. Allana, Pakistan Movement Historical Documents, University of Karachi, 1969, pp. 407-411 (via source):

“[[7]] I cannot emphasize it too much. We should begin to work in that spirit, and in course of time all these angularities of the majority and minority communities, the Hindu community and the Muslim community -- because even as regards Muslims you have Pathans, Punjabis, Shias, Sunnis and so on, and among the Hindus you have Brahmins, Vashnavas, Khatris, also Bengalees, Madrasis and so on -- will vanish. Indeed if you ask me, this has been the biggest hindrance in the way of India to attain the freedom and independence, and but for this we would have been free people long long ago. No power can hold another nation, and specially a nation of 400 million souls, in subjection; nobody could have conquered you, and even if it had happened, nobody could have continued its hold on you for any length of time, but for this. Therefore, we must learn a lesson from this. You are free; you are free to go to your temples, you are free to go to your mosques or to any other place or worship in this State of Pakistan. You may belong to any religion or caste or creed -- that has nothing to do with the business of the State. As you know, history shows that in England conditions, some time ago, were much worse than those prevailing in India today. The Roman Catholics and the Protestants persecuted each other. Even now there are some States in existence where there are discriminations made and bars imposed against a particular class. Thank God, we are not starting in those days. We are starting in the days where there is no discrimination, no distinction between one community and another, no discrimination between one caste or creed and another. We are starting with this fundamental principle: that we are all citizens, and equal citizens, of one State. The people of England in [the] course of time had to face the realities of the situation, and had to discharge the responsibilities and burdens placed upon them by the government of their country; and they went through that fire step by step. Today, you might say with justice that Roman Catholics and Protestants do not exist; what exists now is that every man is a citizen, an equal citizen of Great Britain, and they are all members of the Nation.

[[8]] Now I think we should keep that in front of us as our ideal, and you will find that in course of time Hindus would cease to be Hindus, and Muslims would cease to be Muslims, not in the religious sense, because that is the personal faith of each individual, but in the political sense as citizens of the State.

[[9]] Well, gentlemen, I do not wish to take up any more of your time; and thank you again for the honour you have done to me. I shall always be guided by the principles of justice and fair play without any, as is put in the political language, prejudice or ill-will; in other words, partiality or favouritism. My guiding principle will be justice and complete impartiality, and I am sure that with your support and co-operation, I can look forward to Pakistan becoming one of the greatest Nations of the world.” --- Muhammad Ali Jinnah's first Presidential Address to the Constituent Assembly of Pakistan, August 11, 1947.

Unfortunately, to undo the Gordian knot of provincialism tied on Pakistani politics since its very inception is gonna take more than a few wise men, regurgitation of theory, and referendum; and isn't that the truth!

There are many lessons to be learnt from history, but the one that continues to impress me is the fact that once a Gordian knot is tied upon any matter, or any nation, a thousand wise men may not be able to untie it. When Imam Ali "inherited" the caliphate due to the people finally pleading with him to take up the reigns of the Muslim nation after the third Muslim Caliph's assassination when a Gordian knot had already been tied upon the rapidly emerging new ruling-state that was reaching the shores of the Roman Empire, Persia and India, even the singular “gate to the city of knowledge” was unable to undo the civil wars that besieged his 4-1/2 years in power.

Perhaps the lack of the many wise men in Pakistan who can even begin to tackle the Gordian knot tied upon the nation can be made up by every ordinary man woman and child in Pakistan screaming NO to their own banality of evil; they can stop being silent bystanders while waiting for their turn to become the next victim of the barbarians – both the pirate and the emperor; and stand up to have their presence felt in society. What that means for the upcoming 2013 elections can be read in Some Context for Shia Killings in Pakistan.

Source URL: http://faith-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2013/02/role-of-shias-in-qadianis-kafirdom.html

Unlayering the Middle East War Agenda: Making Sense of Absurdities

Sunday, January 23, 2011

President George W. Bush poses with President-elect Barack Obama, and former presidents, George H.W. Bush, Bill Clinton and Jimmy Carter, Wednesday, Jan. 7, 2009, in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite) http://media.charlotteobserver.com/smedia/2009/01/07/15/9-20090107_presidents_02.standalone.prod_affiliate.138.jpg

Preamble

This is a response to the unforensic focus on the Middle East War Agenda which permeates the alternate media even today, well into the 10th year of the New Pearl Harbor, orchestrated like the Nazi's Operation Canned Goods to “goosestep the herrenvolk across international frontiers” – first into Afghanistan, Iraq, gradually inching its way throughout the arc of crisis, next target: the Crescent of Crisis, Iran. Time magazine had quoted Zbigniew Brzezinski self-servingly presaging these very events in 1979 at the cusp of the Iranian Revolution: “An arc of crisis stretches along the shores of the Indian Ocean, with fragile social and political structures in a region of vital importance to us threatened with fragmentation. The resulting political chaos could well be filled by elements hostile to our values and sympathetic to our adversaries.” (U.S. National Security Advisor to President Jimmy Carter, Zbigniew Brzezinski, Time, Jan. 15, 1979)

It was in the same year that President Jimmy Carter's National Security Advisor, waging a clandestine proxy war upon the USSR, had started giving covert aid to the CIA backed Afghan mercenaries (later renamed “Mujahideens”) to foment sufficient agitation at the flank of the USSR to provoke a Soviet Intervention in Afghanistan to protect their own hegemonic interests: “According to the official version of history, CIA aid to the Mujahadeen began during 1980, that is to say, after the Soviet army invaded Afghanistan, 24 Dec 1979. But the reality, secretly guarded until now, is completely otherwise Indeed, it was July 3, 1979 that President Carter signed the first directive for secret aid to the opponents of the pro-Soviet regime in Kabul. And that very day, I wrote a note to the president in which I explained to him that in my opinion this aid was going to induce a Soviet military intervention.” After the Soviet Union had taken the bait and invaded, blood-thirsty murderer playing chess in other peoples' blood, Dr. Zbigniew Brzezinski confessed in 1998 that he again wrote to Jimmy Carter back in December 1979: “The day that the Soviets officially crossed the border, I wrote to President Carter. We now have the opportunity of giving to the USSR its Vietnam war. Indeed, for almost 10 years, Moscow had to carry on a war unsupportable by the government, a conflict that brought about the demoralization and finally the breakup of the Soviet empire.” (1998 interview to French magazine Le Nouvel Observateur)

Thus, the arc of crisis which Brzezinski had glibly predicted in January 1979, was firmly seeded by January 1980 as the Carter Doctrine, otherwise known as “God is on your side”, to set it all ablaze in the coming future. Sufficiently implanted with the necessary explosive mix of religion, “jihad”, hostage crisis, Iranian Revolution, Soviet intervention in Afghanistan, drug trade, and sectarian fanaticism unleashed in Pakistan by the hanging-judge-military dictator General Zia Ul Haq installed there by the Carter White House in support of the CIA cultivating and harvesting “Islamic Mujahideens” to fight the USSR, it didn't take much ignition beyond the priming. The fire quickly became self-sustaining as new recruits grew up in the lighted cauldron and couldn't easily distinguish their head from their ass – especially with the Pakistan military being in full collusion with the CIA in screwing both Pakistan and Afghanistan society on the Grand Chessboard. Today, these war criminals pat themselves on the back for destroying the USSR with Muslim and Afghani blood costing the complete destruction of what was previously a still stable Afghani and Pakistani society – but they'll all hang someday even if their carcass has to be dragged out from six feet under. In 1996, Zbigniew Brzezinski renamed the arc of crisis in his next geostrategy book The Grand Chessboard, with an even more imposing epithet, “the global zone of percolating violence”, illustrating with maps galore the arc of crisis for those still uninitiated into the vagaries of the exercise of American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Initiatives of the sole unchallenged superpower. (page 53)

That foretold future – explicitly and very publicly presaged in 1979 in a popular weekly magazine read by all and sundry not just in the United States, but in the entire world – fully unleashed by the New Pearl Harbor on September 11, 2001, had the former US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice self-righteously justify the purpose of America's hegemonic cultivation of “the global zone of percolating violence” in 2006 in these sacred words: “What we’re seeing here, in a sense, is…the birth pangs of a new Middle East and whatever we do, we have to be certain that we’re pushing forward to the new Middle East, not going back to the old one.” (U.S. Secretary of State to George W. Bush, Condoleezza Rice, July 21, 2006)

All the preceding is what the blood thirsty hectoring hegemons have themselves narrated.

