Project Humanbeingsfirst: Undoing the Theft of Palestine

Undoing the Theft of Palestine

Undoing The Theft Of Palestine - From Genocide to Genesis in Zero Compromise

Download PDF (3.0 MB 340 pages 8.5x11 Letter paper - please print a hardcopy for a friend, and also give one to a Zionist)

SKIP TO TABLE OF CONTENTS

Undoing
The Theft Of
Palestine

October 2013

Zahir Ebrahim
Project Humanbeingsfirst.org

Undoing The Theft Of Palestine -
From Genocide to Genesis in Zero Compromise

Copyright Notice

For non-profit Gratis Distribution Only under Fair-Use Doctrine

Words: 126085 | Pages: 340 | Printed on September 25, 2015 12:00 am

Published by Project Humanbeingsfirst^TM

First Edition

First Printing October 16, 2013

Eid ul Adha, 10 Zilhaj, Muslim year 1434 A.H.

Second Printing with Afterword September 25, 2015

Eid ul Adha, 10 Zilhaj, Muslim year 1436 A.H.

Fourteen centuries of Islam and still under Occupation

Tomorrow under World Government

DOWNLOAD PDF

PDF: http://sites.google.com/site/humanbeingsfirst/download-pdf/pamphlet-undoing-the-theft-of-palestine-zahirebrahim.pdf

Short URL: http://tinyurl.com/Undoing-The-Theft-of-Palestine

Website: http://one-palestine.blogspot.com/

Copyright © Zahir Ebrahim. Full permission to copy, repost, and reprint, in its entirety, unmodified and unedited, for any purpose, in any reproduction medium, granted, provided the PDF URL above and this copyright notice are also reproduced verbatim as part of this license, and not doing so may be subject to copyright license violation infringement claims pursuant to remedies noted at http://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap5.html. All images, quotations and excerpts are based on non-profit “fair-use” for personal education and research in the public interest consistent with the understanding of laws noted at http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html. Partial replication or dissemination of this book with any page omitted is an infringement. Any use beyond non-profit fair-use requires written consent from all copyright holders. Verbatim reproduction license and non-profit fair-use of copyrighted material noted at http://Humanbeingsfirst.org/#Copyright.

This book is typeset in StarOffice and OpenOffice.

From Genocide to Genesis in Zero Compromise

“This country exists as the fulfillment of a promise made by God Himself. It would be ridiculous to ask it to account for its legitimacy”.

Golda Meir,
Le Monde, 15 October 1971.

The
Zahir Ebrahim
Palestine
Reader

About Zahir Ebrahim

The author, a justice activist, formerly a Silicon Valley systems architect (see engineering patents at http://tinyurl.com/zahir-patents ), founded Project Humanbeingsfirst.org in the aftermath of 9/11. He was, mercifully, most imperfectly educated in the United States of America, which might explain how he escaped the fate of “likkha-parrha-jahils” mass produced from its vast manufacturing consent complex with all his neurons still intact, and still firing on all cylinders. Bio at http://zahirebrahim.org ; Email: humanbeingsfirst@gmail.com ; Verbatim reproduction license at Project website http://humanbeingsfirst.org#Copyright .

'If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.'

Sun Tzu, The Art of War

“Dear Lord Rothschild, 'His Majesty's Government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavor to facilitate the achievement of this object. it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country.'”

Balfour Declaration,
Foreign Office, November 2nd, 1917.

“Two brief remarks: In the first place, if anyone objects that this point of view is immoral, I answer: It is not true; either Zionism is moral and just or it is immoral and unjust. But that is a question that we should have settled before we became Zionists. Actually we have settled that question, and in the affirmative. We hold that Zionism is moral and just. And since it is moral and just, justice must be done, no matter whether Joseph or Simon or Ivan or Achmet agree with it or not. There is no other morality.”

Vladimir Jabotinsky,
“The Iron Wall”, 1923

“This colonization can, therefore, continue and develop only under the protection of a force independent of the local population – an iron wall which the native population cannot break through.”

Vladimir Jabotinsky,
“The Iron Wall”, 1923

“The state of Israel founded in 1948 following a war which the Israelis call the War of Independence, and the Palestinians call the Nakba – the catastrophe. A haunted, persecuted people sought to find a shelter and a state for itself, and did so at a horrible price to another people.

During the war of 1948, more than half of the Palestinian population at the time – 1,380,000 people – were driven off their homeland by the Israeli army.

Though Israel officially claimed that a majority of refugees fled and were not expelled, it still refused to allow them to return, as a UN resolution demanded shortly after 1948 war.

Thus, the Israeli land was obtained through ethnic cleansing of the indigenous Palestinian inhabitants.

This is not a process unfamiliar in history. Israel's actions remain incomparable to the massive ethnic cleansing of Native Americans by the settlers and government of the United states.

Had Israel stopped there, in 1948, I could probably live with it.

As an Israeli, I grew up believing that this primal sin our state was founded on may be forgiven one day, because the founder's generation was driven by the faith that this was the only way to save the Jewish people from the danger of another holocaust.”

Tanya Reinhart,
“Israel/Palestine – How to End the War of 1948”

“If I were an Arab leader, I would never sign an agreement with Israel. It is normal; we have taken their country. It is true God promised it to us, but how could that interest them? Our God is not theirs. There has been Anti-Semitism, the Nazis, Hitler, Auschwitz, but was that their fault? They see but one thing: we have come and we have stolen their country. Why would they accept that?”

David Ben-Gurion,
“The Jewish Paradox”

Table of Contents

	The Brilliant Architecture Behind The Theft Of Palestine
I	Palestine: The Illusion of Power and the Calculus of Dispossession	17
	The Architecture Of An Effective Anti-Colonial Struggle
II	Preamble to Palestine: The Struggle Forward - From Genocide to ReGenesis in ZERO Compromise	41
III	Palestine: The Struggle Forward	64
	The Architecture Of Pious Sell Out
IV	Rescuing A Failed Struggle From Its Narratives	99
V	The endless trail of red herrings	118
VI	Open Letter of Inquiry on Israel-Palestine Part-One: The fine art of academic scholarship for Zion	162
VII	Open Letter of Inquiry on Israel-Palestine Part-Two: Zion and the poor American Academic	212
	The Architecture Of Endless BS Narratives
VIII	My experiments in confusion – Part-1: How many Jews does it take to confuse me?	245
IX	The BDS Red Herring	257
X	The Language of Zionism	262
	The Invisible Architects Behind The Theft Of Palestine
XI	My experiments in confusion - Part-2: The invisible House of Rothschild	271
XII	My experiments in confusion - Part-3: The Omnipotent Rothschilds	286
XIII	Editorial: Some Dare Call It Conspiracy	306
	Afterword: Self-Policing the Palestinian Struggle	326
	Epilogue	331

Epilogue

We now understand who the colonizers are,
and who their assets are –
What “Israel's right to exist”
in Palestine?

That's like asserting British Empire's right to exist in the Indian subcontinent!

As the century long Indian war of liberation against the British East India Company demonstrated, the cultivation of House Niggers and planting of Trojan Horses is most effective in maintaining colonization.

Friends and Enemies:
The Struggle for Liberation of Palestine from World Zionist Jewry Has Only Just Begun

The invisible force that protects the “Iron Wall” of colonization is made Visible

The struggle is made effective only when the common prime-mover force behind Zionistan and World Government is recognized as ONE and the SAME!

We now know the enemy and also know ourselves, and we need not fear the result of a hundred battles

From Genocide to
(Re)Genesis in Zero Compromise

Not Onestate; One Palestine!

Homepage URL: http://humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/p/palestine.html

Undoing The Theft Of Palestine - From Genocide to Genesis in Zero Compromise

Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

Full Copyright Notice

All material copyright (c) Project Humanbeingsfirst^TM, with full permission to copy, repost, and reprint, in its entirety, unmodified, for any purpose, granted, provided the full URL sentence and the copyright notice contained within each Document are also reproduced verbatim as part of this license, along with any embedded links within its main text, and not doing so may be subject to copyright license violation infringement claims pursuant to remedies noted at http://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap5.html. All figures, images, quotations, and excerpts are used without permission based on non-profit "fair-use" for personal education and research use only in the greater public interest. The usage is minimally consistent with the understanding of laws noted at http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 of US Copyright Laws, you are provided the material from Project Humanbeingsfirst upon your request, and taking any action that delivers you any of its documents in any form is considered making a specific request to receive the documents for your own personal educational and/or research use. You are directly responsible for seeking the requisite permissions from other copyright holders for any use beyond “fair use”. Exclusion: All rights are expressly reserved for the usage of the terms (c) Humanbeingsfirst^TM and (c) Humanbeingfirst^TM which are the copyrighted and trademarked intellectual property of Project Humanbeingsfirst^TM. Reproduction Note: It is acceptable to reproduce any document in smaller serialized parts provided the full URL sentence and the copyright notice within each document are also reproduced in each part and the entire document is reproduced. Please read http://humanbeingsfirst.org/#Legal-Disclaimer-Notice.

Caveat Emptor

Please be advised that Project Humanbeingsfirst^TM fully cooperates with all law enforcement and other governmental agencies worldwide in rooting out Terrorism in all its nuanced shades and stripes in order to end its Neanderthal reign of terror upon all who are human beings first. Project Humanbeingsfirst does not distinguish between terrorists clad in turbans and those wearing suits, nor between the predatory rampages of the pirates vs. the emperors, albeit each is apportioned the measure of crime and guilt commensurate to their respective station of power and impact on their victims. Law enforcement personnel worldwide, but especially in the United States and the West, are encouraged to participate with Project Humanbeingsfirst. It is essential for all nations' state security apparatus to learn how to forensically identify the monumental supreme terrorists hiding in plain sight among us under legal cover, the real merchants of death, while they dutifully chase down the easy to spot handful of often deliberately manufactured pirates at sea.

