Pakistan - Surviving 'Divine State' Part2

Chapter 18

The Day After – American Agenda for Pakistan

Zahir Ebrahim
Dateline Saturday March 21, 2009, California, United States of America

This morning I was surprised to find in DAWN (cached), Pakistan's largest English language daily, the following opinion by Mr. Arshad Zaman titled 'Why aren't we acting now?', which began:
“THIS article poses two questions: on the day after US/Nato forces invade and occupy some of Balochistan and Waziristan, what will we say we should have done, and why aren’t we doing it now? Is this far-fetched? ... One hopes that a small group of patriotic officers in Pakistan are also asking themselves what can be done, and why aren’t we doing it now.”
It is high time that DAWN started publishing subject matter that isn't all 'katputli tamasha' (puppetshow) narratives, and on matters which aren't already fait accompli so that something can still be done about them. I had only yesterday emailed some regular DAWN columnist the following note:
Dear [DAWN columnists],
“Take a look at the Dawn of this morning – I captured this snapshot as evidence – not one item here suggests that 'war on terror' is fiction. Not one columnist questions the axioms of empire. Are they all co-opted, mental midgets, or simply savants? How can they be shocked back into reality from their non-stop Mad Tea Party 'United We Stand' unbirthday party celebrations?”
I sent that quoted observation to someone and since two of you are prominently displayed on Dawn's front page today, and you Mr. ... in the inner columns page, as your well-wisher and one who has learnt from all of you, I would like to ask you [whether you] are really aware that the 'war on terror' is a fiction? Or that, [whether] the patricians would wish nothing better than we the plebeians simply amuse ourselves to death on katputli tamashas?
Those who participate in enacting/contributing to [these puppetshows] through commission or omission – what's your opinion about them?
See here, [1] here, [2] and here [3] for how the more sophisticated among the vulgar propagandists work.
Why should you (inadvertently) be part of that con-game? You are too upright to wage a propaganda war on your own peoples.
Please see the [last] reference to appreciate the import of your omissions – for, in a war crimes court, such as at Nuremberg, Justice Robert H. Jackson, the Chief prosecutor for the United States, hath famously stated: “The plans of Adolf Hitler for aggression were just as secret as Mein Kampf, of which over six million copies were published in Germany”. My website contains sufficient analysis and material for anyone who might wish to not be condemned on their vacuous “I didn't know” charge some day. And if you know, and also have column space – something I don't have, and Dawn/News/Nation/NYT/LAT et. al., never publish anything I send them – it should be interesting to see your defense for your omissions.
End [note to DAWN columnists]
Well, it is greatly heartening to read Mr. Zaman's oped this morning. To avert the 'day after' question, that mere fact that it has been raised in this fashion is surely the beginning of an auspicious new dawn in Pakistan. Mr. Arshad Zaman is even more prescient in his analysis than he has humbly let on. Before I fully endorse his conclusions, please permit me to flesh out the bigger picture a bit further. It has all been stated before – but not in Pakistan's newsmedia.
On February 19, 2008, in the aftermath of Benazir Bhutto's assassination, I had observed in my article “Profound Clairvoyance or Blatant Obviousness?”:
'Thus perhaps it is better to continue wishing upon the well and not examine Kosovo's independence yesterday at the hands of NATO that was immediately accepted, never mind aided and abetted, by the United States and the EU after NATO and UN forces had been invited in on a 'peace mission' with a UN resolution in 1999. There is certainly no reason to fear Baluchistan – sharing similar grievances and step-sisterly treatment – meeting a similar 'independence' along similar pretexts that will initially invite NATO in to come 'save us' from the 'Taliban' and the 'loose nukes' about to fall into their inglorious hands! The next step – repartition, as examined in the wakeup call. At that time, the repartitioning of Pakistan will make as much sense, and will garner as much world sympathy and support, as Serbia's partition today.
This is the great slight-of-hand devilish power of the New World Order – make things so bad for the peoples through state-sponsored terrorism and the 'war on terror' which legitimizes any inhumanity and any level of destruction including nuclear attacks on non-nuclear nations, that the terrorized peoples will rush to the State (or the world's Policeman) seeking mainly only their security, willingly giving up anything and everything in return including their inalienable Rights as Human Beings First! Far fetched? That is how the Americans and their brethren in the EU and the UK have lost their “essential liberties”. For the Global South, while the modus operandi remain the same, the baby-steps are mere 'pawn' moves on the 'Grand Chessboard'. Study the geostrategic game of the 'hectoring hegemons' with the imperialist's mind and its doctrines, and the baby-steps become obvious. Keep solely focussing on each baby-step as it unfolds by sheer 'happenstance', and the accurate predictions of the next baby-steps appear clairvoyant!
The newly elected team (and their next legatees) will surely ensure that Pakistan's pathetic 'descent into oblivion' transpires, as by their own admission, they accept that the fabricated 'fight against militants is “our war”, not just America’s war'.
None other than America's favorite son's prophetic words appear to be of most relevance in describing this phenomenon of the 'Negro' that has been transpiring in this nation since its 'wretched' inception:
“The white establishment is skilled in flattering and cultivating emerging leaders. It presses its own image on them and finally, from imitation of manners, dress, and style of living, a deeper strain of corruption develops. This kind of Negro leader acquires the white man's contempt for the ordinary Negro. He is often more at home with the middle-class white than he is among his own people. His language changes, his location changes, his income changes, and ultimately he changes from the representative of the Negro to the white man into the white man's representative to the Negro. The tragedy is that too often he does not recognize what has happened to him.” (Martin Luther King).'
On April 17, 2008, I re-emphasized in my article 'Bin Laden': Key enabler of “imperial mobilization”, the same point:
'The abominable shared fates that unite Iran (“Bush and Iran, again”, WSJ April 15, 2008), and Pakistan, from President Bush calling Pakistan “Terror Central” in 2007, to this week, April 13, 2008, 'clairvoyantly' asserting that “If another September 11 style attack is being planned, it probably is being plotted in Pakistan, and not Afghanistan”. And as already noted in its March 29, 2008 heads-up warning to America by Project HumanbeingsfirstTM (“Nuclear attack on Iran appears imminent!”), when such a “planned” attack transpires, it “will make Sept. 11 pale by comparison” (Bush, Feb. 13, 2008).
That heads-up warning also suggested creating a new peoples institutional barrier against the wanton pursuit of “imperial mobilization” that is otherwise almost trivially enabled by any “new Pearl Harbor” (“How to derail 'imperial mobilization'”). Simultaneously, a rational preemptive self-defense strategy to further deter such Machiavellianly orchestrated “'defensive' US military action” (Brzezinski, Feb. 1, 2007) was also spelled out for the Pakistani ruling elite by Project Humanbeingsfirst in its December 21, 2007 wakeup call (“Wakeup to the grotesque reality of the 'Grand Chessboard'!”).
Neither heads-up warnings are very un-obvious, and both set-ups have been long time in the making, from even before “Inside Iran's Secret War for Iraq”, Time August 15, 2005, which followed on the heels of the famous “all options are on the table”, to Bush speech, Jan 10, 2007, to “Iran's secret plan”, Guardian, May 22 2007, to Petraeus' finally holding up the 'smoking gun' on April 09, 2008. And yet, remarkably, no visible rational self-defense is transpiring.
With the American President's now exact statements on Pakistan, which seem to be the culmination of systematically built-up statements on both Iran and Pakistan from American military commanders and intelligence chiefs over the past years, it should be obvious to even the biggest dunces in Pakistan that another (nuclear) terrorist event anywhere in the world, will directly be blamed upon Pakistan (and Iran). With NATO and American troops already amassed at its borders in significant numbers to take the plunge into Pakistan en flying-route to Tehran at a moments notice from the White House, there will be absolutely no time after crossing the tipping point in America which “will make Sept. 11 pale by comparison”.
And yet, it is necessary to emphasize again, no effective self-defense by any victim is transpiring, as beleaguered Iran is left standing alone by the world to become the next meal of “primacy” of the 'Hectoring Hegemons'.
It is evident that the Pakistani leadership is entirely co-opted into systematically suiciding that nation by its prancing about at the “unbirthday party” with the “Mad Hatter” for the past eight years. Today it appears entirely natural that the United States should just walk right in to 'save' the Pakistanis from the 'radical islamists'. This was quite unimaginable just a few years ago, but every grotesque bomb blast, every few dozen peoples killed in it, every act of extreme violence, political violence, demonstrations, and uncertainty created by 'loose nukes' mantras, culminating in the grotesque assassination of Benazir Bhutto, now makes it the most natural next step for the “truly global superpower”. A deliberate orchestration of “revolutionary times” in Pakistan to make “what is inconceivable in normal times possible in revolutionary times”.
'Why' is rather obvious once again. But for those who do not bother to study the “primacy” craftsmanship of the 'hectoring hegemons', it is about the repartitioning of Pakistan to primarily create an independent and geostrategically significant 'Baluchistan' nation – much like Kosovo's orchestrated independence from Serbia – while finally de-nuking Pakistan! This is only the phase-1 of the repartition plan through violently induced “birth pangs of a new Middle East”, whereby, “whatever we do we have to be certain that we're pushing forward to the new Middle East not going back to the old one.” (Rice, July 21, 2006)
See for instance, the Bernard Lewis Plan for the New Middle East, or the similar Lieutenant-Colonel Ralph Peters' map for the New Middle East, in order to understand what “pushing forward” looks like in the minds of the 'hectoring hegemons'. The key point to note is not the precise new boundary lines, or its merits, but that there should be any new boundary lines forcibly drawn by anyone other than willingly by the peoples who live in these regions!'
On September 20, 2008, the day of the shockingly heinous terrorist act upon the Pakistani peoples at the Marriott Hotel in Islamabad, I wrote in an urgent appeal to the Pakistani news media “WHAT'S TO BE DONE”:
'For Heavens' sake peoples of Pakistan and the World: stop blaming India's RAW, Jihadis' Taliban and Al-Qaeeda, etc., as the prime-movers of this new atrocity on the Pakistani peoples. Misdiagnosing a systemic disease is a sure protocol for never finding its cure!
The destabilization of Pakistan has needed a confluence of patsies and mercenaries. A patsy or dupe is one who strongly believes in what he/she is doing, but is deftly controlled by puppetmasters. A mercenary is one who sells his/her allegiance to the highest bidder at any moment in time. The suicide bombers and cultivated “jihadis” of the likes that Pakistan has never seen in its entire history before, are patsies. The Pakistani ruling-elite are the mercenaries. Between the two, Black-ops and aid dollars have been well spent in Pakistan!
... That is all the reality there is to this new spate of terror in my city in Pakistan – a further excuse for more premeditated, pre-planned, devilishly orchestrated American Intervention in Pakistan until they take over the entire Tribal Belt in order to be in closer proximity to China, and break-off Baluchistan as a new independent neo-liberal 'Gulf State'. The dismemberment and de-nuking of Pakistan is the larger agenda; and Mr. Zardari – like his distinguished predecessor – is the new 'decider' of that agenda.
And “tickling” the terrorists into existence, as CIA Director Michael Hayden observed of CIA's modus operandi: “We use military operations to excite the enemy, prompting him to respond. In that response we learn so much,”. When the victims and their survivors are thus sufficiently mentally “tickled” with the loss of their loved ones under the world's mightiest superpower's barbaric “shock and awe”, and expertly already doctrinally primed with the long-running “god is on your side” jihad to seed the response, the patsies are cleverly armed and guided through Pentagon's Black-ops local handlers' hierarchy to their targets. Sometimes even running false-flag operations this way by setting up diversionary patsies, while the often precision oriented and more devastating terrorist act is directly controlled.
This is the modus operandi to ab initio create the terrorist acts. Once created, the organs of the state, the military, the police, the intelligentsia, the media, the pundits, all naturally focus on the patsies and the victims! Because that is all they see before their un-forensic co-opted eyes. And the Americans send in their military advisors to take-on the menace of these militants before these “jihadis” can take over Pakistan's nuclear weapons and threaten the entire world!
This is how the Americans got into Vietnam too! It begins with pretexts to send in military advisors, with willing complicity of the mercenary rulers already deftly foisted upon the nation for that very purpose – to extend the invitation! Our picturesque Tribal Belt has already become Vietnam for its victims.'
Finally, immediately in the aftermath of the shockingly heinous terrorist act upon the Indian peoples in Mumbai in November 2008, I wrote an urgent appeal to the shocked world in the Letter to Editor dated December 05, 2008, titled “The Real Terrorists”:
'The atrocity in Mumbai last week, and the bizarre data that is emerging, will make more sense if one stops viewing this heinous terrorist act from the traditional Indian-Pakistan lens. It is urgent that people in both nations begin to appreciate what's at stake so that each may initiate proper self-defense against accurately identified hidden dangers from the overt 'katputli tamashas'.
To appreciate it, please study the methods of Rand Corporation, CFR, Zbigniew Brzezinski, et. al., and acquire an understanding of the notion of world-government. Political science runs the world, and the children of Machiavelli are deeply rooted in waging war by way of deception – a game of conquest “as old as mankind”.
From the East India Company to Free Trade to the War on Terror – all enablers of pretexts for “imperial mobilization” and “full spectrum dominance”.
In the West, typically, the smartest students study humanities and social sciences, and the think-tanks as well as the Pentagon are populated with scores of PhDs in political science and history. What do you think they do there? What do you think they do at the Ford and Rockefeller Foundations, and the Carnegie Endowment for Peace? How about at CFR and RIIA?
They are united in one common global agenda – world government. And they get there by shrewdly employing the overarching political science concept articulated by David Ben Gurion “what is inconceivable in normal times is possible in revolutionary times”!'
And Mr. Arshad Zaman's conclusions therefore are right on the money:
“To conclude, then, there are good reasons to believe that a US-Israel-India axis is in pursuit of a coordinated plan to balkanise militarily consequential Muslim states (next Pakistan, then Iran — the order reversed by Musharraf’s weak military policies); ‘secure’ Pakistan’s nuclear weapons; support Baloch irredentism not only to open a corridor both for logistic support of its troops in Afghanistan and for export of Central Asian crude oil, but also to weaken Iran and Pakistan in the long-term; coerce the Pakistan Army into a civil war (advocating suppression of the Taliban by force in Pakistan, while admitting the failure of exactly this policy in Afghanistan); and further consolidate its hold over civilian leadership by creating the kind of financial dependency that would allow it to control ‘democratic’ elections, and to annul their results if they were unfavourable (as Israel did with Hamas).” (DAWN, March 21, 2009)
I am grateful to DAWN, that even though they regularly never publish any material I send them except for the maiden letter of December 03, 2007, titled “The grand chessboard” which had also carried similar warnings, they have finally, and very courageously I might add, published my perspective through the pen of another rational analyst. I thank them both for their moral service to Pakistan at great risk of offending the rulers of the world.


[1] Zahir Ebrahim, OPEN LETTER TO AITZAZ AHSAN March 16, 2009,
[2] Zahir Ebrahim, OPEN LETTER TO NAWAZ SHARIF – THE ROAD AHEAD March 17, 2009
[3] Zahir Ebrahim, LaRouche: Disinformation Systems Redux or still Uber Alles?

- ### -

Related References
[1] Abid Ullah Jan, Even Soviet Union Could not survive this kind of a CIA-backed war, March 15, 2009, pg. 6 cached PDF,
[2] Zahir Ebrahim, Letter to Editor: The Destruction of Pakistan by the CIA, March 15, 2009,
[3] Zahir Ebrahim, The Decapitation of Pakistan by its own Military!, September 28, 2009,
[4] CNN, Top US general says Russia is 'both arsonist and firefighter' in Syria - pot calling the kettle black, February 27, 2018,
[5] Zahir Ebrahim, Saving Pakistan from Synthetic 'Terror Central', July 13-23, 2007,
[6] Zahir Ebrahim, Re-Imagining Pakistan's Defenses - Open Letter to a Pakistani General, November 30, 2007,
[7] Zahir Ebrahim, Imperial Surrogates and 'Terror Central' in Operation Gladio Redux, February 25, 2014,

Chapter 19

Letter to Editor: The Destruction of Pakistan by the CIA

Zahir Ebrahim
Dateline Sunday, March 15, 2009

Project Humanbeingsfirst is of the same accurate assessment as's “Even Soviet Union Could not survive this kind of a CIA-backed war”. [1]
It is uncanny to find so much in common with DW – but then again, there is only one truth surrounded by a 100 million layered lies. Anyone who peers through to the bottom of the Pandora's box however, is guaranteed to uncover the truth (and the solution) – or so the legend goes.
What is pertinent to observe is the rapid escalation, and co-incidence, of the timing of the rapid global financial collapse [2] and Pakistan's rapid deterioration. [3] This only implies one thing to this scribe – the confirmation that during Obama's Administration is the endgame. See “Mr. Obama – The Post Modern Coup”. [4]
There may be some ways to avert it. None of these however, directly include the people of Pakistan unfortunately, except in wishful thinking. For, when the arsonists own the fire stations, and plebeian revolutions remain the dream in only utopian eyes, and the beleaguered peoples unable to even make daily ends meet can only proclaim “Allah chala raha hai”, the outcome is fait accompli. Pakistanis are just as apathetically watching it all unfold on their television screens, as the Americans. And the pathetic reality is that even Pakistan's most distinguished rebel, Mr. Aitzaz Ahsan, could not call the spade a spade.
Look how the distinguished Pakistani barrister and learned scholar even began his recent analysis with the lame opening gambit in “Waiting for the UN”, the first of the two opeds to appear on March 09, 2009 [5] in the News – and one is supposed to get so impressed so as to start singing Hallelujah:
' Addressing a press conference after the Nato Foreign Ministers’ Conference in Brussels on March 5, the US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said: “We must recognize that one tiny, remote corner of the world — the borders of Pakistan — is the nerve centre for extremists who planned 9/11, the bombings in Madrid and London, the assassination of Benazir Bhutto and the recent carnage in Mumbai”. (The NEWS, March 06). She may be right about all the others,...'
She may be right about all the others”? Indeed! Even while he goes on to accurately analyze the one exception in his mind where the US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton might be wrong, his beloved leader's assassination, and rightfully concludes with the commonsensical and rational wisdom in the second of the two opeds on March 14, 2009: [6]
“Let us not wait for the UN and allow even the remaining evidence also to degrade and disappear. Let not the UN become an alibi.”
What stopped Mr. Aitzaz Ahsan from making the same forensic analysis for “who planned 9/11, the bombings in Madrid and London, ... and the recent carnage in Mumbai” as he did for the assassination of Benazir Bhutto”?
So, when the editor of DW writes in his afore-cited editorial:
“In such a situation, only the people of Pakistan can save Pakistan. The first step of this war for Pakistan’s survival begins with identifying and bringing to justice the enemies within.”,
here are some reality checks – and also the first axiomatic baby-step towards the solution:
Is there a Pakistani 'ma ka lal', or 'baab ki baitie', who is already born, and not yet to be born, who can truthfully proclaim what is noted therein? One who might truthfully proclaim on mainstream television and in public speeches the Galilean-truth noted in the editorial by DW?
Thank you.
Zahir Ebrahim


[1] Abid Ullah Jan, Editorial March 15, 2009,
[ cached ]
[2] Zahir Ebrahim, Financial Terrorism March 2009 – Financial News Analysis in Context
[3] Zahir Ebrahim, Perpetuating the fiction of Who Killed Benazir Bhutto February 09, 2008
[4] Zahir Ebrahim, Mr. Obama – The Post Modern Coup November 27, 2008
[5] Aitzaz Ahsan, Waiting for the UN, Monday, March 09, 2009
[6] Aitzaz Ahsan, Waiting for the UN — II Saturday, March 14, 2009

Chapter 20

Open Letter To Aitzaz Ahsan

Zahir Ebrahim
March 16, 2009

Congratulations on your long march victory for restoring the Chief Justice. However, not one among you, including Mr. Nawaz Sharif, and the former now soon to be reinstated Chief Justice, in your long march sloganeering, ever mentioned stopping the drone attacks from Pakistani territories, not one among you mentioned that 'war on terror' is a manufactured fiction that is sinking Pakistan into oblivion, and not one among you asserted that this is NOT OUR WAR.
Okay, Imran Khan only anemically uttered some semblance of sanity – but he too shied away from full spectrum disclosures that Pakistan must disengage from this fabricated war, that we must stop supplying our real enemies, and that based on prima facie evidence, Pakistani Army is entirely in bed with the US and Nato forces and shares Pakistan's dismemberment agenda with them. WHY are you silent?
In fact, you wrote in your oped of March 09, 2009 in the Pakistan's daily The News, that the US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton might well be right on “who planned 9/11, the bombings in Madrid and London, ... and the recent carnage in Mumbai”, except on the matter of “the assassination of Benazir Bhutto”? You offered a detailed forensic analysis of why Hillary Clinton might be wrong in that one case. What stopped you from making the same forensic analysis on those other matters of “imperial mobilization”? As a rational barrister given to acute forensic thinking, you surely cannot believe that an 'Ali Baba' has the supra-national power to overwhelm an armed to the teeth mighty sole-superpower and bring it to its knees?
Can you refute anything in the still unpublished in the mainstream letter to the editor which is [referenced] below? If not, why not straightforwardly state outright that which is true, rational, and moral? You do enjoy a prominent place in Pakistani politics, law, and the media. Why are you silent on these matters when you can create such a raucous on other profound matters of justice? Is this such a rocket science to unravel? Surely not for an astute legal mind.
If you are still unsure about any of these matters, I would be more than happy to enlighten you. And if you don't believe me, I would be happy if you refuted me publicly and allowed me the chance to respond to you in the same forum and venue so that the people in Pakistan can at least come to know that there is another rational perspective. Addressing the systemic cancer of “imperial mobilization” and its manufactured boogiemen at its very fundamental source – by looking at the entire forest instead of being perpetually lost in the leaves, branches, tree, and clump of trees – we can most assuredly navigate Pakistan away from its planned dismemberment.
The Pakistani nation today is dancing to the tune of katputli tamasha enacted for them by yourself, Mr. Nawaz Sharif, and the legal fraternity. And yet, there is something so positive to emerge out of this long march that I am, for the first time since 911, excited and also full of realistic hope that the people of Pakistan have finally come out to vociferously proclaim from their roof-tops and in the streets: I have had it up to my neck and am not going to take it anymore. Bravo Pakistanis!!!
My most humble respect and salutations to you and the leadership of this long march which showed such remarkable national courage against the entire state apparatus that it spontaneously galvanized an entire nation of hitherto apathetic bystanders.
That example today must be giving goose-bumps to the hectoring hegemons, for it is indeed an example to be emulated in all the Western nations which are themselves rapidly descending into police-states of their own. Your good self and Mr. Nawaz Sharif, quite unbeknownst to yourselves, have given enormous courage to all plebeians everywhere and unequivocally shown the power of many against the mightiest entrenched power of tyranny.
Well, let's harness that tectonic energy and the new found public chutzpah to stand up to tyranny by stripping it naked all the way and really show the rulers of the world what they are afraid of at night, and for which, all their years of police-state planning world-wide can be brought to naught just like the Pharaoh's army. That indeed, when the checkered flag drops, and when the rubber finally meets the road, “democracy is inimical to imperial mobilization.”
Zahir Ebrahim, Ali Baba in Mumbai – Eid 2008 Reflections, December 09, 2008,
Zahir Ebrahim, Letter to Editor: The Destruction of Pakistan by the CIA, March 15, 2009,