But comparing their narration to empiricism tells a slightly different story.

That War Agenda today to “birth pangs of a new Middle East” is still variously blamed upon:

the Zionist agenda for Eretz Yisrael,
and/or upon the sole superpower's Primacy and Its Geostrategic Initiatives to preemptively acquire and extract the natural resources in the Middle East and Central Asia before any other nation or group of nations can rise to challenge its dominance.

The former Zionist agenda is pitched as the ungodly wars waged by the Jewish neoconservaties who dominate Washington, blueprinted in their PNAC and other Wolfowitz drawn strategy documents for Securing the Jews-only Realm.

The latter superpower agenda is pitched as the wars of primacy for America's sole preeminence, blueprinted in Zbigniew Brzezinski's The Grand Chessboard and in Pentagon's many Joint Vision strategy documents.

Both premise, while appearing sensible in 2003 when I too employed them in my maiden book Prisoners of the Cave, in the light of today's empiricism outright lead to absurdities.

America is going bankrupt due to these global wars with rising national debt which now stands in the 13 trillion dollar range as officially reported by the US Treasury, and its budget deficit this year, 2011, is 1.4 trillion dollars. This means America has to borrow, i.e., have its central bank the Federal Reserve print, 40 cents for every dollar it spends, thus also commensurately increasing the national debt and the burden upon the already suffering American tax payer.

What sort of idiotic primacy agenda for preeminence is that?

The United States hasn't been able to extract any of the natural resources either from the Middle East and Central Asian soils anymore than she was already extracting previously – as much as it wanted – with its own coddled dictators firmly in power.

Why did she need to wage murderous wars to decimate the region to remove its own cultivated dictators?

It also sure hasn't been good for the Anglo-American oil companies – they can't do business when the region is torn asunder by the cycle of insurgency and counter-insurgency manufactured by the Anglo-American Allies themselves. Same in Afghanistan – no pipelines, only the so called quagmires, as even the mainstream news of the United States puts it.

As for Israel, if Eretz Yisrael is the principal reason for decimating Iraq with millions of tons of Depleted Uranium munitions, destroying its fertile top soils and bountiful water tables, not to mention the ancient DNA of its inhabitants, and with only immense hatred and ire of its millions of Arabs now irretrievably implanted to greet the Zionist from Israel if they ever set foot onto its soil for resettlement, then the Jews can't really occupy that land for themselves now can they?

What did the Israelis really gain by brutally removing the servile Iraqi puppet of their own client state, the United States?

Only chaos in the region!

What Zionistan's founding father, David Ben Gurion, would have easily called “revolutionary times”. Well, according to that science of hegemonic conquest, these chaos-like conditions in the Middle East have also only created more fertile grounds to administer further mind-fcks to the natives because “what is inconceivable in normal times is possible in revolutionary times”.

What other benefit? Perhaps some smaller equally compliant but unstable ethnic principalities carved out of the former equally compliant monolithic and stable Iraq, which today lies in ruin.

But wait, NO Eretz Yisrael!

Only enormous hatred for Israel, and America.

What an agenda for preeminence!

Only the keystone cops could have blueprinted it.

Hmmm....

Reality is almost like an onion.

Comes in layers.

The outer layer, when peeled, shows the next inner layer.

And so on down to the core.

It is difficult to get to the core of reality, without first unpeeling it, layer by layer.

The empirical fact however is that it is not mentioned in the mainstream, and by many others in dissentstream either, because the conspiracy is to not even acknowledge that the onion exists at all for social engineering of ‘United we Stand’ and ‘introducing beneficial cognitive diversity’ to mislead the public.

But the outer layer of the onion is not the entire onion, however persuasive and inviting it may appear!

These are mere labels, the neocons, neoconservatives, neo-cons, they mean nothing by themselves.

America has been involved in warfare from Wounded Knee to Afghanistan, and before WWII, there were no neo-cons by that name.

So how does one explain America’s vast military-industrial-academe-media complex which is what actually wages the wars? How does one explain America's national security state?

But why do they wage wars?

For Israel?

The focus on Israel, and the Jewish Lobby, in my view, can at times be a gigantic red herring. See: “Pamphlet: How To Return to Palestine”, and “The white man's burden still looks white in color!”. The real focus must remain on the oligarchy which funds all sides of wars, and have been doing so for 250 years, and for what eventual purpose?

The War on Terror, the war on Afghanistan, the war on Iraq, the war on Pakistan, the war on Iran, on whatever mantras and asinine pretexts, by themselves make no sense – as the war of neo-conservatism – and it is easy to pin it upon the most visible harbingers for their most obvious motives! The outer layer of the onion.

And what about the silent economic wars of neo-liberalism – aka free trade?

Thomas Friedman best captured the interplay of these two sides of the imperial coin – the thunderous wars of shock and awe, and the matching silent wars of hunger and deprivations due to the loot and plunder of global natural resources via the stranglehold of contrived third world debt – in his 1999 New York Times column titled Manifesto for a Fast World: “The hidden hand of the market will never work without a hidden fist -- McDonald's cannot flourish without McDonnell Douglas, the builder of the F-15. And the hidden fist that keeps the world safe for Silicon Valley's technologies is called the United States Army, Air Force, Navy and Marine Corps.”

But peel down behind both types of wars, behind both philosophies of primacy which are as old as hegemony, as old as mankind, and we get World Government.

Global Governance would not be possible without the transformative abilities of these wars which seed controlled chaos, deprivations, disenfranchisement, and fabricated public appeals to authorities to resolve matters. Which of course they subsequently do, with greater and greater centralization of powers into the private hands of the same oligarchy who create the very crises for which they ex post facto present their own preferred solutions. See: Response to Financial Times Gideon Rachman's 'And now for a world government'.

David Ben Gurion aptly described this Machiavellian modus operandi as “what is inconceivable in normal times is possible in revolutionary times”.

The unlayering is important to get to the heart of the matter, quickly, before it is too late. And one of the reason it is not unlayered in time, is to seed fait accompli. That is the master political science. To understand this political science which is time-critical and which is what enables only narrating these matters ex post facto, see: “Of Ostriches and Rebels on The Hard Road to World Order”.

That too, by itself, is still not the inner most core of the onion, only the next layer down, but it already demonstrates that focus on the outer layer of the onion of reality, the visible reality, makes for a great red herring.

No one in Plato’s cave can ever figure out the reality behind the images on the screen, by examining, and in no matter what excruciating a scholarship, the images on the screen before them.

That is why the outer layer of the onion, whether one sees the onion at all or not, is often pointless garbage.

Whenever I cook dinner at home, I always throw away the outer layer of the onion, it tastes terrible :-)

Thank you.

Zahir Ebrahim | Project Humanbeingsfirst.org

Source URL: http://print-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2011/01/unlayering-middle-east-war-agenda.html

Deconstructing the reality behind The Reality of the "Lesser Evil"

Begin Quote

Is this child dead enough for you?

This little boy was named Naeemullah. He was in his house -- maybe playing, maybe sleeping, maybe having a meal -- when an American drone missile was fired into the residential area where he lived and blew up the house next door.

