Hegelian Dialectic and Hegelian Mind-Fck

What you never learnt despite years of schooling, a Ph.D. in political science, mathematics, physics, history, international relations, or even underwater basket weaving - The one master key that unlocks all mysteries of modernity
What is the Hegelian Dialectic? The singular master key that unlocks the mysteries of modernity as explained by Antony Sutton
'After 16 books and 25 years in basic research I thought I'd heard it all ... the world was a confused mess, probably beyond understanding and certainly beyond salvation - and there was little 'l could do about it.

Back in 1968 my Western Technology and Soviet Economic Development was published by the Hoover Institution at Stanford University. In three substantial volumes I detailed how the West had built the Soviet Union. However, the work generated a seemingly insoluble puzzle - why have we done this? Why did we build the Soviet Union, while we also transferred technology to Hitler's Germany? Why does Washington want to conceal these facts? Why have we boosted Soviet military power? And simultaneously boosted our own? In subsequent books, the Wall Street series, I added more questions - but no answers. I had more or less arrived at the conclusion that there was no rational answer that could be proven.

Then a year or so ago I received an eight-inch batch of documents - nothing less than the membership lists of an American secret society. Glancing through the sheets it was more than obvious - this was no ordinary group. The names spelled Power, with a capital P. As I probed each individual a pattern emerged ... and a formerly fuzzy world became crystal clear.

... These volumes will explain why the West built the Soviets and Hitler; why we go to war, to lose; why Wall Street loves Marxists and Nazis; why the kids can't read; why the Churches have become propaganda founts; why historical facts are suppressed, why politicians lie and a hundred other whys.' --- Preface Antony C. Sutton
Here is a sample, pgs. 37-38:
'How can there exist a common objective when members are apparently acting in opposition to one another?

Probably the most difficult task in this work will be to get across to the reader what is really an elementary observation: that the objective of The Order is neither “left” nor “right.” “Left” and “right” are artificial devices to bring about change, and the extremes of political left and political right are vital elements in a process of controlled change.

The answer to this seeming political puzzle lies in Hegelian logic. Remember that both Marx and Hitler, the extremes of “left” and “right” presented as textbook enemies, evolved out of the same philosophical system: Hegelianism. That brings screams of intellectual anguish from Marxists and Nazis, but is well known to any student of political systems.

The dialectical process did not originate with Marx as Marxists claim, but with Fichte and Hegel in late 18th and early 19th century Germany. In the dialectical process a clash of opposites brings about a synthesis. For example, a clash of political left and political right brings about another political system, a synthesis of the two, neither left nor right. This conflict of opposites is essential to bring about change. Today this process can be identified in the literature of the Trilateral Commission where “change” is promoted and “conflict management” is termed the means to bring about this change.

In the Hegelian system conflict is essential. Furthermore, for Hegel and systems based on Hegel, the State is absolute. The State requires complete obedience from the individual citizen. An individual does not exist for himself in these so-called organic systems but only to perform a role in the operation of the State. He finds freedom only in obedience to the State. There was no freedom in Hitler's Germany, there is no freedom for the individual under Marxism, neither will there be in the New World Order. And if it sounds like George Orwell's 1984 - it is.

In brief, the State is supreme and conflict is used to bring about the ideal society. Individuals find freedom in obedience to the rulers.'