Muslim Corner - The Occupied Mind

- As Muslims, we love wearing our religion upon our forehead. We are also perhaps the most ritualistic pious people on earth. Our mosques are full of heaven seekers. But when it comes to implementing the core meaningful constructs of the religion which transcend the rituals of piety, we are the proverbial empty drum – make a lot of noise. We love to carry the banner of "Islam" in our names, titles, institutions, national constitutions, etc. The non-Muslim not entirely taken in by our show of pious rituals would surely have noticed that more we use the word "Islamic" in our designations and affiliations, more we appear to please false gods while making all our pretenses to the One True God we proclaim to worship.

- Between being useful idiots and pleasing false gods, the choice is often straightforward for us Muslims. Do both. No outsider can tell the difference anyway. It has many advantages – for when caught, we can proclaim we were fooled, that we didn't know. Works great – on the one hand it serves the interests of the false gods du jour, on the other it protects us from retribution if ever the false gods change and new ones become our masters.

- Unlike Christians and Christianity, we have two completely separate words to designate the people who proclaim to follow the religion or are born into that culture (Muslims) vs. the divine religion (Islam). Any time you see one terminology aliasing for another, you might do well to remember that there is some axe to grind somewhere. Bernard Lewis is the venerable master of this obfuscation now being amiably carried by CAIR, when he began his treatise “Crisis of Islam – Holy War and Unholy Terror” with the following gem:

“It is difficult to generalize about Islam. To begin with, the word itself is commonly used with two related but distinct meanings, as the equivalents both of Christianity, and Christendom. In the one sense, it denotes a religion, as system of beliefs and worship; in the other, the civilization that grew up and flourished under the aegis of that religion. The word Islam thus denotes more than fourteen centuries of history, a billion and a third people, and a religious and cultural tradition of enormous diversity.” (Bernard Lewis, Crisis of Islam, pg. 1).

That last sentence is the diabolical deception with which imperial craftsmanship subverts our religion: “The word Islam thus denotes more than fourteen centuries of history, a billion and a third people, and a religious and cultural tradition of enormous diversity.”

According to the Author of the Holy Qur'an upon which the religion of Islam is based, the word Islam denotes only, and only, the following: “This day have I perfected for you your religion and completed My favor on you and chosen for you Islam as a religion;” ( الْيَوْمَ أَكْمَلْتُ لَكُمْ دِينَكُمْ وَأَتْمَمْتُ عَلَيْكُمْ نِعْمَتِي وَرَضِيتُ لَكُمُ الْإِسْلَامَ دِينًا ۚ Holy Qur'an, Surah Al-Maida 5:3)

That is the only, repeat only, context in which the word “Islam” can be legitimately used. It is the only context in which Qur'an has used it – as indicating a divine religion, quite separate from its followers, and the affairs of its followers. That separation of terminology is itself espoused in the Holy Qur'an by virtue of having a separate terminology. It is in fact a distinction of Islam in comparison to all the other Abrahamic religions which do not feature such a clear separation. This is why followers of Prophet Muhammad for instance are not called Mohammedans, nor believers of Islam Islamic, except by the prejudicial orientalists. The word designated in the Holy Qur'an for them is Muslims.

All who misuse the Qur'anic terminology, Muslims and non-Muslims alike, are either ignorant peoples, or, the respected apprentices of Machiavelli. In the latter case, they deliberately try to subvert the religion of Islam by associating it with the inglorious deeds, and the kingly history of Muslims. One can immediately see the result of such gratuitous binding – read the afore-cited book of Bernard Lewis if one is a naïve baby only born yesterday and magically became a scholar overnight.

Based solely on that premeditated collateral damage to language – drawing false associations by overloading semantics in an already well-defined nomenclature, also the principal basis of subliminally as well as cognitively binding something virtuous with something abhorrent such that when the virtuous is mentioned, the abhorrent naturally springs to mind – that Samuel Huntington, the late circus clown of empire at Harvard, diabolically made the following statement in his treatise “The Clash of Civilizations”:

“The underlying problem for the West is not Islamic fundamentalism. It is Islam, a different civilization whose people are convinced of the superiority of their culture and are obsessed with the inferiority of their power. The problem for Islam is not the CIA or the US Department of Defense. It is the West, a different civilization whose people are convinced of the universality of their culture and believe that their superior, if declining, power imposes on them the obligation to extend that culture throughout the world. These are the basic ingredient that fuel conflict between Islam and the West.” (Samuel Huntington, The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order, 1996, pg. 217)

Since when did the word "Islam" indicate civilization? A civilization is an aggregate of peoples. Whereas Islam is a religion. A religion can be practiced in any civilization and by any peoples, including right here in the USA. Samuel Huntington's teacher was evidently Bernard Lewis, and they incestuously fed off each other in seeding Islamophobia in service to their own cause.

Such premeditated collateral damage to language, and fanning the flames of Islamophobia years in advance, enabled forging the US foreign policy in the aftermath of 9/11 against the cleverly devised Hegelian construct of “militant Islam”, to mask what Zbigniew Brzezinski termed “imperial mobilization” in his own treatise, “The Grand Chessboard”, pg. 36.

The roots of Islamophobia are very deep and very distinguished indeed. As noted in the letter to CAIR below, it is the twain of Islamofascism and militant Islam – the pretext for the 'War on Terror'. One cannot be examined in isolation from the other any more than the leaves of a tree can be examined in isolation from its DNA, or cause from its effect. 'Tis rather obvious!

- We Muslims understand this sub-text of the War on Terror – even when we refuse to say it out loud in public. One can hear it in hushed living-room conversations throughout the Muslim world. We might act cowardly in public – but we aren't so stupid when we stare in the mirror.

- While one expects empire and its instruments to indulge in such diabolically specious story-telling, and they do – from academe to politicians to newsmedia – one does not expect the self-proclaimed representatives of its victims to do the same. But this anomalous behavior resoundingly echoes in every instance of Muslims' representation today, from mosques to secular non-profit institutions like CAIR. The one thing which perhaps sheds some penetrating light on this vile zeitgeist is the following insight of Martin Luther King Jr. into a colonized mind:

“The white establishment is skilled in flattering and cultivating emerging leaders. It presses its own image on them and finally, from imitation of manners, dress, and style of living, a deeper strain of corruption develops. This kind of Negro leader acquires the white man’s contempt for the ordinary Negro. He is often more at home with the middle-class white than he is among his own people. His language changes, his location changes, his income changes, and ultimately he changes from the representative of the Negro to the white man into the white man’s representative to the Negro. The tragedy is that too often he does not recognize what has happened to him.”, -- (Martin Luther King Jr., A Testament of Hope, pg. 307)

- “jihad-un-nafs” is the Qur'anic concept of inner courage and strength one must acquire in oneself ( يُجَاهِدُ لِنَفْسِهِ ۚ Holy Qur'an Surah Al-Ankaboot, 29:6) in order to strive for truth and justice in practice before one will in fact ever be able to practice truth and justice ( وَتَوَاصَوْا بِالْحَقِّ Holy Qur'an Surah Al-Asr 103:3) in one's conduct with fellow man. It is often referred out of context as simply the “inner struggle” for the control of the “self”. That out-of-context meaning typically relegates it to a meaningless spiritual battle of no consequence to alleviating the suffering of fellow man from all causes, including tyranny. It is among the many hijackings of the religion Islam by its venerable imperial scholars, experts, narrators, and mullahs who have served empire throughout history unto the present day, and the ignorant peoples of all stripes who bow before these “experts” without using their own commonsense, to turn Islam, the religion of implementing justice for oneself as much as for fellow man, into merely one of a gibberish religion of rituals and soulful Arabic recitations.

Source URL: http://print-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2011/07/cair-report-islamophobia-rising-usa.html

Retrospective 2017

Where we came from and how we got here? Necessary to understand in order to know where we are headed despite the fog of confusion induced by the mighty wurlitzer and its ubiquitous agents and assets. These assets and agents permeate the entire thought space controlling not just public opinion, but also public behavior. From the respectability of the tallest ivory towers to the purity of the highest religious podiums to the vulgarity of the lowest political platforms, all echo the core absurdities and core lies, only in slight variations of course, such that absurdities become “truth” and reality is turned upon its head. The public naturally reacts to this altered reality as they are made to believe it through 24x7 immersion across the spectrum of their loyalties and affinities, from political, religious, cultural, academic, entertainment, social media, to familial elders and trusted mentors. In this altered reality, the vilest become noble, the greatest harbingers of terror become lauded Nobel peace prize winners, and murderous aggressors come as peace-makers. How to make sense of all this? Why are so few able to penetrate through this fog of deceit? Even those who fish for truth often get entangled in the layers of Hegelian Dialectic which protect it and which can easily overwhelm rational thought trapped in the credulity gap of how can that convolution ever be true? So the trusting logic mind bereft of the ability to see through Machiavellian deceit and thus unable to add two plus two correctly often easily dismisses it as “conspiracy theory”. While the more capable intellect able to understand Machiavellian power and often bearing the weight of the moral conscience of the public as its prominent intellectual, is inexplicably seen reinforcing the core axioms and presuppositions of the same synthetic reality. How did I come to be on this road less traveled where conspiracy is not theory but carefully crafted political ideologies to achieve otherwise unachievable unpopular agendas with a measure of the public's own consent? We witness this in practice, from absurdly taking shoes off at airports to du bombing nations, all in the pretext of fighting a never ending war on terror against a synthetic enemy which is necessary for disguising “imperial mobilization”, and all taking place with the public's own consent. Where will that consent culminate?

On The Road Less Traveled

Avoiding The Cunning Intellectual's Trap

Climate Change Corner - Breaking the Set

Is there, or isn't there, man-made Global Warming? The Great ‘Hegelian Mind-Fck’!

'Michael Coren: “What's all this about a hockey-stick?”