As we all know, these drone missiles are, like the president who wields them, super-smart, a triumph of technology and technocratic expertise. We know, for the president and his aides have repeatedly told us, that these weapons -- launched only after careful consultation of the just-war strictures of St. Augustine and St. Thomas Aquinas -- strike nothing but their intended targets and kill no one but "bad guys." Indeed, the president's top aides have testified under oath that not a single innocent person has been among the thousands of Pakistani civilians -- that is, civilians of a sovereign nation that is not at war with the United States -- who have been killed by the drone missile campaign of the Nobel Peace Prize Laureate.

... As Wired reports, shrapnel and debris went flying through the walls of Naeemullah's house and ripped through his small body. When the attack was over -- when the buzzing drone sent with Augustinian wisdom by the Peace Laureate was no longer lurking over the village, shadowing the lives of every defenseless inhabitant with the terrorist threat of imminent death, Naeemullah was taken to the hospital in a nearby town.

... Before the election, we heard a lot of talk about this notion of the "lesser evil." From prominent dissidents and opponents of empire like Daniel Ellsberg and Noam Chomsky and Robert Parry to innumerable progressive blogs to personal conversations, one heard this basic argument:

“Yes, the drone wars, the gutting of civil liberties, the White House death squads and all the rest are bad; but Romney would be worse. Therefore, with great reluctance, holding our noses and shaking our heads sadly, we must choose the lesser evil of Obama and vote accordingly.” --- Chris Floyd, Dead Enough: The Reality of the “Lesser Evil” 09 November 2012

End Quote

Thanks to Chris Floyd¹ for remembering this tiny little Pakistani “unworthy victim” named Naeemullah, as Noam Chomsky would characterize this innocent unmourned victim of the good guys, who, predictably as always, is dismissed merely as “collateral damage”, the “lesser evil” in the war against a greater evil.

By Chomsky's definition, the “worthy victim” is always worthy of being mourned, as it is made victim by the bad guys or their allies. The “unworthy victim” is unworthy of being mourned or even worrying about, as it is made victim by the good guys or their allies.

So the equally innocent child Malala Yousafzai, the “worthy victim”, a victim of the evil-doers, is to be honored and even celebrated, perhaps even anointed as the “peace-maker” and awarded the Nobel Peace prize. It makes the bad guys look really bad and advances the cause of empire's counter-insurgency operations against them.

Quote US Army Field Manual

“Top Secret: There may be times when host country governments show passivity or indecision in the face of Communist subversion ... US Army Intelligence must have the means of launching special operations which will convince host country governments and public opinion of the reality of the insurgent danger ... US Army Intelligence should seek to penetrate the insurgency by means of agents of special assignments, with the task of forming special action groups among the most radical elements of the insurgency.” -- Source: see The Mighty Wurlitzer

End Quote

The brutal creation and public-relations harvesting of “worthy victims” enables putting to bed all the “unworthy victims” as merely the “lesser evil” in empire's counter-insurgency operations. This is examined in the report: Insurgency vs. Counter-Insurgency ( tinyurl.com/what-is-insurgency ).

The brilliant nomenclature of “worthy” vs. “unworthy” I hope helps shed some forensic light for the confused² as to why empire's favorite Malala Yousafzai even has November 11th, 2012, declared by the UN Special Envoy for Global Education and former British Prime Minister Gordon Brown, as the ‘Malala Day’, while Dr. Aafia Siddiqui ( tinyurl.com/Dr-Aafia-Siddiqui ) has ignominiously been put in jail for life. Since no one really likes to remember the “unworthy victims”, I have included their images here.

My old prof. from MIT has surely contributed a great deal of meaningful vocabulary and penetrating concepts for explaining the Machiavellian statecraft of perception management throughout his extraordinary life of dissent. Including the following:

Continue Reading...

From Genesis to Genocide in Palestine – Déjà vu Gaza 2012

Project Humanbeingsfirst observes the self-evident fact of the matter that reading and crying and then repeat, which is what humanity continues to do upon discovering another holocaust, does not help those who are seeing the end of their genocide! Those escaping their holocaust continue to endure it for a long long time. The images on television brought to the rest of us in the comfort and safety of our home only tell a futile story –– for it repeats again and again with even more inhuman brazenity while most just watch on, perhaps with a silent prayer.

Pamphlet: From Genesis to Genocide in Palestine – Only The Dead Have Seen The End of Genocide!

Download PDF (5.3 MB) You can never be allowed to forget it

Caption 'I am a Palestinian.
Hath not a Palestinian eyes? hath not a Palestinian hands, organs, dimensions, senses, affections, passions? fed with the same food, hurt with the same weapons, subject to the same diseases, healed by the same means, warmed and cooled by the same winter and summer, as a Jew is?
If you prick us, do we not bleed?
if you tickle us, do we not laugh?
if you poison us, do we not die?
and if you wrong us, shall we not revenge?
If we are like you in the rest, we will resemble you in that.
If a Palestinian wrong a Jew, what is his humility? Revenge.
If a Jew wrong a Palestinian, what should his sufferance be by Jewish example?
Why, revenge.
The villainy you teach me, I will execute, and it shall go hard but I will better the instruction.' (Adapted from The Merchant of Venice)

How Gaza children experience International Day of the Child November 20, 2012

A battle for Zionistan primarily seeded in the Machiavellian intellect of the ubermensch which begets the genocide of yet another untermensch even as we speak, cannot be fought with tears, protests, and narratives.

Project Humanbeingsfirst uses the word “genocide” and “holocaust” very circumspectly. To the dead it makes little difference whether they are murdered in a concentration camp in the tiny Belsen or the large one in Gaza. To the living, it becomes only a narrative: for some to be borne with screams and nightmares, for others to become a bountiful harvest of political and pecuniary gains. That spans the full gamut of opportunism, from the Holocaust Industry^TM to peddling the travails of a beleaguered peoples in the garb of erudite scholarship and high-minded morality. The worst of which is to plant clever red herrings among the victims in an unprecedented intellectual and psychological warfare to ensure that the golem will never be identified and put down by the victims even in their existential struggle for survival. The onslaught of this holocaust is full spectrum.

The genocidal assault on the civilians of Gaza in 2012 by the mighty state of Israel is once again only enabled because no Palestinian evidently learnt in 2009, never mind in 1948 or 1917, that the power which unleashes this holocaust upon them, now in its 64^th continuous year, actually beats in the heart of a golem that resides not in Zion, but elsewhere.

That golem has surrounded its criminal enterprise with an “Iron Wall” of such power and obscurity that few have been able to breach it –– evidently none among the beleaguered Palestinian peoples themselves if their silence on it is permitted to speak of their missing wherewithal. To this day, most Palestinians, never mind the rest of the peoples on planet earth silently watching the spectacle of an innocent people being systematically eradicated from their own land like “cockroaches”, remain unaware that the principal land deed which gratuitously granted their land to the Jews was addressed to Lord Rothschild. It is their oligarchic enterprise. Yet none dare utter that name –– not even among the Palestinians! Because of that absurdity, it is once again Déjà vu in Gaza, 2012, today!

Pamphlet: The Invisible House of Rothschild

Download PDF (1.0 MB 70 pages)

The Balfour Declaration: Dear Lord Rothschild, 'His Majesty's Government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavor to facilitate the achievement of this object. it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country.'

The holocaust in Palestine cannot be interdicted without first effectively breaching that “Iron Wall” which protects the criminal enterprise of Zionistan. Since few speak of it – never mind comprehend it – the price is continually paid in the pound of flesh extracted from the Palestinian peoples while they are kept innocent of knowledge of their most cunning and diabolical foe.

Pamphlet: How To Return to Palestine

Download PDF (1.4 MB, 118 pages)

A Public Service Message from Project Humanbeingsfirst.org. For what it's worth!