Chapter 21

Open Letter To Nawaz Sharif – The Road Ahead

Zahir Ebrahim
March 17, 2009

Mr. Nawaz Sharif: Congratulations on your long-march victory for restoring the Chief Justice of Pakistan. Several things became manifest in this long drawn out arduous battle, the most salient being two major successes. First, the spontaneous galvanization of the largely apathetic, subsistence-earning Pakistani populace who have had, until yesterday, no inclination for such matters of who sits on the throne, who plunders what from the national kitty under which guise and under what 'katputli tamasha', and who dances to which strings of the puppetmasters, because of other more compelling and mundane matters of simply struggling to put food on the table. This galvanization of the masses which has unleashed so much tectonic energy is to your and your fellow comrades' immense credit. As I humbly noted in my felicitous open letter of March 16, 2009 to the distinguished Barrister Aitzaz Ahsan:
The Pakistani nation today is dancing to the tune of katputli tamasha enacted for them by yourself, Mr. Nawaz Sharif, and the legal fraternity. And yet, there is something so positive to emerge out of this long march that I am, for the first time since 911, excited and also full of realistic hope that the people of Pakistan have finally come out to vociferously proclaim from their roof-tops and in the streets: I have had it up to my neck and am not going to take it anymore. Bravo Pakistanis!!!
My most humble respect and salutations to you and the leadership of this long march which showed such remarkable national courage against the entire state apparatus that it spontaneously galvanized an entire nation of hitherto apathetic bystanders.
That example today must be giving goose-bumps to the hectoring hegemons, for it is indeed an example to be emulated in all the Western nations which are themselves rapidly descending into police-states of their own. Your good self and Mr. Nawaz Sharif, quite unbeknownst to yourselves, have given enormous courage to all plebeians everywhere and unequivocally shown the power of many against the mightiest entrenched power of tyranny.
The second success is unfortunately not as felicitous. This open letter focusses on analyzing this second success, and suggests some concrete steps to take to turn the tables on the very puppetmasters in whose benefit you and all the rest of the Pakistanis have inadvertently just participated.
Please observe the following statements appearing in this morning's DAWN:
'Barrister Aitzaz Ahsan, one of the main leaders of the lawyers’ movement, expressed the hope on Monday that Chief Justice Iftikhar Mohammad Chaudhry would neither hear the case challenging the National Reconciliation Ordinance nor the review petition to be filed by the federal government against disqualification of the Sharif brothers, to demonstrate his impartiality.
Responding to questions at a press conference, he said since beneficiaries of the National Reconciliation Ordinance were against Justice Iftikhar “we hope he himself would not hear the case against NRO in larger interest of justice”.
Mr. Ahsan said Justice Iftikhar had not heard the case against Pervez Musharraf’s presidential election.' (DAWN, March 17, 2009)
Right off the bat one can ascertain the tenor of the second success. Mr. Zardari and those who installed him there for presiding over the dismemberment of Pakistan, have nothing to fear from the courageous judge who has been reinstated through galvanized street-power under your and Aitzaz Ahsan's leadership. Mr. Zardari is free to continue with the same core-policies as his military-dictator predecessor who abdicated in favor of the civilian administrator under the facade of democratic elections. General Pervez Musharraf fought the pernicious 'war on terror' on behalf of the American oligarchs against his own peoples, killed, burned, and maimed his own civilians, destroyed a mosque in the most barbaric fashion in Islamabad under the mantra of “enlightened moderation”, and fully aided and abetted the American Agenda from the day he was installed in power in yet another puppetshow of which you were the first victim. President Asif Ali Zardari has continued with principally the same puppetshow. And the most famous lawyer in Pakistan is reported today to proclaim that the most famous chief justice's restoration will not affect that outcome. What is this bullshit?
Aitzaz Ahsan is, in effect, asserting that the newly reinstated and much lauded Chief Justice of Pakistan is now incapable of being impartial, is incapable of adjudicating in the best interest of the people of his nation based solely on the merit of a case, is incapable of separating personal bias from judicial integrity and judicial acuity, and therefore, one must politely ask: why has the glorified chief justice been restored?
So I suppose that we must first visit, ab initio, the palpable concept that participation in America's 'war on terror' is indeed the highest order treason facing the beleaguered nation and is also an outright manufactured fiction, because, ostensibly, 100% of the nation's politicians, bureaucracy, and its military brass, with the anemic exception of Imran Khan, seem to think that it is a holy unquestionable truth handed down from the 'whiteman' and therefore, not even worthy of addressing, never mind making the key central issue, during this entire judicial struggle.
That, in fact, based on the orders of the 'whiteman', it is not patently treasonous, immoral, and outright criminal to kill one's own peoples and get paid for doing it by the 'whiteman' on whose behalf such mercenarial outrage is undertaken by the state itself.
That, in fact, it is not the geopolitical design to de-nuke Pakistan and divide up its territories into smaller regions by first bringing the nation to its knees through the 'strategy of tension', and demonstrating to the world that Pakistan has become un-governable thus requiring NATO and international intervention for the safety of the world.
That, under the facile pretext of manufactured un-governability, or the fabricated threat of the country about to being taken over by the 'Taliban' and Pakistan's nukes falling into their blood-thirsty 'Islamofascist' hands, or a massive terrorist event occurring anywhere on earth to be subsequently blamed upon Pakistan as repeatedly threatened by former American President George W. Bush, an invasion of Pakistan is not planned by NATO.
Thus, the fact that President Zardari and his criminal advisory cabal so outrageously took credit for the Mumbai Terrorist Act to aid and abet in the construction of that very treasonous pretext that Pakistan has irreparably become “the very petri dish of international terrorism” – words of your own late partner in the Charter of Democracy, uttered before the Council on Foreign Relations on August 15, 2007 – is not more worthy of an urgent protest 'dharna' than installing a powerless chief justice back on the over-glorified throne of ineffectual justice.
Such un-courageous co-option is unheard of in the annals of any self-respecting nation's politics, except when dancing to the closely held strings of the puppetmasters. Thus, in your entire political sloganeering for the reinstatement of the Chief Justice of Pakistan, making the following crucial and deliberate omissions has only successfully helped the devilish agenda of the puppetmasters:
a) never asserting that stopping the drone attacks from Pakistani territories is your mandate;
b) never asserting that Pakistan military's job is to defend the nation and its peoples from external threats and not to wage war upon its own innocent peoples, men, women, and children, at the behest of, and payment from, those threatening the country's very existence;
c) never asserting that the 'war on terror' is a manufactured fiction that is sinking Pakistan into oblivion;
d) never asserting that 911 was a false-flag operation to create the pretext for a “New Pearl Harbor” to enable pre-planned “imperial mobilization” enroute to 'one-world' government;
e) and most importantly, never unequivocally asserting that this is NOT PAKISTAN'S WAR and that we must DISENGAGE NOW!
Evidence for the veracity of these carefully crafted omissions being the real grotesque truth of the matter, may be gleaned in the open letter of March 16, 2009 to Mr. Aitzaz Ahsan, and in the references to other analyses contained therein. Project provides accurate forensic analyses which are being denied you by the myopic newsmedia in Pakistan, and perhaps by your own midget-minded advisors. Unless of course, you are already well aware of these palpable matters and deliberately choose to remain silent for your own vested interests. In this letter, I rationally assume that this is not the case – for the charge for it is treason against the people of Pakistan.
Thus I naively dare to assume that you may not be altogether aware of how modernity is run with 'uber' intellect and devilish political-philosophy – not with propagandist sloganeering except to dull the masses into 'United We Stand'. The relationship between states is only based on the Machiavellian “Art of War” of “waging war by way of deception” as “hegemony is as old as mankind.” In order to effectively counter Machiavelli, in order to unravel the layers upon layers of sophisticated lies which constitute the Hegelian Dialectics of Deception, not only does it requires a fair degree of familiarity with western political-philosophy, but also some rational un co-opted commonsense to sensibly extract oneself from the matrix-world of Alice in Wonderland. This devilish modus operandi of social and political control in modernity was best explained by America's most famously unsung poet-philosopher, Ezra Pound. He called it the “technique of infamy”, whereby, you orchestrate not one lie, but two or more opposing lies, even layered ones, and you ensnare the public's attention in their heatedly debating which of them might be true! All course of action, even by genuine patriots, under this modus operandi lead to fait accompli which favor the Hectoring Hegemons.
Digging to the bottom of such Machiavellian craftsmanship is not in the ken of many a Pakistani, grown up as we have, in oppressive dictatorships and carry upon our backs the rich heritage of divinely ordained monarchic rule of Islamic history which have had no need for complex Machiavellian mind-control games. Our rulers, past and present, typically rule by autocratic fiat and not the consent of the governed, tell simple lies when necessary, and loot with relatively simple unimaginative graft.
It is only the free-wheeling democracies in the West that have necessitated the invention of such sophisticated Hegelian dialectics of deception in order to control their own masses, while giving them the illusion of freedom. Even their looting is orders of magnitude more complex as may be gleaned in the present financial crises in which the handful of oligarchs are emerging richer and becoming owners of most of the real wealth of the world. We are today being subjected to the same levels of deception as the West, and our national leadership, mercenaries and co-opted mental midgets that almost 99% of them are, the remaining patriotic one percent is also apparently succumbing to these deception games of global domination on the 'grand chessboard'. For none among the Pakistani ruling elite hath publicly proclaimed as of this date, including yourself, that “911 was a false-flag operation” and “war on terror is a fabrication”.
And this is also how you have nicely handed the puppetmasters the second success from your “revolution”, by orchestrating this 'katputli tamasha' on the ineffectual matter of judges' restoration, and omitting any reference to the core-issues which the imperial masters do not want raised.
But as noted above, serendipity has also finally favored the Pakistanis, lending new import to the veracious words of the Holy Qur'an, that men may plan, but the Almighty is the greatest of planners!
The public is energized beyond belief and ready to side against the criminal status quo. They are only waiting for courageous leaders to lead them. Please notice that the populace aren't necessarily siding with you, but are primarily standing up to the tyranny of the oppressive rulers in power due to their own frustrations. It would be wise not to confuse their motivation.
Therefore, having finally taken the first courageous baby-step to come out of their shell of apathy, I believe the motivated Pakistani public can be very effectively directed towards the cause for which the more meaningful long-march and 'dharna' has yet to begin. The ab initio treasonous DNA which is the root cause of all contemporary evil in Pakistan: disengaging Pakistan from this fiction of 'war on terror'.
There are many existential threats facing Pakistan, both external ones which are obvious, and also internal ones from our own fifth columnists and ruling elite across the entire feudal spectrum. From landlords to military lords, all are beholden to their sponsors at the Council on Foreign Relations in the United States, and the Royal Institute of International Affairs in Britain. You are surely no stranger to these imperial policy planning institutions, the two most respectable overt organizations of the puppetmasters. Unlike the maligned intelligence apparatus of empire who merely implement broad or narrow covert directives handed them from up above, these front operations of the real oligarchs of the world interface directly with their puppet client-states to enact the policies which lead to the puppetshows which keep any nation's people occupied in the leaves and branches of the make-belief tree while their loot and plunder continues on in the larger real forest. These imperial institutions trivially make patsies of the gullible, and mercenaries of the traitorous. They are the ones who plan and orchestrate the oppressive rulers who have, for so long, cemented the deprivation of the common man in Pakistan, while making fortunes for their ownselves under magnanimous legal sanctions and un-enforceable accountability by imperial collusion. The enemy is deep, broad, sophisticated, Machiavellian, and ubiquitous.
Yet, at the same time, I have come to believe, for the first time really, that it is quite possible to alter Pakistan's pathetic destiny from the tortuous one planned for her by these hectoring hegemons.
You have shown us Mr. Nawaz Sharif, that we can mobilize such enormous masses of people, that no man-made barriers can stop them. We can surely overcome all these existential threats by harnessing that tectonic energy which you have serendipitously unleashed.
By wisely employing the public's new found courage to stand up to tyranny, we can really show the puppetmasters of the world what they are afraid of at night, and for which, all their years of police-state planning world-wide can be brought to naught just like the Pharaoh's army. We can really show the hectoring hegemons that indeed, when the checkered flag drops, and when the rubber finally meets the road, “democracy is inimical to imperial mobilization.”
To achieve this, minimally requires that any aspiring national leadership be un-compromising and un-afraid on the crucial core-issues which have seeded the misery of the Pakistani nation as a puppetstate, and not themselves be covert puppets and mercenaries implementing an imperial agenda in the vein of the devilish 'technique of infamy' alluded to earlier.
And once again, I am greatly heartened to read in this morning's News, in a report aptly titled “Nawaz vows to end 'outdated system' with mass support”, your glamorously hopeful statement: “A new Pakistan is born after March 16”!
If this is really true and not merely an ephemeral mirage, let's examine how you might efficaciously alter the coarse of events on the road ahead and navigate ourselves out of perpetual serfdom which awaits the fate of our peoples.
I am firmly of the view that the following overarching steps, if undertaken immediately and executed astutely, with 360 degree vigilance of both friend and foe alike, can very effectively navigate the nation away from its present precarious perch on the edge of precipice. Indeed, I believe that Mr. Aitzaz Ahsan's inspiring poem (song) which he penned for the beautiful anthem-song for the first long-march, can quite efficaciously be realized to bring back to vibrancy those so despondently staring into the heart of oblivion.
This is the first baby-step:
Step1: Publicly declare as your manifesto all points noted as your omissions above. Seek the awakened public's mandate for that manifesto, and institutionalize that mandate in your political party so that this manifesto for breaking the chains of voluntary servitude is no longer dependent on an individual's survival.
Step2: Amazingly, the rest will naturally follow, just as a flower blooms in spring, and a sweet fruit ripens on the tree for any beautifully planted and holistically nurtured healthy seed. For additional recommended overarching next baby-steps, please see Project Humanbeingsfirst's report “Wakeup to the grotesque reality of the 'Grand Chessboard'!” on its website
Thank you.

Chapter 22

The Prized Negroes of Pakistan

Zahir Ebrahim
March 26, 2009

“The white establishment is skilled in flattering and cultivating emerging leaders. It presses its own image on them and finally, from imitation of manners, dress, and style of living, a deeper strain of corruption develops. This kind of Negro leader acquires the white man's contempt for the ordinary Negro. He is often more at home with the middle-class white than he is among his own people. His language changes, his location changes, his income changes, and ultimately he changes from the representative of the Negro to the white man into the white man's representative to the Negro. The tragedy is that too often he does not recognize what has happened to him.” (Martin Luther King).
I cannot but help completely agree with the greatest Pakistani physicist Pervez Hoodbhoy whose unsurpassed political brilliance routinely penetrates all that ails Pakistan. He is once again quoted in the foreign press, in this instance in the New York Times of March 25, 2009, in their Mighty Wurlitzer's neurolinguistic programming piece “U.S. Weighs Sharif as Possible Partner”, astutely observing:
'“Nawaz Sharif is a reflection of Pakistani society,” said Pervez Hoodbhoy, a physicist and a critic of current government policies. “He is silent on what matters most: the insurgency. What we need is a leader.”'
The fantastic points of agreements I have with prodigy scientist Pervez Hoodbhoy are entirely captured in that one short passage. It is quite an honor for me to have such a distinguished Pakistani physicist reflect my own humble contentions which no instrument of the patricians will otherwise ever bother to quote or cite, for a lowly plebeian can seldom find a place-setting at their high Tea Parties:
1: “Nawaz Sharif is a reflection of Pakistani society,”
Undoubtedly, the Pakistani society was galvanized by Nawaz Sharif's catalyzing chutzpah to finally overcome their years of apathy to courageously assert: I have had it up to my neck and am not going to take it anymore. Felicitations to the Pakistani society were noted in the Open Letter to Aitzaz Ahsan of March 16, 2009 [1].
2: “He is silent on what matters most: the insurgency.”
Indubitably, “Great is truth, but still greater, from a practical point of view, is silence about truth. By simply not mentioning certain subjects... totalitarian propagandists have influenced opinion much more effectively than they could have by the most eloquent denunciations.”
Pervez Hoodbhoy's insightful lament on silence about “what matters most” I am sure, principally stems only from his idealistic concerns of its propagandistic impact on social discourse as expressed by Aldous Huxley above, and therefore, must also include all pertinent omissions of crucial significance, including those noted in the OPEN LETTER TO NAWAZ SHARIF – THE ROAD AHEAD March 17, 2009 [2]:
a) never asserting that stopping the drone attacks from Pakistani territories is your mandate;
b) never asserting that Pakistan military's job is to defend the nation and its peoples from external threats and not to wage war upon its own innocent peoples, men, women, and children, at the behest of, and payment from, those threatening the country's very existence;
c) never asserting that the 'war on terror' is a manufactured fiction that is sinking Pakistan into oblivion;
d) never asserting that 911 was a false-flag operation to create the pretext for a “New Pearl Harbor” to enable pre-planned “imperial mobilization” enroute to 'one-world' government;
e) and most importantly, never unequivocally asserting that this is NOT PAKISTAN'S WAR and that we must DISENGAGE NOW!
3. “What we need is a leader.”
Agreeing with Pervez Hoodbhoy once again in what is palpably a universal truth, the dire urgency for un co-opted national leadership before the existential question of “To be or not to be” is unequivocally answered by the hectoring hegemons on their terms, is un-apologetically spelled out in The Day After – American Agenda for Pakistan March 21, 2009 [3].
The fact that these remarkable three points of agreement are not insignificant for the future of Pakistan, is demonstrated by the same New York Times article which further elaborated on how Machiavelli is to be employed by the native-informants to harness the public's sentiments in order to credibly foster the American Agenda:
'Maleeha Lodhi, a former Pakistani ambassador to the United States, said Washington’s suspicions of Mr. Sharif might actually be helpful. “He is sufficiently distanced from the United States to be a credible partner in the eyes of Pakistanis,” she said.'
Not to have the emerging leader be outshined by a mere former ambassador, the New York Times also cites Mr. Nawaz Sharif as voluntarily being part of the American equation provided all his buttons are pressed in the right order:
'Mr. Sharif, in a recent interview, emphasized the similarities between the approach he would take toward militancy and that currently being discussed in Washington, including separating the Taliban, whose members can be talked to, from Al Qaeda, whose adherents cannot.'
And to doubly ensure that any newly installed legal maestro wouldn't be an impediment to the American Agenda in Pakistan, the New York Times further notes what those right buttons might be:
'Aitzaz Ahsan, the leader of the lawyers’ movement, said it would not be difficult for the United States to work with Mr. Sharif. On March 15, the Sunday of the protest, Mr. Ahsan accompanied Mr. Sharif in a two-and-a-half-ton, bulletproof Land Cruiser, as the men were swamped by crowds.
Their time together, Mr. Ahsan said, revealed an important characteristic about Mr. Sharif that Washington should know. “He’s about personal relationships,” he said. “If you befriend him, you can get him to move mountains.” '
Indeed, “If you befriend him, you can get him to move mountains” to foster the white man's agenda.
Meanwhile, the illustrious Pakistani press, itself guilty of Pervez Hoodbhoy's lament on silence on what matters most, unforensically report in their usual stenographer style on the two pathetic sides of the same counterfeit coin here [4] and here [5], irredeemably proving once again, what colour the imperial god of Pakistan's rulers really is. Little is left to the imagination, and in no less measure than in the construction of White House puppets [6] in the United States, to congenitally join at the hip, the unglamorous fate as well as possible redemption, of both nations' peoples.
Lord Macaulay [7] would be immensely proud of his creation for surely he could not have possibly imagined his enduring colonizing success when he hath proclaimed:
“We must at present do our best to form a class who may be interpreters between us and the millions whom we govern; a class of persons, Indian in blood and colour, but English in taste, in opinions, in morals, and in intellect.” (Thomas Babington Macaulay)
This 'brown Negro' has now permanently metamorphosed “from [being] the representative of the Negro to the white man into the white man's representative to the Negro.”
The only way to prove this observation obsolete is to stand up to the white man's burden, you prized Negroes of Pakistan!


[4] The News, March 26, 2009, US weighs Nawaz as partner in Pakistan,
[5] The News, March 25, 2009, Zardari may meet Holbrooke as Haqqani dashes to Dubai
[7] Thomas Babington Macaulay, Minute of 2 February 1835 'On Indian Education'

Chapter 23

Between Imperial Mobilization and Islamofascism:
Bribing the Maggots and the Soul Extractor