Ross McKitrick: “Well, the hockey-stick graph. This was back in 2001, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [IPCC], it's a UN body that every five years puts out a big assessment of the science. And they are especially alert to any evidence that really promotes the Global Warming story and they give it lots of promotion. And in 2001, they latched onto this result that was fairly fresh in the literature, that had to with what's called paleoclimatology. The study of the behavior of the climate from way back before we had thermometers.

Now, for decades the standard view has been that over the past thousand years, there is a Medieval era, which is very warm compared to the present. You know, the Greenland, the Vikings were able to have farms in Greenland. All over the world there is evidence that it was warmer, and basically better for people. And then things got cold for about 500 years, up to the 1800s, and then we were in a warming phase coming out of the little ice-age as it was called.

In the 2001 IPCC report, they changed all that and presented a graph that looks like a hockey stick lying on its side. So the mean state of the climate is almost constant, up until the year 1900, and then suddenly the temperatures started rising rapidly.

And this was very dramatic. It was an extremely effective graphics for getting people worried about global warming.

And it featured prominently in the debates over Kyoto, the government of Canada had it on its website. Actually the government of Canada quoted from it in a pamphlet they sent out to households across the country, and governments around the world did the same thing. Al Gore features it in his movie.” -- Minutes 0:23 to 2:20

Michael Coren: “... Hold on, you are being very generous here. The hockey stick was used time and time again, and in fact, it became almost iconic within the Global Warming movement. As you say, movies, and pamphlets sent out to people across Canada. And you are not saying to me, it was never genuine, either because there was weak research, or even dishonest research, this is kafkaesque.”

Ross McKitrick: “Well, what we found along the way was there was statistical errors, but one of the big problems was they'd used a contaminated dataset. They had about 400 input data series of these temperature proxies, but they way they were analyzing them was most of the data was thrown out, and there is one little segment of the dataset that all the results depended on, and they are called bristle cone pine series. It's a funny looking tree that grows mostly in Western United States and they grown very old. Thousand years old.

But, people have long known, and the National Academy of Science has repeated this warning: you shouldn't use them for temperature reconstructions, because they have this hockey-stick shape that's got nothing to do with temperature.

Well, it turned out that the hockey-stick graph was formed by taking these bristle cone pines and just putting all the weight on them.

And the original author had redone his analysis taking this small number of bristle cone pines out, and the whole shape changes. The graph just loses its shape, it just becomes sort of noisy and nothing. So, they knew when they published this study.”

Michael Coren: “They lied!”

Ross McKitrick: “I wouldn't say they lied. I think what they did was they didn't disclose the fundamental weakness of the original result.” ' -- Minute 4:42 to 6:20, conversation with Professor Ross McKitrick, The hockey stick is wrong and result of bad science, on Michael Coren Show

Read Zahir's Reflections on Modernity, Climategate, Pandemic, Peer Review, and Science in the Service of Empire

Read Zahir Ebrahim's Letter to David Ray Griffin on his new book 'Unprecedented Climate Mobilization'

Read Zahir Ebrahim's 2016 Summary Report with Ideological Backgrounder: Global Warming / Climate Change A New Religion

The Big Lie

FAQ: Prove to me that the 9/11 Narrative is a Big Lie

By Zahir Ebrahim | Project Humanbeingsfirst.org

April 17, 2014 | Last Updated Saturday, June 21, 2014

Abstract

There are mainly two global schools of thought today on what transpired on September 11, 2001. The first says evil Muslims under the leadership of Osama Bin Laden and an organization called Al-Qaeda, principally carried out that catastrophic terror act on American soil. Minor variations salt that narrative spanning the gamut of plausible sounding arguments from anticipated blowback of iniquitous global policies of the superpower to conspiratorial covert blessings and/or active collusion of the Western intelligence apparatuses, including that of the United States, Israel, Pakistan and others. The majority of the world's officialdoms, and the public mind, have accepted the unsalted version. Today that narrative advanced by the superpower and its surrogates underwrites history books, law books, policy prescriptions, fine literature, and even melodrama as an accepted historical fact. The salted variations mainly sell books. The second school of thought says that the entire first narrative can be nothing but a Big Lie and all its salted versions deliberate red herrings which principally serve to sanctify the Big Lie. This article underwrites the latter argument by advancing the logic method known as reductio ad absurdum on empirical evidence. It is a rational method used in court systems worldwide which any ordinary man and woman of sound mind capable of serving for jury duty can employ on their own to separate fact from fiction. No judge dare reject this forensic technique unless he is running a kangaroo court --- which is perhaps why no legal mind has to date dared to bring this most straightforward argument before the International Criminal Court System in the Hague despite all their vocal dissent as the brilliant consciences of the world. It is the one sure-fire proof of the Big Lie that can immediately lead to sleeping with the fishes for anyone presenting it with any effective measure of legal visibility. That crucial omission is the veritable indicator of the self-serving moral corruption of the finest intellectual minds today, or when innocent of that charge, perhaps their complete indoctrination. The global impact of this co-option is that the Big Lie of the twenty-first century is rapidly getting sanctified as “whole truth” with no moral giants (or even midgets) effectively standing in its way.

The world has been reduced to a fully controlled chaos solely based on that one principal axiomatic Big Lie of 9/11 – that Muslim terrorists wielding Militant Islam attacked America.

The craft of propaganda based on the Big Lie perfected by Adolph Hitler, but not invented by him, has the public mind today accepting absurdities upon absurdities, and consequently easily acquiescing to atrocities inflicted upon others as well as upon themselves by the global superstate in the making, in the name of protecting the world's public from terrorists. Just witnessing what is transpiring at American Airports must make the nation's founders weep profusely in their grave.

Dismantle that one Big Lie and it all comes crashing down. Which is why the American president asserts don't challenge it! And Americans, scholars and laity alike, comply. Do these handful of ubermensch liars trying to orchestrate global governance with global war-mongering, full spectrum propaganda systems, and in full control of key levers of power of Western states which puts Western militaries and Western budgets at their free disposal, think that Muslims have none among them today who can stand up to their Big Lie? Would they rather that we all lie down and submit quietly like the self-serving house niggers they are used to from the era of the East India Company?

This analysis is submitted to MIT Technology Review and MIT Spectrum magazines as an alum submission, of how scientists and scholars today subvert both science and religion in the service of empire no differently than they did in the Third Reich. Perhaps that does not happen at MIT? Then surely MIT Technology Review would print this article to demonstrate how we live in a free society where this does not and cannot happen among MIT scientists and professors of engineering training its next generation of scientists and engineers. Also submitted to the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, IEEE magazine, The Chronicle of Higher Education. I further intend to send this in personal email to all living Nobel Laureates. You are invited to send this to your alma mater newspaper, to discuss it in your classroom, and to counter it with your most scholarly aptitude. Give it your best shot! Unless this analysis is brought into the corridors of mainstream science and social science, it will remain stillborn, preaching mainly to the choir. Please lend a hand. Send it to your local newspapers. Let the scholars of empire in every nation refute it. That will only happen when it is published in mainstream.

Click here for PDF

Continue Reading FAQ: Prove that 9/11 narrative is a Big Lie

Sanctifying the 9/11 Narrative vs. the Holocaust

Sanctification of the 9/11 Narrative

Long Term Impact of Sanctification of the 9/11 Big Lie

Zahir Ebrahim | Project Humanbeingsfirst.org

April 11, 2014

"Holocaust denial is illegal in only 17 countries, most of which are in Europe ... So though the actual number of countries that have criminalized revisionist history isn’t overwhelming by any means, the importance of the outlawing is. Because of it, history is still held hostage to power." --- Lila Rajiva

While the last sentence in the statement above by American rebel extraordinaire of Indian origin, Lila Rajiva, is a truism; and the first sentence captures a monumental crime against the intellect which even surpasses the supreme crime of the Hellenic Civilization, the hemlock administered to Socrates; and while a fait accompli cannot (practically) be reversed once generations grow up in any sanctified narrative, the more pertinent issue for any generation is the sanctification of a narrative in the present tense.

That narrative of the present tense one can always do something about before it gets fully sanctified as public religion and new generations grow up believing and naturally resisting any tampering with their core beliefs. More psychologically potent the belief, and more its political utility, more the indoctrination systems get established in society to inculcate and promulgate those beliefs, and more the resistance of hoi polloi mind to altering it with fact-check, analysis, empiricism, and all left-half brain oriented logical synthesis and deconstruction – because, the right-half brain dominates when faith, religion, dogma, and beliefs are brought into question. That has been recognized not just by the clergy from time immemorial, but by both Machiavelli and Superman.

In our generation, it is the pious sanctification of the 9/11 who dunnit narrative now in brazen progress.

This is how the incumbent president of the United States of America, the unchallenged and preeminent armed to the teeth sole superpower on earth, takes over the continued construction of the Big Lie from where his predecessor first mobilized it into a full blown World War IV: President Obama warns not to challenge the official narrative of 9/11

Image Caption Watch President Obama making the Big Lie sacrosanct. See full Analysis

'I am aware that there is still some who would question, or even justify the offense of 911.

But let us be clear. Al Qaeeda killed nearly 3000 people on that day.

The victims were innocent men, women, and children from America and many other nations who had done nothing to harm anybody.

And yet Al Qaeeda chose to ruthlessly murder these people, claimed credit for the attack, and even now states their determination to kill on a massive scale. They have affiliates in many countries, to try to expand their reach.

These are not opinions to be debated. These are facts to be dealt with.' --- President Obama, Cairo Egypt, June 4th 2009

That is the new core narrative, the imperially asserted by fiat “facts to be dealt with”, the sacrosanct Big Lie of empire which has singularly enabled its own far greater “imperial mobilization” to a far greater Lebensraum, the whole of earth for one-world government.

And the most revealing thing is to perceptively note who else is participating in the Big Lie in making it sacrosanct right alongside the vulgar propagandists of empire all of whom, by the standards already established by the Allies joint Military Tribunal at Nuremberg for hanging the Nazi propagandists and war-mongers, would also hang without folly. It is a new breed of philosophers not known to exist in Nazi Germany, and carefully manufactured since then.