The Invisible Octopus

Dear Zahir,

Regarding Zionism and Israel, although I find it rather pervasive yet it is clear as daylight that they have established a hegemony in the style of the spread of internet, very much enmeshed in the fabric of power. I don't believe this is something that just happens, rather, it seems to me the culmination of decades of organized and conscious effort. It is not natural to see powerful Western nations, in particular US and UK, behave like they are subject to threat and hence need to appease this sinister force even at the expense and betrayal of their own population. Here in Canada, our PM shamelessly supports whatever they do, virtually like a zombie. And it isn't just the Conservatives, Liberals and NDP are in it, too. One of our NDP MPs, Libby Davies, was strongly reprimanded by the late NDP head, Jack Layton, and she had done nothing but express the obvious about Israel. One wonders how we have come to this that a bunch of thugs are can have so much power over our government.

It is so easy to be disillusioned and demoralized when one looks at what is happening in our Muslim nations, though I try to keep faith alive in humanity and decency and justice, reminding myself that for example, the darkest of the night is before dawn. And I also wonder why Russia and China do not provide adequate challenge to these insane financial and belligerent policies that constitute the USrael/UK agenda. It is humanity that is being hijacked... I may have mentioned it to you before but in Farsi we have a saying, "harcheh b'gandad namakash mizannand; waay beh roozi keh b'gandad namak" which translated says, "whatever is liable to rot is treated with salt, alas the day when salt rots".

[A Canadian of Iranian descent]

My Response

"One wonders how we have come to this that a bunch of thugs are can have so much power over our government."

Indeed. This is what the Rothschild scions have been quoted for 250 years: "Give me control of a nations money supply and I care not who makes its laws"!

With that one single primordial control over nations in the form of controlling their central banks, they created what you aptly described: "they have established a hegemony in the style of the spread of internet, very much enmeshed in the fabric of power."

This is how they prevailed over Great Britain, the mother country of Canada, to issue the Balfour Declaration – one of the most treacherous documents in the history of colonialism. Click on the Balfour Declaration image below to see its careful language deconstruction by yours truly - Notice that the Balfour Declaration is issued to the Rothschild name!

Caption The Balfour Declaration November 2nd 1917

The full examination of the Rothschild power structure is in my Rothschild trilogy – called My Confusion Series Part-1, Part-2 and Part-3 !

And as you correctly noted of the interlockingness of their power, akin to "the spread of internet", the following explanation was given by W. Cleon Skoussen in his book 'The Naked Capitalist' on how it was exercised by a handful of men:

‘The real value of Tragedy and Hope … [is the] bold and boastful admission by Dr. Quigley that there actually exists a relatively small but powerful group which has succeeded in acquiring a choke-hold on the affairs of practically the entire human race. Of course we should be quick to recognize that no small group could wield such gigantic power unless millions of people in all walks of life were “in on the take” and were willing to knuckle down to the iron-clad regimentation of the ruthless bosses behind the scenes. As we shall see, the network has succeeded in building its power structure by using tremendous quantities of money (together with the vast influence it buys) to manipulate, intimidate, or corrupt millions of men and women and their institutions on a world-wide basis.’ (W. Cleon Skousen, The Naked Capitalist, pg. 6)

See "Monetary Reform: Who will bell the cat?" for a fuller examination of why it is next to impossible to overturn this all-pervasive corrupt-power once it has been legally granted to the predators.

It makes no difference, once this predatory power is granted and unleashed upon the public, who sits in the White House or the Congress. And the same is true of Canada, the EU, and the UK. I examined this in 2008 on the eve of US presidential elections and called for the boycott of the elections to give a low voter turnout in order to demonstrate the illegitimacy of democratic institutions once such power has been legally granted to the bankster fraternity. It is in this essay: "Not-Voting is a ‘YES’ vote to Reject a Corrupt System".

So yes, all democratic systems of governance under their respective constitutional republic fabrics have been entirely co-opted by such private power. It is that power and its affiliation with Zionism which makes all the western nations beholden to Zionism. If instead of Zionism, the predators had chosen to ally themselves to some new ideology, say "Babism" or Mayaism" -- just cooking up some terms -- then it would have been those ideologies which would now be holding their Damocles' sword upon the peoples of the earth.

In their present alliance with Zionism, the end goal is World Government by the financial oligarchy. All the global crises we see are merely enabling vehicles for this new system of global management of the planet, which to me appears will be ruled from Tel Aviv and legislated from the New Jerusalem – the claimed hometowns of the Rothschilds. It is obvious that this is already coming true -- for those who rule the White House, the sole unchallenged superpower, also rule the world. Soon, very soon, they will supplant the White House and rule the world directly as the new ruling state without pretensions. Zion will be the new "peace-maker" for the planet in her one-world government! We can already witness the prelude to that global “peace-making” in Palestine today in “From Genesis to Genocide” and “Holocaust in our Age”. We can also already see the enabling of the new public relations mantra for the god's chosen peoples in the FBI training graph below. Please click on the image to see its deconstruction by yours truly (also see "Hijacking the word 'Islam' for Mantra Creation"):

Caption An FBI presentation titled “Militancy Considerations” measures the relationship between piety and violence among the texts of the three Abrahamic faiths

The realization of the immenseness of this interlocking power-structure remains invisible in the struggle for Palestine among the Palestinians and their supporters. That is the real tragedy – that mankind has collectively failed to recognize the nature of this all-pervasive power which has besieged the world for over a hundred years by riding on the backs of world wars, empires, and presently the sole superpower.

Who or What can unlock their octopi like grip on the affairs of the world when people don't even see the octopus?

Zahir Ebrahim

Masters over the World

Masters over the world

'... The point is that a Jew has strength, ability and power to create the desire within G-d to accept and become King over the entire creation.

It's understood, that the existence of the entire creation, in truth, is brought about by the Jew's coronation of G-d, and through which He becomes a King over the entire creation, which ultimately results in the fact that all of creation comes from the Primary being, G-d.

It's obvious that since every Jew, men and even women and children, brings about the existence of the entire creation, they become masters over the world, and thus every single creation owes them recognition for this good.

Being that through the Jew, all beings were created, he therefore becomes the master over all of them.

This is especially so in regards to what needs to be accomplished on erev [every?] Rosh Hashana.

Since the judgment of Rosh Hashana is primarily regarding physical matters, as explained in Likutei Torah, therefore the Jew is in complete control, particularly over physical matters.

The physicality of the world itself has to recognize the good that the Jew has accomplished.

Through the Jews they came into being, and their true existence is through their unity with the True Being.

Since G-d and the Jews are one, each Jew becomes a True Being, and is thus able to bring about all of creation.

He therefore has control over all of creation and not only that, but they owe him thanks and are indeed thankful, for being provided with abundance in physical and especially spiritual matters.'

Can this TSA vagina probe happen to your teenage daughter?

America: TSA vagina probe and you

Where are American balls? In the fist of the TSA…

Caption: Obedience training of chicken hawk Americans flexing their courageous muscles on defenseless and powerless Afghanis, Iraqis, Pakistanis, and along the “arc of crisis” in the “global zone of percolating violence” — while pretending to be deaf, mute and dumb to the dehumanization of their own peoples and loved ones by their own perverse government.… To keep the Americans safe, it wasn't sufficient to get the blood of innocent civilizations of Iraq and Afghanistan on the American public's hands. Now their vaginas and testicles, and next their bending over for anal examination, will keep them the most safe.... Where is all that famous bravado which is routinely unleashed upon the 'untermenschen' 20,000 miles away from home? Being only the naïve 'untermensch', I merely ask...