Zahir Ebrahim
April 03, 2009 | Last updated April 05, 2009

Islamofascism, militant Islam, radical Islam, suicide bombers, jihadis, et. al., occupy the mind of not just the beleaguered Pakistani suffering its categorical imperatives, but also the Western mind worrying about the end of their modern Western Civilization at the hands of some antediluvian 'Ali Baba' barbarians. [1] In fact, Daniel Pipes had put it thusly: “[It is] Not a Clash of Civilizations, It's a Clash between the Civilized World and Barbarians.” [2]
While it is expected that the purveyors of “Imperial Mobilization” [3] will try to sell the burden of their 'la mission civilisatrice' to the barbarians, it is always a bit inexplicable that the barbarians should, in every generation, young and old, man and woman, also sell the same to their own 'sheep to the slaughter' – except of course if one recalls the perceptive wisdom of Dr. Martin Luther King, whence, the colonized Negro trivially “changes from the representative of the Negro to the white man into the white man's representative to the Negro.” [4] [36a] Even having understood that tortuous colonizing effect which synthesizes voluntary servitude, I am still filled with consternation when I come across Pakistani Negroes pitching the 'white man's burden'. In an empirical modernity when even distant reality is visible to all and sundry, the astute observation of MLK is no consolation: “The tragedy is that too often he does not recognize what has happened to him.” [ibid.]
Take for example, the recent article “Suicide attacks – religious flair!” [5] by a relatively unknown Pakistani “freelance journalist” [usually also a cover for intelligence agents, assets and sayanim] which stated: “Radical forces in Pakistan have given a new dimension to suicide attacks in today’s environment by intermixing it with religion and collective tasks. Religious flair concept is borrowed from freedom fighters engaged mostly with US or Israeli security apparatus in Palestine or Iraq”, and went on to analyze the construction of this “new dimension”. This colonists' conceptualization of manufactured reality, borne entirely of seeding circuses of “doctrinal motivation, intellectual commitment, and patriotic gratification” [6] for the benefit of its own Western peoples, as well as for blinding the pending meals to their own slaughter under the Hegelian butcher's knife, is endemic throughout the mainstream newsmedia in Pakistan. And of course, it is also systemic everywhere else, wherever the “Mighty Wurlitzer's” [7] suzerainty reigns supreme [8]. In this essay I take the bull by the horn and cleave it asunder, yet again – for the 'Negro' disease continues to plague the 'untermenschen' and shows no sign of being contained, never mind eradicated.
The cited article is quite illustrative of fabricated narratives which attempt to give reality to the 'Unbirthday party' of tortuous “Islamofascism” while entirely omitting to recognize its deliberately manufactured roots to create the pretexts for fighting the lifetime of “World War IV” [9], and therefore, its omissions – the cardinal sin of the vulgar propagandists – cannot be taken lightly. Inadvertent or calculated is immaterial, because, as was duly noted by one more skilled and insightful on matters existential, its utility in modernity to manufacture consent remains unsurpassed:
“Great is truth, but still greater, from a practical point of view, is silence about truth. By simply not mentioning certain subjects... totalitarian propagandists have influenced opinion much more effectively than they could have by the most eloquent denunciations.” (Aldous Huxley)
The grotesque fact of the matter is that the following PBS video clip of Zbigniew Brzezinski from 1980, and the February 18, 1980 Time Magazine's description of what the jihadist American National Security Advisor was doing at the Pak-Afghan border “Selling the Carter Doctrine”, are in action triple-replay today in some Hegelian variations: [9a]
Caption Zbigniew Brzezinski on the Pak-Afghan Border video clip: 'God is on your side'!
The transcription of that one-minute video clip of not too distant past is revealing of America's covert role in making patsies of the 'untermenschen' without any moral compunction:
News voice over 1980: “US National Security Advisor Brzezinski flew to Pakistan to set about rallying resistance. He wanted to arm the Mujahideen without revealing America's role. On the Afghan border near the Khayber Pass, he urged the Soldiers of God to redouble their efforts”
Brzezinski 1980: “We know of their deep belief in God, and we are confident that their struggle will succeed. That land over there, is yours, you'll go back to it one day, because your fight will prevail, and you'll have your homes and your mosques back again; because your cause is right; God is on your side.” [enthusiastic clapping by the Mujahideens]
Brzezinski 1990s in the studio speaking to the PBS interviewer: “... [garbled] coordinated with the Pakistanis will be to make the Soviets bleed, for as much, as long, as possible.”
Surely, the learned “freelance journalist” does not work for the RAND Corporation as a shill for the New World Order, like all the other two-bit 'native-informants' from Pakistan, to not know of such blood-soaked modus operandi for waging war by way of deception?
Surely, the “freelance journalist” is herself not so co-opted as to not realize that when she imaginatively alludes to the “Indian” hand like the Pakistani newsmedia and the ISI routinely parrot: “Or some external elements, like Indian spy agencies protecting their interest, and utilising local hands for logistics and support in orchestrating suicide attacks in urban parts of the country”, that a diabolical 'Jundallah-plusplus' is operational in Pakistan with full cooperation from Pakistan's own military apparatchiks?
Or is it genuinely way past the wit of all Pakistani columnists, purported scholars, lauded think-tankers, career foreign service bureaucrats, military intelligence, and indeed the entire highly paid Pakistani newsmedia, to realize that these manufactured covert-ops are funded by NATO and Pentagon black-ops dollars, and doing to Pakistan from her own soil with suitcases full of dollars, precisely what the CIA-ISI tag-team covertly did to the USSR from the same “PAK” soil not too long ago?
Suitcases full of cash and cultivated “well-placed bureaucrats” for orchestrating covert operations is an old phenomenon in Pakistan as even candidly admitted by a former Director of the ISI in his 1995 memoirs “Profiles of Intelligence” [10]. As an insider to the intelligence apparatus, he observed of the history of American Interventionism in Pakistan:
'Essentially, the US policy configurations vis-a-vis Pakistan have been that of a “master” and not of a “friend”. Oscillating between persuasion and coercion, the US tends to employ all available means to keep Pakistan under watch, pressure and diplomatic subjugation. At times, it has used the 'carrot and stick' of aid, and at others, lashed out threats of economic strangulation or declaring Pakistan a terrorist state.
Pakistan's geostrategic position, nuclear capability, agricultural and technological potential, as well as the Islamic ideological base are matters of vital concern to US policy makers. The US will not and cannot allow Pakistan to govern her own affairs. While Pakistan was still in its infancy, the American hawks pounced upon and hijacked our national interests by building up an exaggerated threat of the former Soviet Union's expansionist designs against Pakistan and their so called 'mad' drive to the warm waters. ...'
Having been trivially made patsies once by selling Pakistan's military the “strategic-depth” snake-oil enticement, the American oligarchs have invented the new boogieman to make patsies of the Negroes once again with some new snake-oil of their “benefit” in the New World Order, for Pakistanis are entirely eager to dance to the tune of the 'white man' regardless of the song. The Director of the ISI further noted of the covert-ops penetration (in Pakistan) by the CIA:
'The CIA is known for adopting various covert and overt means to undermine the integrity of other countries for achieving their own objectives and furthering their 'nefarious' designs. It is equipped with colossal material resources and its men are canny and ruthless in executing their assignments. Their methods in madness include:
a) Espionage and penetration in all areas of interest like defence, foreign affairs, science/technology, developmental programmes, economy, education, and politics. b) Propaganda, disinformation campaigns, subversion, terrorism, psy warfare, assassinations, blackmail, bribes, coercion and intimidation. ...
j) Install CIA agents as presidents, prime ministers, ministers, generals and senior advisors, etc.' (pages 20 – 22)
Therefore, as existential proof of the State itself deceptively abetting such covert-ops in Pakistan today, is simply examining what the already 'well-outed in the Western mainstream' terrorist outfit named 'Jundallah' is doing to beleaguered Iran, our next door Muslim neighbor, even as we speak, and again from the same “PAK” soil, and yet how it is plainly getting away with it, really beyond the sensible wit of rational man to make logical deductions from?
Are these geopolitically driven orchestration of events, while closely spaced in time for which no hard receipts and confessionals can be found until after fait accompli, but which are altogether quite transparently being orchestrated on the Grand Chessboard, really so hard to fathom? Surely not! Please see for instance “Iran, the Associated Press, and Covert-War of 'Imperial Mobilization'”. [11]
Pakistan today is truly the “petri-dish of international terrorism” as was stated by the late Benazir Bhutto at the Council on Foreign Relations on August 15, 2007 [12] before she ventured to return to Pakistan with their overt blessings. But that unfortunate source of terror is the despicable State itself, and the equally despicable Western apparatus which fully controls and funds it as a subservient client-state. The erstwhile twice-leader of Pakistan and the scion of a worthy-name simply neglected to mention that fact as she graced the 'radical Islamists' – the state's own construction – with that lofty aphorism thinking that's what the rulers of the world wanted to hear. The same blunder is being made by Nawaz Sharif and all the others in Pakistan.
The Pakistani newsmedia therefore, is also following the diktats of “wisdom” du jour. Thus it is unsurprising that the perspective developed in the article by the “freelance journalist” would also characteristically omit any mention of the tortuous set-up for the deliberate orchestration of the balkanization of Pakistan [13] with the devilish connivance of the state's own fifth columnists. The history of clever deployment of “doctrinal motivation” through a high degree of “intellectual commitment” to craftily re-synthesize “God is on your side” for illiterate and aggrieved patsies has been so cleverly omitted, that one might think such Machiavellian concepts don't, and cannot, exist in West's highly ethical modernity (sic!).
While no one is surely perfect and all-knowing, especially when it comes to the complex deception laden, Hegelian dialectics driven “imperial mobilization” agendas for 'one-world' government [14], perhaps all who wish to pay lip service to concern for humanity and eagerly pick up the mighty pen to defend it against tyranny, might spend some useful time first researching how “imperial mobilization” is actually conducted with false-flag operations seeding the enabling pretexts, lest they inadvertently lead others astray. They might delve into how NATO intelligence conducted 'Operation Gladio' for creating and sustaining the 'Strategy of Tension' in Western Europe in order to keep the fear of the barbaric 'communists taking over' perpetually alive in the mind of the European public. Many a wanton terrorist act (purportedly) by NATO intelligence, were blamed on their own manipulated patsies like the Red Brigade and the boogieman then in vogue, the godless armed to the teeth with nuclear weapons “communists”. [15]
And today, it is the fully god-imbibed, but supposedly even more barbaric armed to the teeth with box-cutters “islamofascists”. The play of Hegelian dialectics is so superbly orchestrated that no conventional mind can reach the zenith of its moral depravity. The seeds of which, interestingly so, were devilishly re-planted by Bernard Lewis in 1990 right after the demise of the communist USSR, when he coined the mantra “Clash of Civilization” for the same Council on Foreign Relations to which Benazir Bhutto continually paid homage throughout her career.
Bernard Lewis, the “vulgar propagandist” (as knighted by Noam Chomsky in a video interview on CBC, December 9, 2003, see part-2 [16]), seeded this devilish mantra in CFR's Foreign Affairs in 1990 thusly, in order to re-harvest the previously celebrated Brzezinski appendage now left adrift after the satisfactory conclusion of the ten year Afghan War. The bleeding dissolution of the USSR for which both Brzezinski [17], and the judeofascist American Enterprise Institute from where George W. Bush had “borrowed twenty [of its] finest minds” [18] to wage the new lifetime of 'war on terror', had entirely taken full unshared-credit. [19]
“In 1990 Bernard Lewis, a leading Western scholar of Islam, analyzed 'The Roots of Muslim Rage,' and concluded: 'It should now be clear that we are facing a mood and a movement far transcending the level of issues and policies and the governments that pursue them. This is no less than a clash of civilizations - that perhaps irrational but surely historic reaction of an ancient rival against our Judeo-Christian heritage, our secular present, and the worldwide expansion of both. It is crucially important that we on our side should not be provoked into an equally historic but also equally irrational reaction against our rival.' ” (Samuel Huntington in Clash of Civilization).
Only eleven years later, that 'Muslim rage' was catastrophically enacted on the international scene – a “catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor” [20] – supposedly by an islamofascist 'Ali Baba' [21] named 'Bin Laden' [22] to re-enable imperial mobilization”. The distance between seeding mantras and its harvesting does not seem to be a very long epoch in the scientific modernity du jour when only “Prisoners of the Cave” [23] abound in astronomically large numbers.
This isn't rocket science, only political science. A state-craft perversely seeded in the atheistic “Noble Lies” of the Straussian 'Ubermensch' [24]. “Hegemony is as old as mankind” [25] is their sole 'bible', and “one-world government”, their sole imperative [26]. Their calculus of global primacy principally entails Machiavellianly seeding “revolutionary times” all across the “global zone of percolating violence” [27] – the 'war on terror' [28] – while simultaneously precipitating the global financial collapse to make “an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece”. [29] The devil's apprentices have cleverly perceived of a gullible mankind bred on 'bread and circuses', that, “what is inconceivable in normal times is possible in revolutionary times.” [30] Any people will accept under times of stress, turmoil, uncertainty, and war, what they wouldn't under peaceful times. The best way to transform a people, a society, or a world, is to plague them with a lifetime of warfare [31].
The incremental fait accompli inducing baby-steps towards full spectrum transformation of the planet into a world government, unfortunately includes the deadly balkanization and de-nuking of Pakistan. It is part of the long-running genesis-to-genocide death-rebirth cycle of repeatedly raising the phoenix from the grotesquely burnt ashes of humanity. Only a catastrophic destruction of the existing order can lead to the ultimate New World Order of the globalists: an infernal global police state. As connivingly argued by Bertrand Russell, “It seems to follow that a world government could only be kept in being by force,” [32]. All the world wars of the twentieth century were incrementally transformative towards this very globalists' agenda, and the World War IV that we are unfortunate to be living through as the generation caught “Between Two Ages” [33], is intended to induce the grotesque “birth pangs” for the devil's bastard child.
To ensure that not one iota of the preceding paragraphs was ever treated as mere philosophical gibberish by the super-learned of the planet, an exquisite Western Negro unabashedly summed up her white man's blood-stained agenda on how labor-pains are to be induced across the raped “global zone of percolating violence” in these delectable words:
“What we're seeing here, in a sense, is…the birth pangs of a new Middle East and whatever we do, we have to be certain that we're pushing forward to the new Middle East, not going back to the old one.” (U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, July 21, 2006)
With all the empirical evidence of Western barbarianism seen in Afghanistan and Iraq, and the surfeit of doctrinal evidence of the latest 'white man's burden', only a fool, or a treasonous mercenary would deny or ignore the American shenanigans in Pakistan, Iran, and in the “global zone of percolating violence”. As noted elsewhere on Project Humanbeingsfirst's website, while sensibly trying to talk Pakistani military out from perversely contributing to our own treasonous demise by our military bombing our own peoples to smithereens, when I had gratuitously suggested to some newly retired Pakistani Generals that I could trivially construct a suicide bomber to their precise specification, of ht, wt, sex, and other unmentionable body-part specification for less than a certain amount of dollars to make the palpable point of how easy it was to manufacture “jihadis” after you have shattered their tabula rasa and created an ambiance of sustained “jihadist” indoctrination over the past 30 years, I had been stunned when one of them had immediately remarked, something to the effect: “Zahir you are asking too much – I can do it for much less, around 2000 dollars”.
After having patiently listened to me rant non-stop for over three hours on how Machiavellian political theology runs the modern world, the mighty military men (Ret. with full honors I hasten to add) of Pakistan had silently departed, having first agreed with me that the suicide bombings in Pakistan weren't very difficult to fabricate under the present manufactured triumvirate climate of deprivation, indoctrination, and civilian-killings, that these suicide attacks were not a native part of our historical-cultural-sociological-makeup, and that it had suddenly cropped up in Pakistan only in the aftermath of 911. They however left hanging, the plaintiff's obvious begging question, why persist in acts which only create more of that? [33a]
The real issue is not that the suicide bombings are fabricated, or how they are fabricated and inculcated as an expression of political dissatisfaction (see for instance 'Dying to Win – The Strategic Logic of Suicide Terrorism' by Robert A. Pape, 2005), but WHO is manufacturing this abhorrence at the top of the compartmentalized chain of command! That isn't very hard to answer either. Simply ask cui bono!
For anyone to pretend that the blatant agenda for the balkanization of Pakistan by the United States of America – the self proclaimed hectoring hegemons [34] – is not the crucial prime-mover behind Pakistan's calculated destabilization with these wanton acts of terror that are entirely reminiscent of 'Operation Gladio' even to the extent of rapid blame attribution to the 'communists' du jour, i.e., the 'Islamofascists', [34a] is either foolhardiness, or outright treasonous. While a fool can surely be educated, and being one is hardly a crime, the fair tradition of dealing with traitors in all societies demands that the treasonous be hanged without mercy. The moral lessons of modernity further stipulate that this occur only after administering the full rites of the 'Enemy Combatant' protocol. Any Pakistani to still be perpetuating America's fabricated mantras as “Our War” after what the world has blatantly witnessed in Iraq, can only be of the latter kind. Indeed, before coming to power, Mr. Zardari had eagerly asserted, echoing his late wife's sentiments, as also Pakistan military's and its politicians' and newsmedia's aspiration:
'The Pakistan People’s Party (PPP), if it comes into power, must persuade the people that the fight against militants is “our war”, not just America’s war' ( Daily Times, February 17, 2008, 'Taliban fight is our war: Zardari' )
For one given to much rational cynicism, the sole intent of this vulgar propaganda today appears to be for putting Pakistan's military back in the driving seat for the much desired 'unity of command' that was lost when America's favorite posterchild braving the line-of-fire, General PM, fell into disfavor. The terrorist act in Lahore, as was also noted by editor [35], suggests precisely that calculated highest order purpose, of manufacturing sympathy for the previously maligned local bad-guys in order for the elected politicians to officially hand control back to the 'unity of command' of the military as the lesser of all evils without any resistance from the public.
And while I too believe that Pakistan's nuclear-armed military today (assuming they haven't already been disarmed) still holds the infernal key to saving Pakistan through rational and independent-minded realpolitik – as noted in this 2007 Open Letter to Pakistani General [36] – that courageous act of putting out the deliberately lighted fire cannot happen while the 'arsonists are running all the fire brigades in town'!
It must be obvious to anyone that it is rather trivial today to curry favor from the ruling elite – become their shill and bleat the mantra of 'Islamofascism', delve deeply into some arcane aspects of it but keep that very axiom intact. One will surely get noticed eventually, and perhaps acquire a chair at the Hudson, or get employment at the RAND. Minimally, one will get invited to speak at JINSA and Heritage, get published in mainstream news, and variously earn tangible and intangible benefits. And if one would rather play dissent to win over the odd rabble rouser and 'malcontent', composing something like “Between Imperialism and Islamism” (as Pervez Hoodbhoy did in the Himal Southasian, October-November 2007 issue [36a]), will surely lead to invitation at the 911 memorial in New York to speak to 'Muslim-terrorism'.
In either case, whether participating in manufacturing consent among the gullible masses, or dissent among the 'malcontent' [37], so long as one keeps intact the core-axioms of empire [37a] – which today happens to be the narratives of 'Islamofascism' – in these hard times when the military-industrial complex is emerging as the largest and the only superfunded global employer for its war-making global police-state agenda, which of course also includes vulgar propaganda for both Orwellian and Huxleyan imposition of forced and voluntary servitude, it's surely a rational move to join empire. One can, at least, finally earn a decent living when only joblessness and despair surrounds one. After all, one has to feed the family first, before one can fight the good fight.
Perhaps Project and all those upholding the same categorical imperatives, ought to do the same. We are surely wasting our valuable time and our life going against the grain and standing up to the threats of Hemlock – when we can simply become the favored peoples of our rulers! Okay, perhaps the skin-color for some might get in the way. But surely, that can be made up by the “virtue” of empire also acquiring the remaining un co-opted type-3 people “who critically examine ... and judge accordingly” on their payroll (see Mein Kampf, vol 1, ch 10, pg 240, for Hitler's classification of populations). Imagine all the riches.... all of which we shall surely take with us to our grave to bribe the hungry maggots and entice the proverbial Soul Extractor.


[1] Zahir Ebrahim, Ali Baba in Mumbai – Eid 2008 Reflections, December 09, 2008,
[2] Zahir Ebrahim, Open Letter To Middle East Scholar Daniel Pipes, April 03, 2007,
[3] Zbigniew Brzezinski, The Grand Chessboard – American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives, Basic Books, 1996, pg 36, full quote: “Democracy is inimical to imperial mobilization.”
[4] Zahir Ebrahim, The Prized Negroes of Pakistan, March 26, 2009,
[5] Nadia Khan, Suicide attacks – religious flair!, April 02, 2009, originally at: ,
[6] Zbigniew Brzezinski, Op. Cit., pg 212. Full quote: “More generally, cultural change in America may also be uncongenial to the sustained exercise abroad of genuinely imperial power. That exercise requires a high degree of doctrinal motivation, intellectual commitment, and patriotic gratification.”
[7] WILLIAM SCHAAP, attorney, expert witness on media disinformation under sworn court testimony, full statement: “When you read the books about the history of the CIA, one of the heroes was the first man in charge of media operations, a man named Frank Wizner. And they referred to his organization as the Mighty Wurlitzer. And there's this image of this guy sitting at one of those giant organs, you know, with seventeen keyboards and you're playing this -- sort of like The Phantom of the Opera in that scene, and there was the guy running the CIA media operations all around the world. And he really was because every single city of any size on earth, he had some employee who was -- supposedly worked for a newspaper or a magazine or a radio station or a wire service, and they could get stories anywhere.”
Video at: ;
Also see Zahir Ebrahim, A Note on the Mighty Wurlitzer,
[8] Carl Bernstein, THE CIA AND THE MEDIA, ;
Richard Keeble, Hacks And Spooks, March 3, 2006,
[9] Charles Feldman and Stan Wilson, Ex-CIA director: U.S. faces 'World War IV', April 03, 2003, CNN, full statement: 'Former CIA Director James Woolsey said Wednesday the United States is engaged in World War IV, and that it could continue for years. In the address to a group of college students, Woolsey described the Cold War as the third world war and said "This fourth world war, I think, will last considerably longer than either World Wars I or II did for us. Hopefully not the full four-plus decades of the Cold War." He said the new war is actually against three enemies: the religious rulers of Iran, the "fascists" of Iraq and Syria, and Islamic extremists like al Qaeda. Woolsey told the audience of about 300, most of whom are students at the University of California at Los Angeles, that all three enemies have waged war against the United States for several years but the United States has just "finally noticed." "As we move toward a new Middle East," Woolsey said, "over the years and, I think, over the decades to come ... we will make a lot of people very nervous." It will be America's backing of democratic movements throughout the Middle East that will bring about this sense of unease, he said. "Our response should be, 'good!'" Woolsey said. '
[9a] Citation added for completeness, February 10, 2018
Time magazine, Selling the Carter Doctrine, February 18, 1980,
PBS Video clip, Zbigniew Brzezinski at the Pak-Afghan border, 'God is on your side',
[10] Brigadier Tirmazi, Profiles of Intelligence, 1995, excerpted in Zahir Ebrahim, Who Killed Benazir Bhutto? In her own words!, February 04, 2008,
[11] Zahir Ebrahim, Iran, the Associated Press, and Covert-War of 'Imperial Mobilization', April 13, 2008,
[12] CFR Transcript, A Conversation With Benazir Bhutto, August 15, 2007, NY. Introduced by CFR President RICHARD N. HAASS as follows: “It is, for me, a personal pleasure to welcome back to the Council on Foreign Relations an old friend of mine and someone who is familiar to many of you in this room and knows well this organization, the former prime minister of Pakistan, Benazir Bhutto.” The full quote of Benazir Bhutto: “I seek to lead a democratic Pakistan which is free from the yoke of military dictatorship and that will cease to be a haven, the very petri dish of international terrorism.”
[13] Zahir Ebrahim, The Day After – American Agenda for Pakistan, March 21, 2009,
[14] Zahir Ebrahim, The Enduring Capitalist Conspiracy For World Government, September 25, 2008,
[15] Daniele Ganser, NATO's Secret Army: Operation Gladio and Terrorism in Western Europe, 2005, ;
Daniele Ganser, Operation Gladio, Interview, ;
Daniele Ganser, Secret Warfare: Operation Gladio and NATO's Stay-Behind Armies, Introduction Overview, ;
Daniele Ganser, Secret Warfare: From Operation Gladio to 9/11, EIR Interview, April 08, 2005, ;
Chris Floyd, Sword Play: Attacking Civilians to Justify “Greater Security”, ;
Webster G. Tarpley, 9/11 Synthetic Terror, 4th edition, 2007 ;
Philip P. Willan, Puppetmasters: The Political Use of Terrorism in Italy, 2002 ; Timewatch: Operation Gladio, BBC Ch 2, 3-part Documentary, June 1992, available online,
[16] Noam Chomsky, Interview with Evan Solomon on CBC,
[17] Zbigniew Brzezinski, 1998 interview to French magazine Le Nouvel Observateur, translation by William Blum,
[18] George W. Bush, 26 February 2003, speaking to AEI: “Some of the finest minds of our nation are at work on some of the greatest challenges to our nation. You do such good work that my administration has borrowed twenty such minds. I want to thank them for their service.”
[19] AEI history, under the heading “AEI's Diamond Jubilee, 1943-2003”, at, full statement: “The 1980s were great years for AEI's ideas but troubled years for the institution itself. President Ronald Reagan appointed several dozen AEI scholars and fellows to his administration and to federal judgeships, where they helped him to achieve monumental improvements in economic, regulatory, and legal policy and to deploy the more assertive foreign policy that dispatched Soviet Communism by decade's end.”
[20] PNAC Report, Rebuilding America's Defenses, 2000, full context: “Until the process of transformation is treated as an enduring military mission – worthy of constant allocation of dollars and forces – it will remain stillborn”, page 58 ; “Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor”, page 51.
[21] Zahir Ebrahim, Op. Cit.,
[22] Zahir Ebrahim, 'Bin Laden': Key enabler of “imperial mobilization” and nuclear attack on Iran-Pakistan, April 17, 2008,
[23] Zahir Ebrahim, Prisonsers of the Cave, 2003,
[24] Leo Strauss, see Shadia Drury's Interview with Danny Postel, Noble lies and perpetual war: Leo Strauss, the neocons, and Iraq, ;
to appreciate the sublimity of the atheist's genius mind which makes it a Nietzscheian judeofascist superman, also see Zahir Ebrahim, Letter to Editor: Dalit Voice's 'Which god?' February 08, 2009,
[25] Zbigniew Brzezinski, Op. Cit., pg 3, opening sentence of the book.
[26] Zahir Ebrahim, Response to Financial Times Gideon Rachman's 'And now for a world government', December 11, 2008,
[27] Zbigniew Brzezinski, Op. Cit., map pg 53.
[28] Zahir Ebrahim, From Balance of Terror to Unilateral Terror on the Grand Chessboard!, April 26, 2008,
[29] Richard N. Gardner, The Hard Road To World Order, Foreign Affairs, CFR, April 1974, full quote: “In short, the ‘house of world order’ will have to be built from the bottom up, rather than from the top down. It will look like a great ‘booming, buzzing confusion’ to use William James’ famous description of reality, but an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault.”
[30] David Ben Gurion
[31] Norman Dodd, Congressional Investigator, interview disclosure to G. Edward Griffin, The Hidden Agenda of Tax Exempt Foundations for World Government, full statement regarding what was uncovered during the 1953-1954 Congress sanctioned investigation by the Reece Committee in the 1908 minute books of the Carnegie Endowment for Peace: 'We are now at the year 1908, which was the year that the Carnegie Foundation began operations. In that year, the trustees, meeting for the first time, raised a specific question, which they discussed throughout the balance of the year in a very learned fashion. The question is: “Is there any means known more effective than war, assuming you wish to alter the life of an entire people?” And they conclude that no more effective means than war to that end is known to humanity.' ;
Also see full excerpt in Zahir Ebrahim, The Monetary Conspiracy For World Government, November 23, 2008,
[32] Bertrand Russell, The Impact of Science on Society, Unwin 1952, pg 37,
[33] Zbigniew Brzezinski, Between Two Ages: America's Role in the Technetronic Era, Viking,1970,
[33a] Citation added for completeness, February 10, 2018
Time magaine, The CIA's Silent War in Pakistan, Monday, Jun. 01, 2009,
pt4:,9171,1900248-4,00.html ;
Also see: Zahir Ebrahim, The Decapitation of Pakistan by its own Military!, September 28, 2009,
[34] PNAC, author's field in “Rebuilding America's Defences”,
[34a] Citation added for completeness, February 10, 2018
Zahir Ebrahim, Operation Gladio Yesterday and Worldwide Terrorism Today – Identifying the Enemy, January 28, 2014, ;
Zahir Ebrahim, Imperial Surrogates and 'Terror Central' in Operation Gladio Redux, February 25, 2014,
[35] Abid Jan, Lahore Attack: One in the many steps towards making Pakistan another Afghanistan, editorial, March 30, 2009,
[36] Zahir Ebrahim, Re-Imagining Pakistan's Defenses - Open Letter to a Pakistani General, November 30, 2007,
[36a] Citation added for completeness, February 10, 2018
Pervez Hoodbhoy, Between imperialism and Islamism, Himal Southasian, October-November 2007, ;
See its deconstruction in Zahir Ebrahim, FAQ What is an Intellectual Negro?, February 9, 2010, ;
Also see Zahir Ebrahim, The Prized Negroes of Pakistan, March 26, 2009, ;
Also see Zahir Ebrahim, Letter to Editor, Dawn, The Prized Negroes of Pakistan Speak Out, March 30, 2009, ;
Also see Zahir Ebrahim, The Achilles heel of Pakistan – Its Intellectuals, January 16, 2014,
[37] Zahir Ebrahim, Weapons of Mass Deception – The Master Social Science, Jun 01, 2008,
[37a] Citation added for completeness, February 10, 2018
Zahir Ebrahim, The Dying Songbird, September 15, 2013,