It is the breed of propagandists who appear to be preeminent dissenters in the advanced democracies of the West, but who echo the same core narrative of the Big Lie as the vulgar propagandists of empire.

Virtually all such chiefs, I would argue before any War Crimes Tribunal that would be bold enough to try the first group, are no different. They are merely two sides of the same imperial coin – to diabolically engineer the public mind in the service of the exercise of imperial power which would otherwise not be possible among a people not popularly imbued with the spirit of la mission civilisatrice.

The dissent-chiefs equally serve to deceive their own constituency - the rare public mind among hoi polloi that exhibits an ounce of moral gravitas and refuses to accept the mainstream propaganda fare easily accepted by the rest of hoi polloi.

Such minds were easily annihilated or silenced in the Third Reich where there were no pretenses of advanced democracy to be up held. Nazi Socialism had decreed a divine master plan for the fatherland. Whereas the dissent rebels are permitted to exist in its replacement that must maintain the illusion of freedom of speech, of dissent, and of advanced democracy in action which permits vigorous debate as the beacon of Western civilization to the rest of the world.

In Dante's conception of his Inferno, I would argue that they deserve to be in the lowest and innermost circle of hell - because, they are the most villainous in their deception and deceit. They contribute to the successful sanctification of the Big Lie while pretending to be great moralists among the very audience who have the willingness and moral gravitas to endeavor in abolishing the deception and look up to these Superman for moral guidance.

This is a most distinguished group of sanctifiers indeed. Today, all of them echo in exact synchronicity, the who dunnit sacrosanct axiom of 9/11, while they boldly dissent with the exercise of hegemony that stems directly from upholding that sacred axiom.

Because of them, this new sacred narrative of 9/11 now under sanctification during our own lifetime, will create endless generations believing the Big Lie. And because of it, condemning Islam and Muslims --- the following graph is intended to set the stage for it, which is why it was made available so diligently to the public:

Image Caption see FBI Muslims Radical Militancy Considerations

I will take the bet that within a few years, this Jews led dominant narrative of 9/11 which has seeded World War IV, like the Holocaust^TM seeded in World War II, will become 9/11^TM.

Not just 17 nations, but all nation-flags of the world in world government, will make it illegal to question that enabling Big Lie that brought global governance and global police-state to the new global Lebensraum.

When a narrative is sanctified, not just culturally, but also legally with specific entitlements to the state penitentiary or to St. Elizabeth for blasphemy against it, then, irrespective of what that narrative is, an iron curtain outlasting generations is diabolically lowered around the public mind from which a civilization or society simply cannot escape. What can be a greater crime against humanity than that -- enslaving for eons, generations in false beliefs, which in turn inform and govern their public and private behavior.

As already stated, while for the previous sanctifications of history nothing substantial or pragmatic can be done today as the powers that benefit from its sanctification are all ubiquitous, omnipotent, and omniscient, always proclaiming that “absence of evidence is not evidence of absence” with a straight face, and that perhaps is the only arguable justification brought to bear on the sacrosanctness of Holocaust^TM (as the extensive public evidence compiled at http://ihr.org overwhelmingly substantiates), for the present day 9/11 narrative that has still not quite become TM, its fait accompli can still be interdicted.

Continue Reading FAQ: Prove that 9/11 narrative is a Big Lie

The Dying Songbird

The Dying Songbird

Zahir Ebrahim | Project Humanbeingsfirst.org

September 15, 2013

Islamabad, Pakistan.

The whole aim of practical politics of dissent by genuine gadflies to power is to prevent the future fait accompli that is being engineered by 'history's actors' in the present. This is why genuine dissent, that with real teeth and non-zero efficacy, cannot be permitted to exist and flourish. It is instead replaced with manufactured dissent as an essential part of statecraft itself when the illusion of dissent and public opinion is to be maintained in a 'free' democratic society.

Rehearsing crimes of power after these crimes are fait accompli; after all the barbers in town already know it; after their disclosure as the narrative of official history through FOIA declassification, whistle-blowing and deep-throat leaks, and in posthumous confessional diaries of monumental war criminals, none of which really reveal any real secrets, or only do so ex post facto when it is already a fait accompli; is either the job of the professional historian who relies on officialdom to write the official history pre-sanctioned by power by what it chooses to document and what it chooses to make-believe to posterity, or of manufactured dissent!

Let the twain: a genuine intellectual gadfly vs. fabricated dissent and its useful idiots, not be confused with each other!

The latter is the Superman who echoes the axioms of power underneath his supercilious dissent with it, or tells the obvious truth ex post facto, both to the applause of the instruments of power itself, while collecting all the well-intentioned activists and consciences around him. He is the collection-agent of power. His con-job is to ensure that dissent does not stray too far from home. The world is full of the latter, a modern necessity to complement the manufacturing of consent; to cunningly constrain dissent within acceptable limits when dissent is permitted in a 'free' society.

This brilliant Superman herdsman often comes anointed with super advanced degrees, titles, accolades, is well-published, most cited, and speaks with an MIT, Harvard or Oxford accent. He is as powerful in his dissenting “United We Stand” message to his tiny herd as the Superman orator is in his “United We Stand” message to the mainstream herd. The Superman herdsman of dissent is the more brilliant twin in the Hegelian Dialectic of manufactured consent vs. manufactured dissent.

Continue Reading The Dying Songbird

Gatekeepers From Left to Right

Songbird or Superman – You Decide!

Masterpiece of Plagiarism in Pakistan - Peerless in something, at last!

Open Letter to the Academe of Pakistan on the Masterpiece of Plagiarism in Pakistan

Zahir Ebrahim | Project Humanbeingsfirst.org

Monday, January 14, 2014

Open Letter to Pakistan's Academia, its Stewards, its Beneficiaries

This Open Letter pertains to the shocking case of the Masterpiece of Plagiarism in Pakistan I had uncovered in September-October 2011. The plagiarizing physicist had, with great chutzpah, wholesale copied entire physics papers written by others, including by the famous physicist and Nobel laureate of 1918, Max Planck, and reprinted these, near verbatim, under his own name in his two books and in HEC approved journals. The entire plagiarism case, unraveled by Zahir Ebrahim with the courageous assistance of his fellow Pakistani detective-confrere Ehsan Legari, is documented in the following letter to editor:

[1] Letter to Editor: Masterpiece of Plagiarism in Pakistan under the Watchful Eyes of its Distinguished Stewards of Science and Higher Education, By Zahir Ebrahim http://zahirebrahim.wordpress.com/masterpiece-of-plagiarism-in-pakistan/

The first paragraph of the aforementioned letter to editor summed up the masterpiece scandal :

“I wish to bring to the notice of the world of academe the bold plagiarism of the work of world’s best known physicist and Nobel laureate of 1918, Max Planck, including verbatim theft from others to build up a padded portfolio of plagiarized publications, and its aiding and abetting by the Higher Education Commission (HEC) of Pakistan through a conspiracy of dunces, inept policies, and a systemic culture of corruption and whitewash wherein Paul protects Peter while they all receive payouts from the public exchequer by bloated anointments as ‘Distinguished National Professor’ and other sainthood.”

Caption Uncovering the Masterpiece of Plagiarism in Pakistan: Hear no evil, Speak no evil, See no evil. Click on image to uncover the dizzying heights Pakistani physics can rise beyond expectations -- the near perfection in the art of facsimile reproduction by its physicist in two near-verbatim fully plagiarized books! (image via wiki)

Please Continue Reading...

Also see Zahir Ebrahim's followup Letter to HEC

Open Letter to the Doctors of America from Zahir Ebrahim

April 30, 2013

Dear Medical Practitioners in the United States of America

What bothers me about America is that of the 20,000 doctors and surgeons in Boston, from Harvard-MIT MD-Phds to the Dana-Farber super-specialists in every healthcare related field esoterica, not one can stand up to call a spade a spade? The physician I spoke to privately on Jeff Bauman's Boston Marathon explosion injury images broadcast in the newsmedia (see Domestic Terror and Police-State), with just one look at the photos told me this cannot possibly be real.

Yet no medical practitioner, professor of medicine, EMT, EMS, man of science or man of commonsense from Boston to San Francisco has publicly made that call that the exploded legs victim looking alert and not bleeding to death while being strolled on Boylston Street in a wheelchair instead of a gurney is an absurdity?

Is that what you teach your medical students in the United States of America?

What has gone wrong that this nation only produces cowards?

Did Americans learn nothing from the Banality of Evil that created (and destroyed) the Third Reich?

Are you super learned AMA and FDA approved professors of medicine blind? Or merely “United We Stand” super Good Americans?

Disgusted.