For those who love to intellectualize their own terrorization while they terrorize others with 'United We Stand', the Airport intrusive patdowns cannot be understood in isolation from the two parallel contexts of “imperial mobilization” and “police state” which cradle that act. The pat-downs are merely obedience training for the American public.

It appears that in this particular instance, there was no choice for the passengers – be exposed to radiation and full nudity via X-ray body-scan, or, feel the pain of sexual groping and molestation.... LAX, Terminal six, United Airlines.

The grotesquely absurd demand by the TSA agent seeking $500,000 from Amy Alkon must be resoundingly defeated because I suspect it is not just the pot calling the kettle black (ulta chore kotwal ko dante), not just a TSA agent suing Amy for her loud complaining, but the TSA itself is suing Amy, DHS is suing Amy, Police-state is suing Amy, as part of silent acceptance of obedience training of Americans.

I suspect that this is another testing of the waters by the hectoring hegemons, a barometer, a rain gauge, of how successful their obedience training has been thus far --- will the Americans even accept this vile absurdity that after the state shoves its hand inside the American vagina, it prohibits complaining about it and the majority of people accept it?

The intimidation of lawsuit is also intended to be precedent setting to ensure that the majority of the public do not revolt because it will hit them directly in the pocket-book.

Remember, indoctrination and obedience training is primarily for the masses. The public already has accepted all the rest of 'war on terror' absurdities which have been heaped upon them since 9/11:

Convince People of Absurdities and get them Acquiescing to Atrocities: The Enduring Power of Machiavellian Political Science

‘War on Terror’ is not about ‘Islamofascism’ – Please get with the real agenda you people!

10th Anniversary: 9/11 and Imperial Mobilization

Hijacking Islam for Imperial Mobilization

Please promulgate this issue widely. Publish it if you have a website. Highlight Amy Alkon's case if you are a writer. Donate funds to her legal defense team if you have the capacity. For all these acts, you will actually be helping protect your own loved ones' vaginas and balls. And most importantly, take Amy's own advice for the best way you can support her, by standing up for your own self: "Thank you so much -truly appreciate that. And my wonderful attorney has the legal defense handled, but what I hope people will do is make a stand for our rights. Many, many thanks.-A"

Swine Flu: That Great Debate of 2009

Swine Flu: Fait Accompli

He had already said “It's fait accompli” --- vs. --- She consistently lied “It's voluntary”

The merit of the CASE IS IRRELEVANT because the mercenaries and vulgar propagandists' half truths always triumph over full lies!

The 'empire' plays to win strategically and can't be derailed by a handful of reactionary truth tellers after the manufactured crises have been affected – for had truth-telling any efficacy, Socrates might have been handed a trophy instead of the Hemlock, and Jesus the kingdom instead of the cross. The key to the success of Hegelian Dialectics over time, is the diabolical Fait Accompli sewn in baby-steps. The impact of the invasion of Iraq upon its peoples cannot be reversed by withdrawing the American troops anymore than the impact of the Pandemic can be reversed by arguing whether the vaccine is good or bad. The Pandemic has already created its intended fait accompli – for, 90% of the masses are not only ready today to take the vaccine but also demanding it. The secretive agenda probably is to inoculate at least 50% of the targeted populations in this generation, priming them for at least two things: microchipping, and staging for long term population reduction/culling through some complex biowarfare protocol. They will surely achieve 70 to 80 percent success towards that goal in this round of the pandemic pandemonium. And this is a conservative estimate. That's pretty damn remarkable social engineering for one baby-step fait accompli. More baby-steps to come. The overarching agenda for world-government and its multi-dimensional goals is long-term, across multiple generations, and hinges on irreversibility of small baby-steps to eventually raise the complete Phoenix of the New Atlantis from the systematically burnt ashes in stages of the old order. Under the guise of this Pandemic look how much has already been achieved: the immense loss of national sovereignty to WHO. Under its level-6 Pandemic alert, WHO now controls the emergency response stratagems in all nations that are signatory to its convention. That's most of the world!

As validation of what is stated above, just look at the long lines demanding the vaccine after the declaration of emergency by the President of United States

And the mass psychology driving the long lines is an Edward Bernays special. In CFR shill's own very perceptive words of October 16, 2009:

“... Having said that, does it work to mandate [vaccination]? I think what would work better would be to say that there was a shortage and people tend to buy more of something that's in demand. (Laughter.) We saw that -- there was one season where, really, people lined up all night to get a flu shot.

... we thought we were going to need two doses for every adult and since we are – only one dose, so, actually, we have twice as many doses and enough for the whole population at this point, I understand.”

Watch the entire incestuously-reinforcing CFR disinfo session on Pandemic Influenza this past October 16, 2009:

No one from the learned audience in the above video asked the distinguished panel of experts carefully assembled by the CFR (whose bios, it was explicitly stated, is on the web and “in your packets if you are here”), that how did they suddenly learn that now the public needed only a single doze of inoculation, when just a few months ago it was being heavily promoted as requiring multiple dozes?

No one asked them that where did they get the new scientifically valid data (as opposed to anecdotal one) to change their expert recommendations so rapidly within the span of just a couple of months, when the vaccines for this new pathogen are themselves very new and haven't been around long enough to carry out controlled double-blind studies of their efficacy over the long term to know how many dozes are needed – since the damn virus itself is new and never seen before on planet earth?

And if the older vaccines are imagined by their manufacturers to be very broad-spectrum, as the President of the United States presumed when he ordered several billion dollars worth without testing on the actual new virus, then why did the officials not know how many dozes will be needed just a few months ago? What new data was received in the span of just a few short months between the summer and fall?

And the most crucial aspect to this question, no one asked the distinguished panelists who spoke in all sorts of foreign accents, that if, by their own admission, this 2009 virus is “novel” and “lacks certain signatures which other pandemic influenza viruses have ... which suggest that this virus is not a 1918 like virus ... or 1957 or 1968 virus”, then they could not have possibly known of the older vaccines' efficacy on this new virus a priori any more than the newly patented vaccines, and therefore, when did they actually test the vaccines on the new virus and upon whom?

Because, practically speaking, how could they have tested the vaccines on the new virus (for any length of time) when they didn't even know, and surely now don't know, who actually has the virus and who doesn't since “the CDC abruptly advised states to stop testing for H1N1 flu, and stopped counting individual cases” way back in late July 2009?

So, where did the clinical testing data magically come from between the summer and fall, for the expert's statement: “we thought we were going to need two doses for every adult and since we are – only one dose,” – except out of thin air no differently than the missing WMDs in Iraq after the domain experts from that officialdom had similarly asserted that their “data” incontrovertibly indicated that these were there and about to be launched upon the United States unless the superpower invaded Iraq with the most absolute “shock and awe” immediately?

But the ubiquitous Dr. Nancy Snyderman of NBC says that “this is one time there is no conspiracy, listen to our government agencies, these guys are telling the truth. You know there is no conspiracy here folks. Get your damn vaccine.” Should we believe her and dreadingly also await the inevitable ex post facto “oops!” for this new nemesis of mankind?

Obviously not one science person in the audience, and those supposedly calling in their questions on Twitter, knew how to add 2 + 2 to become skeptical of the panelists' techno-babble gibberish anymore than any mainstream scientists have been of the official NIST report on the how the WTC towers catastrophically collapsed into their own footprints due to a short fire. No one among the questioners straightforwardly suggested to the expert CFR panelists that as per their own admission (quoted above), the simplest convincing explanation appeared to be their own one made in jest, that they were indeed artificially manufacturing demand for the swine flu vaccines for their own agendas!