Chapter 24

Ali Baba in Mumbai – Eid 2008 Reflections

Zahir Ebrahim
December 09, 2008

Dateline Eid-ul-Adha, California, Tuesday, December 09, 2008
There is a concerted effort worldwide to once again resurrect the same fabricated 'al qaeeda' boogiemen in the aftermath of the Mumbai terrorist act. It is shameful that many an educated Pakistani has also become an unwitting participant in also coloring these mantras, each according to his or her own inclination. I reservedly say 'unwitting' because surely many are well intentioned, and merely misled like their brethren in the West. The mercenaries of course are another matter, for they willingly spread disinformation – through both commission by spinning falsehoods, and omission by refraining to disclose historical facts in full forensic perspective – in the service of their higher masters, up the chain of management. The grotesquely manufactured reality of 'Al-Qaeeda', 'Bin Laden', et. al., was unraveled in the following succinct Project Humanbeingsfirst report dated May 11 2008: The WAR on TERROR 2008 Omnibus Collection (PDF). Its Abstract reads as follows:
'This is a short collection of already published reports and essays of Project Humanbeingsfirst which minimally expands upon the simplification of modernity as expressed on the project's website: What is all this verbiage by Project HumanbeingsfirstTM really all about? Is there a reductionist and simplified explanation in terms of first principles for all this complexity of modernity that gives birth to such urgent matters of human concern in the first place? Yes. In the simplest terms: “Might defines right” leads to “Hegemony is as old as mankind”, which in turn leads to “If we don't have real enemies then we have to create or imagine some and yell 'we are being attacked'” in order to a) justify one's hegemonic barbarianism upon others; and b) motivate an unwilling plebeian peoples into sacrificing for the conquests of the ruling elite. Euphemistically: “imperial mobilization”. Grotesquely: “quest for Lebensraum”. That's all there is to it. This omnibus, comprising a total of 23304 words, minimalistically elaborates on the above single sentence, in any of its variations, in the context of modernity du jour.'
It is important for all of us, Pakistanis, Indians, the world public – or at least the thinking among us – to begin to look beyond the 'katputli tamashas' being enacted for us. There is far more going on than meets the eye. The motivation for this atrocious puppetshow in Mumbai was elaborated upon yesterday in the essay The Mumbai Terrorist Act: An International Chorus of Actors! Ushering in one-world government requires international cooperation among its harbingers!
The 'maasi museebte'* is not the problem for those watching the puppetshow – even if, once in a while, she reaches out from behind the television screen with her new and improved 'jahroo' (broom) and whacks those sitting in the front row! These days, instead of an ordinary tinka (straw) 'jahroo', it just happens to be an explosive 'jahroo', but same idea.
As a matter of scientific inquiry, perhaps one might ponder upon this phenomenon. If people are empirically feeling the effects of the 'maasi's jahroo' on their faces while watching 'Kaliyan', then what might be a rational and scientific explanation?
Please just do this mental exercise, even if only as an interesting thought experiment, and even if you truly feel that 'maasi museebte' is 'god' and can indeed reach out from her barren perch in Afghanistan and bring down a mighty super-power to its knees with merely a cell phone and laptops, never mind a mere smack on the head with a 'jahroo' from hell (or from behind the tv screen). How would you create such an existential experiment? This is how black-ops does it too – with smoke-and-mirrors, and with copious help from patsies and mercenaries.
There is no 'Al qaeeda', no 'Bin Laden' – these are fanciful abstractions constructed for the purpose explained in the above report. As the case in all enduring believable myths, it is much more effective to build them on something which is existent, and not entirely immanent. Thus it is easier for people to accept it, especially for those with short term memories – that's most of us in the West. Thus there was indeed a real person called Bin Laden. Pakistani journalist Hamid Mir even interviewed him ( ), as did the British journalist Robert Fisk. The mythological boogieman is fashioned upon a real character, a real CIA asset, but it is no different than 'Ali Baba'! Even the FBI does not blame the real one for 911 – see the snapshot of their most-wanted poster of him as of April 22 2008.
But of course, empire makers well understand that the pursuit of “full spectrum dominance” can be “uncongenial to democratic instincts”, as the “economic self-denial (that is defense spending), and the human sacrifice (casualties even among professional soldiers) required in the effort” makes “democracy ... inimical to imperial mobilization.” The planners at the RAND Corporation, the AEI, et. al., also keenly perceive that “... as America becomes an increasingly multicultural society, it may find it more difficult to fashion a consensus on foreign policy issues, except in the circumstance of a truly massive and widely perceived direct external threat. .... More generally, cultural change in America may also be uncongenial to the sustained exercise abroad of genuinely imperial power. That exercise requires a high degree of doctrinal motivation, intellectual commitment, and patriotic gratification.”
And that is where the boogiemen come in, to manufacture that “circumstance of a truly massive and widely perceived direct external threat.” The more fanciful the better.
What can be more imaginative than an omnipotent, omnipresent, evil 'Ali Baba' who can bring down 4 airliners in the most armed to the teeth sole superpower – in the entire history of mankind one might add – from a desolate perch in the Hindu Kush with only box-cutters, and ram them at 500 mph into tall buildings spectacularly collapsing them into their own foot-prints at almost free-fall speed? Even more miraculously, collapsing one of the tall buildings, WTC-7, entirely magically without any airplane hitting it! But since no one will buy a mind-melding 'yoda' from Star Wars doing this, he is simply aliased to a once upon a time real character who used to be a CIA asset. Everyone had heard of him valiantly serve the imperial interests as their controlled patsy – or more aptly as the “moral equivalent of our founding fathers” – but who was now projected to have turned against his own patron saints due to “Militant Islam” and its doctrine of global “Triumphalism” leading to a “Clash of Civilizations”! Simply embellishing a real person with some 'magic-carpet' powers right out of a children's story book has been far more effective than having to invent a character who had never existed. With the art of disinformation and psyops perfected to the precision of a hard science, and all the world's newsmedia under the control of the “Mighty Wurlitzer”, it has been rather easy!
Similarly, distorting Islam to present it as antediluvian and out to aggressively conquer the world, has been far more effective than inventing a new “doctrinal motivation” from scratch. Especially, since the 'Islamofascists' from the previous harvest were already available, ripe for re-harvesting. Their mentality was so well understood by all the 'Rand Corporations' along the Potomac, that they specifically targeted Afghanistan and Pakistan's border region for this re-harvest, knowing fully well the natives' thousand year tradition of 'Pakhtoonwali' – you kill an Afghani's (Pathan's) family, drop bombs on his wedding gathering, burn and torture his women and children, and you have a thousand recruits ready to take perpetual revenge on the infidels regardless of cost. And what is better than to have their own kind do this to them? Thus enter the Pakistan's subservient military bombing their own civilians in the pristine tribal belt of Pakistan – the home to those who hold their 'Pakhtoonwali' tradition more sacred than any other heritage. These are people unlike any other on the face of the earth. While all have been conquered or colonized by others, only these tribal populations have resisted all occupation since time immemorial, jealously guarding their freedoms and their independence, and also retaining their ancient traditions. A Machiavelli astutely learned in political science and psyops, and commandeering the world's sole superpower's awesome military might, can use them like a child's putty!
In 2007, while the 'Army Act 2007' was still in effect, I offered two Pakistani military men, recently retired 3-star generals, whom I had occasion to partake a meal with in Islamabad, that I could craft any terrorist to their specification for them for a mere $15000 – a number that I conjured up out of thin air thinking it was suitably low to impress upon them how easy it was to harvest the surviving victims whose parents, wives, daughters, sons, had been bombed to smithereens, who had nothing to look forward to in life except the abyss of hunger, deprivation, and alienation, and especially from among those holding the 'Pakhtoonwali' tradition. I was trying to rationally talk them out of bombing our own peoples in the tribal belt in this fictional 'war on terror' by explaining to them how Machiavellian political science works. I had held their attention for over 3-1/2 hours. And I was rather stunned when one of the 3-star generals of Pakistan's Army, and let me hasten to add (Retired), responded to my 'jihadi manufacturing challenge' with “Zahir you are asking too much, I could do it for $2000”!
Indeed! Yet they continue to bomb our own peoples. They deliberately destroyed the lal-masjid in Islamabad with such barbaric ferociousness directly under the 'shock and awe' orders from the Pentagon, knowing fully well where the destabilization impact of the subsequent retaliations will be felt. It isn't rocket science for anyone, let alone for a professional standing Army's American trained high command! See my gut-wrenching missive that I composed in tears in the summer of 2007 knowing fully well what was going on and what will happen: “Saving Pakistan from Synthetic 'Terror Central'”. After meeting the Pakistani Generals and realizing that while they were highly educated and immensely experienced in the art of war-making, they understood very little of political science – men of obeying orders that they were as part of their professional training – and I composed the following long open letter to a hypothetical Pakistani General, addressing all of Pakistan's senior military cadre employing this encounter as a literary device: “Re-Imagining Pakistan's Defenses – Open Letter to a Pakistani General”. But who listens to an ordinary common man's commonsense? In all likelihood, no one even read that letter. And exactly on Eid ul-Adha Day 2007 that same year, I had made the following plea: “Wakeup to the grotesque reality of the 'Grand Chessboard'!” The same plea, a year later, has become even more prescient in the aftermath of the Mumbai Terrorist Act. And as the good President of United States of America has publicly stated:
Good morning [America]. At this moment, somewhere in the world, terrorists are planning new attacks on our country. Their goal is to bring destruction to our shores that will make September the 11th pale by comparison.” (President of the United States, George W. Bush, Feb. 13, 2008)
Another 911 anywhere in the world and the American President, incumbent and newly-elected, will know exactly where to bomb, as Pakistan's Ambassador Hussein Haqqani had re-confirmed:
'[On] Wednesday, a media report quoted Pakistan’s envoy to Washington as saying that US leaders had warned Islamabad that if the United States suffered an attack that was traced back to Pakistan Washington would retaliate. “Those (statements) have been made,” Ambassador Hussain Haqqani told editors and reporters at The Washington Post. “We want to make sure that it doesn’t come to that.” (Dawn, June 12, 2008)
How remarkably easy it has been for most of humanity to be duped into this fabricated 'war on terror' with the help of our own mercenaries in power! Not one of them has the gall to stand up and announce – “war on terror is fiction”! Watch the following 2005 presentation in the documentary ZERO ( ), made by CSIS to the commission of the European parliament for security and defense, as narrated by one of its attendee members, where he makes the following statement of fact:
Begin Transcription (by Project Humanbeingsfirst):
“In the summer of 2005, the commission of the European parliament for security and defense, of which I am a member, was invited to a special screening created by the Washington Center for Strategic [and International] Studies”
(Slide: CSIS Debating 21st Century Nuclear Issues, Edited by Owen C. W. Price and Jenifer Mackby, subtitled Black-Dawn: Scenario-Based Exercise, dated: May 3 2004)
“We were asked to watch a film which depicted what would happen in Europe, if Brussels was hit by a nuclear bomb.”
“Fifty thousand deaths, hundred thousand injured. The reactions of various European governments.”
“Suddenly, footage of Osama Bin Laden claiming responsibility for a nuclear attack on NATO headquarters comes on screen.”
“All members of the parliament, myself included, were rendered speechless.”
“American experts from the Center for Strategic Studies, were on hand to explain the action on the screen.”
“Then a parliamentarian finally said: Today we were shown a convincing demonstration of how Osama Bin Laden's image can be completely manipulated. All the Osama's we have seen over the years, may never have existed. Just as a nuclear attack on NATO Headquarters in Brussels has never taken place.”
End Transcription. (ZERO: An Investigation Into 9/11)
How can one prove what I write here, that the 'war on terror' is fiction? That “Bin Laden” is “Ali Baba”? And that the Mumbai Terrorist Act was a false-flag operation, just like 911 was?
The same way that any sound judge in a court room would – especially one like Robert Jackson at Nuremberg! Short of that – and it was a victor's justice, nothing more – well-intentioned peoples must endeavor to at least learn the truth stripped of its complex psyops, even if they remain afraid of articulating what they learn out loud. At least, they will knowingly not spew garbage, or create disinformation, or cultivate red herrings, as this 'champion of justice and humanity' recently did: “Rebuttal to Paul Craig Roberts': 'Washington Arrogance has Fomented a Muslim Revolution'”. There are tens of thousands of 'Paul Craig Roberts' in Pakistan, as elsewhere, beginning with Pakistan's own co-opted ruling elite, down to its 'enlightened-moderated' newsmedia, NGOs, academics, industrialists, et. al. Paul Craig Roberts was gentle enough to only bestow upon me the honorific “you are a completely stupid fool, a disgrace to humanity” when I called him on his disinformation. I actually carry that invective with much pride and it is the only honor I have received thus far from the hectoring hegemons, apart from their visit to my home in 2003! Other benedictions may not be so merciful. For the mercenaries among them deliberately subverting our nations in perpetuating this fiction of 'war on terror' – be it America, Pakistan, India, and every other – there is the hangman's noose to look forward to.
The way the Rockefellers have it orchestrated however, the one-world government – the raison d'être for all this death and mayhem of humanity – is almost fait accompli! In that new world order, the present would look like the good old days! PCR's honorific, a blessing! I use the word 'almost' deliberately because I continue to believe that there is many a slip between the cup and lip! If only the plebeians can learn to overcome our voluntary servitude!
It is only befitting to use Elie Wiesel's eloquence to close these despondent Eid reflections, for a cataclysm of no less torment has indeed befallen those who have finally seen the end of war:
“I still curse the killers, their accomplices, the indifferent spectators who knew and kept silent, and Creation itself, Creation and those who perverted and distorted it. I feel like screaming, howling like a madman so that that world, the world of the murderers, might know it will never be forgiven.”
Thank you.
Zahir Ebrahim

* 'maasi museebte', as I recall my childhood memories, was a character in the 1970s' popular Pakistani television puppetshow 'Kaliyan'. Similar to Sesame Street.

Chapter 25

The Decapitation of Pakistan by its own Military!

Zahir Ebrahim
September 28, 2009 | Revised November 02, 2009
Author's Note, Nov. 02, 2009: Pakistanis, apparently, simply cannot perceive that “insurgency” is manufactured – judging by the asinine questions they asked the Secretary of State Hillary Clinton during her visit to Pakistan last week. Every one of them was simplistic and devoid of any appreciation for the political science behind “imperial mobilization”. Ignoring the mercenaries, traitors, and vulgar propagandists at work in Pakistan, many well-meaning Pakistanis are entirely confused. Therefore, this revision draws upon some stark lessons learnt from Iraq to further substantiate the original report. See additional evidence and extensive deconstruction of mythologies in The Pakistan Decapitation Papers.