Zahir Ebrahim

Project Humanbeingsfirst.org

California

Source URL: http://print-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2013/04/open-letter-to-doctors-of-america.html

Unlayering the Middle East War Agenda: Making Sense of Absurdities

Unlayering the Middle East War Agenda: Making Sense of Absurdities

Zahir Ebrahim | Project Humanbeingsfirst.org

Sunday, January 23, 2011

President George W. Bush poses with President-elect Barack Obama, and former presidents, George H.W. Bush, Bill Clinton and Jimmy Carter, Wednesday, Jan. 7, 2009, in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite) http://media.charlotteobserver.com/smedia/2009/01/07/15/9-20090107_presidents_02.standalone.prod_affiliate.138.jpg

Preamble

This is a response to the unforensic focus on the Middle East War Agenda which permeates the alternate media even today, well into the 10th year of the New Pearl Harbor, orchestrated like the Nazi's Operation Canned Goods to “goosestep the herrenvolk across international frontiers” – first into Afghanistan, Iraq, gradually inching its way throughout the arc of crisis, next target: the Crescent of Crisis, Iran. Time magazine had quoted Zbigniew Brzezinski self-servingly presaging these very events in 1979 at the cusp of the Iranian Revolution: “An arc of crisis stretches along the shores of the Indian Ocean, with fragile social and political structures in a region of vital importance to us threatened with fragmentation. The resulting political chaos could well be filled by elements hostile to our values and sympathetic to our adversaries.” (U.S. National Security Advisor to President Jimmy Carter, Zbigniew Brzezinski, Time, Jan. 15, 1979)

It was in the same year that President Jimmy Carter's National Security Advisor, waging a clandestine proxy war upon the USSR, had started giving covert aid to the CIA backed Afghan mercenaries (later renamed “Mujahideens”) to foment sufficient agitation at the flank of the USSR to provoke a Soviet Intervention in Afghanistan to protect their own hegemonic interests: “According to the official version of history, CIA aid to the Mujahadeen began during 1980, that is to say, after the Soviet army invaded Afghanistan, 24 Dec 1979. But the reality, secretly guarded until now, is completely otherwise Indeed, it was July 3, 1979 that President Carter signed the first directive for secret aid to the opponents of the pro-Soviet regime in Kabul. And that very day, I wrote a note to the president in which I explained to him that in my opinion this aid was going to induce a Soviet military intervention.” After the Soviet Union had taken the bait and invaded, blood-thirsty murderer playing chess in other peoples' blood, Dr. Zbigniew Brzezinski confessed in 1998 that he again wrote to Jimmy Carter back in December 1979: “The day that the Soviets officially crossed the border, I wrote to President Carter. We now have the opportunity of giving to the USSR its Vietnam war. Indeed, for almost 10 years, Moscow had to carry on a war unsupportable by the government, a conflict that brought about the demoralization and finally the breakup of the Soviet empire.” (1998 interview to French magazine Le Nouvel Observateur)

Thus, the arc of crisis which Brzezinski had glibly predicted in January 1979, was firmly seeded by January 1980 as the Carter Doctrine, otherwise known as “God is on your side”, to set it all ablaze in the coming future. Sufficiently implanted with the necessary explosive mix of religion, “jihad”, hostage crisis, Iranian Revolution, Soviet intervention in Afghanistan, drug trade, and sectarian fanaticism unleashed in Pakistan by the hanging-judge-military dictator General Zia Ul Haq installed there by the Carter White House in support of the CIA cultivating and harvesting “Islamic Mujahideens” to fight the USSR, it didn't take much ignition beyond the priming. The fire quickly became self-sustaining as new recruits grew up in the lighted cauldron and couldn't easily distinguish their head from their ass – especially with the Pakistan military being in full collusion with the CIA in screwing both Pakistan and Afghanistan society on the Grand Chessboard. Today, these war criminals pat themselves on the back for destroying the USSR with Muslim and Afghani blood costing the complete destruction of what was previously a still stable Afghani and Pakistani society – but they'll all hang someday even if their carcass has to be dragged out from six feet under. In 1996, Zbigniew Brzezinski renamed the arc of crisis in his next geostrategy book The Grand Chessboard, with an even more imposing epithet, “the global zone of percolating violence”, illustrating with maps galore the arc of crisis for those still uninitiated into the vagaries of the exercise of American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Initiatives of the sole unchallenged superpower. (page 53)

That foretold future – explicitly and very publicly presaged in 1979 in a popular weekly magazine read by all and sundry not just in the United States, but in the entire world – fully unleashed by the New Pearl Harbor on September 11, 2001, had the former US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice self-righteously justify the purpose of America's hegemonic cultivation of “the global zone of percolating violence” in 2006 in these sacred words: “What we’re seeing here, in a sense, is…the birth pangs of a new Middle East and whatever we do, we have to be certain that we’re pushing forward to the new Middle East, not going back to the old one.” (U.S. Secretary of State to George W. Bush, Condoleezza Rice, July 21, 2006)

All the preceding is what the blood thirsty hectoring hegemons have themselves narrated.

But comparing their narration to empiricism tells a slightly different story.

That War Agenda today to “birth pangs of a new Middle East” is still variously blamed upon:

1) the Zionist agenda for Eretz Yisrael,
2) and/or upon the sole superpower's Primacy and Its Geostrategic Initiatives to preemptively acquire and extract the natural resources in the Middle East and Central Asia before any other nation or group of nations can rise to challenge its dominance.

The former Zionist agenda is pitched as the ungodly wars waged by the Jewish neoconservaties who dominate Washington, blueprinted in their PNAC and other Wolfowitz drawn strategy documents for Securing the Jews-only Realm.

The latter superpower agenda is pitched as the wars of primacy for America's sole preeminence, blueprinted in Zbigniew Brzezinski's The Grand Chessboard and in Pentagon's many Joint Vision strategy documents.

Both premise, while appearing sensible in 2003 when I too employed them in my maiden book Prisoners of the Cave, in the light of today's empiricism outright lead to absurdities.

America is going bankrupt due to these global wars with rising national debt which now stands in the 13 trillion dollar range as officially reported by the US Treasury, and its budget deficit this year, 2011, is 1.4 trillion dollars. This means America has to borrow, i.e., have its central bank the Federal Reserve print, 40 cents for every dollar it spends, thus also commensurately increasing the national debt and the burden upon the already suffering American tax payer.

What sort of idiotic primacy agenda for preeminence is that?

The United States hasn't been able to extract any of the natural resources either from the Middle East and Central Asian soils anymore than she was already extracting previously – as much as it wanted – with its own coddled dictators firmly in power.

Why did she need to wage murderous wars to decimate the region to remove its own cultivated dictators?

It also sure hasn't been good for the Anglo-American oil companies – they can't do business when the region is torn asunder by the cycle of insurgency and counter-insurgency manufactured by the Anglo-American Allies themselves. Same in Afghanistan – no pipelines, only the so called quagmires, as even the mainstream news of the United States puts it.

As for Israel, if Eretz Yisrael is the principal reason for decimating Iraq with millions of tons of Depleted Uranium munitions, destroying its fertile top soils and bountiful water tables, not to mention the ancient DNA of its inhabitants, and with only immense hatred and ire of its millions of Arabs now irretrievably implanted to greet the Zionist from Israel if they ever set foot onto its soil for resettlement, then the Jews can't really occupy that land for themselves now can they?

What did the Israelis really gain by brutally removing the servile Iraqi puppet of their own client state, the United States?

Only chaos in the region!

What Zionistan's founding father, David Ben Gurion, would have easily called “revolutionary times”. Well, according to that science of hegemonic conquest, these chaos-like conditions in the Middle East have also only created more fertile grounds to administer further mind-fcks to the natives because “what is inconceivable in normal times is possible in revolutionary times”.

What other benefit? Perhaps some smaller equally compliant but unstable ethnic principalities carved out of the former equally compliant monolithic and stable Iraq, which today lies in ruin.

But wait, NO Eretz Yisrael!

Only enormous hatred for Israel, and America.

What an agenda for preeminence!

Only the keystone cops could have blueprinted it.

Hmmm....

Reality is almost like an onion.

Comes in layers.

The outer layer, when peeled, shows the next inner layer.

And so on down to the core.

It is difficult to get to the core of reality, without first unpeeling it, layer by layer.

The empirical fact however is that it is not mentioned in the mainstream, and by many others in dissentstream either, because the conspiracy is to not even acknowledge that the onion exists at all for social engineering of ‘United we Stand’ and ‘introducing beneficial cognitive diversity’ to mislead the public.

But the outer layer of the onion is not the entire onion, however persuasive and inviting it may appear!

These are mere labels, the neocons, neoconservatives, neo-cons, they mean nothing by themselves.

America has been involved in warfare from Wounded Knee to Afghanistan, and before WWII, there were no neo-cons by that name.

So how does one explain America’s vast military-industrial-academe-media complex which is what actually wages the wars? How does one explain America's national security state?

But why do they wage wars?

For Israel?

The focus on Israel, and the Jewish Lobby, in my view, can at times be a gigantic red herring. See: “Pamphlet: How To Return to Palestine”, and “The white man's burden still looks white in color!”. The real focus must remain on the oligarchy which funds all sides of wars, and have been doing so for 250 years, and for what eventual purpose?

The War on Terror, the war on Afghanistan, the war on Iraq, the war on Pakistan, the war on Iran, on whatever mantras and asinine pretexts, by themselves make no sense – as the war of neo-conservatism – and it is easy to pin it upon the most visible harbingers for their most obvious motives! The outer layer of the onion.

And what about the silent economic wars of neo-liberalism – aka free trade?

Thomas Friedman best captured the interplay of these two sides of the imperial coin – the thunderous wars of shock and awe, and the matching silent wars of hunger and deprivations due to the loot and plunder of global natural resources via the stranglehold of contrived third world debt – in his 1999 New York Times column titled Manifesto for a Fast World: “The hidden hand of the market will never work without a hidden fist -- McDonald's cannot flourish without McDonnell Douglas, the builder of the F-15. And the hidden fist that keeps the world safe for Silicon Valley's technologies is called the United States Army, Air Force, Navy and Marine Corps.”

But peel down behind both types of wars, behind both philosophies of primacy which are as old as hegemony, as old as mankind, and we get World Government.

Global Governance would not be possible without the transformative abilities of these wars which seed controlled chaos, deprivations, disenfranchisement, and fabricated public appeals to authorities to resolve matters. Which of course they subsequently do, with greater and greater centralization of powers into the private hands of the same oligarchy who create the very crises for which they ex post facto present their own preferred solutions. See: Response to Financial Times Gideon Rachman's 'And now for a world government'.

David Ben Gurion aptly described this Machiavellian modus operandi as “what is inconceivable in normal times is possible in revolutionary times”.

The unlayering is important to get to the heart of the matter, quickly, before it is too late. And one of the reason it is not unlayered in time, is to seed fait accompli. That is the master political science. To understand this political science which is time-critical and which is what enables only narrating these matters ex post facto, see: “Of Ostriches and Rebels on The Hard Road to World Order”.

That too, by itself, is still not the inner most core of the onion, only the next layer down, but it already demonstrates that focus on the outer layer of the onion of reality, the visible reality, makes for a great red herring.