But that's not the end of straightforwardness if one was actually permitted and inclined to ask questions freely as a science person is imagined to be wont. It could have gone straight down hill from there if even one person present had any courage to boldly ask the obvious followup questions and pushed the envelope of the CFR assembled experts' credibility right to the edge. One could, for instance, have put the following biowarfare related burning questions residing on many a skeptic's mind to the CFR panelists and given them an opportunity to counter all the nay-sayers rationally with reproducible scientific evidence rather than disparagingly as was actually done (see below):

a) what role did the secret bioweapons laboratories and their mad scientists play in fabricating this never before seen in nature hybrid virus, as by their own admission its signature is different from all other past pandemic viruses;

b) could they prove that the new virus occurred entirely naturally and that bioweapons labs played no black-ops role in its synthesis and dissemination when it is only they who possessed all the samples from the previous pandemic viruses and could indeed have more easily fabricated the new pathogen to their desired level of deadly pathogenicity than the poor pigs relying only on their natural pig-pens – just like 911 is more straightforwardly explained as an inside job, a coup d'etat, than as the surprise attack of a disgruntled Ali Baba upon the most armed to the teeth superpower from his underground caves in the Hindu Kush;

c) that, there definitely appeared to be so much incredulity in common in the officially designated nemesis in both cases, Osama Bin Laden and the pigs, that the public insists on seeing some verifiable proof this time around before submitting to the officialdom's remedies and could they kindly provide that proof since their own glowing bios, though undoubtedly stellar, were not sufficient evidence;

d) how could the big-Pharma have filed so many patents for the vaccines before the existence of the new virus itself was known, and remarkably, also just in time to profit from the sudden appearance of the virus as a pandemic, with WHO, CDC, and all governmental agencies coercively pushing these vaccines as the only solution upon the global public while giving blanket immunity from liability to the big-Pharma whose stock has gone soaring, and that why might not one conclude from all this that the pharmaceutical companies knew about the virus and its pandemic breakout schedule ahead of time and they are being given immunity from lawsuit because the vaccines are indeed dangerous and untested;

e) how could they make such accurate predictions of when the viral pandemic would burst on the world scene, even as a hypothetical case study, as for instance in the Air Force's April 1996 planning document “Alternate Futures for 2025” pg. 54 which stated: “in 2009, when an influenza pandemic struck”, and in IBM's 2006 interdepartmental memo whose very first bullet item stated: “There is a 100% chance that a Pandemic will occur within the next 5 years”;

f) that could they explain scientifically, how such predictions could be accurately made to come to pass by just the laws of chance on something as unpredictable as a mutating virus, without someone deliberately bringing it to fruition?

One could have further challenged the distinguished CFR panelists at this point by asking whether they were aware that the pandemic served CFR's own diabolical agenda of creating “an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece [to] accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault” as was blatantly stated by CFR's Richard Gardner in the April 1974 Foreign Affairs article Hard Road to World Order, and that they, as stellar scientists, but perhaps un-learned in the ways of Machiavellian social engineering, were being played as mere pawns for creating justifications towards that globalists' agenda?

Obviously, not one person in that carefully screened audience had ever read anything other their own science and medical text books. But strangely, no one from the internet Tweeted in those kinds of questions either (sic!). Indeed, one erudite questioner in physical attendance, someone who identified himself as being affiliated with Cornell Medical School (the man pictured in the CFR video image above), even preemptively described any skeptical questioning by the ever growing coalition of bipartisan nay-sayers in the world, as a sort of “Hitler-Stalin Pact” in this disparaging way:

“I think we are all aware that the anti-vaccine movement is having a field day on the internet and on media outlets like Fox News and so on, and causing reductions in vaccine uptake. And it appears a pretty unholy alliance of the ultra-right and the ultra-left working together as the sort of Hitler-Stalin pact (laughter), and I am not sure that we are countering these people very well ... and you have to take these people on in a different style than the scientists are used to. ... Crazy people who think the vaccine will kill you! ... How best we can to stop the anti-vaccine movement?”

It is surely not beyond the wit of those “crazy people” left standing after all that propaganda and giving the CFR's dog and pony show only some minor indigestion from their over-exuded hubris, to imagine that the following riot preparations, ostensibly for the masses demanding vaccine and not getting it – again an Edward Bernays Special Edition – is in reality for the “Hitler-Stalin pact” malcontents unwilling to play ball and actually refusing it:

But Judge for Yourself if unconvinced that there is more to this pandemic story, and consequently, more to the bizarre impetus behind the hook or by crook vaccinating the world's populations under its ‘booming, buzzing confusion’ than meets the eye. Or, if you'd rather skip to The Conclusion, or jump to the Preamble to better grasp the overarching dynamics behind the swine flu first, do it now.

Okay: So join Miss Piggy, Arnold Ziffle, Porky Pig, Pooh's Piglet and the Putnam Gang

Swine Flu: That Great Debate of 2009

THE AFFIRMATIVES

“This is one time there is no conspiracy, listen to our government agencies, these guys are telling the truth. You know there is no conspiracy here folks. Get your damn vaccine” — Dr. Nancy Snyderman, NBC’s Chief Medical Editor, August 2009

THE NEGATIVES

“Sky rocketing stock values of Novavax Inc., precipitated by dozens of flu deaths in Mexico, implicates a leading Anglo-American network of genetic engineers in a conspiracy to commit genocide” — Dr. Leonard Horowitz, April 2009

( PDF of the above powerpoint presentation is here ~5 MB )

FINAL ROUND

He said “It's a recipe for disaster” --- vs. --- She said “legal immunity”, no sweat!

He said “It's fait accompli” --- vs. --- She said “It's voluntary”

He files lawsuit in New York to halt the vaccination campaign “None of the vaccines against H1N1 have been properly tested” --- vs. --- She insists on vaccine safety with great authority as “the most important tool against the pandemic”!

He reviews “Early and Current Fears about Vaccine Dangers” --- vs. --- She delivers the current data “As of 11 October 2009, worldwide there have been more than 399232 laboratory confirmed cases of pandemic influenza H1N1 2009 and over 4735 deaths reported to WHO.”

He finally argues “remember the swine flu scare of 1976?”

--- vs. --- And she strongly recommends “trust your government, trust the scientists, and take 3 shots”!

Are you pulling your remaining hair out by now?

THE JUDGES

Email a friend an invitation to come and judge with Miss Piggy and the Putnam Gang

THE CONCLUSION

H1N1 Conclusion: Whether or not there is a real Swine Flu pandemic raging, whether or not it may be real biowarfare, or mainly psyops being waged upon the unsuspecting world's public in combination with other fabricated global threats, I am saying 'NO' to Swine Flu Vaccination. All this heavy-handed hullaballoo appears to me to be yet another “war on terrorism” to fabricate a global pretext for quite a different agenda from the publicized one. The real agenda this time around being to inoculate the world public with something inimical in the guise of fighting the pandemic. This is more than simply an attempt to sell vaccines of dubious efficacy for hefty corporate profiteering. It suspiciously appears to be the new “imperial mobilization” of the long wished for population reduction agenda, 'to “prime” populations worldwide'. The threat of the A/H1N1 virus killing some (or many) people may well be real even if manufactured, just like 911 – the “new pearl harbor” – was a real demonstration of fabricated threat by controlled demolition which killed many thousand people. But under these dubious 'sky is falling' conditions made to “look like a great ‘booming, buzzing confusion’ to use William James’ famous description of reality,” the most rational and commonsensical course of action under conflicting claims of vaccine safety and efficacy backed by draconian 'police-state' policies to forcibly administer it: 1) take one's statistical chances with the “pandemic” rather than with its forced “cure”; 2) permit the human body's own natural defenses to fight the disease if infected, rather than be aided into oblivion by its purported helper, the vaccine! (See Note on Vaccination for additional clarity)

Read the forensic points upon which this conclusion is based
Read more gory details of the deconstruction of this psyop in the April–May 2009 Swine Flu Report here
Understand the crucial bottom-line here
See the deconstruction of the Digital Cacophony here
See the construction of the Ultimate Revolution here
See That Great Debate of 2009 here
AFP October 15, 2009: Lawsuit seeks to halt US swine flu vaccination campaign (“None of the vaccines against H1N1 have been properly tested,” The suit was brought on behalf of a group of doctors, nurses and other medical personnel in New York, where health care professionals who see patients are required to be vaccinated against H1N1, ...) (cached)
New Discovery Nov 05, 2009: Guilty of Insider Trading “Morning Joe” Features Dr. Nancy “Get your damn vaccine” Snyderman and NYT report on Dr. Nancy Snyderman August 21, 1999

Source URL: http://print-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2009/11/swine-flu-fait-accompli.html

Modern Medicine, Rockefellers, Big Pharma, Eugenics, Vaccination, and us

What's the truth about modern medicine?