[PHBF Report] Dateline Sept. 28 to Nov. 02, 2009, California, United States
Let me begin this very difficult exposition as a Pakistani citizen (my only citizenship, by choice, despite being a legal permanent resident in the United States for almost three decades) with the question Who really killed Benazir Bhutto? [1] I mean who are the prime-movers?
The trigger-pullers are obviously irrelevant and remain faceless. They will surely never be known.
Well, let's read it in Benazir Bhutto's own lucid words which have now been augmented, almost two years later, with the Pakistan's Army Chief of Staff's belated disclosures of September 21, 2009. [2] Why belated? Well, please see these unpublished letters to many Pakistani newspaper editors on their repeatedly perpetuating the fiction of Who Killed Benazir Bhutto in cahoots with the 'hectoring hegemons' and their agents! All traitors and co-opted errand boys. [3]
The American agenda for Pakistan is not a state-secret. Rather, it is only thinly disguised as perpetually fighting the “insurgents” in a lifetime of war, the World War IV. [4] Whereas, in reality, both the “insurgency”, and the “counter-insurgency”, are entirely designed and fabricated in the USA as part of the evolving tactics of Hegelian Dialectics. They are enacted on the ground by various two-bit errand boys and expert trigger pullers. The already well-known existence of black-ops assassination squads in Pakistan/Afghanistan, known to the local peoples for years as the real prime-movers behind the heinous local terrorist acts, belatedly confirmed by NYT, WP, and NYT, in August 2009. [5] See these two December 2008 reports on the Mumbai terrorist Act as reportedly orchestrated by ALI BABA from his perch in the Hindu Kush. [6] The arrival of the black-ops in the region is not recent, albeit the public disclosures might be.
Starting in the immediate aftermath of 911, and perhaps even earlier, Pakistan may well have become the largest deployment region for the CIA in modern times, both covert (unknown to Pakistani government and secretly working to destabilize Pakistan with false-flag operations), and overt (with Pakistani military's aiding and abetting, in full view of the world, ostensibly fighting the “insurgents”, “Bin Laden”, “Al-Qaaeda”, but in the process mainly “tickling” its own innocent civilians in many a barbaric way). [7]
And since Jundallah got launched to destabilize Iran from Pakistani soil (their “insurgencies”), Baluchistan along with the Pak-Afghan regions have been awash with black-ops, and obviously of course, also with officially recognized US soldiers manning American military bases on Pakistani soil. [8] But these soldiers of freedom were rarely spotted in the streets of major cities before. The following video report of September 08, 2009, therefore portends of ominous whirlwinds imminently engulfing Pakistan: [9]
RussiaToday September 08, 2009, Contractors in Pakistan: are troops next?
To put this ominous presence of soldiers of freedom and fortune on Pakistani soil in full black-ops context of NATO and the Western Alliance, of diabolically manufacturing and sustaining the very pretexts out of uniform to enable the in-uniform forces to continue on with their perpetual mission of fighting World War IV, it is sufficient to look at what is transpiring in IRAQ for lessons to wisely apply to one's own predicament in order to avoid a far worse one.
Fast forwarding past all the initial pretenses of Sadaam Husain being responsible for 911, his WMDs about to destroy America, the Mission Accomplished statement of President Bush, and the “oops! intelligence failure” statements by the neo-con's own Iraq Study Group after the raping of Mesopotamia and the DNA of its ancient and proud peoples were fait accompli, etceteras, the biggest reason for not withdrawing the US troops from Iraq is continually stated to be the infernal ongoing INSURGENCY. Iran, Shias, Sunnis, and Al-Qaeeda are variously blamed for the main cause of America's continued military occupation of Iraq; new “troop-surges” are periodically announced amidst some dissenting consternation willy-nilly expressed in its news media and by its politicians to let the American public know that it is not an easy choice to be making. The Iranian strawman has already been amply unraveled elsewhere. [10] However, witness the following familiar statement of former President George W. Bush on the legend of the new Ali Baba [11] of Mesopotamia, Abu Musab Al-Zarqawi: [12]
“You know, I hate to predict violence, but I just understand the nature of the killers. This guy, Zarqawi, an al Qaeda associate -- who was in Baghdad, by the way, prior to the removal of Saddam Hussein -- is still at large in Iraq. And as you might remember, part of his operational plan was to sow violence and discord amongst the various groups in Iraq by cold- blooded killing. And we need to help find Zarqawi so that the people of Iraq can have a more bright -- bright future.” -- George W. Bush, Press Conference, 1 June 2004
The indefatigable Michel Chossudovsky, citing Bush's afore-quoted statements wrote: “Zarqawi constitutes Washington's justification for the continued military occupation of Iraq, not to mention the brutal siege of densely populated urban areas directed against 'Al Qaeda in Iraq' which is said to be led by Zarqawi.” [13]
It is now November 02, 2009 – and the United States is still very much in Iraq. Its own economy is in deep recession, and the free-money printing by the Feds is taking it towards hyperinflation. The world is not only mired in its worst global financial crisis that is seeing the end of Western hegemony in its industrial production capabilities, but is also plagued by a global pandemic, global warming, and an un-ending global war on terror, sinking valuable trillions of dollars which could otherwise have been spent on converting overnight the entire world's six billion population into America's middle class status of the 1960s, while also wiping out much of the developing nations' unbearable debt. That alone would most assuredly have earned the United States the genuine love of the entire world instead of the present shoes thrown at its all powerful president. How remarkably has the world's sole superpower been brought down so pathetically to its knees by the Ali Baba of Iraq that today it cannot even extricate itself from giving a diabolical police-state to its own peoples in the pretext of saving them from the global terrorist! What sort of idiotic “American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives” agenda, and what kind of asinine quest for “Full Spectrum Dominance” is this? [14] Wow Ali Baba, what magical powers you have of not only so successfully entangling the United States in the Iraqi “quagmire” indefinitely, but of being the prime-mover behind the demise of nation-states to usher in the only permissible solution out of these multifaceted global threats – world government! [15]
Focussing on the pertinence at hand however, what does the Ali Baba of Iraq have to do with the following shocking news reports purveyed in titles which are illustrative enough of the key point: “Were British Special Forces Soldiers Planting Bombs in Basra?” September 25, 2005 ; British “Undercover Soldiers” Caught driving Booby Trapped Car “They refused to say what their mission was.” September 20, 2005. [16]
Michel Chossudovsky, writing the latter article and displaying his un co-opted integrity, asked the 64-million dollar obvious questions – the same modus operandi being replayed in Pakistan with even more drastic effect, as now the black-ops have been hardened in Iraq on how not to get caught when plenty of patsies can be trivially harvested for the job of “legitimizing Insurgency” [17] – which none appear to be publicly asking in Pakistan:
'The following Reuters report raises some disturbing questions.
Why were undercover British “soldiers” wearing traditional Arab headscarves firing at Iraqi police?
The incident took place just prior to a major religious event in Basra.
The report suggests that the police thought the British soldiers looked “suspicious”. What was the nature of their mission?
Occupation forces are supposed to be collaborating with Iraqi authorities. Why did British Forces have to storm the prison using tanks and armoured vehicles to liberate the British undercover agents?
“British forces used up to 10 tanks” supported by helicopters “to smash through the walls of the jail and free the two British servicemen.”
Was there concern that the British “soldiers” who were being held by the Iraqi National Guard would be obliged to reveal the nature and objective of their undercover mission?
A report of Al Jazeera TV, which preceded the raid on the prison, suggests that the British undercover soldiers were driving a booby trapped car loaded with ammunition. The Al Jazeera report (see below) also suggests that the riots directed against British military presence were motivated because the British undercover soldiers were planning to explode the booby trapped car in the centre of Basra: ...'
See: Who is behind “Al Qaeda in Iraq”? Pentagon acknowledges fabricating a “Zarqawi Legend”, in which the Washington Post of April 10, 2006, in its rare moment of candor – just like the New York Times' ex post facto exposé of April 20, 2008 on the Pentagon using retired Generals as mercenaries for hire to blatantly lie on American television in order to drum public support for the Iraq war [18] – is quoted in full context as follows: [19]
'“The Zarqawi campaign is discussed in several of the internal military documents. "Villainize Zarqawi/leverage xenophobia response," one U.S. military briefing from 2004 stated. It listed three methods: "Media operations," "Special Ops (626)" (a reference to Task Force 626, an elite U.S. military unit assigned primarily to hunt in Iraq for senior officials in Hussein's government) and "PSYOP," the U.S. military term for propaganda work..." (WP. 10 April 2006)
The military's propaganda program, according to the Washington Post, has "largely been aimed at Iraqis, but seems to have spilled over into the U.S. media. One briefing slide about U.S. "strategic communications" in Iraq, prepared for Army Gen. George W. Casey Jr., the top U.S. commander in Iraq, describes the "home audience" as one of six major targets of the American side of the war." (WP, op cit.)
An internal document produced by U.S. military headquarters in Iraq, states that "the Zarqawi PSYOP program is the most successful information campaign to date.”'
With that precious lesson in “imperial mobilization” through sustained PSYOP and manufactured “insurgency” learnt from our brethren Muslim nation of Iraq – where, in retrospect, and in moments of reflection through their daily strife and humiliation, its beleaguered people must surely ponder upon what could they have possibly done earlier, before 1990, during the iron-reign of Sadaam Hussein, and throughout those horrible intervening 13 years of Western hegemonic sanctions, to have avoided this new dismal fate altogether – let's return to Pakistan.
The multimodal approaches to destabilizing, and consequently balkanizing Pakistan under the fabled pretext of its own illusive Ali Baba, “Osama Bin Laden”, have been so transparent, that today, finally, many a retired con-fession artist are getting in on the act to claim the flag of patriotism. [20] Going for hajj after having eaten 900 mice is the favorite pastime of Pakistani praetorian guards. I am only waiting for any sitting Pakistani General to rise to that occasion, if it's not already too late! [21] But I am afraid it probably is – see here, here, here, here, and here. [22]
The decapitation of Pakistan by Pakistan's finest, wantonly justifying the inglorious 'white man's burden' – the same old 'la mission civilisatrice' under a new name – upon impoverished indigenous shoulders! [23] Even Martin Luther Kings' penetrating description fails to do justice to the scale of calamity in Pakistan: [24]
The white establishment is skilled in flattering and cultivating emerging leaders. It presses its own image on them and finally, from imitation of manners, dress, and style of living, a deeper strain of corruption develops. This kind of Negro leader acquires the white man's contempt for the ordinary Negro. He is often more at home with the middle-class white than he is among his own people. His language changes, his location changes, his income changes, and ultimately he changes from the representative of the Negro to the white man into the white man's representative to the Negro.”
The shameful and criminal dislocation of up to 2.4 million civilians in May of this year was rightly described as “an exodus that is beyond biblical”. [25]
Caption Swat exodus biblical. UK Independent, May 31, 2009, caption: In Pakistan, an exodus that is beyond biblical; Photo Rashid Iqbal/EPA, source UK Guardian, May 11, 2009, caption: People flee Pakistan's restive Swat valley after a curfew was temporarily lifted to allow people to leave the intensifying conflict
Just as from the USSR's point of view in yesteryear, the “insurgency” against them in Afghanistan was foreign inculcated, entirely fabricated in the USA (as we know today but held as a closely guarded secret then), which thus forced the Soviets to apply counter-insurgency measures, and subsequently, an outright invasion of Afghanistan (read Brzezinski's own statements in Saving Pakistan, and watch Brzezinski speak in this video clip devilishly crafting the “insurgency” for the Russians on the Pak-Afghan border); the so called “insurgency” in Pakistan is also calculatingly fabricated, ab initio, in the USA through covert intervention and black-ops. [26] Subsequently, with sufficient “tickling” during the overt counter-insurgency operations, and by astutely harvesting all the cultural cracks and lacunae of the people, the “insurgency” acquires a reactionary life of its own. [27]
That latter stage, as well as on-going black-ops induced wanton acts of terrorism using the pre-“tickled” dupes and patsies as now rapidly transpiring, October 9-12, 2009, NYT, NYT – like the secret and 'officially denied' component of NATO's Operation Gladio in Western Europe of yesteryear which blamed it on the communists to keep an increasingly skeptical public's fear of the then boogieman du jour continually alive – are Machiavellianly projected in the news media, by the native informants, by the fabricated dissent-chiefs, and the Mighty Wurlitzer, as INSURGENCY. [28] And therefore, it is officially argued, an unarguable raison d'être for continuing the barbaric counter-insurgency to implement the writ of the state. This predictably creates a self-sustaining destabilization as both commonsense and political science 101 would inform even an imbecile. The blood-drenched puppetshow so enacted, inevitably affords a compelling pretext to the puppetmasters to justify their own military intervention to “save” the people who are incapable of doing it themselves.
The innocent Pakistan military, not too well-versed in political science or Hegelian Dialectics based Machiavellian state-craft (I presume), in this prelude to NATO forces marching in, is similarly being compelled to take real counter-insurgency measures like the Soviets. Aided and abetted of course by high ranking traitors from within their own ranks, and by their foreign paymasters' militaries (NATO, Blackwater now renamed Xe, and other un-named foreign divisions operating within Pakistan which I call “Jundallah-plusplus” to distinguish them from “Jundallah” which is apparently targeting Iran from Pakistani soil). The simple fact that Pakistan is supplying all the drinking water (bottled by Nestle), and full logistics channel for war-making supplies to NATO in Afghanistan is telling in and of itself. Pakistan is equally responsible for destroying the Afghan society, the Afghan people, and there is no less spilled-blood of innocent Afghani Muslims upon Pakistan's hands over the past 30 years, than upon the United States'.
Pakistani military helped destroy Afghanistan, and they are now helping to destroy Pakistan. No Pakistani civilian I know, including myself, ever authorized the Pakistani military to destroy Afghanistan, or aid the United States in its own hegemonic plans on the Grand Chessboard. Do you know anyone? So from where did they get their mandate? I would rather have clean drinking water in my tap, damn it! What good are the bloody nukes when they become the raison d'être for our very destruction in this manner without ever firing a single missile at the drones that are killing our own peoples?
It gives me no pleasure to repeatedly rehearse this footnote to history. What is not already obvious to the Pakistanis? It must surely still occur to many a reasonable military man serving with genuine zeal and honor in the real pivot of power in Pakistan that the end is drawing near. What are they doing idly watching the battle of their lives from the sidelines – when they are not shooting or displacing their own peoples that is? As quoted from a Dawn newspaper column:
THIS article poses two questions: on the day after US/Nato forces invade and occupy some of Balochistan and Waziristan, what will we say we should have done, and why aren’t we doing it now? Is this far-fetched? ... One hopes that a small group of patriotic officers in Pakistan are also asking themselves what can be done, and why aren’t we doing it now.” [29]
Gentlemen may cry, Peace, Peace--but there is no peace. The war is actually begun! The next gale that sweeps from the north will bring to our ears the clash of resounding arms! And that's the tortuous déjà vu reality today. [30]
If one is genuinely confused about who is the enemy, whether it's the Taliban, Al-Qaeeda, Islamism, Militant Islam, unknown foreign fighters, foreign intelligence agencies, India, Israel, American interests, or the United States' globalist oligarchs hell bent on criminally realizing their one-world government agenda by fabricating and harvesting “revolutionary times” across the planet, [31] please spend some time reviewing the book The Pakistan Decapitation Papers available from Project [32] Write to me if you are still uncertain about who is behind “tickling” the so called “insurgents” into existence, and why that is necessary in order to fight the lifetime of World War IV with our blood. After all, God is on your side”! [33]
Caption Zbigniew Brzezinski on the Pak-Afghan Border: 'God is on your side'!

Footnotes April 03, 2003, Ex-CIA director: U.S. faces 'World War IV' by Charles Feldman and Stan Wilson,
[5] NYT August 19, 2009 C.I.A. Sought Blackwater’s Help to Kill Jihadists
The Washington Post August 20, 2009 , CIA Hired Firm for Assassin Program
NYT August 20, 2009, C.I.A. Said to Use Outsiders to Put Bombs on Drones
The Miami Herald, Oct. 02, 2009, Scores of bodies found in Pakistan's Swat valley By Saeed Shah, McClatchy Newspapers
Los Angeles Times April 13, 2008, Bomb blast in Iran mosque kills 9
'Bombings are rare in Iran, but insurgencies have been blamed for some deadly bomb attacks in recent years. In February 2007, a car loaded with explosives blew up near a bus carrying members of Iran's Revolutionary Guard, killing 11 of them. In 2006, blasts killed nine people in Ahvaz near the Iraq border. Iran alleges that the United States, Israel, and Britain are behind the upsurge in militant activity and says it has intelligence to support the allegation.' -- LA Times, April 13, 2008.
[9] Russia Today September 08, 2009, 'Contractors in Pakistan: are troops next?' Interview with Wayne Madsen
[12] Global Research, June 11, 2004, Historical Origins of the Islamic State (ISIS): Who is Abu Musab Al-Zarqawi? By Michel Chossudovsky
[13] Global Research, April 18, 2006, Origins of the Islamic State (ISIS): Who is behind “Al Qaeda in Iraq”? Pentagon acknowledges fabricating a “Zarqawi Legend” By Michel Chossudovsky
[14] Zahir Ebrahim, Prisoners of the Cave, 2003, Chapter 1
Project Humanbeingsfirst's Tutorial: The Hegelian Dialectics of Deception – Today's Focus: Anatomy of Modern Lies, Senseless Warfare, Merchants of Death
[16] Global Research, September 25, 2005 Were British Special Forces Soldiers Planting Bombs in Basra? Suspicions Strengthened by Earlier Reports, by Michael Keefer
Global Research, September 20, 2005 British “Undercover Soldiers” Caught driving Booby Trapped Car “They refused to say what their mission was.” by Michel Chossudovsky
[18] NYT, Sunday, April 20, 2008, Message Machine: Behind TV Analysts, Pentagon’s Hidden Hand - A PENTAGON CAMPAIGN Retired officers have been used to shape terrorism coverage from inside the TV and radio networks. By DAVID BARSTOW
See its pertinent deconstruction in Zahir Ebrahim, 'Bin Laden': Key enabler of “imperial mobilization” and nuclear attack on Iran-Pakistan
See Project Humanbeingsfirst's A Note on the Mighty Wurlitzer
[19] Global Research, April 18, 2006 Who is behind “Al Qaeda in Iraq”? Pentagon acknowledges fabricating a “Zarqawi Legend” by Michel Chossudovsky
Press TV September 14, 2009 Ex-Intel officer discloses US plans for Pakistan, exclusive interview of Pakistan's former ISI Chief General Hamid Gul to Press TV
'US officials "want to go for Pakistan's nuclear assets. They are inching close to those nuclear assets day by day," he added. When asked about Washington's long-term goal in Pakistan, the former Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) said that the United States wants to keep the country destabilized.' -- Press TV Sept. 14, 2009.
This is the same General Gul turning on his own patrons after he had fully assisted them in “giving to the USSR its Vietnam war” from Pakistani soil. An African proverb says: you need a very long spoon to sip with the devil.
Tehran Times September 14, 2009, Blackwater involved in Bhutto and Hariri hits: former Pakistani army chief
'TEHRAN - Pakistan’s former chief of army staff, General Mirza Aslam Beg (ret.), has said the U.S. private security company Blackwater was directly involved in the assassinations of former Pakistani prime minister Benazir Bhutto and former Lebanese prime minister Rafik Hariri.' -- Tehran Times Sept. 14, 2009
Why was this General muted when all the specious reports were being so boisterously promulgated by the Mighty Wurlitzer's propaganda machinery both in the West and in Pakistan's own newspapers? See the many Letters to Editors on Perpetuating the Fiction of who killed Benazir Bhutto by Zahir Ebrahim,
[22] UK Telegraph September 27, 2009 US threatens to escalate operations inside Pakistan
The News, Friday, September 25, 2009 More drone strikes possible in Pakistan (dead link) September 24, 2009 US Mulls Increasing Drone Strikes in Pakistan - Will Pakistan Escalation Come With Afghan Escalation? by Jason Ditz, September 27, 2009 US Threatening to Attack Major Pakistani City of Quetta - Will US Drone Strikes Move From Rural Pakistan to Baloch Capital? by Jason Ditz September 24, 2009 U.S., NATO Poised For Most Massive War In Afghanistan's History, By Rick Rozoff writing for Stop NATO
Thaindian News October 5, 2009 US pullout from Afghanistan would be ‘disastrous’: Musharraf,
[Added] Zahir Ebrahim, White Man's Burden,
The Grand Chessboard by Zbigniew Brzezinski, 1996,
[24] A Testament of Hope: The Essential Writings and Speeches of Martin Luther King (Jr.), pg. 307,
UK Independent, Sunday, 31 May 2009, In Pakistan, an exodus that is beyond biblical - Locals sell all they have to help millions displaced by battles with the Taliban By Andrew Buncombe ;
[Attribution Corrected] Photo Rashid Iqbal/EPA, source UK Guardian, Monday, 11 May 2009, caption: People flee Pakistan's restive Swat valley after a curfew was temporarily lifted to allow people to leave the intensifying conflict
[27] BBC News, Islamabad, October 02, 2009 Pakistan in video beating probe By Syed Shoaib Hasan,
[28] NYT October 9, 2009 Latest Pakistan Bombing Seen as Warning to Government
NYT October 12, 2009 Car Bomb Kills at Least 41 in Restive Region of Pakistan
Article: NATO’s secret armies linked to terrorism? 2004, by Daniele Ganser ;
Book: NATO’s Secret Armies. Operation Gladio and Terrorism in Western Europe, 2004 by Daniele Ganser , free PDF available online ;
Video: BBC Documentary Timewatch, 3 episodes, aired on BBC Ch 2, June 1992,
[Added] Analysis: Operation Gladio Yesterday and Worldwide Terrorism Today – Identifying the Enemy By Zahir Ebrahim, ; Imperial Surrogates and 'Terror Central' in Operation Gladio Redux By Zahir Ebrahim,
[Added] Zahir Ebrahim, Masters of Dissent and The Dying Songbird,
[Added] Zahir Ebrahiim, Gatekeepers From Left to Right - Response to Chris Hedges' amalgam of half-truths 'A Decade After 9/11: We Are What We Loathe',
[30] Epilogue in The Pakistan Decapitation Papers, echoing the immortal words of Patrick Henry, March 23, 1775,

Chapter 26

Bringing back the lost Zen to Pakistan
Don't concentrate on the finger or
you will miss all that heavenly glory!