No one in Plato’s cave can ever figure out the reality behind the images on the screen, by examining, and in no matter what excruciating a scholarship, the images on the screen before them.

That is why the outer layer of the onion, whether one sees the onion at all or not, is often pointless garbage.

Whenever I cook dinner at home, I always throw away the outer layer of the onion, it tastes terrible :-)

Thank you.

Zahir Ebrahim | Project Humanbeingsfirst.org

Source URL: http://print-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2011/01/unlayering-middle-east-war-agenda.html

The Public Mind

Edward Bernays On The Public Mind:

“We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of.”

Aldous Huxley On The Public Mind:

“we are in process of developing a whole series of techniques which will enable the controlling oligarchy who have always existed and presumably always will exist, to get people actually to love their servitude!”

Bertrand Russell On The Public Mind:

“What a man believes upon grossly insufficient evidence is an index to his desires – desires of which he himself is often unconscious. If a man is offered a fact which goes against his instincts, he will scrutinize it closely, and unless [and at times even when] the evidence is overwhelming, he will refuse to believe it. If, on the other hand, he is offered something which affords a reason for acting in accordance with his instincts, he will accept it even on the slenderest evidence.”

Goethe On The Public Mind:

“None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free. The truth has been kept from the depth of their minds by masters who rule them with lies. They feed them on falsehoods till wrong looks like right in their eyes.”

Adolf Hitler On The Public Mind:

“Not infrequently it is a case of overcoming ingrained prejudices which are mostly unconscious and are supported by sentiment rather than reason.

It is a thousand times more difficult to overcome this barrier of instinctive aversion, emotional hatred and preventive dissent than to correct opinions which are founded on defective or erroneous knowledge.

False ideas and ignorance may be set aside by means of instruction, but emotional resistance never can.”

“One must also remember that of itself the multitude is mentally inert, that it remains attached to its old habits and that it is not naturally prone to read something which does not conform with its own pre-established beliefs when such writing does not contain what the multitude hopes to find there.

Therefore, some piece of writing which has a particular tendency is for the most part read only by those who are in sympathy with it.”

“The deluge of papers and books published by the intellectual circles year after year passed over the millions of the lower social strata like water over glazed leather.”

“The great majority of a nation is so feminine in its character and outlook that its thought and conduct are ruled by sentiment rather than by sober reasoning.

This sentiment, however, is not complex, but simple and consistent. It is not highly differentiated, but has only the negative and positive notions of love and hatred, right and wrong, truth and falsehood. Its notions are never partly this and partly that.

English propaganda [during World War I] especially understood this in a marvellous way and put what they understood into practice.

They allowed no half-measures which might have given rise to some doubt.

Proof of how brilliantly they understood that the feeling of the masses is something primitive was shown in their policy of publishing tales of horror and outrages which fitted in with the real horrors of the time, thereby cleverly and ruthlessly preparing the ground for moral solidarity at the front, even in times of great defeats.

Further, the way in which they pilloried the German enemy as solely responsible for the war--which was a brutal and absolute falsehood--and the way in which they proclaimed his guilt was excellently calculated to reach the masses, realizing that these are always extremist in their feelings.

And thus it was that this atrocious lie was positively believed.”

“Generally, readers of the Press can be classified into three groups:

First, those who believe everything they read;

Second, those who no longer believe anything;

Third, those who critically examine what they read and form their judgments accordingly.

Numerically, the first group is by far the strongest, being composed of the broad masses of the people. Intellectually, it forms the simplest portion of the nation. It cannot be classified according to occupation but only into grades of intelligence.

Under this category come all those who have not been born to think for themselves or who have not learnt to do so and who, partly through incompetence and partly through ignorance, believe everything that is set before them in print.

To these we must add that type of lazy individual who, although capable of thinking for himself out of sheer laziness gratefully absorbs everything that others had thought over, modestly believing this to have been thoroughly done.

The influence which the Press has on all these people is therefore enormous; for after all they constitute the broad masses of a nation. But, somehow they are not in a position or are not willing personally to sift what is being served up to them; so that their whole attitude towards daily problems is almost solely the result of extraneous influence.

The second group is numerically smaller, being partly composed of those who were formerly in the first group and after a series of bitter disappointments are now prepared to believe nothing of what they see in print. They hate all newspapers. Either they do not read them at all or they become exceptionally annoyed at their contents, which they hold to be nothing but a congeries of lies and misstatements.

These people are difficult to handle; for they will always be sceptical of the truth. Consequently, they are useless for any form of positive work.

The third group is easily the smallest, being composed of real intellectuals whom natural aptitude and education have taught to think for themselves and who in all things try to form their own judgments, while at the same time carefully sifting what they read.

They will not read any newspaper without using their own intelligence to collaborate with that of the writer and naturally this does not set writers an easy task.

Journalists appreciate this type of reader only with a certain amount of reservation.

Hence the trash that newspapers are capable of serving up is of little danger--much less of importance--to the members of the third group of readers. In the majority of cases these readers have learnt to regard every journalist as fundamentally a rogue who sometimes speaks the truth.

Most unfortunately, the value of these readers lies in their intelligence and not in their numerical strength, an unhappy state of affairs in a period where wisdom counts for nothing and majorities for everything.

Nowadays when the voting papers of the masses are the deciding factor; the decision lies in the hands of the numerically strongest group; that is to say the first group, the crowd of simpletons and the credulous.”

“Particular attention should be paid to the Press; for its influence on these people is by far the strongest and most penetrating of all; since its effect is not transitory but continual. Its immense significance lies in the uniform and persistent repetition of its teaching.

Here, if anywhere, the State should never forget that all means should converge towards the same end.

It must not be led astray by the will-o'-the-wisp of so-called 'freedom of the Press', or be talked into neglecting its duty, and withholding from the nation that which is good and which does good.

With ruthless determination the State must keep control of this instrument of popular education and place it at the service of the State and the Nation.”

“No matter what an amount of talent employed in the organization of propaganda, it will have no result if due account is not taken of these fundamental principles.

Propaganda must be limited to a few simple themes and these must be represented again and again. Here, as in innumerable other cases, perseverance is the first and most important condition of success.”

AND: This is How the Mighty Wurlitzer does all of that to construct the Fourth Reich:

What is the 'Mighty Wurlitzer'?

It used to be the honorific of Frank Wisner, the first chief of political warfare for the Central Intelligence Agency, used to describe the C.I.A.’s plethora of front organizations and newsmedia stooges that he was capable of playing (like a great organ with many keyboards) for synthesizing any propaganda tune that was needed for the day. See Operation Mockingbird.

The fact that such an omnipresent Message-Machine is not ancient history but very much current affairs, is underscored by this NYT headline “Behind TV Analysts, Pentagon’s Hidden Hand”, Sunday, April 20, 2008

Therefore, today, I use the term 'Mighty Wurlitzer' as a metaphor to pluralistically refer to the same message-machine, i.e., the intelligence apparatus for manufacturing consent and controlling dissent, and its concomitant conscious manipulation of peoples' thoughts, feelings, actions and in-actions, in order to serve the primacy interests of the behind the scene governing oligarchy. The latter are, invariably, also the de facto owners of the complete messaging-system now even more globally ubiquitous than when Frank Wisner played the world for a fool.

This 'grand organ' is now able to even more effectively synthesize, implant, and reinforce, all the right set of beliefs (myths) among the entire world's public – by suitably combining 'events' with imaginative 'expos' writing – which appropriately primes the world populations to acquiesce to the oligarchic agendas. While playing this orchestra is now an integral part of all state-craft, its major musical themes are entirely determined by the behind the scenes owners of the system. While some might refer to the underlying techniques as propaganda and psy-ops, 'Mighty Wurlitzer' singularly captures the messaging-system controlled under a unified purpose of command which is both highly compartmentalized and cellularized. Only the Mighty Wurlitzer knows the entire tune.

Continue Reading The Mighty Wurlitzer

What is Hegelian Dialectic

The Hegelian Dialectic:

What you never learnt despite years of schooling, a Ph.D. in political science, mathematics, physics, history, international relations, or even underwater basket weaving - The one master key that unlocks all mysteries of modernity

'After 16 books and 25 years in basic research I thought I'd heard it all ... the world was a confused mess, probably beyond understanding and certainly beyond salvation - and there was little 'l could do about it.

Back in 1968 my Western Technology and Soviet Economic Development was published by the Hoover Institution at Stanford University. In three substantial volumes I detailed how the West had built the Soviet Union. However, the work generated a seemingly insoluble puzzle - why have we done this? Why did we build the Soviet Union, while we also transferred technology to Hitler's Germany? Why does Washington want to conceal these facts? Why have we boosted Soviet military power? And simultaneously boosted our own? In subsequent books, the Wall Street series, I added more questions - but no answers. I had more or less arrived at the conclusion that there was no rational answer that could be proven.

Then a year or so ago I received an eight-inch batch of documents - nothing less than the membership lists of an American secret society. Glancing through the sheets it was more than obvious - this was no ordinary group. The names spelled Power, with a capital P. As I probed each individual a pattern emerged ... and a formerly fuzzy world became crystal clear.

... These volumes will explain why the West built the Soviets and Hitler; why we go to war, to lose; why Wall Street loves Marxists and Nazis; why the kids can't read; why the Churches have become propaganda founts; why historical facts are suppressed, why politicians lie and a hundred other whys.' --- Preface Antony C. Sutton

Here is a sample, pgs. 37-38:

'How can there exist a common objective when members are apparently acting in opposition to one another?

Probably the most difficult task in this work will be to get across to the reader what is really an elementary observation: that the objective of The Order is neither "left" nor "right." "Left" and "right" are artificial devices to bring about change, and the extremes of political left and political right are vital elements in a process of controlled change.

The answer to this seeming political puzzle lies in Hegelian logic. Remember that both Marx and Hitler, the extremes of "left" and "right" presented as textbook enemies, evolved out of the same philosophical system: Hegelianism. That brings screams of intellectual anguish from Marxists and Nazis, but is well known to any student of political systems.