Watch Desiree Rover: Vaccinations, Weapons of Mass Destruction - State of the Planet Conference, August 1, 2009

“Bed-bugs cause smallpox! I had no idea. In Pakistan, as children, like all of our generation in most developing nations, we were inoculated against smallpox and I remember being taught that it was spread by human contact!” --- Zahir Ebrahim's incredulous response to the sleuthing by Twelfth Bough on their discovering the remarkable research of Dr. Charles A. R. Campbell, M. D. and the above revealing talk by medical research journalist Desiree L. Rover.

Caption: Some slides from Desiree Rover's presentation

Watch David Rockefeller speaks about population control at the UN Ambassador's Dinner

“It is not a world that any of us would want to live in. Is such a world inevitable? It is not sure but there are two possible ways by which a world of 10 billion people can be averted. Either the current birth rates must come down more quickly or the current death rates must go up. There is no other way.” --- Robert McNamara, Speech to International bankers as Head of the World Bank, October 2, 1970, cited in Population control, US bio-weapons research, McNamara, Rockefeller, and AIDS

Eustace Mullins' 1988 underground classic Murder By Injection also speaks to the same conspiracy by the Rockefeller controlled medical profession – to vaccinate people to death and to blame it on natural causes. The Swine Flu Pandemic of 2009 came to underscore the same conclusions.

But what really is the real truth regarding modern medicine?

Is it pro-life (“Primum non nocere”: “First, do no harm"), or is it pro-population reduction (see United Nations Agenda 21, condensed version, 10 minutes dummies' version, The Move to Depopulate the Planet By Stephanie R. Pasco, Codex Alimentarious & Nutricide by Dr. Rima Laibow, etc.)?

If it is the latter, then how comes whenever I go to the doctor when I am ill I usually come back healthy – I should be dead by now if they were really trying to kill me! But if they are really trying to heal me, why do they preclude the development of other non big-Pharma related modalities of health care, such as alternate medicine?

Continue Reading at: What's the truth about modern medicine?

Ushering in Big Brother: Inventing the CMOS Imaging Sensor - Good or Bad?

The Fable of the Bees and the Seduction of Science and Technology

“Societal issues questions baggage I have been carrying around with me for a few years and I am going to unload on you ...
There is another set of issues which is loss of privacy from all this networking. When I first invented this CMOS image sensor technology we got a little bit of publicity and a reporter for the BBC radio came and talked to me, interviewed me, and he said:
'so tell me how you feel about the fact that now Big Brother is gonna be able so spy on us a lot better with all these cameras'.
And I said:
'oh it's not really a problem because there is not enough people to watch all the video screens and all cameras that are out there and we don't have to worry.'
But to my surprise, and chagrin a little bit, you know now computers can analyze images, and computer systems can track you based on facial recognition software from camera to camera to camera, as you might move around in a highly surveilled city for example.
And, so that means that you will be tracked and all your activity completely logged. It's on your permanent record now, whatever you did, or something you really don't want people to know about.
You know, is that a good thing? I don't think so. I feel like it's an invasion of my privacy. ...
I don't really like this application of my technology. There is nothing I can do about it, I have now unloaded that on you, so thank you.
We'll get back to the science and technology now, but I hope you also worry about these things and I especially hope you figure out what we are gonna do about this in the future.”
--- Dr. Eric Fossum, inventor of the CMOS imaging chip, the "camera-on-a-chip" technology which "is used in nearly all camera phones and webcams, digital-still cameras, high-speed motion capture cameras, automotive cameras, dental x-ray cameras, and swallowable pill cameras."

Remembering Steve Jobs

Steve Jobs' Commencement Address at Stanford University on June 12, 2005

Caption WOW!

While we honor this iconoclast for his peerless techno-visionary, for his passions, for his spirit of love, there is something else we must also ponder upon: The Legacy.

No, not what is captured in his commencement speech. And no not what all the presidents in the world, of nations and corporations, and nor all the tens of millions of iphone and ipad users in the world, soon to be billions, are remembering him for.

This legacy is the seduction of, and the fascination with, technology which has enabled The Technetronic Era

Steve Jobs was surely among its Greatest Master Builders – and I surmise that to his last breadth, he remained unaware of it!

Just as unaware as the rest of us who “see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil”

Caption The Master Builders of the Technetronic Era

How are such ardent worker-bees ever to find the pause for reflection on what they are doing while they are busy doing it? -- The Seduction of Science and Technology and the Concomitant Corruption of the Intellect and the Soul

About Us

About

The Plebeian Antidote To Hectoring Hegemons

Fresh Air

Opening up the Discussion Space here on urgent matters of human concern. Main Index here. Pubs Index here. Topical Index here. Press Releases here. Download PDF here. View Printable here. Mirror here. Mirror Blog here. Comments Page here. Contact here. Book 'Prisoners of the Cave' here. About its author here. 'My Little Jihad' here. Feel free to take anything, thoughts, words, madness, sanity, courage, foolishness, but do see the big copyright and fine print legal notices first. Home is humanbeingsfirst.org.

Please see Welcome Letter and Letter to Muslims.

Modernity Simplified

What is all this verbiage by Project Humanbeingsfirst^TM really all about? Is there a reductionist and simplified explanation at the level of a 'poor-man'?

Yes. In the simplest terms: 'Might defines right'.

This leads to “Hegemony is as old as mankind”.

That in turn leads to the following psychological pathocracy – some call it empire:

If we don't have real enemies then we have to create or imagine some, and yell 'we are being attacked' in order to, principally:
a) justify one's hegemonic barbarianism upon others; and
b) motivate an unwilling plebeian peoples into sacrificing for the conquests of the oligarchic elite.

Euphemistically, today as the winning empire, this is called “imperial mobilization”.

Grotesquely, for previously defeated empires, it is called “quest for Lebensraum”.

That's all there is to it.

All which follows is only in further examination of how that is accomplished under the veneer of “democracy”, because, in the absence of such deception, “democracy is inimical to imperial mobilization”. That quoted statement was made by Zbigniew Brzezinski in his 1997 book: The Grand Chessboard – American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives.

This “quest for Lebensraum” (German word for acquiring more space as an imperative), ahem, “imperial mobilization” of the ruling oligarchy, the ubermensch (German word for superior, above all others), just happens to be the age-old quest for one-world government in disguise.

It is to be achieved piece-meal, incrementally, one fait accompli at a time, one fabricated crisis at a time, one manufactured war at a time, one real or imagined pestilence at a time, and one catastrophe at a time.

The psychological pathocracy of modern statecraft requires continuous threats, crises, and uncertainty, to corral the democratic instincts of the modern public into accepting the unpleasant totalitarian agendas of the ruling oligarchy.

The solution presented for addressing each uncertainty is the next baby-step towards centralized global control of all humanity in a global empire of the financial oligarchy.