Zahir Ebrahim
November 12, 2009 | Updated Nov. 16, 2009

I find it sadly amusing that the editor of the Pakistan People's Party sympathizers' website, fancifully titled 'letusbuildpakistan', should have reprinted Project Humanbeingsfirst's analysis of what Hamid Mir and Geo TV's gratuitous hectoring of their tiny presence in cyberspace might commonsensically portend for the PPP leadership and President Zardari, under the honorific Conspiracy Theorists”.
And it is even more sadly amusing to me – if one is permitted to combine these two conflicting emotions simultaneously – that so far, none of its readers has chosen to publicly comment on it.
The 'Brahmin' priest couldn't have put a more effective 'Shudra' label on a lowly plebeian's work. Or perhaps the humble writing simply didn't warrant a reaction, never mind a refutation, lest one became grossly polluted by the untouchable subject. That lack of reaction is perhaps in itself a pointer to something else.
And that is, that like the rest of us ordinary 'untermenschen' struggling to make some sense of the grotesque reality around us, perhaps all the many builders of Pakistan too can stand to benefit from a little Zen in their perspectives.
That, six feet under, there is no PPP, no Military, no Mullah, no Secular Humanism, no Islamofascism, no 'left', no 'right', no empire, no hectoring hegemons, no world government, no lucrative paychecks from the local NGOs or accolades at the Western think-tanks, and no ISI assets and sayanim shilling for the handful of high-ranking mercenaries within the Pakistani Military under the Technique of Infamy.
That, maggots can equally not tell the difference who lies, who spins, who murders in how great a numbers under which blaring trumpet and uniform, the best.
And that quintessential Tao of Reflection, is apparently entirely missing from the Pakistani psyche as all the partisans of their respective churches gather around the Unbirthday Party table with the Mad Hatters of this world boisterously singing the Islamofascism song in its many harmonious variations.
It is, almost as if, that sense of Zen has deliberately, or willingly, been co-opted.
Certainly, all that American tax-payers' beautifully inflated sweat spent corrupting Pakistan has been well worth it – sure buys a lot of golf courses, Mercedes, and country homes. The hectoring hegemons' own organs of propaganda blithely proclaim how they are the paymasters of the Pakistani military, possibly the only nuclear-armed military in the world where the obedient 'Negroes' listen with the most humble posture when the whiteman speaks:
Caption Why do House Niggers feel compelled to carry the white man's burden? (Photo1 source Pentagon, Photo2 source: unknown web news)
And create this mayhem in return for the blood-monies deposited in Pakistani peoples' name:
Swat exodus biblical. UK Independent, May 31, 2009, caption: In Pakistan, an exodus that is beyond biblical; Photo Rashid Iqbal/EPA, source UK Guardian, May 11, 2009, caption: People flee Pakistan's restive Swat valley after a curfew was temporarily lifted to allow people to leave the intensifying conflict
Caption The Decapitation of Pakistan by its own Military! Extensive compilation of pertinent news reports between April 2009 and December 2009 at (Photo1: In Pakistan, an exodus that is beyond biblical, Swat, The UK Independent, May 30, 2009; photo1 source: Rashid Iqbal/EPA, via UK Guardian, May 11, 2009, caption: People flee Pakistan's restive Swat valley after a curfew was temporarily lifted to allow people to leave the intensifying conflict ; Photo2: AFP Deadly blast hits Pakistan livestock market, Adezai, Nov 08, 2009, source Aljazeera ; Photo3: AFP Pakistan forces to take on Taliban, two suicide bombers hit Peshawar Oct 17, 2009, source Aljazeera)
Can anyone tell the difference between Pakistan Military's barbaric assault on its own 'lesser' people, eagerly fertilizing its own soil with its own kith's blood to connivingly fabricate the patsy suicide bombers, and the American-Israeli slaughter of the 'untermenschen'? Which is worse is unarguable, if it's even possible to distinguish between the Red-Teams and the Blue-Teams:
Caption Victims - Does it matter to the dead which military murders them under which flag and trumpet? Civilian victims from Iraq (photo1 left) killed by the Christian American military, and Gaza Palestine (photo2 right) killed by the Jewish Zionist military. Pakistani civilian victims of insurgents-terrorists bomb blasts (photo2,3 top), and civilian victims created by Pakistan military's counter-insurgency ops (photo1 top); more civilian casualties of counter-insurgency ops compiled at
The Los Angeles Times on Sunday, November 15, 2009 even attempted to provide some updated official ballpark numbers from Fox News' previously reported estimates of October 04, 2009 (cached), on what those blood-bribes to Pakistan's military look like. To this scribe's skeptical eye, these were off by at least one or two decimal places as they still did not account for the billions in black-ops budget which is beyond official purview and hence reporting. Nevertheless, in the report headlined: “CIA says it gets its money's worth from Pakistani spy agency”, the 'TASS' disclosed the amounts while spinning the same imperial axiom that it was to fight the 'war on terror':
'The CIA has funneled hundreds of millions of dollars to Pakistan's intelligence service since the Sept. 11 attacks, accounting for as much as one-third of the foreign spy agency's annual budget, current and former U.S. officials say. ... Almost every major terrorist plot this decade has originated in Pakistan's tribal belt, where ISI informant networks are a primary source of intelligence. ... The CIA payments are a hidden stream in a much broader financial flow; the U.S. has given Pakistan more than $15 billion over the last eight years in military and civilian aid. Congress recently approved an extra $1 billion a year to help Pakistan stabilize its tribal belt at a time when Obama is considering whether to send tens of thousands of additional troops to Afghanistan.'
The stellar 'Negro' newspaper of Pakistan, Daily Times, again parroted that imperial mantra in their own bold headline the next morning without examining where the finger was really pointing towards, deliberately omitting to draw attention to the diabolical glory of “imperial mobilization”: “ISI used CIA money to build new Islamabad headquarters : One-third of CIA budget goes to ISI”. The news reports are cached here and here for forensic scrutiny in future law courts.
Yes indeed, lost is the complex art of adding 2 + 2 to the Pakistani genius.
This phenomenon is not only local to the Pakistani soil, but transcends geographical boundaries to wherever the Pakistani genius persists. It spans the gamut from the glorified native informant's erudite prose in CFR's Foreign Affairs magazine, to the right Hon. Ambassador of Pakistan's CFR-CEIP endorsed entire book-length treatise splitting two imperially cultivated peas in a pod. And all the Machiavellian Betweens. None of course bother to explain “full spectrum dominance”, or how it is orchestrated when “Democracy is inimical to imperial mobilization”, never mind attempt to unravel the destruction of the United States itself in the globalists' diabolical pursuit of one-world government by leaching-off and spending-out the unchallenged superpower's largesses into unbridled international terrorism, domestic police-state, and insolvency.
Let us together bring back that basic ability to perform simple arithmetic first, before dreaming of 'Let Us Build Pakistan'. Dupes, patsies, and 'Negroes' don't build nations. They merely help in destroying them by concentrating on the finger presented to them instead of what it's pointing to. The previous East India Company excelled in holding up many a finger and co-opting many a Raja, vazeer, and court-jester. And so does the modern hectoring hegemon. See Modernity Explained. And the 'Negro' Explained.
That self-evident truism applies to all of us who don't wish to be dupes and patsies, who don't wish to be fooled into voluntary servitude, and who don't wish to have a boot stamped on our face in perpetuity while getting us to love it! This is irrespective of where we might live, and what our tribal-cultural-religious affiliations might be. It applies to all of mankind, for all times, for “hegemony is as old as mankind.” But how to avoid being trapped under its jackboot?
I hope you, dear reader, can take the time to watch this short 2-minute clip of Bruce Lee teaching that essential Tao, of “Don't concentrate on the finger or you will miss all that heavenly glory”:
Bruce Lee teaching the Tao of Reflection, the Zen of Martial Arts, to a younger apprentice in the movie Enter the Dragon.
Let me just add that I think, and I also feel, that anti-conspiracy skeptics are making a good start. Skepticism is indeed the hallmark of the genuine patriot. And I hasten to clarify that I do not mean to sound patronizing when saying that.
I am merely stating the obvious science of social engineering capitalized upon by none other than Hitler himself, and which is today just as ubiquitously being practiced worldwide as in the yesteryear. And that is, to know precisely where to target psyops and propaganda: at “the crowd of simpletons and the credulous ... when the voting papers of the masses are the deciding factor”.
As Hitler further observed the characteristic type most amenable to accepting bullshit as gospel from heaven, and those that aren't:
“First, those who believe everything they read; Second, those who no longer believe anything; Third, those who critically examine what they read and form their judgments accordingly.”
It's all examined here. And that isn't a conspiracy theory as the reader must surely agree, for the Third Reich was empirically built upon it. Denying that today only means one is wasting one's time speaking to only the indoctrinated idiots and fools.
So, I dare to presume that the reader of this article will accept the wisdom that 'those who critically examine what they read and form their judgments accordingly' are rather difficult to fool, and therefore, can't be classified as either indoctrinated or idiotic.
That furthermore, such people pose the only genuine existential threat to the unjust tyrant and to its thousand errand boys, and therefore, the honest man and honest woman would be proud to be included in this tiny group who genuinely do “wa-twa-so-bil-haq” as Muslims and non-Muslims. I.e., they remain actively engaged with truth no matter where it takes them, even if it goes against their own parents, against prevailing wisdom, or against their ownself. No qualms about that surely, at least to the moralizing theory part of it which is almost universal. The atheists today appear to be its greatest principled exponents judging from who stands up to falsehood more: the man of cloth perennially sitting on the prayer-mat and on the lofty pulpit preaching his 'truth' and bowing in pious prostration before his god, or others in existential protest standing up to theirs and risking their very life.
Therefore, in genuine earnestness, I once again humbly endeavor to explain – and really only under the presumption that I am indeed addressing the third group of people who do indeed take the time to critically examine what they read and form their judgments accordingly – why my deconstruction of what is happening in Pakistan is absolutely not just a 'conspiracy theory', but disclosing a real monumental conspiracy of the hectoring hegemons against the Pakistani peoples.
That, this criminal conspiracy entails having alternately glorified, then demonized, and then a change of 'errand boys' as relief, and then repeat, mercenaries at the helm of affairs in Pakistan while baby-step faits accomplis are diabolically seeded under the continuously fabricated conditions made to “look like a great ‘booming, buzzing confusion’”.
The unhidden goal in this round of murderous blood-plays on the Grand Chessboard: The Balkanization of Pakistan under the pretext of saving it from the Islamofascists!
That's it in a nutshell. How complicated is that for a rational mind to examine? When they don't, it implies only one thing. Only ONE!
Anyone who contributes to either the mantras of Islamofascism, Taliban, Al-Qaeeda, or the waging of endless wars against that fabricated enemy instead of the real one, in my view has already been unequivocally adjudicated upon at Nuremberg.
While the morality of the victor is always relative, as Justice Vinson of the US Supreme Court observed for his own nation in 1951:
“Nothing is more certain in modern society than the principle that there are no absolutes, that a name, a phrases, a standard has meaning only when associated with the considerations which give birth to nomenclature. To those who would paralyze our Government in the face of impending threat by encasing it in a semantic strait-jacket, we must reply that all concepts are relative”,
and always becomes absolute while administering the victor's justice as sermonized by the US Chief Prosecutor in 1946 at Nuremberg before sending the Nazi leadership to the elaborately prepared gallows:
“If certain acts of violation of treaties are crimes, they are crimes whether the United States does them or whether Germany does them, and we are not prepared to lay down a rule of criminal conduct against others which we would not be willing to have invoked against us”,
for the vast majority of ordinary people un-attuned to the pragmatic witticism of Pakistan's distinguished Ambassador to Washington:
'“Foreign relations are not discussed in poetry, ... Saddam Husain’s last speech was also full of poetry but it could not save him or his nation”', and that 'relationships between nations are based on ground realities',
it does not change with the prevailing winds.
A courageous people must indeed face up to the “ground realities” just as the Hon. Ambassador of Pakistan boldly stated to his own audience, but unlike some pusillanimous and hectoring cowards, also apply the same standards across the board rather than rush to coddle the greatest criminals exuding the most power as “ground realities”.
The following is an excerpt from last year, September 10, 2008 to be precise, from a letter I wrote my own TAO teacher in Lahore, titled: “Happy-Happy Zardari: A monologue on Hope and Voluntary Servitude”. The fact that it was written more than a year ago, and what it pertinently references is from almost two years ago, is both its vindication and its relevance to still saving the present for a better future.
Begin Excerpt
Pakistan remains exemplary in this – see Project Humanbeingsfirst's February 2008 prescient report “Who Killed Benazir Bhutto? In her own words!” [6], and its November 2007 solutions recommendations “Open Letter to a Pakistani General” [7]. The election of Mr. Asif Ali Zardari as the new President of Pakistan confirms the setup by the Hectoring Hegemons for devilishly re-architecting Pakistan's borders – as predicted in the series of reports on Pakistan's Destabilization by Project Humanbeingsfirst – through increasing economic oppression [8] [9] [10] [11] and tyranny [12] upon the common man [13] already unable to make ends meet [14].
And then, the 'ubermensch' will come on their white horse wielding “shock and awe” to “save” the “the very petri dish of international terrorism” [15] from becoming the new “Terror Central” [16] and threatening the civilized world due to its instability and civil war! That ominous “saving” [17] is already in its advanced setup stages [18] even as I write this. Many front-faces have been lined up who will retain and maintain the core-lie to continually enable the 'ubermensch' quest for “full spectrum dominance” – that of 'war on terror' – and the present incarnation with Mr. Zardari is just another “happy-happy” ever-smiling face! [19] But a more insidious face than the Generals' before, in order to present the more acceptable illusion of freedom and democracy as that is what is being demanded by the constituency to be controlled. Well, let's give it to them under the praetorian tutelage of a re-incarnated seasoned Godfather who can be relied upon to obediently do the master's bidding on account of natural inclination [20] to usurp [21] and plunder [22], with plenty of skeletons in the closet to keep a strong check on the desired strategic direction when necessary! [23]
Observing the events of the day (September 10, 2008) [24] being rehearsed with all the pomp and majestic show – complete with horse-drawn buggy and kisses on the cheeks and all – before the applauding world with Mr. Zardari taking the highest oath of office in Pakistan, reminded me of the opening wedding scene from Mario Puzo's movie the Godfather, attended by the motley of morality-challenged, all dressed in their finest Sunday outfits. The only thing that appeared to be missing during the festivities in the non-movie version was the camera zooming into private meetings in beautifully shuttered oak and mahogany paneled darkened rooms behind closed doors on how the “territory” was to be divided up, who would get what loot, and who would be assigned to make which offer that couldn't be refused! Even the fictional Michael Coreleone could not go so “legit” as the real life enactment! Once made “legit” and cleansed into a “virgin”, is it slanderous to recall the past? None of the afore-stated staid recollections from newspaper reports even begin to scratch the real surface of the actual experiences of many Pakistanis under Asif Ali Zardari during the two short hereditary reigns of his beloved wife. His popular nom de guerre of “Mr. ten percent” among the general public hardly did him justice. And neither could Al Capone ever be charged for anything other than tax evasion! Even that opportunity no longer exists – so long as the godfather dutifully continues America's “war on terror”!
The earnest columnist Ardeshir Cowasjee of the Daily Dawn had repeatedly noted in his many weekly columns that the former President, General Musharraf, was the best among the worst of the lot, and while I never agreed with the famous octogenarian of Pakistan on the notion of choosing the lesser of two evils from a carefully constrained artificial choice forcibly inflicted upon the suffering populace, I do agree with that sentiment. But not because of anything Ardeshir Cowasjee ever observed.
But because, with President Zardari at the helm, and aided in his mission by the mindlessly silly and horrendously greedy Parliamentarians who turn on a penny, Goethe's notion of servitude – “none are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free” – is being attempted in Pakistan under a godfather-civilian ruler as an alternative to the brute servitude under a military-general that was beginning to wear thin with the people! The latter however, in comparison, was surely a superior option to serve under, as there was at least no illusion of freedom! The cycle of false-leaders is quite revealing even as it continually fosters only the imperial agendas.
Let's snapshot from the setup that began this “imperial mobilization”: The democratically elected Nawaz Sharif being replaced by Musharraf in 1999 to acquire a “unity of command” over the client-state, and the pubic showing enormous relief at being rescued from their misery by a military dictator who seemed to wanna fix everything for them – for the people wanted someone strong to lead them after all the previous debacles under “democracy”; 9 years later Musharraf now being replaced by Zardari and the people once again showing even more relief because they wanted to be led by democracy once again after all the debacles under military dictatorship that has brought the country to the brink of bankruptcy and dismemberment! The new “democratic” leader now appears to be equally keen on fixing everything for the people, but marches quickly in lock-step to the same beat as his autocratic predecessors!
While the people are kept busy in these 'katputli tamashas' [puppet shows] expertly crafted for them by the Rand Corporation and the Pentagon in America, no element of “imperial mobilization” is ever left to chance. It is just as precision an operation in Pakistan as 911 was in New York! If a military strongman is needed to enable the 'war on terror' by nurturing “jihadis” with the attack on Afghanistan, the climate is created to install him. If destabilization is needed to enable dismemberment of a former frontline client-state which has outlived its usefulness on the 'Grand Chessboard' in its present configuration, faux democracy is crafted to bring the destabilization to its critical mass. The concept of years of planning and long consistent execution times, as is political science based state-craft, is entirely alien to the impetuous Pakistani mind. Brought up over the past sixty years to only expect uncertainty, loot and plunder, disappearances and oppression, a Pakistani has become mentally attuned to going to sleep at night not knowing who will be in-charge the next morning (or where one might wake up)!
Thus, the notion that a devilish multi-year precision planning, and such state-craft sophistication as the 'dialectics of deception' described by Project Humanbeingsfirst in many of its reports, is even possible, is entirely foreign to the relatively simple, feudalistic Pakistani genius. Therefore, 'katputli tamashas' and frequent change of Acts and actors is great for the masses – for many couldn't care less who is in power, tied as most have become to their daily bread and hope for miraculous deliverance!
The exuberance shown by the world's leaders in rushing to congratulate the new Mr. 100% Pakistani President into their fold – one who had candidly noted: 'The Pakistan People’s Party (PPP), if it comes into power, must persuade the people that the fight against militants is “our war”, not just America’s war' [25] – and all of them together agreeing to maintain that enabling core-lie of “imperial mobilization” intact, amply demonstrates this.
This coddling of a person who was further reported brazenly proclaiming “Asif Ali Zardari told a British TV that political agreements were not words of Qura’an which could not be changed with the changing political scenario. According to the TV, he was asked about his shifting positions and not fulfilling his promises to which he said there was nothing final in politics and positions could change with the changing situations.” [26], makes President Zardari actually the best qualified among the lot for the job of presiding over the dismembering of Pakistan! One who need not, by one's own admission, honor any agreements one may sign, or the deals one may make, with one's own countrymen in order to gain their trust! Wow! What an egregiously blatant mocking of a peoples quite accustomed to “Voluntary Servitude”. Notice that there are no riots in the streets in Pakistan, no protests, and while the nation's ruling elite is politically and visibly united in celebrating the victory of democracy over dictatorship, the poor man is kept busy trying to barely survive!
Finally, one can rightfully claim, that there is little difference between the peoples of America, and the peoples of Pakistan – united they do stand in “hope” and inaction for a better tomorrow, as the rich plunderers laugh their way to the bank!
Indeed, I hate to suggest once again that all this was plainly manifest when Musharraf had issued his own proclamations paving the way for PPP and Bhutto to come to power with the NRO and the sacking of the judges by crafting his unilateral Executive Orders, which like in America, once made into law, become effectively irreversible. I had plainly written on December 21, 2007 in Project Humanbeingsfirst's warning to the Pakistani peoples “Wakeup to the grotesque reality of the 'Grand Chessboard'!” [27] (while most of the Pakistani and Western press appeared not to have ever been students of political science, history, or even forensic science – the only reason most among them are likely called journalists, the press, the newsmedia, is surely only because they carry suitably designed business cards or are rich enough to own the media – there are a few exceptions of course, as shown by this oped in the Nation of February 22, 2008 [28]; and I have no idea why the rest of the respected columnists like Ardeshir Cowasjee remained silent, despite my urgent and repeated pleas to them to at least comment on the warning in their own soap-boxes in order to draw attention to it, as no English newspaper in Pakistan was willing to publish it or any of the letters to editor [29] that I sent them before I gave up on further wasting my time; I had also, in my earnestness, foolishly apprised two newly retired 3-star Pakistani Generals in Islamabad of these matters over a long private lunch conversation, with obviously little impact and much wasted effort):
“#2. The present 'elections' in Pakistan are a manifest fraud under the orchestration of the 'hectoring hegemons' themselves, and must be abandoned in the greater national interest of the peoples of Pakistan themselves.
This mantra of elections is replete with red herrings craftily synthesized to maintain Pakistan as a servile client-state in order to carry on with the same bold 'imperial designs' on the 'Grand Chessboard'. It is merely the rebottling of the same old wine in a different bottle. It will surely be legitimately conducted, with no apparent riggings, and duly approved by all the impartial international observers to give the artful elections an official international legitimacy.
It is quite immaterial who wins in these elections. The laws and the judiciary of the nation have already been reconstituted under the umbrella of 'emergency' to enable the nation to carry on unfettered in its primary objective of fighting the 'War on Terror' as an obedient patsy client-state – and hence to carry on in its own devilishly crafted suicide!
These elections will conveniently 'elect' a legislature whose leaders have also been deftly primed by the 'hectoring hegemons' themselves! And the highest executive office in the land is already retained in the hands of the same old 'wine' drinker.
Thus all the 'ducks' are still lined up perfectly in a row, just as they were on the very eve of 911.
#3. The people of Pakistan must fully reconcile with the Military of Pakistan immediately - the reconciliation being of the type that was witnessed by the surprised world between the oppressors and the oppressed in South Africa.
Not the type that is being pushed through the NRO to legitimize looters, plunderers, and rapists of the nation in order to staff the legislature with the made by 'CFR in the USA' and made by 'RIIA in the UK' Pakistani politicians with at best criminal credentials, and at worst, treasonous ones!
The military of Pakistan, as an institution, is indeed also the only hope of Pakistan as we must survive on the 'Grand Chessboard' and only they hold the cards. What is about to befall the nation can also only be averted by them. The civilians and the Military must unite – immediately – for overarching national considerations that far transcend individual grievances, ego trips, and past transgressions.
Thus the civilians must abandon all meaningless and mindless protests which are in any case devoid of any fundamental comprehension of the reality du jour on the 'Grand Chessboard' – none of them seek fundamental changes to our fate, nor do they appear to fathom what such changes are even supposed to be - and are merely only chasing red herrings that have been deftly crafted as perhaps per the Machiavellian 'technique of infamy'. ...
These protests are needlessly continually giving the Western public the impression of 'instability' which only adds to the credibility of the various pretextual mantras to come 'deliver' us from ourselves! There is much more at stake than to usher in a thin veneer of faux 'democracy' which is all that these protests are unwittingly accomplishing as can be empirically witnessed by anyone with half a brain.
#4 Instead of the faux 'democracy', the Pakistani Military rulers on their part must now rise to the challenge of genuine patriotism and as genuine guardians of the nation and help carve a genuine Democracy, with the capital D and without the quotes, as briefly outlined in “Re-Imagining Pakistan's Defenses – Open Letter to a Pakistani General”, and as explored in “Saving Pakistan from Synthetic 'Terror Central' ”.
Briefly, that entails crafting a genuine Constitution under a bilateral 'social contract' between the people and the state, that is subsequently ratified by the people of Pakistan through a direct referendum vote. This can be accomplished within a few short months if there is the national and military will that understands the urgency of the matter and executes on it by gathering the right peoples to craft it!” [ Read items 5, 6, and 7 here ]
Item 2 above, in bold, appears amazingly prescient – right? The new “wine drinker” makes little impact on the journey however. And we observe that Musharraf withdrew [30] without rectifying any of his own power-shenanigans in favor of the new “wine drinker” whom he had himself enabled and pardoned with the NRO that has lent new meaning to the adage 'steal only in millions and billions, for generous pardon in the name of national security, national interest, or national reconciliation is the only outcome for monumental crimes when all loot'.
The new “wine drinker” in turn was, and is, being guided by the same hectoring hegemons [31] [32] [33] [34] who crafted and led the American foreign policy in the decimation of Afghanistan and Iraq, as expected – and so brazenly at times that there is no need to even hide that fact from the public – when Musharraf very well could have implemented all of the afore-stated recommendations for the genuine protection of Pakistan, as he enjoyed absolute power and the public would have welcomed his moves against the hectoring hegemons with open arms! Therefore, the lame surprise as demonstrated in this news report, aptly titled “Benazir's promise remains unfulfilled” [35], is at best – well what can one say that hasn't already been said about the press! Pakistani media is now but a distant reflection of the American media eagerly galloping down the same path. See Chapters 4, 6, and 7 of my book “Prisoners of the Cave” for a better understanding of what one is likely to see more and more of in Pakistan! [36]
If all this prescience is such advanced rocket science, how is it that an ordinary plebeian, with only a computer and an internet connection, can figure it all out, including the solution space, and none of the profound intelligentsia and the press in Pakistan can?
The answer must be that we are a well deserving nation ready to be replaced by a better peoples – as per the promise of the Qur'an!
But wait – I am not ready to be replaced, nor am I willing to accept that verdict, and neither are the 200 million Pakistanis suffering under the yoke of the handful of co-opted praetorian ruling elite of Pakistan! “Voluntary Servitude” may indeed be our failing due to excessive misplaced hope, but is that as criminally culpable as the tyrants who criminally rule over us by exploiting that failing?
Being a victim is not a crime, even if being a foolish one repeatedly is reprehensible!
End Excerpt
This ain't no game dear brothers and sisters, friends and respected elders. It is continually being paid for in innocent blood of that lowly 'other'. Tomorrow, it will be our own, it it isn't already.
This also ain't no matter of penning narratives in blogs, of making platitudinous speeches in town halls, of freedom of speech, of abstract rights which mean little in practice – but doing something useful about our own singular existential imperative rather than merely talk about it.
And one can't do anything unless one diagnoses and triages the now almost comatose patient correctly. But it is still breathing. Not dead yet!
I genuinely pray that intelligence men, or men of greater intelligence, military men, political men, and of course women, those of uncommon valor, are reading this. Also, that at least some among them so inebriated with the banality of evil and prostration to power, will find the inevitable chutzpah to take me to court (but not disappear me into some horrible rendition). Just like Pakistan's distinguished Ambassador used his best friend, the legal system, and filed a plentiful law suit for defamation against The Nation newspaper of Pakistan (The Nation Oct. 17, 2009, notice cached here). I however won't settle for any kangaroo court. But will be more than delighted to see anyone in the International Criminal Court of Justice.
Please watch my personal lawyer, Justice Robert H. Jackson of the US Supreme court, and the Chief Prosecuting Counsel for the United States, already having laid out my iron-clad case at Nuremberg more conclusively than any lawyer can:
Robert-Jackson-Nuremberg-Day-187-Closing-July 26-1946
But of course, that requires a Military Tribunal administering the victor's justice to bring those very conclusions about.
Short of such a victor's justice selectively administered, yes indeed the hectoring hegemons and their 'errand boys' will win in the Fourth Reich just as they did in the Third Reich in yesteryear. Anyone efficaciously challenging them, anywhere in the world, is marched to the gallows as the terrorist, disappeared, or outright shot through the head. Others are simply ignored, or afforded their Hyde Park corners to asphyxiate themselves in freespace. All that freedom of speech in vacuum is very valuable of course to generously accord to the plebeian – we now sit around typing all day or make speeches to the cheering choir rather than tearing down the totem poles constructed to rule over us. And even more egregiously, actually fighting for the right to continue doing that pleasurably sterile thing over and over again! Some of the more famous among us are in fact also getting quite rich doing it. Some others are simply enamored by their own brilliant dissent-productions and feel badly when it isn't appreciated.
Be that as it may, I humbly invite everyone, but especially the Pakistanis reading this, to refute me if I make a mistake, or to boldly join me if I appear to speak the truth in correctly concluding the answer to 2+2 =?
Let's together unmask them all by uniting on the common nemesis. Even the natural instinct for self-preservation in the lowly herd helps them correctly identify the hidden hectoring hegemon of their jungle, and they boldly unite against it under their existential imperative:
Battle At Kruger
Why can't we?
As one of my favorite Urdu poets famously said: 'Mauj hai darya mein, bairoon-e-darya kuch nahin'. [1] That piece of poetic witticism if practiced by those now deceived, just as it is practiced by the herd in the video above, will checkmate the very “ground realities” that our man in Washington is so worried about.
Let's help him shall we? But in order to effectuate even that single verse of poetry, minimally requires knowing how to add 2 + 2 = 4 before the Rubicon is crossed, before the barbarians march in through the gates of hell bringing their “shock and awe” with them, and before one's own treasonous traitors and mercenaries do the people in. Indeed a great failing of the Iraqi people. But it was not of poetry.
Footnote [1] Translation: A wave outside of the ocean is nothing, as part of the ocean it can become a tsunami.

Chapter 27

Imperial Surrogates and 'Terror Central' in Operation Gladio Redux

The Saudi-Salafi-Wahabi-Deobandi and Taliban-Al-Qaeda: Terrorists OR
Imperial Surrogate Armies in Disguised Uniforms Executing Operation Gladio?