The dialectical process did not originate with Marx as Marxists claim, but with Fichte and Hegel in late 18th and early 19th century Germany. In the dialectical process a clash of opposites brings about a synthesis. For example, a clash of political left and political right brings about another political system, a synthesis of the two, neither left nor right. This conflict of opposites is essential to bring about change. Today this process can be identified in the literature of the Trilateral Commission where "change" is promoted and "conflict management" is termed the means to bring about this change.

In the Hegelian system conflict is essential. Furthermore, for Hegel and systems based on Hegel, the State is absolute. The State requires complete obedience from the individual citizen. An individual does not exist for himself in these so-called organic systems but only to perform a role in the operation of the State. He finds freedom only in obedience to the State. There was no freedom in Hitler's Germany, there is no freedom for the individual under Marxism, neither will there be in the New World Order. And if it sounds like George Orwell's 1984 - it is.

In brief, the State is supreme and conflict is used to bring about the ideal society. Individuals find freedom in obedience to the rulers.'

Download PDF Antony C. Sutton's America's Secret Establishment (1983-2002)

Read Hegel's book from the FAQ: What is 'Hegelian Mind Fck'

Witness how the Hegelian Dialectic is being used in The Quigley Formula for orchestrating the Hard Road to World Government

Source URL: http://print-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2013/11/hegelian-dialectic-what-is-it.html

Agenda 21 For Dummies

Download the UN Documents Mentioned in the Videos

Which Organization in the United States is the prime-mover behind this?

PDF The Hard Road To World Order, The Council on Foreign Relations, New York, Foreign Affairs, April 1974

Which Family in the United States is the prime-mover behind all this?

“Some even believe we (the Rockefeller family) are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure – one world, if you will. If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.” --- Memoirs, 2002, pg. 405, ch. Proud Internationalist; Chairman The Council on Foreign Relations; Chairman Emeritus Chase bank, link1 for full context , link2 for full context , link3 for full context , link4 for full context

“Ironically however, the very innovations that are making possible dramatic improvements in human well-being are also creating new problems which raise the spectre of an alarming and possibly catastrophic disaster to the biosphere we live in. And herein lies the dilemma that we all face. Let me illustrate. Improved public health, has caused the world’s infant mortality rate to decline by 60 percent over the last 40 years. In the same period, the world’s average life expectancy has increased from 46 years in 1950s to 63 years today. This is a development which as individuals we can only applaud. However the result of these positive measures is that the world population that has risen during the same short period of time geometrically to almost 6 billion people, and can exceed easily 8 billion by the year 2020. The negative impact of population growth on all of our planetary eco-systems is becoming appallingly evident. The rapid growing exploitation of the world’s supply of energy and water is a matter of deep concern. And the toxic by products of widespread industrialization and increased atmospheric pollution to dangerous levels. Unless nations will agree to work together to tackle these cross-border challenges posed by population growth over consumption of resources and environmental degradation, prospects for a decent life on our planet will be threatened. The recent UN meeting in Cairo is appropriately focussed on one of these key issues, population growth. But the controversies which have erupted at the conference illustrate the problem of coming to grips with issues that are deeply divisive and which have a profound moral dimension. The United Nations can and should play an essential role in helping the world find a satisfactory way of stabilizing the world population and stimulating economic development in a manner that is sensitive to religious and moral considerations. Economic growth is of course an inevitable corollary of a growing population, and is essential to improved standards of living. But without careful coordination, unrestrained economic growth poses further threats to our environment. This was a major subject of discussion at the conference in Rio de Janeiro on the environment two years ago. The focus then was on sustainable growth, and global development. [Agenda 21] It was pointed out at the conference that growth is most efficiently managed by the private sector, but regulation of the process by national governments and international bodies is also needed. And once again, United Nations can certainly be among the catalysts and coordinators of this process.” --- David Rockefeller, Annual UN Ambassadors’ Dinner Sep 14, 1994, link for full context

Which Family in Europe is the prime-mover behind all this?

“We (the House of Rothschild) provide advice on both sides of the balance sheet, and we do it globally. ... We have had 250 years or so of family involvement in the finance business, ... There is no debate that Rothschild is a Jewish family, ... For a family business to survive, every generation needs a leader, ... Then somebody has to keep the peace. Building a global firm before globalisation meant a mindset of sharing risk and responsibility. If you look at the DNA of our family, that is perhaps an element that runs through our history.” --- Baron David de Rothschild, The first barons of banking by Rupert Wright, UAE thenational.ae, November 6, 2008, link for full context: The Invisible House of Rothschild By Zahir Ebrahim

Is there any respectable name that you can cite who agrees with your take on matters?

“We are at present working discreetly with all our might to wrest this mysterious force called sovereignty out of the clutches of the local nation states of the world. All the time we are denying with our lips what we are doing with our hands, because to impugn the sovereignty of the local nation states of the world is still a heresy for which a statesman or publicist can perhaps not quite be burned at the stake but certainly be ostracized or discredited.” --- Arnold Toynbee, The Trend of International Affairs Since the War, International Affairs, November 1931, pg. 809, link for full context: The Poor-Man's Guide to Modernity By Zahir Ebrahim

But that's only a dead historian you cite --- how about someone living, who is also part of officialdom and shares these insane notions?

“In the next century, nations as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single, global authority. National sovereignty wasn't such a great idea after all.” --- Strobe Talbot, Former President Bill Clinton's Deputy Secretary of State, 1992, link1 for full context

“We are living through exceptionally difficult times. Financial crisis and its dramatic impact on employment and budgets, the climate crisis which threatens our very survival --- a period of anxiety, uncertainty, and lack of confidence. Yet these problems can be overcome, by a joint effort, in and between our countries. 2009 is also the first year of Global Governance with the establishment of the G-20 in the middle of financial crisis. The climate conference in Copenhagen is another step towards the Global Management of our Planet. Our mission, our presidency is one of hope, supported by acts, and by deeds.” --- Herman Van Rompuy, EU Council President, press conference Nov 19, 2009, op.cit.

Source URL: http://print-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2013/03/agenda-21-for-dummies.html

The Invisible House of Rothschild

The Invisible Octopus By Zahir Ebrahim

January 30, 2012

A reader wrote to Project Humanbeingsfirst.org :

Dear Zahir,

Regarding Zionism and Israel, although I find it rather pervasive yet it is clear as daylight that they have established a hegemony in the style of the spread of internet, very much enmeshed in the fabric of power. I don't believe this is something that just happens, rather, it seems to me the culmination of decades of organized and conscious effort. It is not natural to see powerful Western nations, in particular US and UK, behave like they are subject to threat and hence need to appease this sinister force even at the expense and betrayal of their own population. Here in Canada, our PM shamelessly supports whatever they do, virtually like a zombie. And it isn't just the Conservatives, Liberals and NDP are in it, too. One of our NDP MPs, Libby Davies, was strongly reprimanded by the late NDP head, Jack Layton, and she had done nothing but express the obvious about Israel. One wonders how we have come to this that a bunch of thugs are can have so much power over our government.

It is so easy to be disillusioned and demoralized when one looks at what is happening in our Muslim nations, though I try to keep faith alive in humanity and decency and justice, reminding myself that for example, the darkest of the night is before dawn. And I also wonder why Russia and China do not provide adequate challenge to these insane financial and belligerent policies that constitute the USrael/UK agenda. It is humanity that is being hijacked... I may have mentioned it to you before but in Farsi we have a saying, "harcheh b'gandad namakash mizannand; waay beh roozi keh b'gandad namak" which translated says, "whatever is liable to rot is treated with salt, alas the day when salt rots".

[A Canadian of Iranian descent]

My Response

"One wonders how we have come to this that a bunch of thugs are can have so much power over our government."

Indeed. This is what the Rothschild scions have been quoted for 250 years: "Give me control of a nations money supply and I care not who makes its laws"!

With that one single primordial control over nations in the form of controlling their central banks, they created what you aptly described: "they have established a hegemony in the style of the spread of internet, very much enmeshed in the fabric of power."

This is how they prevailed over Great Britain, the mother country of Canada, to issue the Balfour Declaration – one of the most treacherous documents in the history of colonialism. Click on the Balfour Declaration image below to see its careful language deconstruction by yours truly - Notice that the Balfour Declaration is issued to the Rothschild name!

Caption The Balfour Declaration November 2nd 1917, addressed to Lord Rothschild - How did the House of Rothschild convince the largely Christian British aristocracy to grant a Jewish family the title to a land that the British empire did not own and was merely a custodian of as the war booty of the first World War? Ask yourself: Why would the indomitable British Empire give the Jewish House of Rothschild this unparalleled political Declaration? As a quid pro quo for what? Why did the British Royal Family suddenly become sympathetic to the Jews at the expense of an existent indigenous population? Click image to read the deconstruction of this most treacherous short political document of modern history whose grotesque repercussions are still being felt a century later, but not one political figure dares to talk about it. What invisible power prevents the goyem world from seeing the elephant in the bedroom? Apart from our famous stupidity of course?

The full examination of the Rothschild power structure is in my Rothschild trilogy – called My Confusion Series Part-1 , Part-2 , Part-3 !

And as you correctly noted of the interlockingness of their power, akin to "the spread of internet", the following explanation was given by W. Cleon Skousen in his book 'The Naked Capitalist' on how it was exercised by a handful of men:

‘The real value of Tragedy and Hope … [is the] bold and boastful admission by Dr. Quigley that there actually exists a relatively small but powerful group which has succeeded in acquiring a choke-hold on the affairs of practically the entire human race. Of course we should be quick to recognize that no small group could wield such gigantic power unless millions of people in all walks of life were “in on the take” and were willing to knuckle down to the iron-clad regimentation of the ruthless bosses behind the scenes. As we shall see, the network has succeeded in building its power structure by using tremendous quantities of money (together with the vast influence it buys) to manipulate, intimidate, or corrupt millions of men and women and their institutions on a world-wide basis.’ (W. Cleon Skousen, The Naked Capitalist, pg. 6)

See "Monetary Reform: Who will bell the cat?" for a fuller examination of why it is next to impossible to overturn this all-pervasive corrupt-power once it has been legally granted to the predators.