That world order, the new world order, as we can already perceive even in its initial stages, is governed with moral relativism wherein, legal opinions as those proclaimed by a United States Justice before its Supreme Court, prevail:

'Nothing is more certain in modern society than the principle that there are no absolutes, that a name, a phrases, a standard has meaning only when associated with the considerations which give birth to nomenclature. To those who would paralyze our Government in the face of impending threat by encasing it in a semantic strait-jacket, we must reply that all concepts are relative.'

The term 'oligarchic elite' refers to people who are several notches above – and more hidden from public view in their enormous wealth and their secretive exercise of 'social engineering' – than what is typically understood by the term 'ruling elite', or simply the 'elite'. The latter often refers to the generally affluent 1% of any society, more interested in being rich and running corporations than in 'social engineering', and many among them can be found in the Forbes' richest people listing.

But one will never see a Rothschild, or David Rockefeller listed in Forbes billionaires list. That's perhaps because they are trillionaires, with all their massive wealth legally hidden behind private tax-exempt foundations, and in their opaque ownership of private banks, which in turn own many a private central bank! They can muster vast sums of private monies for 'social engineering', and administer untold funds through their tax-exempt foundations and think-tanks. They are the proverbial 'king makers' who craft 'errand boys' to do their policy bidding.

To unmask them all before fait accompli is Project Humanbeingsfirst's imperative – i.e., before it's all a done deal.

Ex post facto, narrators can rehearse the deceptions and their disentanglement all in the comforts of one-world government. And of course laugh their way to fame and fortune just as today's narrators call it erudite scholarship to openly rehearse the settlement of the Americas and the genocide of millions of its indigenous peoples.

Even the sixth graders in elementary schools today throughout the North American continent learn of the choice between the gattling-gun (force) and the small-pox laden bacteriological warfare (treachery) magnanimously offered to the indigenous natives, without batting their own eye-lids or offering a few tears in compensation.

Detachment from history and from previous generations who inflict crimes upon the 'lesser humanity', the 'untermenschen' (German word for 'lesser peoples'), evidently washes away both the evidence and the guilt. But not the bold and often truthful narratives which become openly public, and their bearers lauded scholars and touted academics.

In the transition to the modernity of today, the euphemisms have become considerably refined with the march of Western civilization. It is now the more egalitarian choice between “democracy” (euphemism for force) and “revolution” (euphemism for treachery) under the dialectical “either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists”, that is being magnanimously offered to the indigenous natives along the “arc of crisis” in the “Global Zone of Percolating Violence”. The objectives unfortunately remain the same as in antiquity – by hook or by crook usurping what does not belong to one. The two quoted descriptive phrases are once again Zbigniew Brzezinski's, respectively from a January 15, 1979 Time magazine article titled 'IRAN: The Crescent of Crisis', and from Brzezinski's already mentioned 1997 book.

Thusly, in the case of our modernity as well, perhaps only our progeny might also bear truthful witness to the crimes and sham of intellectualism of their hypocritical ancestors – scholars, leaders, military-men, holy-men, politicians, teachers, news-bearers, both in the West and the East, on the left and the right – who hath proclaimed to stand for truth, but who only aided and abetted vile hegemonic power with their own convolutions and confabulations. Modernity du jour is entirely unwilling to unravel their confusing and deceptive narratives.

We must wait a 100 years, or perhaps only 20, before anyone who is a somebody will again truthfully proclaim how new 'smallpox laden blankets' were used to fashion one-world government. Before then, it is all to be dismissed as 'conspiracy theory'.

This is why, as had been self-servingly predicted by the Council on Foreign Relations in 1974:

'... it will look like a great ‘booming, buzzing confusion’ to use William James’ famous description of reality, but an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault.'

That, in the simplest of terms, is Modernity Simplified to the level of a 'poor-man' (i.e., one with limited ability, or time, to carefully read, write, and reason about the times one lives in).

Read minimal expansion upon this basic explanation in The Poor-Man's Guide to Modernity here.

Read Project Humanbeingsfirst's Welcome Letter to comprehend a common man's role in that modernity.

Endorsement

If you feel that any of the documents of Project Humanbeingsfirst speak for you, that you ought to have authored them, then you may add your public endorsement to the specific document as its virtual author of conscience. A subsequent confirmation step is required. For endorsement request, please click here.

Contact

Please write to Humanbeingsfirst@gmail.com

Legal-N-Things

Full Copyright Notice

Legal Disclaimer Notice

1) Project Humanbeingsfirst^TM asserts that as human beings first, one is entitled to all the inalienable Human Rights noted in http://www.hrweb.org/legal/undocs.html, including those of free thought and free expressions of those thoughts in addition to of course not being the victims of any hectoring hegemons. Freedom of expression stops at the threshold of justice. If one is offended by these simple moral truths, one has the equal right to not be here.

2) Project Humanbeingsfirst documents often contain external links as citations and references, and sometimes incorporate and/or embed external media content. The other content of these external websites, as well as the external links/media used by Project Humanbeingsfirst, is the sole responsibility of their respective owners/authors and Project Humanbeingsfirst cites each external link or embeds media content only for academic, scholarly, and/or documentation purpose as specifically pertaining to the topic at hand in its own presentation. Project Humanbeingsfirst is not affiliated with these external sources nor responsible for any of their actions, speech, or thoughts, whether legal or otherwise. 3) Public's voices added through comments or email or letter contact with Project Humanbeingsfirst, termed “contact voices”, come under the purview of “fair use” and may be reproduced and reused elsewhere without notice. 4) These “contact voices”, howsoever the contact is made, are obviously only their respective owner's, whomsoever they might be, and are not reflective of Project Humanbeingsfirst and nor is Project Humanbeingsfirst responsible for that or any other content owned/linked to by these “contact voices”. 5) Men and women of conscience who endorse the work of Project Humanbeingsfirst or become “virtual authors” of its documents as echoing their own heartfelt sentiments, or anyone in the world or on another planet links to Project Humanbeingsfirst documents, obviously do so at their own moral imperative, for their own purposes, and Project Humanbeingsfirst is not affiliated with them nor responsible for their actions, speech, or thoughts, whether legal or otherwise.

6) Any interference with peoples' rights to access the freely available documents of Project Humanbeingsfirst in any shape or form, is denying their unalienable right to be educated and informed, and is thus deemed akin to preventing the public from visiting a library making such interference liable under the same civil and/or criminal laws as might be applicable in such case.

7) Anything that is not covered above, is covered by the blanket statement that Project Humanbeingsfirst stands firm by its claim of being the Plebeian Antidote to Hectoring Hegemons. Project Humanbeingsfirst does not solicit funds nor accepts donations. All Project Humanbeingsfirst's opinions in any form, essays, reports, letters, books, etc., are completely gratis. Thus it is completely independent of all co-opting pressures, except perhaps that of the proverbial loaded gun with its trigger cocked when put to its head. When that happens, you may know it – look for complete silence, echoes of the hectoring hegemons' own core lies and axioms, and political science absurdities. It is entirely your responsibility to adjudicate Project Humanbeingsfirst's bombastic self-portrayal; to carefully validate its reports before accepting any opinion, informed or not, on the mere basis of its self-serving claim to forthrightness; and to think for yourself. Those who allow others to think for them, often end up prematurely dead. Most people however rather die than think, and evidently they do; Project Humanbeingsfirst is not in the 'saving' business. No opinion of Project Humanbeingsfirst should be deemed as offering any sort of advice, legal or medical advice, whether solicited or unsolicited, even when its positions at times may strongly and very boldly contradict conventional and/or official wisdom with copious commonsense and rational analyses to back it. You get what you paid – and you paid exactly zero monies here. There is no transaction.

8) Project Humanbeingsfirst is only responsible for its own work, both its credit, if any, and its penalties for taking its unvarnished positions in the pursuit of justice.

9) Any grievances against Project Humanbeingsfirst may be addressed in court. Please also see fine print in caveat emptor.