Zahir Ebrahim
Tuesday, February 25, 2014 | Last updated March 31, 2016


A country at war and unable to defend itself because it is unwilling to identify that insurgents are just another military division of state actors themselves, the Surrogate Army, masquerading as non-state actor rebels autonomously waging fourth-gen warfare in a “self-fulfilling prophecy” for perpetual war --- That is the GREAT PRETENCE of our uncle toms and traitors! Surrogate Armies of empire deployed from Pakistan to Syria are lighting the “arc of crisis” in the “Global Zone of Percolating Violence” in the name of insurgency, and the educated lot is unable to call it for what it is.
“An arc of crisis stretches along the shores of the Indian Ocean, with fragile social and political structures in a region of vital importance to us threatened with fragmentation. The resulting political chaos could well be filled by elements hostile to our values and sympathetic to our adversaries.” — Zbigniew Brzezinski, IRAN: The Crescent of Crisis - TIME, Jan. 15, 1979
“To argue that America is already at war in the region with a wider Islamic threat, of which Iran is the epicenter, is to promote a self-fulfilling prophecy.” — Zbigniew Brzezinski, US Senate Foreign Relations committee, February 1, 2007
Why set the “arc of crisis” ablaze?
“It is also a fact that America is too democratic at home to be autocratic abroad. This limits the use of America's power, especially its capacity for military intimidation. Never before has a populist democracy attained international supremacy. But the pursuit of power is not a goal that commands popular passion, except in conditions of a sudden threat or challenge to the public's sense of domestic well-being. The economic self-denial (that is defense spending), and the human sacrifice (casualties even among professional soldiers) required in the effort are uncongenial to democratic instincts. Democracy is inimical to imperial mobilization. .... More generally, cultural change in America may also be uncongenial to the sustained exercise abroad of genuinely imperial power. That exercise requires a high degree of doctrinal motivation, intellectual commitment, and patriotic gratification.” — Zbigniew Brzezinski, The Grand Chessboard, 1996
“I am aware that there is still some who would question, or even justify the offense of 911. But let us be clear. Al Qaeeda killed nearly 3000 people on that day. The victims were innocent men, women, and children from America and many other nations who had done nothing to harm anybody. And yet Al Qaeeda chose to ruthlessly murder these people, claimed credit for the attack, and even now states their determination to kill on a massive scale. They have affiliates in many countries, to try to expand their reach. These are not opinions to be debated. These are facts to be dealt with.” — President Obama, Cairo Egypt, June 4th 2009
“No stages. This is total war. We are fighting a variety of enemies. There are lots of them out there. All this talk about first we are going to do Afghanistan, then we will do Iraq… this is entirely the wrong way to go about it. If we just let our vision of the world go forth, and we embrace it entirely and we don’t try to piece together clever diplomacy, but just wage a total war… our children will sing great songs about us years from now.” — Michael Ledeen, AEI, October 29, 2001 (via

This article continues my previous analysis of Operation Gladio of yesteryear as the template for perceptively understanding worldwide terror today being similarly inflicted from continent to continent by well-trained Western surrogates disguised in Islamofascist uniforms and blamed on Islamofascist patsies to similarly keep fueling World War IV. For the perceptive readers, my Report on The Mighty Wurlitzer is sufficient to comprehend both the why and how “militant Islam” has been made the dominant narrative of empire. In this article I focus on the “Terror Central”, Pakistan.
The latest spate of terror attack, this time in my own city Islamabad, on March 03, 2014, which took the life of a young lawyer, Fizza Malik, and ten others, and the responsibility for it claimed by yet another manufactured terror network fancifully labeled Ahrarul Hind, which is stated to have phoned in its message to Pakistan's largest English language news daily, Dawn, cannot be overcome by merely continuing on with the core narratives of empire. (The same terror template was again reinstantiated in the heart wrenching Easter Sunday bombing on March 27, 2016, in the ancient city of Lahore where I grew up and first studied engineering, killing at least 72 people, including women and children, and injuring more than 300 others. The larger than life global terror bombing template remains unchanged, be it in Pakistan where the casualty is often the highest, or in Europe from Paris to Brussels. Just different Gladio actors from some Taliban group to some ISIS group take their respective bows on their assigned stage, or are blamed.)
Fizza Malik - Young Pakistani lawyer killed in terror attack in Islamabad on March 03, 2014
Caption ISLAMABAD, March 03, 2014: At least 11 people, including additional sessions judge Rafaqat Awan, were killed and 29 others wounded on Monday during a gun and bomb attack in a court in the capital city’s F-8 area, DawnNews reported. Asad Mansoor, a spokesperson for the Ahrarul Hind which is a lesser-known splinter group of the Tehreek-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), while talking to claimed that his group was responsible for today's court attack. According to the PIMS (Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences) list, the dead include: Additional Sessions Judge Rafaqat Ahmed Awan, senior advocate Rao Abdul Rashid, advocate Tanveer Ahmed Shah, Fizza Malik (photo above), Mian Muhammad Aslam, AIOU regional director Muhammad Riaz, policeman Akbar Umer Tariq, junior munshi Talib Hussain, court staff Shabir, Haji Sanullah and an unidentified person. (news sources, photo Fizza Malik
The Pakistani intellectual must rise to challenge, ab initio, the entire concept of terrorism beyond the accepted narratives spinned by the Pakistani media and opinion-makers of all stripes. Those who give any damn about this nation at all, even an iota's worth, must carefully examine the behind the scenes motivation which fundamentally drive worldwide terrorism today, of which Pakistan is a crucial link. Those with any power to do so must forcefully wrest control of the narrative from the agents, assets, and sayanim of empire who deny Pakistan's public any conception of these diabolical behind the scene forces of the Hegelian Dialectic that drive global terrorism, before the country can ever be effective in defending itself from its own domestic terrorism. The roots of this terror reach far deeper than the antediluvian “militant Islam” projected as being on the rampage worldwide. It penetrates right into the very heart of empire and enables its “imperial mobilization” worldwide.
The sorry fact that the entire establishment of Pakistan, in toto, is self-servingly pitching that imperial narrative while continuing to permit her sovereign territories to be droned by the sole superpower, with occasional outbursts of bravado by her own military in equally futile military operations which mostly kill and displace her own innocent civilians, which in turn naturally seed from amongst the angry and traumatized survivors a continual supply of new recruits into the same terrorist cesspool of suicide bombers, bespeaks of the validity of the common man's rather empirical opinion that childish fools and brigands and blackguards are ruling Pakistan.
However, I still hope that at least some sensible military leaders of Pakistan, and its other elites with power to affect change and the will to pursue it, are reading this article.
Some of the following passages are excerpted from my 2009 essay: Reflections on Modernity.
My all time favorite physicist of Pakistan, the MIT literate prodigy, Dr. Pervez Hoodbhoy, the scholar who contributed his own punditry to the mantra of Islamism in dialectical penmanship to Daniel Pipes’ in erudite prose like “Between Imperialism and Islamism” and “The Threat From Within”, once wrote me in response to my trying to get him to see that Bin Laden couldn’t have done 911 as WTC collapses looked like controlled demolition and that he, Hoodbhoy, was failing to connect all the dots which clearly lead to puppetmasters, saying something to the effect: ~ “remember how our ancestors connected the dots in the sky and saw all those shapes as their gods…”.
So henceforth, Pervez Hoodbhoy judiciously avoided connecting the dots lest he too be misled into seeing things that aren’t there, while of course finding it infinitely pleasurable to continue echoing the mantras and axioms of empire. Not only MIT trained scientists, but apparently almost all major scientists and scholars of any IVY and other lofty pedigree are pregnant with imperial wisdom in that way.
These brilliant scholars only see puppetshows, and painstakingly describe them, but never go towards uncovering the forces which drive them. Since I have already described their salient characteristics in detail before, let me just reproduce it here as its worthwhile to relate that to the topic at hand:
  • None of them betray that they possess long term memories, or any comprehension of even recent history that can be contextualized to the present.
  • None of them seem to have heard of ‘covert-ops’, ‘black-ops’, and 'false-flag operations'; none of them have read the shrewd analysis of the imperial thinkers themselves of the necessity of real mobilizing pretexts such as the “New Pearl Harbor” and “clear and present danger” as otherwise “Democracy is inimical to imperial mobilization”.
  • None of them apparently understand that covert-ops while they are operational and active, are meant to be secretive and mendacious, which is why they are called ‘covert’, and that their unraveling necessitates perceptively seeing beyond what’s being deliberately made manifest and what’s being insisted upon as ‘two plus two equals five’ – for hard receipts for them will only be uncovered by historians through the famed declassification process post faits accomplis (i.e., ex post facto). The visible effects of these covert-ops and false-flag operations blamed on patsies is however commented upon with most erudite sophistication.
  • Thus all of these ‘astute’ thinkers, commentators, and media pundits none too miraculously reach the same minimal and common conclusion space regardless of their own starting thesis, or the circuitous routes taken in their analysis and speculations, that at the bare minimum, the scourge of ‘fundamentalism’ and ‘militant Islam’ needs to be checked with renewed commitment in the global ‘war on terror’, or else no one in the ‘civilized world’ would remain safe from these antiquated Taliban style ‘evil jihadis’ and ‘al qaeeda’. That root of terror has now been successfully showcased as residing in Pakistan – the ‘Terror Central’!
  • The root of terror is further determined to be funded by Saudi Arabia, which is itself visibly seen to be pushing its Salafi-Wahabi-Deobandi brand of antediluvian terror upon its surrounding nations, from Syria to Pakistan, in cahoots with the Taliban and Al-Qaeda; in fact, it is variously argued that Saudi Arabia is largely behind the resurgence of the latter “insurgency” throughout the world.
  • It is indeed deemed a ‘clash of civilizations’, not of the East and the West titans, but of ‘radical antiquated militant Islam’ and the rest of civilized humanity! That “Today [even] if one could wipe America off the map of the world with a wet cloth, mullah-led fanaticism will not disappear”, as the distinguished native-informant par excellence, the world class physicist Pervez Hoodbhoy, has conclusively observed in his latest analysis of the matter in “Preventing More Lal Masjids”, and which he had earlier explored in great analytical depth in “The Threat From Within”. And none [too] surprisingly, echoing the same mantra of Pakistan becoming a ‘terrorist sanctuary’ [as] CNN a few days ago [which] aired the documentary by Nick Richardson “Pakistan – The Threat Within”. The unanimity of this conclusion space is scary to say the least – at least for us Pakistanis.
  • It would appear that the world’s leading thinkers, journalists, newsmedia, scholars and leaders “united we stand” that Pakistan poses a serious threat to world peace! Not the hectoring hegemons who have cleverly utilized 911 “to goosestep the Herrenvolk across international frontiers” in what only appears to be another ‘operation canned goods’ or the ‘Reichstag fire’, the much coveted ‘New Pearl Harbor’ to achieve the ‘transformation of [its] forces’ to achieve ‘full spectrum dominance’ over the planet and outerspace; but my wretched lands of the ancient Indus valley, and my wretched peoples – we are the world threat! Saving Pakistan from Synthetic ‘Terror Central’ – Orchestration of ‘Lal Masjid’ – a precursor to ‘shock and awe’? July 13-23, 2007.
In the light of what is transpiring in Pakistan today, it is not at all prescient that Pervez Hoodbhoy should have written the following in his ode to Daniel Pipes: “The Threat From Within”. In response to it, I had been compelled to write to dissent-specialist Hoodbhoy that had there not been an author’s name in that document and someone had asked me to guess who had written it, I would have easily guessed Daniel Pipes. Take a look at the following passage for instance:
‘Is Radical Islam Inevitable?
With the large and growing popular sentiment against Musharraf and his army, one cannot rule out the possibility that in the years ahead nuclear armed Pakistan may fall under a neo-Taliban style Salafi-Wahabi-Deobandi leadership allied with conservative senior military leaders. If it does, then Pakistan could become the world’s most dangerous state. But, although possible, it is certainly not inevitable – countervailing forces work against this nightmare scenario.’ —— Pervez Hoodbhoy, Pakistan – The Threat From Within, Pakistan Security Research Unit (PSRU), Brief Number 13, 23rd May 2007.
The crafty Machiavellian omissions present in that saintly expression of fear by uber physicist Pervez Hoodbhoy: “in the years ahead nuclear armed Pakistan may fall under a neo-Taliban style Salafi-Wahabi-Deobandi leadership allied with conservative senior military leaders. If it does, then Pakistan could become the world’s most dangerous state”, was once again most recently dismantled in Response to ‘Wahabization- Salafization of Pakistan and Muslim Ummah : Fighting the Terrorists But Supporting Their Ideology. In that article in 2009, I had again explained to the Muslim public mind that:
  • The Muslim mind grossly misperceives the difference between gardeners and weeds. Focussing on weeds, no matter how eruditely, is inconsequential if the diabolical gardeners who secretly water it without revealing their role (wit Brzezinski “God is on your side”), and often also manufacture it (wit Zionism, Islamism), are not dealt with first. Their ‘ubermensch’ mind will always cultivate or synthesize newer varieties as deemed necessary for “imperial mobilization”.
  • The first order problem is not the weeds, which is only the effect. The first order problem is their first-cause, the gardeners. These “weeds” do not grow to this level of social and political penetration all by themselves.
  • The weeds are “tickled” into existence, fertilized, nurtured and harvested by the gardeners for crafting a perpetual enemy to fight against, often times as red herrings.
  • While the unsuspecting public attention remains focussed on the weeds’ attention-grabbing plays in the left-field, the real game of “imperial mobilization” goes on in the right-field.
  • The wanton terror of these weeds is at times naturally occurring, by the very fact of their continually fertilized existence, and by the “doctrinal motivation” of “God is on your side” fed them; at other times it is created on demand, as targeted false-flag operations subsequently blamed on the weeds who often die in the process; and always kept in the public mind by the power of myth construction, of an elusive all powerful Ali Baba and his rapidly multiplying surrogates of “militant Islam” who not only threaten all of Westerndom, but the entire civilized world.
  • The modern uniforms of this Western manufactured terror base are those of the Salafi-Wahabi-Deobandis-Taliban-Al-Qaeeda et. al. motif. Only the label and color of uniform varies to give the illusion of multiplying weeds.
  • These vile surrogates and their sub surrogates work for empire in the many countries of the world no differently than NATO's Stay Behind Armies once did in the many nations of Western Europe; controlled through layers of compartmentalized handlers in cellularized semi-autonomous networks, and operating under the singular overarching directive to keep the threat of Islamofascism alive in the public mind.
  • These terror cells may well be at liberty to do random terrorism just like in Operation Gladio of yesteryear; given leeway to settle petty scores among themselves in their competition to grow and prosper – say on cornering the opium, weapon, theology, or terror markets; even encouraged to serve the local political bosses and domestic intelligence apparatuses for the opportunities to corrupt and co-opt that it presents; while major catastrophic terror acts being centrally planned, coordinated, and rehearsed in compartmentalized teams for years to create the flawless executions seen in the many false-flag operations since 9/11, including 9/11.
  • The fact that “Saudi petro dollars” are only in proxy service to their masters’ voice is no state-secret.
Cut off the gardeners' resupply lines to the weeds, and the weeds will not only die their own natural death with no intelligence apparatuses and networks left to feed them, but that fate can then, finally, also be accelerated by some judicious use of “Roundup”, the weed killer!
The Saudi government itself which is often fingered by the useful idiots as the terrorists' principal godfather, is merely the prostitute of empire that is kept in power by empire as their own front-man controlling Islam's holiest sites. It is in fact empire's own sacred authority over the Muslims. By having the Saudis control Mecca and Medina, and by destroying all of Islam's archaeological vestiges from existence in the name of expansion and development, Saudi Arabia can be made an easy target of anger for Muslim masses whenever empire is ready to eject that surrogate. The public anger can easily be channeled to their expendable dogs when the time comes.
It is my sad and sorry prediction that this artificial country called Saudi Arabia which was diabolically engineered out of the grand chessboard of the twentieth century by the British Empire in collusion with its Anglo-American allies, will similarly be bombed to smithereens like Iraq sometimes in this twenty-first century --- to once again save the Muslims of the world from the Saudi-Salafi-Wahab tyranny. Just as Iraq was bombed to save the Iraqis from Saddam's tyranny! The oil control will simply pass over to new surrogates.
That is the twisted reality of the matter. It is called Hegelian Dialectic. And it relies principally upon the control of the public mind to engineer their consent. That requires full control of the narrative. But of course professors of political science, brilliant physicists, religious pontiffs, distinguished politicians, think-tankers, and other assorted opinion-makers who participate in controlling that narrative as stooges and assets of empire have never heard of it. Who is a witting stooge and who isn't is besides the point --- all who participate in echoing the core lies of empire work for it.
Identify the real enemy, and its real agenda, and the beleaguered nations of the world, especially Pakistan, Iran, the Middle Eastern nations along the “arc of crisis” in the “global zone of percolating violence” as drawn by Zbigniew Brzezinski, will have the first real opportunity to wage a genuine war on terror against the principal prime-movers of global terror.
But keep deflecting attention to the surrogates and to their barbaric bulldogs, and the distorted narrative alone will ensure that the disease will continue to be improperly diagnosed.
And hence, the proposed global dystopic treatment, the Global War on Terror with drone attacks, police-states, and military invasions, as the World War IV replacement of the Cold War, will be kept going by public consent for a generation and preferably longer.
Is this rocket science?
Nay, it is only political science! The most difficult science of them all. It is neither taught in schools, nor in universities, and obviously never in the work-force. Its burden is made most onerous for those rare prophets who might dare to teach it to those few who would pay heed. George Bernard Shaw, the most insightful playwright that tiny Anglo-Saxon island of worldwide usurpation has ever produced, perceptively observed of its weight in the Preface of his 1921 book of plays, Back To Methuselah:
“[The] hard fact being that we must not teach political science or citizenship at school. The schoolmaster who attempted it would soon find himself penniless in the streets without pupils, if not in the dock pleading to a pompously worded indictment for sedition against the exploiters. Our schools teach the morality of feudalism corrupted by commercialism, and hold up the military conqueror, the robber baron, and the profiteer, as models of the illustrious and the successful. In vain do the prophets who see through this imposture preach and teach a better gospel: the individuals whom they convert are doomed to pass away in a few years; and the new generations are dragged back in the schools to the morality of the fifteenth century, and think themselves Liberal when they are defending the ideas of Henry VII, and gentlemanly when they are opposing to them the ideas of Richard III. Thus the educated man is a greater nuisance than the uneducated one: indeed it is the inefficiency and sham of the educational side of our schools (to which, except under compulsion, children would not be sent by their parents at all if they did not act as prisons in which the immature are kept from worrying the mature) that save us from being dashed on the rocks of false doctrine instead of drifting down the midstream of mere ignorance. There is no way out through the schoolmaster.”
In our own 21st century too, as in the century of George Bernard Shaw, our well-intentioned men and women of science, arts and letters, the lauded savants, domain experts and Nobel laureates, all having advanced university degrees with “learned” and “expert” prominently stamped upon their forehead, display barely a nodding acquaintance with the subject of political science; and mostly only with its name. The few who do inevitably go to work for the Superman of empire. Their only god has always been power, and Mephistopheles, not truth, not compassion, and not concern for the lesser humanity despite oft rehearsed public relations in “humanist” terms. These are the vulgar propagandists, the pied pipers whom the rest of the super-educated useful idiots of modernity, the well-intentioned “likkha-parrha jahils”, hold sacred as if it was all revealed in the Sinai. Siding with the tales of the emperor is also always “legal” and mostly safe (so long as the emperor remains in power of course), often bringing with it the unbridled opportunities to profit, open doors, entry visas, social standing, the privilege to flatter one's ego, and the gratification to carry the white man's burden. All of which easily blur any remaining distinction between ideological mercenaries, and mere pimps and prostitutes, useful idiots, and Uncle Toms. Once the false narratives are uttered, it comes to make not even two straws worth of difference who is a propagandist by malevolent creed, who by opportunism, who by ignorance, and who by psychological dispensation.
All these brilliant savants of modernity, both man and Superman, the perennial breed in every society who hold the pens, lead its rocket science, and make its public's mind, have been educated to the point that adding two plus two correctly is their most dreaded pons asinorum, taxing both their mind and their consciences so feverishly that it is never to be crossed publicly.
George Bernard Shaw couldn't have spoken a more truer half-sentence in his entire half-century of most perceptive and progressive writings than this one: “Thus the educated man is a greater nuisance than the uneducated one: indeed it is the inefficiency and sham of the educational side of our schools ... that save us from being dashed on the rocks of false doctrine instead of drifting down the midstream of mere ignorance.”
The remaining half-sentence this sanguine bedrock of moral sanity left unstated, perhaps only due to some polite consideration for the British empire then on the wane, and not due to being victim of the schoolmasters he lamented: the description of the empirical Superman who already exists. That brilliant Social Darwinian among the Neo-Darwinians, infested with extreme predatory instincts and extreme pathological evil, who replaced God after Nietzsche killed Him in the name of giving birth to the immanent Superman of the future! Instead, Shaw, just as immoderately as the Neo-Darwinians, misattributed the mayhem that he was witnessing in the aftermath of World War I: “At the present moment one half of Europe, having knocked the other half down, is trying to kick it to death, and may succeed: a procedure which is, logically, sound Neo-Darwinism.” to the rule of the infirm: “Government and exploitation become synonymous under such circumstances; and the world is finally ruled by the childish, the brigands, and the blackguards.” (Ibid.) That is perhaps only three-quarters truth, or half-truth, and not the whole truth.
The world was then, as it is today, from behind the scenes of the idiocy of political governments, ruled firmly by the rational and calculated primacy instincts of the most brilliant Superman who continually divine wars, and World Wars, now we are up to World War IV, as the means of crisis creation to piece-meal remake World Order in their own image.
In fact, the educated man controlling the narrative as the avant-garde in intellectual thought, not only remains a greater nuisance than the uneducated one, he also becomes the vile propagandist by adopting silence about truth that is to be protected from the masses. The British novelist and essayist Aldous Huxley most insightfully understood this about distortions fashioned by omissions and its practical utility in influencing public behavior. Huxley observed in the Preface of his 1931 book of fable, Brave New World, which depicted a eugenist dystopia controlled by ubermensch forces from behind the scenes that the rest of society remained unaware of:
'The greatest triumphs of propaganda have been accomplished, not by doing something, but by refraining from doing. Great is truth, but still greater, from a practical point of view, is silence about truth. By simply not mentioning certain subjects, by lowering what Mr. Churchill calls an “iron curtain” between the masses and such facts or arguments as the local political bosses regard as undesirable, totalitarian propagandists have influenced opinion much more effectively than they could have done by the most eloquent denunciations, the most compelling of logical rebuttals.'
In a talk given to the students at the University of California, Berkeley, on the thirtieth anniversary of the publication of the Brave New World, Aldous Huxley observed of the very real and empirical role of these behind the scenes forces depicted in his fable, in channeling the public mind that is already most carefully primed by Shaw's schoolmaster for celebrating ignorance, into complete voluntary surrender to the Superman:
'You can do everything with bayonets except sit on them! If you are going to control any population for any length of time you must have some measure of consent. It's exceedingly difficult to see how pure terrorism can function indefinitely. It can function for a fairly long time, but I think sooner or later you have to bring in an element of persuasion. An element of getting people to consent to what is happening to them. Well, it seems to me that the nature of the Ultimate Revolution with which we are now faced is precisely this: that we are in process of developing a whole series of techniques which will enable the controlling oligarchy who have always existed and presumably always will exist, to get people actually to love their servitude! This is the, it seems to me the ultimate in malevolent revolution shall we say.'
We see precisely that reality unfurl today. Shaw's educated childish fools impervious to political science, and brigands and blackguards, controlled by Huxley's oligarchic forces from behind the scenes, attempting to persuade the public mind to accept Alice in Wonderland absurdities as fact.
We even observe how willingly the world public traveling through American airports surrender themselves to grotesque indignities in physical searches to keep them safe from Ali Baba. The only truly global superpower in the history of earth's civilizations, which Zbigniew Brzezinski in his 1996 Mein Kampf, The Grand Chessboard – American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives, characterized as: “America is not only the first, as well as the only, truly global superpower, but it is also likely to be the very last.” (pg. 209), has been reduced to a police-state with virtually its own public's consent.
All on the mere fable that Ali Baba wielding some antediluvian and distorted dogmas from the stone-age propagandistically titled “militant Islam”, is a ubiquitous threat to their well-being! Pakistan is daily bombed by drones based on that very same fable. The world is rapidly being reduced to a global police-state based on that same fable.
Who is feeding this antediluvian insurgent army of Pakistan these putrid dogmas of “militant Islam” which fatally prescribe “God is on your side” to the insurgents who have been diabolically motivated and skillfully trained to fight for “their cause” with such verve that they can take on the entire state apparatus from Pakistan to Syria reducing them to banana republics.
We gain enormous insights by seeing who was behind it in the yesteryear to create a similar American Surrogate Army, then disguised in the Afghani shalwar-kameez uniform, to initially wage covert warfare upon the then Soviet Union to provoke the Soviet Intervention, and subsequently openly with what was then known as “jihadi Islam”.
We are even made wiser if we can learn to relate the past to the present – for covert actually means to keep who's behind it secret while it is ongoing, and to Machiavellianly wrap it in “Plausible Deniability”. That term of deceit, signed into an Executive Order NSC 10/2 which directed the CIA upon its very founding to conduct “covert” rather than merely “psychological” operations, is explained in my essay: Anatomy of Conspiracy Theory.
Here is how covert warfare empirically works – it relies on deception and covert means. It was admitted to by empire's own grand architect, Dr. Zbigniew Brzezinski, ex post facto. The following is reproduced from my 2011 essay: Islam and Knowledge vs. Socialization.
Zbigniew Brzezinski: 'God is on your side'The Muslim mind, harboring mostly a facile view of its religion all throughout history, and remaining quite ignorant of its interplay with imperial matters in every epoch, was harvested once again in today's epoch for a primacy agenda with nothing but snake oil, the “jihadi Islam”. This time around by Zbigniew Brzezinski for “giving to the USSR its Vietnam War” in Afghanistan 1979-1988 by creating the “Mujahideens”. It is worth reproducing here Zbigniew Brzezinski's 1998 interview to French magazine Le Nouvel Observateur for his own confessions of the utility of promulgating facile world views to accomplish this:
'Question: The former director of the CIA, Robert Gates, stated in his memoirs [“From the Shadows”], that American intelligence services began to aid the Mujahadeen in Afghanistan 6 months before the Soviet intervention. In this period you were the national security adviser to President Carter. You therefore played a role in this affair. Is that correct?
Brzezinski: Yes. According to the official version of history, CIA aid to the Mujahadeen began during 1980, that is to say, after the Soviet army invaded Afghanistan, 24 Dec 1979. But the reality, secretly guarded until now, is completely otherwise Indeed, it was July 3, 1979 that President Carter signed the first directive for secret aid to the opponents of the pro-Soviet regime in Kabul. And that very day, I wrote a note to the president in which I explained to him that in my opinion this aid was going to induce a Soviet military intervention.
Question: Despite this risk, you were an advocate of this covert action. But perhaps you yourself desired this Soviet entry into war and looked to provoke it?
Brzezinski: It isn't quite that. We didn't push the Russians to intervene, but we knowingly increased the probability that they would.
Question: When the Soviets justified their intervention by asserting that they intended to fight against a secret involvement of the United States in Afghanistan, people didn't believe them. However, there was a basis of truth. You don't regret anything today?
Brzezinski: Regret what? That secret operation was an excellent idea. It had the effect of drawing the Russians into the Afghan trap and you want me to regret it? The day that the Soviets officially crossed the border, I wrote to President Carter. We now have the opportunity of giving to the USSR its Vietnam war. Indeed, for almost 10 years, Moscow had to carry on a war unsupportable by the government, a conflict that brought about the demoralization and finally the breakup of the Soviet empire.
Question: And neither do you regret having supported the Islamic fundamentalism, having given arms and advice to future terrorists?
Brzezinski: What is most important to the history of the world? The Taliban or the collapse of the Soviet empire? Some stirred-up Moslems or the liberation of Central Europe and the end of the cold war?
Question: Some stirred-up Moslems? But it has been said and repeated Islamic fundamentalism represents a world menace today.
Brzezinski: Nonsense! It is said that the West had a global policy in regard to Islam. That is stupid. There isn't a global Islam. Look at Islam in a rational manner and without demagoguery or emotion. It is the leading religion of the world with 1.5 billion followers. But what is there in common among Saudi Arabian fundamentalism, moderate Morocco, Pakistan militarism, Egyptian pro-Western or Central Asian secularism? Nothing more than what unites the Christian countries.' (source Global Research)
It is also worth reproducing here how Brzezinski fashioned these “Some stirred-up Moslems”:
News voice over 1980: “US National Security Advisor Brzezinski flew to Pakistan to set about rallying resistance. He wanted to arm the Mujahideen without revealing America's role. On the Afghan border near the Khayber Pass, he urged the Soldiers of God to redouble their efforts”
Brzezinski 1980: “We know of their deep belief in God, and we are confident that their struggle will succeed. That land over there, is yours, you'll go back to it one day, because your fight will prevail, and you'll have your homes and your mosques back again; because your cause is right; God is on your side.” [enthusiastic clapping by the future 'Mujahideens']
Brzezinski in the studio speaking to the interviewer: “The purpose of coordinating with the Pakistanis will be to make the Soviets bleed, for as much, as long, as possible.” (transcription is mine from the documentary video clip)
The mass ignorance and the facile world views that lay behind “their deep belief in god” among the Muslims was devilishly harvested with “god is on your side” to leave the Muslim civilization of Afghanistan into dust, and to set the stage for the future disintegration of Pakistan, with nothing but “Some stirred-up Moslems”!
It is the same fundamental lack of wherewithal today among the Muslims which is also enabling the same grandmasters to wage the perpetual 'Global War on Terror' upon the world as the age-old pretext for “imperial mobilization” on The Grand Chessboard. The enemy in yesteryear was crafted as Communism. The enemy today is crafted as Militant Islam. The new Surrogate Army wields “militant Islam” as its “doctrinal motivation” just as the previous Surrogate Army wielded “jihadi Islam” as its “doctrinal motivation” (see Hijacking the word 'Islam' for Mantra Creation).
That method of covert warfare through Surrogate Armies is now redeployed to light the “arc of crisis” in the “Global Zone of Percolating Violence” presaged by the diabolical Zbigniew Brzezinski in the map that he drew on page 53 of The Grand Chessboard.
To not recognize this method of warfare as such by the victim nations, especially Pakistan whose military intelligence apparatuses played the leading role in providing proxy services to the United States for waging that Surrogate Warfare upon the Soviet Union, can only mean that those in a position to recognize it for what it is, and those with an iota of intelligence to recognize it for what it is, and do not do so, are part and parcel of that Surrogate Army themselves! They are traitors to the nation.
How can one prove to the rest of the naïve public of what I so strenuously labor herein with every ounce of energy and intellect that I can muster, that the 'Global War on Terror' is a fairytale, a fiction, a Goebbellian big lie, and that “Bin Laden and his legions of Al-Qaeda and Taliban” are no more than “Ali Baba and Fourty Thieves”, fables and fodder, for the Imperial Surrogate Armies which march along the “arc of crisis” to empire's Geostrategic Imperatives alone? I already answered that question most straightforwardly back in 2008, when Ali Baba had decided to invade Mumbai and I immediately sensed another false-flag operation was underway just as quickly as I had sensed it for 9/11 while, once again, the rest of the narrators of empire were all singing the well-rehearsed Alice in Wonderland song of “militant Islam”:
'The same way that any sound judge in a court room would – especially one like Robert Jackson at Nuremberg! Short of that – and it was a victor's justice, nothing more – well-intentioned peoples must endeavor to at least learn the truth stripped of its complex psyops, even if they remain afraid of articulating what they learn out loud. At least, they will knowingly not spew garbage, or create disinformation, or cultivate red herrings, as this 'champion of justice and humanity' recently did: “Rebuttal to Paul Craig Roberts': 'Washington Arrogance has Fomented a Muslim Revolution'”. There are tens of thousands of 'Paul Craig Roberts' in Pakistan, as elsewhere, beginning with Pakistan's own co-opted ruling elite, down to its 'enlightened-moderated' newsmedia, NGOs, academics, industrialists, et. al. Paul Craig Roberts was gentle enough to only bestow upon me the honorific “you are a completely stupid fool, a disgrace to humanity” when I called him on his disinformation. I actually carry that invective with much pride and it is the only honor I have received thus far from the hectoring hegemons, apart from their visit to my home in 2003! Other benedictions may not be so merciful. For the mercenaries among them deliberately subverting our nations in perpetuating this fiction of 'war on terror' – be it America, Pakistan, India, and every other – there is the hangman's noose to look forward to.'
Those unable to call a spade a spade who continue to control the narrative by echoing the empire's core lies, are the first cause of evil from which all the rest of the evils of war naturally follow. These vulgar propagandists are no ordinary evil-doers. They are supreme evil-doers differing from all other evil-doers in that their core lies contain within itself the accumulated evil of the whole. Refer to a similar statement made by Robert Jackson at Nuremberg for defining the supreme international crime. It is these controllers outside Plato's cave who must be unmasked and neutered first. Without their control of the narrative, the public mind simply cannot be engineered to agree upon the synthetic reality of “militant Islam”.
Authors, media commentators, politicians and academics spinning reports of terrorism without tracing the source of terror back to the primary forces of imperial mobilization, forces which directly benefit from the existence of these “insurgents” who continually lend more and more shocking pretexts for empire's ongoing “counter-insurgency” operations both directly, and through their state surrogates worldwide, as the global war on terror, are just as guilty of propaganda warfare as Goebbels and his surrogates. Their fate is captured in these photographs:
'Don't Be Afraid'
Nazi propaganda chief Joseph Goebbels with his six children Image source Der Spiegel
Magda Goebbels poses with her children Image source Der Spiegel
The Goebbels' innocent children paying the ultimate price Image source Der Spiegel
Caption The Goebbels family --- the fate of vulgar propagandists and those who innocently perish with them --- evidently, only defeat or victory adjudicates who is a propagandist and who isn't, not evidence. Hitler had asserted at the eve of World War II from his mountain top in Bavaria to his generals that he would 'give a propagandist reason for starting the war' and admonished them not to 'mind whether it was plausible or not'. 'The victor', he had told them, 'will not be asked afterward whether he told the truth or not. In starting and waging a war it is not the right that matters, but victory.' (William Shirer, Rise and Fall of the Third Reich) That unexpected “victory” of hubris, unassailable hubris, eventually caught up with the propagandists when Robert H. Jackson made the conclusive case for hanging the Nazi leadership along with the verbiage-only Nazi Scholar, Alfred Rosenberg, as war criminals and for crimes against humanity amidst their most eloquent protestations that they did not know what Hitler had been up to: 'The plans of Adolf Hitler for aggression were just as secret as Mein Kampf, of which over six million copies were published in Germany.' (Nuremberg)
“May 1, 1945, in the evening. The daughters and the son were already in bed, but were not asleep yet. "Don't be afraid," their mother said. "The doctor is going to give you a shot now, one that all children and soldiers are getting." She left the room, and Kunz injected the morphine, "first into the two older girls, then the boy and then the other girls." Each child received a dose of 0.5 cc. It "took eight to 10 minutes."
When the children had fallen asleep, Magda Goebbels went into the room, the cyanide pills in her hand, as Kunz testified. She returned a few seconds later, weeping and distraught. "Doctor, I can't do it, you have to do it," she said. The dentist replied: "I can't do it either." "Then get Dr. Stumpfegger," she said. Ludwig Stumpfegger, who was slightly younger than Kunz, had been one of SS chief Heinrich Himmler's personal doctors.
A week later, Russian coroners performed autopsies on the bodies of the children and concluded that their deaths had "occurred as a result of poisoning with cyanide compounds." The Goebbels themselves had committed suicide outside the bunker, and Stumpfegger died while attempting to break through the Russian lines in Berlin.” — Source Der Spiegel
Thank you.