The tortuously descriptive expression “Hegelian Mindfuck” (syntactically sugared to the spelling “Hegelian Mind Fck”) captures the raping of the public’s moral imagination and commonsense by brilliant hectoring hegemons. It is the perverse method of mass behavior control through perception management, in which the mind-fcked public, quite unwittingly, is guided, coerced, and left with no choice but to voluntarily give a measure of its consent to its own enslavement; acquiescing to its own loss of freedom in decision making; and voluntarily submitting to the diktats of those in positions of power as: 'they know best'. Thoughts and behavior are voluntarily self-policed in accordance with the tune of the shepherd's whistle.
The highest shepherd in Hegelianism is the 'state', the supreme authority, meaning, in essence, those who control the theology, beliefs, policies, and agendas of the state. The state is often akin to religion, its precepts a taboo, its narratives holy and divine. Belief in the axioms of 'state' is sacred --- regardless of the state. The modern nation state in that respect is little different from empires of the past or present. The state is “implemented” by front-men and front-woman who, in electoral democracies, are elected by the public in the mistaken belief that this elected ruling class is the public's representatives to the state, doing what's best for those who elected them, when, in reality, the ruling class is the representatives of the controllers of the state to the people, manipulating the public to believe and behave in accordance with what's projected to be in the interest of the state. Profound? Hardly. This was true even when kings ruled in the name of gods too. What changed in modernity is the make-belief script and its actors.
Just a simple example makes this clear: going to war --- getting people to lay down their lives for the state under the sound of trumpet, when, in reality, the behind the scenes shepherds of the state are the ones deciding when, and for what, to make war and peace in the blood of the sheep. Only a truly fucked up mind can be made to believe and act in this unholy manner to voluntarily give its measure of consent for a 'higher cause' as defined by the shepherd, which culminates in its blood offering and commensurate 'honor' in society. It's called 'patriotism'.
In a theological state, its clergy class is deemed to be the representatives of God to man, and thus, in even more egregious a manner in the name of divine favor, the state gets away extracting voluntary servitude from the flock in much the same way as in electorally elected government. Military-style dictatorships however, are slightly different in that they control public behavior at the point of their totalitarian bayonet. Such coarse dictatorships usually find little use for Hegelian mind fuck; the point of the bayonet is sharp enough for the public to obey regardless. Albeit, in the Orwellian depiction of a more sophisticated totalitarian dystopia, mind-control is seen as being instrumental in extracting the desired behavior, uniformity, and conformity, under full spectrum thought control. Even a slightly divergent or independent mind within the darkest privacy of the silence of thought, is deemed a threat to the state. Independence of thought, which naturally leads to resistance to behavior control in any form, as depicted by George Orwell in Nineteen Eighty-four, is deemed to be a 'thought crime' punishable by legal sanction.
Theological states are more inclined to police thought crimes than democratic states where the illusion of 'freedom' is normally maintained. However, as witnessed on the sacred cow axiom of the Jewish HolocaustTM, even democratic states willingly give up that illusion of freedom when necessary; it is a criminal offense in European states, Canada, to not accept the Jewish narrative of the Holocaust. In the United States, it is usually the end of a career. Similarly, in times of crisis, constitutionally guaranteed freedoms are suspended or abolished in the name of state security, as in the various Congress approved Patriot Acts, and Presidential Executive Orders. Without some form of mass behavior control, a state simply cannot function in its primacy objectives, and the most diabolical method for this exercise is to employ the Hegelian Dialectic. The public can never figure out what's really going on.
In the democratic modernity, any strain of totalitarianism in the state which often accompanies its primacy imperatives in which the public are not naturally participant and their compliance must be extracted by mind fuck whenever it's needed, is disguised with cunning illusions. Both sustained propaganda and indoctrination from birth rely on some technique of mind fuck for mass behavior control in the name of any number of pretexts, such as the flag, religion, the state's sacred cow axioms, self-defence, crisis management, terror and threat of terror, aliens, natural and unnatural catastrophes, fear of catastrophes, etc. The public mind is kept agitated and in a state of turmoil under one pretext or another, which is why war has been so useful as a means of social control since time immemorial.
The expression “Hegelian Mindfuck” originated (as far as one is aware) in the insightful analyses of comrade in common cause, A. Peasant, at Twelfth Bough. See its usage in The Ultimate Hegelian Mindfuck, and in the broad spectrum tutorial that covers a large canvas of modernity: Hegelian Mindfuck Records. All rights reserved (PDF). More “Hegelian Mindfuck” here, here.
To mildly sanitize the expression to pass automatic filters, and also to make it acceptable to the profoundly innocent of knowledge”, Project Humanbeingsfirst borrowed it with permission and re-spelled it “Hegelian Mind Fck”. Several Project Humanbeingsfirst reports carry that appropriate expression in the report title itself (see here, here, here). Other missives elaborate upon it (see here, here, here, here).
The Hegelian Dialectic upon which this diabolical raping of the public's mind is calculatingly waged to keep the peasants and the plebeians and the useless eaters perpetually chained as “Prisoners of the Cave”, is examined in the tutorial: The Hegelian Dialectics of Deception Today's Focus: Anatomy of Modern Lies, Senseless Warfare, Merchants of Death – Educate Yourself.