It makes no difference, once this predatory power is granted and unleashed upon the public, who sits in the White House or the Congress. And the same is true of Canada, the EU, and the UK. I examined this in 2008 on the eve of US presidential elections and called for the boycott of the elections to give a low voter turnout in order to demonstrate the illegitimacy of democratic institutions once such power has been legally granted to the bankster fraternity. It is in this essay: "Not-Voting is a ‘YES’ vote to Reject a Corrupt System".

So yes, all democratic systems of governance under their respective constitutional republic fabrics have been entirely co-opted by such private power. It is that power and its affiliation with Zionism which makes all the western nations beholden to Zionism. If instead of Zionism, the predators had chosen to ally themselves to some new ideology, say "Babism" or Mayaism" -- just cooking up some terms -- then it would have been those ideologies which would now be holding their Damocles' sword upon the peoples of the earth.

In their present alliance with Zionism, the end goal is World Government by the financial oligarchy. All the global crises we see are merely enabling vehicles for this new system of global management of the planet, which to me appears will be ruled from Tel Aviv and legislated from the New Jerusalem – the claimed hometowns of the Rothschilds. It is obvious that this is already coming true -- for those who rule the White House, the sole unchallenged superpower, also rule the world. Soon, very soon, they will supplant the White House and rule the world directly as the new ruling state without pretensions. Zion will be the new "peace-maker" for the planet in her one-world government! We can already witness the prelude to that global “peace-making” in Palestine today in “From Genesis to Genocide” and “Holocaust in our Age”. We can also already see the enabling of the new public relations mantra for the god's chosen peoples in the FBI training graph below. Please click on the image to see its deconstruction by yours truly (also see "Hijacking the word 'Islam' for Mantra Creation"):

Caption An FBI presentation titled “Militancy Considerations” measures the relationship between piety and violence among the texts of the three Abrahamic faiths. Click image to read the deconstruction of this wholly villainous propaganda graph being used to train the Christian law enforcement goyem.

The realization of the immenseness of this interlocking power-structure remains invisible in the struggle for Palestine among the Palestinians and their supporters. That is the real tragedy – that mankind has collectively failed to recognize the nature of this all-pervasive power which has besieged the world for over a hundred years by riding on the backs of world wars, empires, and presently the sole superpower.

Who or What can unlock their octopi grip on the affairs of the world when people don't even [want to] see the octopus?

Caption Rothschild Governance by Networks - Click to see the Networks map in hi-resolution

About Us

About

The Plebeian Antidote To Hectoring Hegemons

Fresh Air

Opening up the Discussion Space here on urgent matters of human concern. Index here. Legacy Topical Index here. Press Releases here. Download PDF here. View Printable here. Comments Page here. Contact here. Book 'Prisoners of the Cave' here. About its author here. 'My Little Jihad' here. Feel free to take anything, thoughts, words, madness, sanity, courage, foolishness, but do see the big copyright and fine print legal notices first. Home is humanbeingsfirst.org.

Please see Welcome Letter and Letter to Muslims.

Modernity Simplified

What is all this verbiage by Project Humanbeingsfirst^TM really all about? Is there a reductionist and simplified explanation at the level of a 'poor-man'?

Yes. In the simplest terms: 'Might defines right'.

This leads to “Hegemony is as old as mankind”.

That in turn leads to the following psychological pathocracy – some call it empire:

If we don't have real enemies then we have to create or imagine some, and yell 'we are being attacked' in order to, principally:

a) justify one's hegemonic barbarianism upon others; and

b) motivate an unwilling plebeian peoples into sacrificing for the conquests of the oligarchic elite.

Euphemistically, today as the winning empire, this is called “imperial mobilization”.

Grotesquely, for previously defeated empires, it is called “quest for Lebensraum”.

That's all there is to it.

That, in the simplest of terms, is Modernity Simplified to the level of a 'poor-man' (i.e., one with limited ability, or time, or inclination to carefully read, write, and reason about the times one lives in).

Read minimal expansion upon this basic explanation in The Poor-Man's Guide to Modernity here.

Endorsement

If you feel that any of the documents of Project Humanbeingsfirst speak for you, that you ought to have authored them, then you may add your public endorsement to the specific document as its virtual author of conscience. A subsequent confirmation step is required. For endorsement request, please click here.

Contact

Please write to Humanbeingsfirst@gmail.com

Legal-N-Things

Full Copyright Notice

Legal Disclaimer Notice

0) Project Humanbeingsfirst^TM declares that its formal views are represented only on its main website Humanbeingsfirst.org, which DNS expands to humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com, henceforth called Homepage, and its sub websites: A Project Humanbeingsfirst Document (All Print), Faith-Politico, Pakistan-Politico, On Islam, Press Releases, PDF (maintained on Sites), and its Books websites accessed through the Homepage including Prisoners of the Cave, Hijacking Islam, all henceforth referred to as Project Humanbeingsfirst Websites. The mirror websites maintained on wordpress.com are obsolete and void; access to the wordpress account was suspended by wordpress in 2014 for unspecified reasons. Project Humanbeingsfirst has no account on any social media platform (Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, WhatsApp, Youtube, Linkedin, etc.), or on any other website (digitial libraries, digital publications, news organizations, Indymedia, Wikipedia, wiki family of websites, Yumpu, Archive.org, etc.). Any documents and opinions appearing as Project Humanbeingsfirst or Zahir Ebrahim reprints, or as edited reprints, or in excerpts and quotes on other website pages, including news websites, social media websites, or as comment under the name of Project Humanbeingsfirst or Zahir Ebrahim, are not representative of Project Humanbeingsfirst's and Zahir Ebrahim's formal views which are only expressed on Project Humanbeingsfirst Websites. Any discrepency of opinion, or between documents, is resolved by the most recent version of documents on Project Humanbeingsfirst Websites as having precedence, and representing new data or new understanding.

1) Legal and Political Correctness Notice Project Humanbeingsfirst^TM asserts that as human beings first, one is entitled to all the inalienable Human Rights noted in http://www.hrweb.org/legal/undocs.html, including those of free thought and free expressions of those thoughts in addition to of course not being the victims of any hectoring hegemons. Freedom of expression stops at the threshold of justice. If one is offended by these simple moral truths, one has the equal right to not be here.

2) No Affiliation Notice Project Humanbeingsfirst documents often contain external links as citations and references, and sometimes incorporate and/or embed external media content. The other content of these external websites, as well as the external links/media used by Project Humanbeingsfirst, is the sole responsibility of their respective owners/authors and Project Humanbeingsfirst cites each external link or embeds media content only for academic, scholarly, and/or documentation purpose as specifically pertaining to the topic at hand in its own presentation. Project Humanbeingsfirst is not affiliated with these external sources nor responsible for any of their actions, speech, or thoughts, whether legal or otherwise. 3) Public's voices added through comments or email or letter contact with Project Humanbeingsfirst, termed “contact voices”, come under the purview of “fair use” and may be reproduced and reused elsewhere without notice. 4) These “contact voices”, howsoever the contact is made, are obviously only their respective owner's, whomsoever they might be, and are not reflective of Project Humanbeingsfirst and nor is Project Humanbeingsfirst responsible for that or any other content owned/linked to by these “contact voices”. 5) Men and women of conscience who endorse the work of Project Humanbeingsfirst or become “virtual authors” of its documents as echoing their own heartfelt sentiments, or anyone in the world or on another planet links to Project Humanbeingsfirst documents, obviously do so at their own moral imperative, for their own purposes, and Project Humanbeingsfirst is not affiliated with them nor responsible for their actions, speech, or thoughts, whether legal or otherwise.

6) Peoples Rights Notice Any interference with peoples' rights to access the freely available documents of Project Humanbeingsfirst in any shape or form, is denying their unalienable right to be educated and informed, and is thus deemed akin to preventing the public from visiting a library making such interference liable under the same civil and/or criminal laws as might be applicable in such case.

7) Anything that is not covered above, is covered by the blanket statement that Project Humanbeingsfirst stands firm by its claim of being the Plebeian Antidote to Hectoring Hegemons. Project Humanbeingsfirst does not solicit funds nor accepts donations. All Project Humanbeingsfirst's opinions in any form, essays, reports, letters, books, etc., are completely gratis. Thus it is completely independent of all co-opting pressures, except perhaps that of the proverbial loaded gun with its trigger cocked when put to its head. When that happens, you may know it – look for complete silence, echoes of the hectoring hegemons' own core lies and axioms, and political science absurdities. It is entirely your responsibility to adjudicate Project Humanbeingsfirst's bombastic self-portrayal; to carefully validate its reports before accepting any opinion, informed or not, on the mere basis of its self-serving claim to forthrightness; and to think for yourself. Those who allow others to think for them, often end up prematurely dead. Most people, however, rather die than think, and evidently they do; Project Humanbeingsfirst is not in the 'saving' business. No opinion of Project Humanbeingsfirst should be deemed as offering any sort of advice, legal or medical advice, whether solicited or unsolicited, even when its positions at times may strongly and very boldly contradict conventional and/or official wisdom with copious commonsense and rational analyses to back it. You get what you paid – and you paid exactly zero monies here. There is no transaction.

8) Responsibility Notice Project Humanbeingsfirst is only responsible for its own work as formally expressed on Project Humanbeingsfirst Websites, both its credit, if any, and its penalties for taking its unvarnished positions in the pursuit of justice.

9) Any grievances against Project Humanbeingsfirst may be addressed in the World Court. Please also see fine print in caveat emptor.

	Welcome Letter	Introduction	Good Reads	INDEX
Home Page	Print All Documents	Faith-Politico	On Islam	Pakistan-Politico	Contact