References For Further Study

10th Anniversary of Benazir Bhutto's Assassination

Pakistan on the chopping block in 2018?

The long running 'strategy of tension' coming to fruition in Pakistan

“it is folly to be America's enemy, it can be fatal to be its friend.” --- Henry Kissinger

Friday, December 29, 2017
Last updated Sunday, January 14, 2018 10:00 pm
Zahir Ebrahim

Caption Making the Public Mind:  Report on the Mighty Wurlitzer - Architecture of Modern Propaganda for Psychological Warfare
'The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country. We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of.'
If you actually read this far, you are surely the curious type who'd also like to understand in much greater depth the mechanics of how the 'strategy of tension' interplays with propaganda warfare and psychological operations, the necessity of manufacturing the boogeyman of Bin Laden and Al-qaeeda, loose nukes et. al. in its latest variants, alongside the manufactured terror, the bomb blasts, the assassinations, the frequent dharnas, the rising debt burden, the looming economic collapse, the hard crisis upon hard crisis with the concomitant perception management that cunningly installs desired beliefs which make the public mind to accept preplanned policies as solutions to these crises, in Report on Mighty Wurlitzer (
If you can perceptively understand that modus operandi, then no news media, no learned pundit who graces your television screen 24x7, no politician, no academic, no philosopher, no propagandist, no molvi, no ayatollah, no president and no prime minister can make your mind as easily as they do today as vassals and stooges of the Mighty Wurlitzer, to get you to react in the aggregate to manufactured crises as predicted by game theory, the cornerstone of modern mass behavior control.
Even after ten years of Benazir Bhutto's assassination, not just Pakistan's news media, but the world's news media, continues to play variations on the same tunes of the Mighty Wurlitzer.
Under president Trump's administration, the United States of America appears to be taking all the antagonistic steps against both Iran and Pakistan to make the Wakeup call of 2007 even more pertinent as the world enters 2018. Unfortunately, neither nation can still make an effective self-defense (despite all their bravado that is more reminiscent of Sadaam Hussein before the first Tomahawk cruise missiles hit the ancient land of Mesopotamia). The establishment leaders, intellectuals, politicians and opinion-makers in both nations, alongside the rest of the world, still continue to “United We Stand” with the base fiction of “War on Terror” of the United States. Neither has the courage to publicly recognize and call this fiction for what it is, albeit, most wise people in both nations well understand the calculus of hegemony and primacy which underwrites it.
Well, as in love, timeliness in war can make the difference between win and lose. Perhaps it is already too late to throw the tea overboard for Pakistan! The nation has been completely destroyed from within over the past two decades of alternately raining American made military dictatorship and American made mercenary democracy upon it, before the first American missiles and American boots will ever land on its sacred soil to “save” it from the “terrorists”.
But then, just as Patrick Henry tried to rile up the elites of the distant American colonies with his now famous clarion call to free them from the imperial jackboot stamped upon their face, perhaps the same holds true for all who are vigilant, active, brave, in any nation:
“Besides, sir, we shall not fight our battles alone. There is a just God who presides over the destinies of nations, and who will raise up friends to fight our battles for us. The battle, sir, is not to the strong alone; it is to the vigilant, the active, the brave.” --- Patrick Henry, March 23, 1775
As Muslims, our belief in God helping us when we help ourselves is much stronger – or so we like to tell each other. Our tragedy however, is that we are overrun with great belief without the courage of our convictions! And we also don't have Patrick Henrys to lead us into battle.
Sadly, instead, “her shaaq per ulloo bhaitha hai” (an owl is perched on every branch --- the nation is overrun with fools and useful idiots in all corridors of power, when they are not outright mercenaries that is).
Will the existential crisis facing Pakistan in 2018 and beyond, thanks only partly to being America's best friend all these years, the rest is surely our own misery, motivate a transformation away from that ugly Zeitgeist of always being a pliant vassal state of great powers du jour?
The foundational question for Pakistan from which all good and evil naturally follow is really this: will its leaders, its politicians, its intellectuals, and its establishment ever find the courage to stop being house niggers of the massa?
That revolution of the mind I see is slowly already in the making! It is being driven bottom up by the clergy class, being led primarily by the revolutionary Iran trained Shia Muslim clergy on the one hand who wish to emulate the Islamic revolution in Iran, and a new Sunni Barelvi revolutionary movement called “Labaik Ya Rasool-Allah” on the other which is being led by a most unusual cleric on wheelchair who wishes to bring back the glory days of thirteen centuries of Sunni Muslim rule. Both groups claim to want to enact the original teachings of the Prophet of Islam, as they each perceive it through their respective sectarian epistemology, and both have started very dynamic national movements to influence the masses. The Iran trained revolutionary Shia leadership however has refrained from entering the political theatre and instead chosen to concentrate on mass education and raising social awareness; to raise a new generation of Shia madrassa-trained Muslim men and women who shall become the backbone of the future Shia revolution in Pakistan to usher in Iranian style “nizam-e-vilayat” as a dominion of the global “valih-e-faqih”. There are several other groups as well but not worth mentioning, including militant antediluvian groups turned “respectable”, and dogmatic religious factions among both Shia and Sunni that have long been politically active and almost always self-servingly aligned with the status quo, whose rather lack lustre clergy profess the same ambitions but thus far have commanded little traction nationally; quite unlike the first two revolutionary movements whose rise to national prominence is a recent phenomenon. These new crop of revolutionary Shia and Barelvi religious leaders display an uncannily high level of learnedness of ancient texts of Islam, the Holy Qur'an, and intriguingly, also obscure verses in Persian language of “Sir” Allama Muhammad Iqbal (the national poet laureate and intellectual father of Pakistan), all of which they deploy liberally in their rhetoric for social transformation of Pakistan back to “real Islam”, alongside claims of throwing the tea overboard the moment they come to power.
However, there appears to be no indication of any awakening from the plague of occidentosis (Westoxification) among the so called liberal class, the educated class, the professional class, the business class, the praetorian guard class which includes feudals of all shades, and the rank and file class. Among the latter class, the vast majority of the indigent public in both urban and rural areas, largely because of deprivation, lack of opportunity, daily struggle for subsistence existence, and occupying marginalized stratas of society, appear to be increasingly attracted to the new revolutionary clergy class as the ones possessing the panacea for ending the servitude and misery forced upon them by the ruling class.
How long will the metanoia take to trickle up to the actual ruling class who run the country?
This ruling class of ours, nay, the ruling class in virtually all Muslim dominant nations (with the exception of Iran), willingly carry the white man's burden as the obedient Uncle and Aunty Thomases, are amply rewarded for their servitude with permission to loot and plunder the public exchequer in line with the overarching objectives of the massa, will simply have to be replaced forcibly.... and that cannot happen without an actual physical organic revolution in Pakistan. Of this, there are no signs whatsoever as of this writing in 2018. Indeed, there can be no 19th and 20th century style revolutions in Pakistan, not even like revolutionary Iran, because Pakistan is not a homogeneous nation. The seeds of division are too deep and too broad spectrum, and the public mind is too indolent. The rising new Sunni Barelvi leadership wearing the revolutionary mantle, different from the revolutionary Shia leadership, is attempting to rather Pollyannaishly, peaceably replace the ruling class with themselves through the ballot box of 2018. If this new revolutionary clergy class comes to significant parliamentary power, at least they promise to strive to dump the tea overboard. However, what will happen to the already fractious Pakistani society under their dogmatic sectarian stewardship is anybody's guess. Thus far, they have defined themselves mainly in terms of their foreign and domestic enemies, including corruption of the Pakistani elites and other Muslim sects they do not approve of. They have not mentioned at all how they plan to address the very real domestic challenges facing Pakistan's population after they have wiped out all their enemies from the face of the planet.
Neither the Shia nor the Sunni revolutionary thinking on display in Pakistan by their respective clergy class appear to have any solutions for living in modernity except to bring back antiquity. Perhaps they haven't had the time to develop their post-antiquity ideology, think of manifestos and constitutions for a country like Pakistan with its deep divisions and fracture lines, by which their plan for Pakistan can be adjudicated beyond their pious claims against their enemies.
The vacuum in integrity and honesty in the corridors of power has opened the leadership doors wide open for alternatives to step in, including the clergy class. Since Pakistani clergy class has never tasted unfettered political power or national responsibility, nor experienced developmental and population challenges at a national scale, nor do they brook any familiarity with the actual mechanics of modern statecraft and its relation to international institutions and global politics, their competency to run a modern nation-state beyond their recitation of ancient Prophetic wisdoms and Caliphatic history of conquests, would only be determined on the job. If the Iranian clergy can learn on the job to run a theological state and continue to survive American sanctions and American-sponsored wars, the Pakistani clergy surely may have rational claims to a modern precedent, except that Pakistan is not Iran, and Pakistanis are not Persian! But Pakistan is also a nuclear state. There will always be greater urgency to confront Pakistan and de-nuke it if any revolutionary clergy class of Pakistan, Shia and Sunni, ever comes to power. In its calculus of primacy and hegemony, the white man's burden simply cannot tolerate any Muslim nation possessing real nuclear weapons (as opposed to tolerating the illusion of possession). The massa class well understands all that they have destroyed and stolen of the Muslims in the centuries past and cannot risk losing Western hegemony and its vassal states to a revival of “revolutionary Islam” with teeth. This means that when military-style injection of its forces is not being staged, even more strangulating sanctions and psychological warfare can be expected than weathered by revolutionary Iran before it was forced to give up (or roll back) its nuclear program under the 2015 JCPOA agreement with world powers for the promise of economic relief.
Where Pakistanis have survived American-sponsored military dictatorships, American-sponsored political graftmanships, American-sponsored inept leadership, and American-sponsored enlightened moderation, the divine state will surely survive the clerics as well, American-sponsored and not.
There is evidently a deep secret to the very existence of Pakistan --- and anyone given to even a modicum of metaphysical reflection can easily believe that this secret hasn't been revealed (or uncovered) as yet.
I support anyone and any system that can a) deliver the nation from servitude; and b) give justice and fairness to its public. The rest we can do ourselves. We are a hard working industrious people, we don't need foreign hand-outs, and we don't need big-brother hand-holding. Let us live in dignity and self-respect among nations, give us fairness and justice domestically, stop the elite from looting the exchequer and living their privilege at the expense of the public, and we shall show the world what it means to throw tea overboard once again.
And that, as the cynic would say, is the greatest of all platitudes!
Thank you.

Further Reading

Report Published Friday, December 29, 2017
Report Last Updated Saturday, March 3, 2018 08:00 pm 138654
PDF Generated on Saturday, March 3, 2018 at 08:00 pm Pages: 370 Words: 139031

Back to Table of Contents

Epilogue: 10th Anniversary of Benazir Bhutto's Assassination 370/370 Pakistan on the chopping block in 2018?

Full Copyright Notice

All material copyright (c) Project HumanbeingsfirstTM, with full permission to copy, repost, and reprint, in its entirety, unmodified, for any purpose, granted, provided the full URL sentence and the copyright notice contained within each Document are also reproduced verbatim as part of this license, along with any embedded links within its main text, and not doing so may be subject to copyright license violation infringement claims pursuant to remedies noted at All figures, images, quotations, and excerpts are used without permission based on non-profit "fair-use" for personal education and research use only in the greater public interest. The usage is minimally consistent with the understanding of laws noted at In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 of US Copyright Laws, you are provided the material from Project Humanbeingsfirst upon your request, and taking any action that delivers you any of its documents in any form is considered making a specific request to receive the documents for your own personal educational and/or research use. You are directly responsible for seeking the requisite permissions from other copyright holders for any use beyond “fair use”. Exclusion: All rights are expressly reserved for the usage of the terms (c) HumanbeingsfirstTM and (c) HumanbeingfirstTM which are the copyrighted and trademarked intellectual property of Project HumanbeingsfirstTM. Reproduction Note: It is acceptable to reproduce any document in smaller serialized parts provided the full URL sentence and the copyright notice within each document are also reproduced in each part and the entire document is reproduced. Please read

Caveat Emptor

Please be advised that Project HumanbeingsfirstTM fully cooperates with all law enforcement and other governmental agencies worldwide in rooting out Terrorism in all its nuanced shades and stripes in order to end its Neanderthal reign of terror upon all who are human beings first. Project Humanbeingsfirst does not distinguish between terrorists clad in turbans and those wearing suits, nor between the predatory rampages of the pirates vs. the emperors, albeit each is apportioned the measure of crime and guilt commensurate to their respective station of power and impact on their victims. Law enforcement personnel worldwide, but especially in the United States and the West, are encouraged to participate with Project Humanbeingsfirst. It is essential for all nations' state security apparatus to learn how to forensically identify the monumental supreme terrorists hiding in plain sight among us under legal cover, the real merchants of death, while they dutifully chase down the easy to spot handful of often deliberately manufactured pirates at sea.