Conspiracy: “in law, agreement of two or more persons to commit a criminal or otherwise unlawful act. At common law, the crime of conspiracy was committed with the making of the agreement, but present-day statutes require an overt step by a conspirator to further the conspiracy. Other controversial aspects of conspiracy laws include the modification of the rules of evidence and the potential for a dragnet. A statement of a conspirator in furtherance of the conspiracy is admissible against all conspirators, even if the statement includes damaging references to another conspirator, and often even if it violates the rules against hearsay evidence. The conspiracy can be proved by circumstantial evidence. Any conspirator is guilty of any substantive crime committed by any other conspirator in furtherance of the enterprise. It is a federal crime to conspire to commit any activity prohibited by federal statute, whether or not Congress imposed criminal sanctions on the activity itself.” -- Columbia Encyclopedia
Ah – but what if the “criminals” were to write the laws and the statutes themselves? Then, the conniving and conspiring isn't legally defined as a crime, nor the “criminals” called criminals. In fact, most are called bankers (emperors previously), and their instruments today, foundations (fleets previously)! Isn't that just peachy?
Now let Dr. Zbigniew Brzezinski and the US. Secretary of state Hillary Clinton confirm that very process of behind the scenes planning and orchestration by “legalized” instruments of the oligarchy without it legally being defined as “conspiracy” and “subversion” --- it's all in the OPEN stupid and therefore not deemed illegal!

The Hegelian Dialectic and Hegelian Mind-Fck 8/8 Zahir Ebrahim Project Humanbeingsfirst.org

Full Copyright Notice

All material copyright (c) Project HumanbeingsfirstTM, with full permission to copy, repost, and reprint, in its entirety, unmodified, for any purpose, granted, provided the full URL sentence and the copyright notice contained within each Document are also reproduced verbatim as part of this license, along with any embedded links within its main text, and not doing so may be subject to copyright license violation infringement claims pursuant to remedies noted at http://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap5.html. All figures, images, quotations, and excerpts are used without permission based on non-profit "fair-use" for personal education and research use only in the greater public interest. The usage is minimally consistent with the understanding of laws noted at http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 of US Copyright Laws, you are provided the material from Project Humanbeingsfirst upon your request, and taking any action that delivers you any of its documents in any form is considered making a specific request to receive the documents for your own personal educational and/or research use. You are directly responsible for seeking the requisite permissions from other copyright holders for any use beyond “fair use”. Exclusion: All rights are expressly reserved for the usage of the terms (c) HumanbeingsfirstTM and (c) HumanbeingfirstTM which are the copyrighted and trademarked intellectual property of Project HumanbeingsfirstTM. Reproduction Note: It is acceptable to reproduce any document in smaller serialized parts provided the full URL sentence and the copyright notice within each document are also reproduced in each part and the entire document is reproduced. Please read http://humanbeingsfirst.org/#Legal-Disclaimer-Notice.

Caveat Emptor

Please be advised that Project HumanbeingsfirstTM fully cooperates with all law enforcement and other governmental agencies worldwide in rooting out Terrorism in all its nuanced shades and stripes in order to end its Neanderthal reign of terror upon all who are human beings first. Project Humanbeingsfirst does not distinguish between terrorists clad in turbans and those wearing suits, nor between the predatory rampages of the pirates vs. the emperors, albeit each is apportioned the measure of crime and guilt commensurate to their respective station of power and impact on their victims. Law enforcement personnel worldwide, but especially in the United States and the West, are encouraged to participate with Project Humanbeingsfirst. It is essential for all nations' state security apparatus to learn how to forensically identify the monumental supreme terrorists hiding in plain sight among us under legal cover, the real merchants of death, while they dutifully chase down the easy to spot handful of often deliberately manufactured pirates at sea.